< Back to IRS

Chris Elmeda

How Do I Apply the Gambling Sessions Method for Federal Tax Deductions?

So I finally wrapped up my gambling sessions accounting method calculations from my FanDuel log for the year 2023. This whole thing is giving me a headache. My total winning sessions for the year came to about $815k, while my losing sessions totaled roughly $246k. For context, I received W-2G forms that added up to $2.3m. Using the sessions method really brought down what I need to report as winnings. If I look at all individual transactions, my total losses were $3.1m and total winnings were $2.9m, leaving me about $200k in the hole for 2023. When I entered the $815k of session winnings into H&R Block software, I'm looking at a federal tax bill of $290k and state taxes around $56k. Here's what I can't figure out - how do I properly deduct my losses at the federal level? I know you can deduct losses up to the amount of winnings, but since I used the sessions method, do I report the losing sessions amount ($246k)? Or can I use my total losses ($3.1m) up to the winning sessions amount of $815k? Also, if I just reported all $2.3m from the W-2Gs and then deducted $2.3m in losses, my state tax bill jumps to about $175k without using the sessions method. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Jean Claude

•

The gambling sessions method can definitely be confusing, but you're on the right track. When using the sessions method for reporting gambling income, you're essentially treating each session as a single gambling event rather than reporting every individual transaction. Under this method, you'd report your winning sessions total ($815k) as your gambling income on Schedule 1. For your losses, you would deduct the losing sessions amount ($246k) as an itemized deduction on Schedule A - not the total individual transaction losses. The key point is maintaining consistency in your methodology. The sessions method is designed to more accurately reflect the economic reality of gambling activities, as recognized by the Tax Court in several cases. Since you've chosen the sessions method, you need to stick with that approach for both reporting income and deducting losses. Remember that gambling losses are only deductible if you itemize deductions, and only up to the amount of your gambling winnings. In your case, you could deduct up to $815k in losses, but since your losing sessions totaled $246k, that's your deduction amount.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

Thanks for the help, but I'm still not sure I understand completely. If I'm using the sessions method and my winning sessions total $815k, can I only deduct the $246k losing sessions? Or can I deduct up to $815k from my total losses of $3.1m? I feel like I'm missing something since my actual net result was negative for the year.

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

When using the sessions method, you must be consistent - so you would report the $815k as income and can only deduct the $246k in losing sessions on Schedule A. You cannot mix methods by using sessions for income but total losses for deductions. The sessions method considers each gambling session as a complete unit. When you calculate that you had $815k in winning sessions and $246k in losing sessions, those are the only figures that matter for tax purposes. Your total transaction losses of $3.1m aren't relevant once you've chosen the sessions method.

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

I went through a similar nightmare with my sports betting last year. After bouncing between tax professionals who gave me conflicting advice, I found a tool that saved me - taxr.ai at https://taxr.ai actually specializes in handling gambling tax situations just like yours. I uploaded my FanDuel statements and W-2Gs, and their system automatically calculated everything using the sessions method correctly. They even showed me exactly how to report everything on my tax forms. What I liked most was that they explained why the sessions method was legitimate for my situation and showed me the relevant tax court cases that support this approach. It took what was going to be days of complicated spreadsheet work and reduced it to about 30 minutes. Plus, I had documentation to back everything up in case I ever got audited.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

Does taxr.ai handle state taxes too? My state doesn't allow gambling loss deductions at all, and I'm worried about how to report consistently between federal and state returns.

0 coins

Shelby Bauman

•

How reliable is this for DraftKings specifically? I've heard horror stories about people getting their calculations wrong and facing huge penalties. Does it create documentation that would stand up in an audit?

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

Yes, taxr.ai handles state taxes as well. They'll show you how to properly report your gambling activity on both federal and state returns, even for states that don't allow gambling loss deductions. They make it clear which numbers go where to maintain consistency while following different rules. For DraftKings specifically, it works perfectly. The system is designed to process statements from all major gambling platforms. What I found most valuable was the audit-ready documentation it creates - a detailed report showing your session calculations, methodology, and relevant tax court cases that support this approach. It's exactly the kind of documentation you'd need if the IRS ever questions your gambling tax treatment.

0 coins

Shelby Bauman

•

I tried taxr.ai after reading about it here and it completely cleared up my confusion! I was in basically the same situation with about $1.7m in W-2Gs but actually ended up down for the year overall. The sessions method calculation through taxr.ai showed I only needed to report $690k in gambling income instead of the full W-2G amount. The system automatically identified my sessions and calculated everything for me. It also gave me a detailed report explaining the methodology and even cited relevant tax court cases supporting this approach. When I showed everything to my accountant, he was initially skeptical but after reviewing the documentation, he agreed this was the correct way to handle it. Saved me well over $100k in taxes I would have otherwise overpaid. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with gambling tax issues.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

•

If you're still struggling with the IRS, I can tell you from experience that trying to call them directly to get clarification on gambling tax issues is nearly impossible. After spending weeks trying to get through the general line, I found https://claimyr.com which got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with confirmed that the sessions method is legitimate and explained exactly how to report it. They clarified that I needed to be consistent - using the same method for both income and losses. I asked specific questions about my W-2Gs versus session calculations and got clear guidance. Honestly, I was shocked at how quickly I got through and how helpful the agent was. Saved me weeks of stress and uncertainty.

0 coins

Salim Nasir

•

How does this service actually work? I've tried calling the IRS gambling hotline multiple times and just get disconnected or wait for hours. Do they somehow bypass the queue?

0 coins

Hazel Garcia

•

Yeah right. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. This sounds like a scam to me. If it was that easy, everyone would be doing it. Did you actually get through or are you just promoting something?

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

•

The service works by using an automated system that continuously calls the IRS until it gets through, then connects you immediately when a line opens up. It's not "skipping" the queue - it's just handling the frustrating repeated calling and waiting for you. I was extremely skeptical too before trying it. But I had spent nearly 3 weeks trying to get through on my own with no success. With Claimyr, I was connected to an IRS agent within about 15 minutes. The agent was able to verify my specific situation with the gambling sessions method and confirmed I was handling it correctly. They actually exist to prevent scams by helping people get official answers directly from the IRS instead of potentially questionable advice online.

0 coins

Hazel Garcia

•

I need to eat some crow here. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try Claimyr as a last resort because I've been trying to get through to the IRS for weeks about my gambling tax situation. I was connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. The agent confirmed that my sessions method calculations were correct, and I should be reporting $780k in winning sessions as income and $215k in losing sessions as itemized deductions on Schedule A - not my total losses for the year. They also explained that combining the daily session results is the proper approach for continuous gambling activity on the same platform in a single day, which cleared up a major point of confusion for me. Genuinely surprised this service actually worked. Saved me from potentially making a very expensive mistake on my return.

0 coins

Laila Fury

•

Something else to consider - make sure you're keeping extremely detailed records of your gambling activities. According to my tax guy, you need: 1. Date and type of wager 2. Name/location of gambling establishment 3. Names of other persons present 4. Amounts won or lost If you're using the sessions method, you need to document how you're defining a session (by day, by gambling type, etc.) and be consistent. The more documentation you have, the better positioned you are if audited.

0 coins

Does anyone know if screenshots of my betting history from the FanDuel app are sufficient documentation? I didn't keep a separate gambling diary but I can export all my transaction history.

0 coins

Laila Fury

•

Screenshots alone probably aren't ideal, but they're definitely better than nothing. The best approach is to export your complete transaction history from FanDuel and then organize it into sessions yourself with clear documentation of your methodology. The IRS wants to see that you're being consistent and reasonable in how you define your gambling sessions. Many tax professionals recommend defining a session as a calendar day for online betting platforms, but whatever method you choose, stick with it and document your reasoning. If you use software or a service to help calculate sessions, keep copies of those reports too as supporting documentation.

0 coins

Simon White

•

Just wanted to add - don't forget that professional gamblers have different rules! If gambling is your profession (you do it full-time, treat it like a business, etc.) you can report gambling income and losses on Schedule C instead. This allows you to deduct losses beyond your winnings. But be careful claiming to be a professional gambler - the IRS scrutinizes these claims heavily, and you need to prove you're treating gambling as a business with the intent to make a profit. Most recreational gamblers should stick with the sessions method.

0 coins

Hugo Kass

•

Is there a specific dollar amount or frequency that automatically qualifies you as a professional gambler? I placed bets almost daily and had over 6,000 transactions last year.

0 coins

There's no specific dollar amount or frequency threshold that automatically makes you a professional gambler. The IRS uses a "facts and circumstances" test based on nine factors from the Supreme Court case Groetzinger v. Commissioner. Key factors include: whether you carry on gambling activities in a businesslike manner, whether you maintain books and records, whether you have other income sources, the time and effort you spend, your expertise in the activity, your history of income/losses, and whether you depend on gambling income for your livelihood. Having 6,000 transactions shows significant activity, but frequency alone isn't enough. You'd need to demonstrate that you approach gambling as a business - keeping detailed records, having a systematic approach, treating it as your primary occupation, etc. Most importantly, you need to show a genuine profit motive over multiple years. I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in gambling taxes before claiming professional status. The penalties for incorrectly claiming professional gambler status can be severe, and the IRS audits these returns at much higher rates.

0 coins

I've been through a similar situation with FanDuel gambling taxes and can confirm what others have said about the sessions method. The key thing to understand is that you must be consistent - if you use the sessions method to calculate your gambling income, you must also use it for your loss deductions. In your case, you would report the $815k in winning sessions as gambling income on Schedule 1 (Other Income), and you can deduct up to $815k in losses as an itemized deduction on Schedule A. However, since your losing sessions totaled $246k, that's your actual deduction amount - not the full $3.1m in individual transaction losses. The sessions method is well-established in tax court cases and is designed to better reflect the economic reality of gambling activities. Just make sure you have solid documentation of how you defined your sessions (by day, by type of game, etc.) and applied that methodology consistently throughout the year. One thing to double-check - when you calculated your sessions, did you properly account for multi-day tournaments or events? Those can sometimes complicate the session definition. Also, keep all your FanDuel transaction exports and any spreadsheets showing your session calculations in case of an audit.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

This is really helpful, especially the point about multi-day tournaments. I think I may have made an error in my session calculations because I did participate in some multi-day DFS contests on FanDuel. Should those be treated as a single session even if they span multiple calendar days, or should I split them by the days I made entries? Also, when you mention keeping FanDuel transaction exports - do you know if there's a specific format the IRS prefers, or are CSV downloads sufficient? I want to make sure I have everything properly documented in case of questions later.

0 coins

Lauren Zeb

•

For multi-day tournaments or contests, the general approach is to treat the entire tournament as a single session since it's one continuous gambling event, even if it spans multiple calendar days. The key is that you're participating in one contest with a single entry fee and one potential payout. However, if you made multiple separate entries on different days for the same tournament, you might need to evaluate each entry separately. The most important thing is consistency - whatever method you choose for defining sessions with multi-day events, apply it the same way throughout your entire year. Document your reasoning clearly. As for file formats, CSV downloads from FanDuel are perfectly acceptable for IRS documentation. The IRS doesn't specify a particular format - they just want to see complete, accurate records of your gambling activity. What matters most is that your records show the date, type of wager, amount wagered, and outcome for each transaction. Keep both the original CSV files and any spreadsheets you created to calculate your sessions, along with notes explaining your methodology. I'd also recommend printing key summary reports to have physical backups, since online gambling platforms sometimes change their historical data access over time.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

I've been dealing with a very similar situation with my Bovada gambling records, and after months of research and consultation with tax professionals, I can confirm that the sessions method approach described here is correct. One critical point I learned that might help you: make sure you're defining your sessions consistently throughout the entire tax year. I initially tried to define sessions differently for different types of bets (daily for sports betting, per-tournament for poker, etc.) and my CPA told me this could create problems if audited. For your specific numbers - reporting $815k in winning sessions as income and deducting $246k in losing sessions on Schedule A - this is the proper approach under the sessions method. You cannot cherry-pick by using sessions for income calculation but total losses for deductions. Also, since you mentioned using H&R Block software, double-check that it's handling the gambling income correctly. Some tax software doesn't properly account for the sessions method and may try to force you to report the full W-2G amounts. You may need to override the software's suggestions and manually enter your session-calculated amounts with proper documentation attached. Keep detailed records of your session calculation methodology - if the IRS ever questions it, you'll need to show exactly how you consistently defined and calculated each session throughout the year.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

This is exactly the kind of clarity I needed! I was wondering about the consistency requirement across different bet types. I had been treating my sports bets differently from my daily fantasy contests, which sounds like it could be problematic. One follow-up question - when you mention that H&R Block might not handle the sessions method properly, did you end up having to file amendments or corrections? I'm worried that if I override the software's calculations, I might trigger additional scrutiny from the IRS. How did you document the override in your filing to make it clear you were using an accepted methodology rather than just trying to reduce your tax burden? Also, did your CPA have any specific recommendations for how to present the sessions method calculations if you do get audited? I want to make sure I'm prepared with the right documentation format.

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

I didn't have to file amendments, but I did have to be very careful about documentation. When overriding H&R Block's automatic calculations, I attached a detailed statement explaining my use of the sessions method, including references to relevant Tax Court cases like Shollenberger v. Commissioner and Mayo v. Commissioner that establish this methodology. For audit preparation, my CPA recommended creating a comprehensive package that includes: 1) Your complete gambling transaction history from the platform, 2) A detailed spreadsheet showing how you calculated each session with clear methodology notes, 3) A summary comparing your sessions method results to the raw W-2G totals, and 4) Citation of the legal precedents supporting this approach. The key is showing that you applied a reasonable, consistent methodology throughout the year rather than manipulating numbers to reduce taxes. Document everything as if you're already being audited - clear dates, consistent session definitions, and logical explanations for your approach. One tip: consider having your session calculations reviewed by a tax professional before filing. The small upfront cost can save enormous headaches if the IRS ever questions your methodology. They can also help ensure your documentation meets professional standards and would hold up under scrutiny.

0 coins

I've been through a very similar situation with DraftKings and can offer some additional perspective on the sessions method. After working with a tax attorney who specializes in gambling cases, I learned that the sessions method isn't just about convenience - it's actually the most legally defensible approach for frequent online gamblers. The key insight my attorney shared is that the sessions method better reflects the "economic substance" of your gambling activity. When you're betting continuously throughout a day on the same platform, treating each individual wager as separate creates an artificial inflation of both wins and losses that doesn't match the economic reality of your gambling behavior. For your specific situation with $815k in winning sessions and $246k in losing sessions, you're absolutely correct to use these figures. The $3.1m in total transaction losses becomes irrelevant once you've chosen the sessions method - mixing methodologies is exactly what gets people in trouble with audits. One thing I'd add that others haven't mentioned: consider the timing of when you actually received payouts versus when sessions closed. Some gamblers get tripped up by cash-out timing, especially with promotional bonuses or delayed settlements. Make sure your session calculations align with when you actually had access to winnings, not just when bets were placed or resolved. Also, document any promotional credits or bonuses separately - the IRS sometimes scrutinizes how these are handled in session calculations.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

This is really valuable insight about the "economic substance" aspect - I hadn't thought about it that way before. Your point about promotional credits is especially relevant since FanDuel gave me several bonus credits throughout the year that I used for additional betting. When you mention aligning session calculations with when you actually had access to winnings, did you run into any issues with pending withdrawals or delayed settlements? I had some larger payouts that took 2-3 days to clear, and I'm wondering if those should be counted in the session when the bet was placed/won or when the funds actually became available in my account. Also, did your tax attorney provide any specific guidance on how to handle those promotional bonuses in the session calculations? I received probably $15k worth of various bonuses and free bets throughout the year, and I'm not sure if those should be treated as separate income or just factored into the overall session results when used.

0 coins

For pending withdrawals and delayed settlements, the general rule is to count winnings in the session when the gambling event concluded (when you won the bet), not when funds actually hit your account. The delay is just a processing issue, not part of the gambling activity itself. However, document these timing differences clearly in case questions arise. Regarding promotional bonuses, my experience has been that free bets and bonus credits should be treated as having a $0 basis when calculating session results. So if you use a $100 free bet and win $300, your session gain is $300, not $200. But if you lose the free bet, there's no loss to record since you had no money at risk. Cash bonuses that become withdrawable after meeting wagering requirements are different - those should be treated as income when they become unrestricted. The key is consistency and clear documentation. I kept a separate log of all promotional activity and how it was integrated into my session calculations. This level of detail really helped when my CPA was preparing my return and gave me confidence that everything would hold up if questioned. One more tip: consider reaching out to a gambling tax specialist rather than a general CPA if your gambling activity is substantial. The specialized knowledge is worth the extra cost for complex situations like this.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

This is an incredibly helpful thread - I've been struggling with the exact same situation with my BetMGM gambling records. After reading through all these responses, I finally understand why my tax preparer kept asking me to "be consistent" with my methodology. One thing I wanted to add from my research: make sure you understand how your state handles gambling income if you're using the sessions method. Some states don't recognize the sessions method at all and require you to report the full W-2G amounts as income, even if you're using sessions for federal purposes. This can create a significant difference between your federal and state tax calculations. In my case, I live in a state that doesn't allow gambling loss deductions, so even though I'm using the sessions method federally to report $650k instead of $1.8m in W-2Gs, I still have to report the full $1.8m on my state return with no offsetting deductions. It's brutal, but at least the federal savings help offset the state tax hit. Also, for anyone considering the professional gambler route mentioned earlier - be extremely careful. I consulted with a tax attorney about this, and they warned that the IRS has been aggressively auditing professional gambler claims, especially for sports betting. Unless you truly treat gambling as a full-time business with systematic approaches, detailed business records, and can demonstrate consistent profit-seeking behavior over multiple years, stick with the sessions method as a recreational gambler. The documentation standards everyone mentioned are spot-on. I created a comprehensive audit file with my session calculations, methodology explanation, and supporting case law. Better to over-document than wish you had more records later.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today