How is the income for a law firm partner taxed? Self-employment tax questions
I've been reading through a bunch of finance articles lately trying to educate myself on how different careers actually work money-wise. I came across something interesting about law firm partners that I'm confused about. There was this one post where someone mentioned making $1.9M as a law firm partner in 2022. I've been learning about how income flows from the firm to the partners, but I'm still not clear on exactly how taxation works for them. From what I understand so far: - Law firm partners pay regular income tax on their earnings - They also have to pay Self Employment tax on top of that So if someone's making $1.9M as a law firm partner: - They'd pay Income Tax on the full amount (following tax brackets) - Plus 15.3% self employment tax on the entire $1.9M Is this actually how it works? Seems like a massive tax burden compared to other high-earning professionals. I initially thought they'd be taxed at the top rate (37%) for everything, but I realize now that's not how tax brackets work - you only pay the higher rate on income above each threshold. Any partners or tax folks who can explain how this actually works?
21 comments


Ingrid Larsson
You're close but not quite right about how law firm partners are taxed. Let me break it down: 1. Yes, partners pay regular income tax on their earnings, but it's through the pass-through taxation system since most law firms are structured as partnerships or LLCs. 2. For Self-Employment tax (which funds Social Security and Medicare), there's a key detail you're missing. In 2025, Self-Employment tax is 15.3% (12.4% for Social Security + 2.9% for Medicare), but the Social Security portion ONLY applies to the first $168,600 of earnings. Above that, only the 2.9% Medicare portion continues. 3. However, there's an additional 0.9% Medicare surtax on income above $200,000 (single) or $250,000 (married filing jointly). So for a partner earning $1.9M, they would pay: - Regular income tax through progressive brackets - Self-Employment tax: 15.3% on first $168,600 (roughly $25,800) - 2.9% Medicare tax on remaining income up to $200K - 3.8% (2.9% + 0.9%) on everything above $200K This is still substantial, but not 15.3% on the full $1.9M as you were thinking.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
•Thanks for the breakdown. Does this mean that law firm partners don't get a W-2 like regular employees? How do they handle tax withholding throughout the year - do they have to make estimated quarterly payments or something? I'm also curious how retirement plans work for them since they're not traditional employees.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
•Correct, partners don't receive W-2s since they're not employees - they receive Schedule K-1 forms showing their share of the partnership's income. They're responsible for making quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties. For retirement plans, partners have several options including SEP IRAs, Solo 401(k)s, or defined benefit plans. Many larger firms offer "partner-only" plans with higher contribution limits than regular employee plans. These can be powerful tax-deferral tools for high-earning partners, allowing them to shelter significant amounts from immediate taxation.
0 coins
Zainab Mahmoud
After going through so much confusion with my own taxes as an independent contractor, I found this AI tool called taxr.ai that has been incredibly helpful for figuring out complex tax situations like this. I was trying to understand my tax obligations when I joined a small partnership, and the explanations I got online were all over the place. I uploaded some of my tax documents to https://taxr.ai and asked specific questions about pass-through income and self-employment taxes. The tool analyzed everything and gave me a clear breakdown of exactly what I owed and why. It also pointed out deductions I could take as a partner that I had no idea about. Might be worth checking out if you're trying to understand complicated tax structures like law firm partnerships where the rules aren't straightforward.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•How does this compare to just talking with an accountant? I'm skeptical of AI tools handling complex tax situations like partnership income. Does it actually give advice or just generic explanations? And what about privacy - aren't you concerned about uploading financial documents to some random website?
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•I'm interested in this too. Can it handle state-specific tax questions? I'm in California and our state taxes are a whole other level of complicated, especially for business owners and partners.
0 coins
Zainab Mahmoud
•It's different from an accountant in that you can ask unlimited questions 24/7 without hourly billing, but it complements professional advice rather than replacing it. The explanations are actually tailored to your specific situation based on the documents you upload, not just generic info. For privacy concerns, they use bank-level encryption and don't store your documents after analysis. I was hesitant too but researched their security protocols before uploading anything. They explain everything on their site.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here last week, and wow - it actually delivered! As someone who recently became partner at a small law firm, I had so many questions about the tax implications. I uploaded my K-1 and other documents, and the analysis I got was incredibly detailed. The tool explained exactly how the Medicare surtax applies to my situation, how much I should be setting aside for quarterly payments, and even identified some partnership expenses I could deduct that I hadn't considered. It saved me from making a major mistake with how I was handling my home office deduction as a partner. The best part was being able to ask follow-up questions and get immediate answers without feeling like I was running up a bill with my accountant. Seriously worth checking out if you're dealing with partnership taxation.
0 coins
Lena Müller
If you're trying to contact the IRS to get clarification on partnership taxes, good luck getting through! I spent HOURS on hold trying to get answers about partnership tax rules before my April filing. After three failed attempts and hours of hold music, I found this service called Claimyr that actually got me through to a real IRS agent. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they use technology to navigate the IRS phone system and wait on hold for you. When they reach a live agent, they call you and connect you directly. I was skeptical but desperate after wasting an entire afternoon on hold. I used https://claimyr.com and got a call back within 45 minutes with an actual IRS agent on the line. I got my partnership tax questions answered directly from the source. Totally changed how I deal with the IRS now.
0 coins
TechNinja
•How much does this cost? Sounds too good to be true tbh. I've literally never gotten through to the IRS in less than 2 hours of holding.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
•I don't buy it. The IRS is deliberately understaffed and there's no magic way to skip their phone queues. This sounds like just another service charging people for something that should be free. You probably just got lucky with call timing.
0 coins
Lena Müller
•They don't skip the queue - they wait in it for you, which is the whole point. You don't have to sit there listening to hold music for hours. When they get through to an agent, they call you and connect you. It's like having someone else stand in a physical line for you. I understand the skepticism - I felt the same way. But after my third failed attempt to reach someone (getting disconnected after 90+ minutes), I was willing to try anything. The service works exactly as advertised. I didn't have to waste another afternoon on hold, and I got my questions answered.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment last week, I decided to try it myself when I needed to ask about some partnership tax filing requirements that were confusing me. I was prepared to report back that it was a waste of money, but I'm honestly shocked. They called me back in about an hour with an actual IRS representative on the line. The agent answered all my questions about how partnership income should be reported and clarified the self-employment tax confusion I had. What would have been another frustrating day of hold music and likely disconnections turned into a 20-minute productive conversation. For anyone dealing with complex tax situations like partnership income, being able to actually speak with the IRS directly is invaluable. I've completely changed my opinion on this service.
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
One thing that nobody has mentioned yet is that many law firm partners have their partnerships structured as S-Corps specifically to reduce the self-employment tax burden. By taking part of their income as salary (which is subject to FICA taxes) and part as distributions (which aren't), they can legitimately reduce their overall tax burden. You do have to pay yourself a "reasonable salary" first, which the IRS looks at closely, but this strategy is very common among high-earning professionals. My brother-in-law is a law partner and saves tens of thousands each year with this approach.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•Thanks for bringing this up - I hadn't even considered the S-Corp angle. Do you know if there are any downsides to this approach compared to a standard partnership? And how does the firm's overall structure impact individual partners' ability to do this?
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
•The main downside is additional administrative complexity and costs. S-Corps require more formal documentation, separate payroll processing, and generally higher accounting fees. There can also be limitations on fringe benefits compared to C-Corps. Regarding firm structure, it varies widely. Many large law firms are LLPs (Limited Liability Partnerships), and individual partners can't unilaterally change how they're taxed. Some firms allow partners to form "partner professional corporations" that then become partners in the firm. This creates an extra layer but allows individual partners to gain S-Corp tax treatment. It's very firm-specific and usually requires firm management approval and sometimes adjustments to the partnership agreement.
0 coins
Yara Assad
Sorry to jump in with a basic question, but can someone explain WHY law partners have to pay self-employment tax in the first place? I thought that was just for independent contractors and freelancers. If they're partners in a big established firm, why aren't they just considered employees for tax purposes?
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•It comes down to how business entities are structured and taxed. In a partnership, the partners are not employees - they're owners of the business. The partnership itself doesn't pay taxes; instead, all profits "pass through" to the partners who report it on their personal returns. Since partners aren't employees receiving W-2 wages with FICA taxes already withheld, they have to pay the equivalent through self-employment tax. They're essentially both the employer and employee from a tax perspective, so they pay both sides of Social Security and Medicare taxes.
0 coins
Ev Luca
•@Olivia Clark explained it well! To add to that - this is actually why some partners feel like they re'getting double "taxed compared" to traditional employees. A regular employee pays 7.65% in FICA taxes their (half while) the employer pays the other 7.65%. But as a partner, you re'paying the full 15.3% yourself since you re'considered both. The trade-off is that partners typically have much more control over business decisions, profit sharing, and tax deductions than regular employees. They can deduct business expenses, depreciation, and other items that W-2 employees can t.'So while the self-employment tax burden is higher, the overall tax strategy options are usually more flexible.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
This is a really helpful thread! I'm a CPA who works with several law firm partners, and I wanted to add a few practical considerations that might be useful: 1. **Quarterly estimated payments are crucial** - Partners earning $1.9M need to be very careful about underpayment penalties. The IRS expects you to pay 110% of last year's tax liability (or 90% of current year) through withholdings and estimated payments. 2. **State taxes vary significantly** - Some states don't have self-employment tax equivalents, while others (like California) have additional taxes that can really add up for high earners. 3. **Retirement planning is actually a huge advantage** - Partners can often contribute much more to retirement plans than W-2 employees. For 2025, SEP-IRA contributions can go up to 25% of net self-employment income or $70,000, whichever is less. 4. **Business expense deductions** - Partners can deduct things like continuing legal education, bar association dues, professional subscriptions, and even portions of home office expenses if they work from home regularly. The tax burden is definitely substantial, but the flexibility and deduction opportunities often make it more manageable than it initially appears. I always recommend partners work with a CPA familiar with partnership taxation - the rules are complex and mistakes can be expensive.
0 coins
Ally Tailer
•This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I was looking for! As someone just starting to understand these concepts, the point about quarterly estimated payments is particularly important - I hadn't realized how strict the IRS is about underpayment penalties for high earners. One follow-up question: when you mention partners can deduct home office expenses, how does that work when they also have an office at the firm? Can they deduct both, or does having a firm office disqualify the home office deduction? Also, regarding the SEP-IRA contribution limits - is that $70,000 limit per partner individual, or is there some kind of firm-wide limitation that could affect it?
0 coins