< Back to IRS

Bethany Groves

How to safely switch from a suspicious tax preparer who's been filing questionable returns?

I've been using the same tax preparer for about 5 years now, and something feels off. He's consistently gotten me refunds that seem larger than what my friends with similar situations receive. I trusted him completely and never really looked at the details of my returns until recently. When I finally reviewed my most recent filing, some things just don't add up based on my actual situation. I'm pretty worried now because I don't know if he's doing something illegal or just "aggressive" with deductions. Either way, I want to switch to someone more reputable, but I'm terrified about what might happen if a new accountant reviews my past returns and finds issues. Could I end up owing the IRS thousands in back taxes, penalties, and interest? Does anyone have experience with this? Can I just find a new tax preparer for this upcoming tax season and move forward, or do I need to address potential problems with my past filings? Any advice would be appreciated because I'm honestly stressing about this.

You're right to be concerned if something seems off about your tax returns. As a tax resolution specialist, I see this situation more often than you might think. First, know that YOU are ultimately responsible for what's on your tax return, even if someone else prepared it. That said, you have options. I'd recommend finding a reputable CPA or Enrolled Agent who can review your past returns (at least the last 3 years, which are most relevant for potential audits). They can help assess if there are genuine problems. If issues are found, you might consider filing amended returns. Being proactive about fixing errors before the IRS catches them often results in reduced or eliminated penalties. The IRS generally appreciates voluntary compliance. Don't stick with a preparer you don't trust just because you're afraid of consequences. That can make a potential problem much worse over time.

0 coins

If I switch to a new accountant and they review my returns, am I obligated to file amendments if they find problems? Or could I just start filing correctly going forward? Also, if my returns were filed fraudulently, would I be in legal trouble even though I didn't know what the tax preparer was doing?

0 coins

You're not legally obligated to file amendments just because a new accountant identifies issues, but it's usually in your best interest if significant problems exist. The statute of limitations for the IRS to audit returns is generally 3 years, but extends to 6 years for substantial underreporting and has no limit for fraudulent returns. As for legal culpability, while you sign your return declaring it's accurate to the best of your knowledge, the IRS does differentiate between taxpayer negligence and preparer fraud. If you can demonstrate you provided accurate information and had no reasonable way to know the preparer was being dishonest, you might avoid fraud penalties. However, you'd still be responsible for the tax owed plus interest.

0 coins

I went through something similar last year and found https://taxr.ai super helpful. I was suspicious of my returns for years but didn't know what to look for specifically. Their AI analyzed my past returns and flagged several questionable deductions my old preparer had taken. The tool explained exactly what was wrong in normal language and even suggested what documentation I would need if audited. It was honestly a relief to finally understand what was happening with my taxes. I also used their "compare preparer" feature to find a better accountant in my area with experience handling these transitions.

0 coins

Does it actually work with complicated tax situations? I'm self-employed with rental properties and investments. Would it catch "creative" deductions in a situation like mine?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about AI tools for something this serious. How does it know what's actually wrong versus just standard tax minimization strategies? Sounds like it might flag legitimate deductions and cause unnecessary panic.

0 coins

For self-employed situations with rentals and investments, it works surprisingly well. The system understands Schedule C, Schedule E, and investment reporting requirements. It specifically looks for patterns that are suspicious, like unusually high home office deductions or questionable business expenses that don't match your industry profile. Regarding legitimate tax minimization, the tool differentiates between aggressive-but-legal strategies and actual red flags. It provides a risk assessment rather than black/white judgments. For example, it might say "this deduction has a 70% chance of being questioned in an audit" rather than simply "this is wrong." It also explains why something might be questionable based on IRS guidelines.

0 coins

Just wanted to update after using taxr.ai from Comment 2. I was honestly shocked at what it found. My "tax guy" had been claiming business deductions for things I never even mentioned to him! He invented a home office I don't have and deducted vehicle expenses way beyond my actual business mileage. The tool helped me understand exactly what was wrong and gave me options for fixing it. I ended up finding a legitimate EA through their recommendation system who helped me file amended returns for the past 3 years. Yes, I owed some back taxes, but the penalties were minimal because I came forward voluntarily before any audit. Peace of mind is worth so much. I sleep better knowing I'm not waiting for the IRS hammer to drop someday. Plus my new preparer actually explains everything clearly instead of just saying "trust me, I know what I'm doing" like the old guy.

0 coins

When I was dealing with trying to reach the IRS about questionable returns my former preparer filed, I spent WEEKS trying to get through on their helpline. Then I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - it literally saved my sanity. They held my place in the IRS phone queue and called me when an agent was about to answer. I spoke with an actual IRS representative who explained my options for addressing potential fraudulent returns filed by my preparer. Turns out there's a specific process for reporting preparer misconduct (Form 14157) that puts the focus on them rather than you. Getting direct answers from the IRS gave me much more confidence about how to proceed than just worrying or guessing what might happen.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? They somehow hold your place in the IRS phone line? That sounds impossible with how the IRS phone system works.

0 coins

This sounds like complete BS. Nobody can magically get through to the IRS faster. They're probably just taking your personal info and selling it.

0 coins

It works by using automated technology to navigate the IRS phone system and wait in the queue for you. When an agent is about to pick up, they call you and connect you directly to that agent. They don't access any of your tax information - you're just cutting out the hold time. Regarding your skepticism, I had the same reaction initially. But they don't ask for any tax information or financial details - just your phone number so they can call you when an agent is available. They're basically a sophisticated auto-dialer service that waits on hold so you don't have to. The IRS isn't giving them special access; they're just handling the most frustrating part of the process for you.

0 coins

I have to apologize for my skeptical comment earlier. After my frustration reached a breaking point trying to get IRS guidance about my questionable returns, I reluctantly tried Claimyr. Within 2 hours of submitting my request, I was speaking with an actual IRS agent who walked me through the process of reporting my previous tax preparer. I was able to get into the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program which significantly reduced the penalties I would have faced if they had discovered the issues first. The agent also explained exactly what documentation I needed to gather to protect myself. For anyone worried about switching from a sketchy preparer, getting direct guidance from the IRS was incredibly helpful. They were surprisingly understanding about the situation since apparently it's quite common.

0 coins

I think everyone's overreacting here. Tax preparers use different strategies - some more aggressive than others. Unless your guy is claiming totally fictional deductions like dependents who don't exist, it's probably just a difference in risk tolerance. Most "questionable" returns are just maximizing gray areas in the tax code. My brother-in-law is a CPA and says the IRS is so understaffed they only audit a tiny percentage of returns. You could probably just switch preparers and move forward without any issue. Why create problems for yourself?

0 coins

This is dangerous advice. The IRS may be understaffed, but their computer systems automatically flag suspicious returns and discrepancies. They can also open audits years after filing. When they do catch fraudulent returns, the penalties and interest can be devastating. I've seen people lose their homes over this kind of thinking.

0 coins

I'm not suggesting anyone commit fraud - just pointing out that "aggressive" tax preparation isn't necessarily illegal. There's a difference between creative but legitimate deductions and outright fraud. Most preparers operate in the gray zone where they're maximizing every possible deduction while staying technically within the rules. The reality is that many people switch preparers without facing any consequences. The IRS processes over 150 million individual returns annually and audits less than 1%. If the issues aren't egregious, there's a good chance nothing will happen, especially if future returns are filed properly.

0 coins

Has anyone just tried talking to their tax preparer about their concerns? Before I switched from my questionable guy, I scheduled a meeting and asked him to explain some deductions I didn't understand. His reaction told me everything - he got defensive and couldn't provide documentation. If your preparer can explain their methodology clearly and stands by their work, maybe it's just aggressive but legal preparation?

0 coins

I did this and it backfired badly. My "tax guy" realized I was questioning him and suddenly "lost" my previous years' documentation. Then he started saying any problems were because of information I provided, not his work. It created a huge mess. I'd recommend having a new preparer review things first before confronting the old one.

0 coins

I think this approach depends entirely on the relationship and the preparer's character. Some might be open to explaining their process, while others could see it as a threat and react poorly. If you do meet with them, make it conversational rather than accusatory. Ask things like "Can you help me understand this deduction so I can keep better records for it next year?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today