Should I be concerned about being audited for the fourth year in a row? What's going on?
I'm starting to feel like the IRS has a personal vendetta against me. This is now the fourth consecutive year I've been selected for an audit, and I'm completely baffled as to why. My tax situation isn't particularly complex - I'm a W-2 employee with a side gig that brings in about $18,000 annually. I report everything properly, keep meticulous records, and use reputable tax software. The first audit was for tax year 2022, which I kind of understood because I had claimed some home office deductions. The second one (2023) targeted my business expenses for my side hustle. By the third audit (2024), I was getting frustrated but still cooperated fully. Now I just got notified about being audited for my 2025 return! Each previous audit has ended with no changes or minimal adjustments (less than $200). It's become a huge time suck and emotionally draining. My accountant seems puzzled too. Is there some kind of flag on my account? Should I be doing something differently? Is it normal to be audited multiple years in a row like this? I'm seriously considering hiring a tax attorney at this point, even though my situation isn't complicated enough to normally warrant one.
20 comments


PrinceJoe
This pattern of consecutive audits is definitely unusual. The IRS typically uses a scoring system called the Discriminant Function System (DIF) to select returns for audit, and while lightning can strike twice, four years in a row suggests something specific might be triggering these reviews. A few possibilities: 1) Your side gig might be in a category the IRS scrutinizes more heavily (like cash-intensive businesses), 2) There could be a mismatch between income reported on 1099s and what's on your return, 3) Someone might be filing reports against you (competitors, ex-spouse, etc.), or 4) Your initial audit may have placed you in a higher-risk category. I'd recommend requesting a transcript of your account from the IRS website. This might show if there are specific codes or flags on your account. Also, consider scheduling a meeting with a Taxpayer Advocate Service representative - they're independent within the IRS and can sometimes provide insight into unusual patterns like this.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Thank you for this detailed response! I hadn't considered the possibility of someone reporting me - that's concerning but I guess possible? My side gig is digital marketing consulting, so not cash-based at all. Everything is paid via direct deposit or PayPal and I report it all. Do you think hiring a tax attorney at this point would help, or is that overkill? And if I do contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service, what specifically should I ask them?
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Getting a tax attorney might be premature at this stage, especially if your previous audits resulted in minimal changes. A better first step would be working with the Taxpayer Advocate Service - they're free and can review your situation from an independent perspective within the IRS. When contacting them, explain your pattern of consecutive audits with minimal findings and ask if they can investigate whether there's a specific flag or code on your account causing this. Ask them to review if your DIF score is unusually high for some reason. They can sometimes see patterns in the system that aren't apparent to regular IRS employees or outside tax professionals.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
I went through something kinda similar last year - got audited three times over four years. What finally helped me was using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to analyze my tax returns. Their AI spotted patterns in my deductions that were likely triggering the audits - turns out I was categorizing some business expenses in a way that raised red flags, even though the expenses themselves were legitimate! The service analyzed my previous returns and showed me exactly where the potential issues were. After fixing those issues on my most recent return, I haven't been audited since. Their system also helped me organize my documentation better so I was super prepared when dealing with the last audit. Might be worth looking into since you're dealing with repeated audits.
0 coins
Owen Devar
•Does this service actually look at your specific audit risk? Like can it tell you your "audit score" or whatever the IRS uses? I'm curious because I keep hearing different things trigger audits but nobody seems to know for sure.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•I'm skeptical about any service claiming to predict IRS audit patterns. The DIF score the IRS uses is a closely guarded secret. How can they possibly know what triggers an audit when tax professionals with decades of experience can only guess?
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
•The service doesn't claim to know your exact DIF score since that's proprietary to the IRS. What it does is analyze your return against known audit triggers based on published IRS data and statistical patterns. It identifies things like unusual deduction ratios for your income level or profession that might stand out. They use a combination of AI pattern recognition and input from tax professionals who have handled thousands of audits. It's not perfect prediction, but it's way better than guessing. In my case, they identified that my home office deduction was disproportionately high compared to others in my income bracket and profession, even though it was technically legitimate. After adjusting how I reported it, the audits stopped.
0 coins
Owen Devar
Just wanted to update - I tried taxr.ai after seeing this thread and wow, it actually found some issues with how I was reporting my side business expenses! The analysis showed I was using some expense categories that apparently trigger more scrutiny for my industry. I've been audited twice in the past few years and was honestly getting paranoid. The report highlighted that I was claiming home office deductions in a way that looked suspicious even though they were legitimate. It also found a pattern in my travel expense reporting that apparently raises flags. I've fixed these issues for my 2025 filing and feel way more confident now. Totally worth it for the peace of mind alone.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
When I had a similar audit situation a few years ago, I finally got to the bottom of it by actually speaking with an IRS agent (which was IMPOSSIBLE to do until I found a workaround). I spent weeks trying to get through the regular IRS phone lines with no luck. Then I discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) which got me through to an actual human at the IRS in about 15 minutes. The agent was able to tell me there was a specific flag on my account from my first audit that was automatically triggering reviews. Once I knew what the issue was, I could finally address it. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they navigate the IRS phone system for you and call you back when they reach a human. Saved me hours of hold time and frustration.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Wait how does this actually work? Are they just calling for you or do they have some special connection to the IRS? Seems too good to be true considering how impossible it is to reach anyone there.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•This sounds like a scam. There's no way some random service has special access to the IRS. They're probably just putting you on hold themselves and charging you for the privilege. Anyone could do this on their own for free.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
•They don't have special access to the IRS - they use technology to navigate the phone system and wait on hold for you. When a human IRS agent finally answers, their system connects that call to your phone number. It's basically like having someone wait on hold for you, but automated. I was skeptical too, but I was desperate after spending hours on hold multiple times. The system just calls you when it gets through to a human, so you don't waste your day listening to hold music. They don't access any of your personal tax info or talk to the IRS on your behalf - they just get you past the hold time, then you handle the actual conversation with the agent yourself.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
I need to apologize to @6 and admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After dismissing it as a scam, I was stuck on hold with the IRS for over 2 hours yesterday and hung up in frustration. Finally gave in and tried the service this morning. Within 20 minutes, my phone rang and there was an actual IRS representative on the line! No more wasted hours on hold. The agent was able to explain that there was an unresolved issue from a previous audit that kept flagging my account. Got it cleared up in one call. I've spent literally days of my life on IRS hold music over the past few years, and I'm kicking myself for not trying this sooner. Sometimes my skepticism gets the better of me. If you're dealing with repeated audits, actually talking to someone at the IRS is probably the fastest way to resolve it.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
Something nobody's mentioned yet - check if you're claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The IRS is required by law to delay and potentially review returns with EITC claims. If you're claiming this credit every year, it might explain the repeated scrutiny. Doesn't mean you're doing anything wrong, just that there's mandatory verification. Also, if your prior audits showed any adjustments at all (even minor ones), that can trigger follow-up audits for the next few years. The system flags returns with past compliance issues.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•That's really interesting - I haven't claimed EITC, but there WAS a small adjustment ($175) on my first audit. Could that really trigger three more years of audits? That seems excessive for such a small amount.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
•Yes, even small adjustments can trigger follow-up reviews, especially if the issue falls into certain categories that the IRS is particularly focused on. The IRS has internal scoring systems that can flag your return for several years after any adjustment, regardless of the dollar amount. The rationale is that if they found one issue, there might be others they missed or similar errors in subsequent years. Their data shows that taxpayers who had adjustments once are statistically more likely to have issues in future returns. It's not about the dollar amount as much as the pattern. After a few years of clean returns with no issues, the additional scrutiny should eventually stop.
0 coins
Brady Clean
You might want to check if you're accidentally hitting the "audit lottery" by having perfectly round numbers on your Schedule C deductions. I had a client who got audited 3 years straight because they always put numbers like $1,000 or $500 for expenses instead of actual figures like $983.27. The IRS automated systems flag returns with too many round numbers as statistically unusual - real expenses rarely add up to perfect $100 increments. Try being more precise with your expense tracking and see if that helps.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Oh wow, I've definitely been rounding some of my expenses to the nearest $50 or $100! I had no idea this could trigger an audit. Will definitely start using the exact amounts going forward. Thanks for this tip!
0 coins
Austin Leonard
Have you considered filing Form 911 (Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance)? Given that you've been audited four consecutive years with minimal findings, this could qualify as a "significant hardship" case. The Taxpayer Advocate Service is designed to help in situations exactly like yours where the normal IRS processes seem to be causing unreasonable burden. When you file Form 911, be specific about the pattern - four consecutive audits, minimal adjustments totaling less than $200, and the financial and emotional toll this is taking. Include documentation from all previous audits showing the outcomes. The TAS can actually review your account internally and may be able to identify specific flags or codes that are triggering these repeated selections. Also, consider whether you've been consistent in how you report your digital marketing income. Even if you're reporting everything correctly, switching between different income reporting methods (1099-NEC vs. 1099-MISC classifications, or changes in business expense categories) can sometimes trigger the audit selection algorithm. The IRS computers look for patterns and inconsistencies, even when everything is legitimate.
0 coins
Freya Collins
•This is excellent advice! I hadn't heard of Form 911 before, but four consecutive audits with such minimal findings definitely sounds like it could qualify as significant hardship. I'm going to look into filing this right away. Regarding the income reporting consistency - you might have hit on something there. I did switch from receiving mostly 1099-MISC forms to 1099-NEC forms when the rules changed, and I've also refined how I categorize some of my business expenses over the years (trying to be more accurate). Could these changes, even though they're legitimate improvements, actually be working against me by making my returns look inconsistent year to year? Should I try to maintain exactly the same reporting structure going forward, or is it better to use the most accurate categories even if they differ from previous years?
0 coins