Is Alimony Still Taxable After 2018 for Modified Divorce Agreements?
I'm really confused about how alimony is taxed when there are modifications to pre-2018 divorce agreements. I originally got divorced in 2016 and had an agreement where I paid alimony that was tax deductible for me and taxable income for my ex. Now we've had to modify the agreement in 2025 due to some changes in our financial situations. The problem is, I'm reading the IRS publications and I'm completely lost on whether I can still deduct these payments. The language isn't clear to me. It says something about alimony being deductible if the agreement was executed before 2019, but then there's this exception about modifications that "expressly states the repeal of the deduction for alimony payments applies to the modification." Our modified agreement doesn't say anything about the tax deductibility one way or the other. It's silent on the issue. Does that mean I can still deduct my payments? Or because it was modified after 2018, am I out of luck even though it doesn't specifically mention the tax implications? I need to figure this out before filing my 2025 taxes. Any help would be appreciated!
22 comments


Effie Alexander
The tax treatment of alimony changed significantly after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, but your situation has a clear answer based on what you've shared. If your original divorce agreement was from 2016 (before 2019), and your recent modification in 2025 does NOT contain specific language stating that "the repeal of the deduction for alimony payments applies to the modification," then you can still deduct your alimony payments. The key here is that for pre-2019 agreements that get modified, the modification must EXPRESSLY state that the new rules apply. If there's no statement about deductibility in the modification, then the original tax treatment continues - meaning it remains deductible for you and taxable income for your ex-spouse. This is actually one of those rare situations where silence in a legal document works in your favor with the IRS.
0 coins
Melissa Lin
•Thanks for the explanation. I've been hearing different things from friends. What if we eventually do another modification in the future? Would we need to specifically mention something about keeping the old tax treatment, or is silence still okay? Also, does this mean my ex still has to report this as income on their taxes? They're claiming they don't anymore.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
•For future modifications, the same rule applies - silence means you maintain the original tax treatment. However, I would recommend explicitly stating in any future modification that "this modification does not change the tax treatment of alimony payments established in the original pre-2019 agreement" just to avoid any confusion. Yes, your ex-spouse should still be reporting the alimony as income on their tax return. If they're not reporting it, they're incorrectly applying the tax law. The tax treatment is linked - if it's deductible for you, it's taxable for them. They can't have it both ways. This might be something to discuss with them or have your attorneys clarify to prevent future issues with the IRS.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
I went through this exact same situation last year and was totally confused. After spending hours on the phone with the IRS and getting nowhere, I used https://taxr.ai to upload my divorce documents and modification agreement. Their AI analyzed all the documents and explained that since my modification didn't expressly mention the tax change, I could still claim the deduction. The site gives you a clear analysis of your specific tax situation based on your actual documents. For complicated tax situations like alimony changes, having something actually review your specific documents makes a huge difference rather than trying to interpret general advice. I was able to confidently take my deduction and even got documentation to support it in case of an audit.
0 coins
Romeo Quest
•Did they charge you for this service? How long did it take to get an answer? I'm in a similar situation but my modification has some vague language about "following current tax laws" and I'm not sure if that counts as "expressly stating" the repeal applies.
0 coins
Val Rossi
•I'm skeptical about these AI services. How can you trust it's giving the right advice? Did a real tax professional review it or is it just computer generated? Tax law is complicated and getting it wrong can be expensive.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
•I received my analysis within about 30 minutes. The system highlighted the specific language in my documents and referenced the actual tax code sections that applied to my situation. It was super specific to my case, not generic advice. The analysis included the exact IRS guidelines and court cases that supported the interpretation. It wasn't just an opinion - it provided me with documentation showing why my modification didn't trigger the new rules. The language needs to be explicit about applying the repeal, so your "following current tax laws" phrase is exactly the kind of ambiguous wording they helped clarify for me.
0 coins
Val Rossi
I need to follow up on my skeptical comment about AI tax services. I decided to try https://taxr.ai with my own divorce modification from 2023 and was really surprised. The system actually found a clause in my modification that I didn't realize could be interpreted as changing the tax treatment! It highlighted specific language about "conforming to current statutes regarding taxation of support payments" that my lawyer had included. According to the analysis, this could potentially be interpreted by the IRS as expressly adopting the new rules. I took this information to my accountant who agreed that it was a grey area, and we decided to file conservatively by not taking the deduction. Without this review, I might have incorrectly claimed a deduction that could have triggered an audit. Sometimes being skeptical leads to learning something new!
0 coins
Eve Freeman
After struggling to talk to someone at the IRS about this exact alimony issue for weeks (constant busy signals and disconnects), I used https://claimyr.com to get through to a human at the IRS. There's a video of how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Claimyr basically waits on hold with the IRS for you and calls you when an agent is actually on the line. I was able to speak directly with an IRS agent who confirmed that since my modification didn't specifically mention adopting the new tax rules, I could continue to deduct alimony payments under my pre-2018 agreement. Getting that confirmation directly from the IRS gave me much more confidence than just guessing based on my interpretation of the tax code.
0 coins
Clarissa Flair
•How does this actually work? Do they just keep calling until they get through? And do they hear what you discuss with the IRS agent? Seems weird to have a third party involved.
0 coins
Caden Turner
•This sounds like BS. The IRS doesn't give binding answers over the phone. Even if you get through, the person you talk to might give you incorrect information. I've been told different things by different IRS employees on the same question. Don't rely on phone advice for something this important.
0 coins
Eve Freeman
•They use automated systems to continuously call and navigate the IRS phone tree until they get through to the queue for a real person. Once they're in line, they call you to connect. They don't listen to your conversation - they just connect you directly to the IRS agent when one becomes available, then drop off the line. You're right that phone advice isn't legally binding, but I found it helpful to hear the IRS perspective directly. I followed up by requesting a Private Letter Ruling for complete certainty, which the agent helped me understand how to do. Getting through to discuss the process was the first step I needed, and Claimyr made that possible after weeks of failed attempts.
0 coins
Caden Turner
I have to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was still struggling with an IRS issue related to my alimony payments and decided to try it out of desperation. Not only did I get through to the IRS (after trying for almost a month on my own), but the agent I spoke with was actually knowledgeable about the alimony tax law changes. She confirmed that modifications to pre-2019 agreements need EXPLICIT language adopting the new tax treatment, or the old rules still apply. I was able to get my specific questions answered and even had the agent note my account with details about our conversation. This saved me from paying an accountant for a formal tax opinion, which would have cost hundreds of dollars. Sometimes being proven wrong is actually a good thing!
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
One important thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you're keeping good records of all payments! The IRS requires you to report the SSN of the recipient spouse on your tax return when claiming the alimony deduction. Also, remember that for alimony to be deductible (under the pre-2019 rules that still apply to your case), payments must meet specific requirements: - Payments must be in cash (including checks or money orders) - Payments must be required by the divorce or separation instrument - The instrument must not designate the payment as something other than alimony - You and your ex-spouse can't be members of the same household when payments are made - There's no liability to make payments after the death of the recipient spouse - The payments aren't treated as child support I learned this the hard way when I got audited in 2022 for alimony deductions from 2019.
0 coins
Harmony Love
•What kind of documentation did the IRS want when you got audited? Just bank statements showing the transfers or something more specific? I've been paying through Venmo and now I'm worried that might be a problem.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•During my audit, the IRS requested: copies of my divorce decree and any modifications, bank statements showing the payments, and proof that the payments were specifically for alimony (not child support or property settlements). They also verified that my ex reported the same amounts as income. Venmo should be fine as it's considered a cash payment method, but make sure your descriptions are clear that it's for alimony/spousal support. I recommend downloading yearly statements from Venmo for your records. The bigger issue is making sure the payment amounts match what's in your agreement and that your ex is reporting them as income. The IRS compares the SSN reporting between returns, and discrepancies can trigger audits.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
Has anyone considered putting an addendum in their modification to explicitly state that you want to keep the old tax treatment? My attorney suggested adding language like: "Both parties agree that this modification does not expressly state that the repeal of the alimony deduction under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act applies to this modification, and therefore the original tax treatment of alimony payments as deductible by the payor and includible in the income of the recipient shall continue." Would that be helpful or create more problems?
0 coins
Effie Alexander
•That's actually excellent language to include in a modification! It directly addresses the requirements in the tax code and makes it clear to both parties (and the IRS) that you intend to maintain the pre-2019 tax treatment. Including this kind of explicit statement can prevent misunderstandings between ex-spouses about tax reporting responsibilities, which often leads to problems when one party reports inconsistently with the other. It also provides clear documentation if either party is audited. I'd definitely recommend including language like this in any modification to a pre-2019 divorce agreement.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my 2017 divorce agreement was modified in 2024, and like the original poster, our modification is silent on tax treatment. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like I should be able to continue deducting my alimony payments since there's no explicit language in the modification adopting the new tax rules. But I'm curious - has anyone here actually been through a tax season filing this way and had any issues with the IRS? Also, @Rudy Cenizo, that addendum language your attorney suggested is brilliant. I wish I had thought of that before we finalized our modification. For anyone else reading this who hasn't modified yet, definitely consider adding that protective language! One question for the group - if I continue taking the deduction based on the silence in my modification, should I attach any documentation to my tax return explaining the situation, or just file normally and keep the divorce documents in case of questions later?
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
•I filed my 2024 taxes in this exact situation - my 2015 divorce agreement was modified in 2023 with no mention of tax treatment, and I continued taking the alimony deduction. No issues with the IRS so far, and my return was processed normally. For documentation, I didn't attach anything to my actual tax return, but I kept copies of both my original divorce decree and the modification agreement in my tax files. My accountant advised that attaching explanatory documents when they're not required can sometimes draw unnecessary attention to your return. The key is just making sure you have the documentation readily available if questioned, and that your ex-spouse is consistently reporting the payments as income. As long as both parties are filing consistently and your modification truly doesn't contain explicit language about the tax changes, you should be fine filing normally. @Ethan Clark The silence in your modification should work in your favor based on how the tax code is written. Just keep good records!
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a very similar situation - divorced in 2015, modified the agreement in 2024 with no mention of tax implications. After reading everyone's experiences, I feel much more confident about continuing to take the deduction. What really stands out to me is how consistent everyone's advice has been: if the modification doesn't explicitly state that the new tax rules apply, then the original pre-2019 treatment continues. The IRS seems to have written this rule pretty clearly - they require express language, not implied or assumed changes. For anyone else in this situation, I'd recommend: 1. Keep copies of both your original divorce decree AND the modification 2. Make sure your ex-spouse understands they still need to report the payments as income 3. Consider adding protective language to any future modifications (like @Rudy Cenizo suggested) 4. Keep detailed records of all payments It's frustrating that the IRS publications aren't clearer about this, but based on everyone's real-world experiences here, it seems like we're interpreting the law correctly. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories - it's so much more helpful than trying to decode tax publications alone!
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
•This has been such an eye-opening discussion! As someone new to this community, I really appreciate how everyone has shared their actual experiences rather than just theoretical advice. I'm going through a divorce right now (started in 2024) so the new rules will apply to me regardless, but reading about all the complications with modifications to older agreements makes me realize how important it is to be very specific about tax language in divorce documents. It sounds like so many people are dealing with ambiguous wording that creates uncertainty years later. @Zoe Papanikolaou your summary is really helpful - I m'saving this thread as a reference. Even though my situation is different, the advice about keeping detailed records and making sure both parties understand their tax obligations applies to everyone dealing with alimony. It s'clear that consistency between ex-spouses in how they report these payments is crucial for avoiding IRS issues down the road. Thanks to everyone for sharing your real experiences. It s'so much more valuable than trying to figure this out from IRS publications alone!
0 coins