Enrolled Agent Exam Study Materials - My SEE Test Experience
I've been studying for the SEE exam since early February (about 3 weeks ago) and wanted to share my experience with different study materials. I'm incredibly relieved to have passed 2 parts already! I started with the Second part on February 12th and just took the First part yesterday. Here's where things get frustrating. For that initial three weeks, I logged around 90+ hours studying - way beyond the recommended study time for Part 2 of the SEE. I practically memorized all 250 practice questions and every single quiz question in my study program. Obviously, I didn't expect identical questions on the actual exam, but I thought the practice material would at least cover similar concepts or question types... Well, I was COMPLETELY wrong! Five questions into the real exam, I felt totally lost. Maybe 2-3 questions resembled what I'd studied, but the vast majority covered entirely different concepts. Somehow I managed to pass using my test-taking instincts, but I was shocked. You might wonder why I'm so upset if I passed? Because I wasted 90+ hours studying material that was basically useless! I might as well have studied marine biology for all the good it did me. After that disaster, I did some research (should've done this sooner) and discovered many people recommend Passkey Books for SEE prep. I ordered it immediately and had it by February 15th. Best decision ever! (Major thanks to everyone who recommends Passkey!) For Part 1, I foolishly continued using my original program alongside Passkey, thinking "Maybe Part 2 was just a fluke." HUGE mistake. My original program had 500 practice questions for Part 1, and I spent hours working through them repeatedly. What worried me was how drastically different the Passkey questions were from my original program's questions... When I took Part 1 yesterday, out of those 500 practice questions, NOT A SINGLE ONE appeared on the test. I'm not exaggerating - there wasn't even a question that resembled the concepts from my original materials. The good news? The actual test closely matched Passkey's questions and was much easier than Part 2. If I'd relied solely on my original materials, I would've completely lost it. So that's my warning to fellow EA candidates. I'm planning to take Part 3 on March 10th or 14th. If anyone has tips for the Part 3 exam, please share!
27 comments


Gemma Andrews
As an instructor who's helped hundreds of candidates pass the SEE exams, your experience is unfortunately common. The quality difference between study materials is dramatic. The SEE isn't about memorizing specific questions but understanding tax concepts and how to apply them in different scenarios. The best materials teach you the underlying principles and how the IRS tests them, not just practice questions. Passkey is indeed excellent because it focuses on teaching concepts rather than just test prep. Gleim is another solid option that many of my students have success with. Their materials tend to be more comprehensive and their question bank is regularly updated to match current exam patterns. For Part 3 (Representation, Practices and Procedures), focus on understanding Circular 230 provisions, practitioner responsibilities, and representation procedures. This section tests your understanding of the professional requirements for EAs rather than specific tax calculations. Make sure you understand the different types of representation (exam, collection, appeals), the timelines involved, and the specific powers given to enrolled agents. These are frequently tested concepts.
0 coins
Pedro Sawyer
•How many hours would you recommend studying for Part 3? Is it generally considered easier or harder than the other sections? I'm planning to start my EA journey next month.
0 coins
Gemma Andrews
•For most candidates, I recommend 60-80 hours of study time for Part 3. It's typically considered the easiest of the three parts because it's more procedural and has fewer calculations than Parts 1 and 2. Part 3 focuses more on professional responsibilities, representation procedures, and ethical requirements rather than complex tax calculations. Many find this more straightforward, especially if you already have some experience with tax practice.
0 coins
Mae Bennett
After struggling with my EA exam prep, I found this amazing AI-powered study tool at https://taxr.ai that completely transformed my experience. I was in the same boat using traditional study materials and feeling completely unprepared during the actual exam. What I love about taxr.ai is that it analyzes the actual exam patterns and creates practice questions that truly reflect what you'll see on test day. Instead of memorizing unrelated questions, it helped me understand the underlying concepts the IRS is actually testing. The system adapts to your strengths and weaknesses too. When I kept missing questions about business expenses, it generated more practice in that area with explanations that actually made sense.
0 coins
Beatrice Marshall
•Does it work for all three parts of the SEE? I'm particularly worried about Part 2 with all the business tax stuff.
0 coins
Melina Haruko
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. How is it different from other test prep programs that claim to have "real exam questions" but don't deliver?
0 coins
Mae Bennett
•It absolutely works for all three parts of the SEE exam. Part 2 (Business) is actually where I saw the biggest benefit because it breaks down complex business tax concepts into manageable chunks and provides practice scenarios that mirror the actual exam. What makes taxr.ai different is that it doesn't claim to have "real exam questions" - instead it uses AI to analyze the pattern and style of current SEE exams and generates practice that matches the conceptual thinking required. The questions won't be identical (that would violate test protocols) but they train your brain to approach problems the way the actual exam does.
0 coins
Melina Haruko
I was really skeptical about taxr.ai mentioned above, but after failing Part 1 twice using traditional study materials, I decided to give it a shot. Completely changed my approach to studying for the exam. The difference was night and day - the practice questions actually prepared me for how the SEE phrases their questions and the tricky ways they test concepts. I passed Part 1 last week with room to spare and now I'm using it for Part 2. What surprised me most was how it helped me identify my weak areas that other programs missed. Highly recommend for anyone struggling with the traditional study materials like I was.
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
If you're struggling to get through to the IRS for clarification on EA exam procedures or status, I highly recommend Claimyr's service at https://claimyr.com. I was on hold for HOURS trying to get information about my testing window extension and getting nowhere. Someone in my study group suggested Claimyr and showed me this demo video https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. I was doubtful it would work, but I was desperate. They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes when I had previously waited for 3+ hours before giving up. The agent was able to resolve my testing window issue immediately, and I was able to schedule my exam for the following week instead of waiting months for the next testing window. Seriously saved my EA journey.
0 coins
Reina Salazar
•Wait, how does this actually work? Do they just call for you or something? I'm confused how a third party service can get you through faster.
0 coins
Saanvi Krishnaswami
•Yeah right. Nothing gets you through to the IRS faster. This sounds like a scam to take money from desperate people.
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
•They don't just call for you - they use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold in your place. When they reach a live agent, they call you immediately and connect you directly. You're the one actually talking to the IRS agent, not a third party. I was extremely skeptical too, but I can promise you it's not a scam. The difference is they have technology that keeps your place in line without you having to listen to that awful hold music for hours. I wasted an entire day trying to get through before using this service, and it saved me from missing my testing deadline.
0 coins
Saanvi Krishnaswami
I was totally wrong about Claimyr being a scam. After my skeptical comment, I had an emergency situation with a client audit and my EA status verification was causing problems. Spent two full days trying to reach someone at the IRS with no luck. In desperation, I tried the Claimyr service. Got connected to an actual IRS agent in 35 minutes when I had been trying unsuccessfully for days. The agent confirmed my status and I was able to represent my client without any further issues. I've never been happier to admit I was wrong about something. If you're dealing with IRS phone issues while studying for or practicing as an EA, this service is genuinely worth it.
0 coins
Demi Lagos
For anyone prepping for the SEE, I found the free practice exams on the Prometric website incredibly helpful for getting used to the actual exam interface. They don't have many questions, but they're official and use the same testing system as the real exam. Also, don't underestimate the EA Reddit community. There are study groups and people share their recent test experiences which gives you an idea of what to focus on. The topics seem to rotate slightly with each testing window.
0 coins
Mason Lopez
•Do you know if they update those practice exams when tax laws change? I'm worried about studying outdated material.
0 coins
Demi Lagos
•The Prometric practice exams are updated annually to reflect current tax law, typically by May for the testing window that begins each July. They're limited in scope but are accurate for the current testing cycle. For the most up-to-date material, I'd recommend supplementing with current IRS publications that correspond to your exam sections. Tax law changes are explicitly noted in these publications and they form the foundation of what's tested.
0 coins
Vera Visnjic
After passing all three parts, here's my advice: treat the exam like a puzzle, not a memory test. The questions are designed to test your understanding of tax principles, not whether you've memorized specific facts. I found creating my own tax scenarios and solving them using IRS publications was much more effective than endless practice questions. When you practice looking up information in publications, you develop the research skills needed for the exam and real practice.
0 coins
Lena Schultz
•That's a really interesting approach! Did you create specific scenarios for certain topics that you found particularly challenging? I'm working on Part 3 now and would love any specific strategies.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•@ce65d8d68218 For Part 3, I focused on creating scenarios around power of attorney situations, penalty abatement requests, and collection procedures. For example, I'd create a fictional client with multiple tax years in collections and work through the entire representation process - from initial contact to resolution. I also practiced writing penalty abatement letters and walking through the appeals process step-by-step. The key is understanding the timeline requirements and procedural steps, not just memorizing the rules. When you can visualize yourself actually representing a client through these processes, the exam questions become much clearer. The IRS Practice and Procedure handbook became my best friend for this section!
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
Thank you so much for sharing your detailed experience with the SEE exam! Your story about wasting 90+ hours on materials that didn't match the actual exam is exactly what I needed to hear. I'm just starting my EA journey and was about to purchase one of those popular online programs that promises "thousands of practice questions." Your recommendation about Passkey Books is incredibly valuable - I'm ordering it today. It's frustrating that you had to learn this the hard way, but your experience will definitely save other candidates from making the same mistake. I'm curious about your timeline - you mentioned taking Part 2 first, then Part 1, and planning Part 3 for March. Is there a strategic reason for taking them in that order, or was it just based on your preparation schedule? I've heard mixed opinions about whether order matters for the SEE exams. Also, for anyone else reading this - does the 18-month window to complete all three parts start from when you pass your first exam, or from when you take your first exam? I want to make sure I plan my testing schedule appropriately. Thanks again for the honest breakdown of study materials. Posts like this are why this community is so valuable!
0 coins
Sophia Long
•@692829e45460 Great questions! I'm actually new to this community too but have been lurking and researching the EA exam process extensively. From what I've learned, the 18-month window starts from when you PASS your first exam, not when you take it. So if you fail your first attempt, that doesn't start your clock ticking. Regarding exam order, I've seen mixed advice too. Some people suggest starting with Part 3 since it's generally considered easier and can give you confidence, while others recommend saving it for last since it's more procedural. I think it really depends on your background - if you have tax prep experience, Parts 1 and 2 might feel more natural to start with. The Passkey recommendation keeps coming up in multiple threads I've read, so that seems like solid advice. I'm planning to start my prep in a couple months and will definitely be following this approach rather than those expensive programs with questionable practice questions. Thanks @ce65d8d68218 for sharing such a detailed experience - it's exactly the kind of real-world insight that helps newcomers like us avoid costly mistakes!
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
This is such a helpful and detailed breakdown of your SEE exam experience! As someone who just started studying for my EA exams, your post is exactly what I needed to read before investing too much time in the wrong materials. Your experience with spending 90+ hours on practice questions that didn't reflect the actual exam is both frustrating and enlightening. It really highlights how important it is to choose quality study materials over quantity of practice questions. The fact that you passed despite feeling unprepared shows that good test-taking skills can help, but obviously proper preparation would have made the experience much less stressful. I'm definitely going to look into Passkey Books based on your recommendation and the positive feedback from others in this thread. It sounds like the key difference is that quality materials focus on teaching underlying tax concepts rather than just drilling practice questions that may not be representative of the actual exam. One question about your study approach - when you were using Passkey alongside your original program for Part 1, did you notice any conflicts or contradictions between the two materials? I'm wondering if using multiple sources might create confusion rather than reinforcement. Thanks for sharing such an honest account of your journey. Posts like this make the EA exam process feel much less intimidating when you know what to expect and how to prepare effectively!
0 coins
Mei Wong
•@d73f89d17d35 Great question about using multiple study sources! I'm also just starting my EA prep and this is something I've been wondering about. From what I've read in other threads, mixing materials can sometimes create confusion if they approach concepts differently or use different terminology. It seems like the key is finding one high-quality primary source (like the Passkey Books that keep getting recommended) and then using supplementary materials sparingly - maybe just for extra practice in weak areas or to get different perspectives on particularly challenging topics. @ce65d8d68218 mentioned that the Passkey questions were drastically different from their original program's questions, which suggests these programs might be teaching different approaches to the same concepts. That could definitely be confusing during the actual exam when you need to think clearly and consistently. I'm planning to stick with one main study program and supplement with the free IRS publications that others have mentioned. Has anyone else found success with a single-source approach versus mixing multiple programs?
0 coins
Kaiya Rivera
As someone who just discovered this community while researching EA exam prep, I can't thank you enough for this incredibly detailed breakdown of your experience! Your story about spending 90+ hours on materials that didn't match the actual exam is both eye-opening and terrifying - but exactly what I needed to hear before making my own study material investments. I was literally about to purchase one of those programs that advertises "thousands of practice questions" thinking more questions = better preparation. Your experience clearly shows that's not the case at all. The quality and relevance of the material matters so much more than quantity. The Passkey Books recommendation is getting mentioned repeatedly in this thread, and your firsthand comparison between materials really drives home why it's worth investing in the right resources from the start. It's frustrating that you had to learn this lesson the expensive way (in terms of time), but your detailed account will definitely help other candidates avoid the same trap. I'm curious about the timeline pressure - you mentioned planning to take Part 3 in March after taking Parts 2 and 1 in February. That seems like a pretty aggressive schedule. Are you feeling confident about being able to maintain that pace, especially given how much time you spent on the first two parts? I'm trying to plan my own testing timeline and wondering if I should build in more buffer time between exams. Thanks again for sharing such an honest and thorough experience. This is exactly the kind of real-world insight that makes this community so valuable for EA candidates!
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•@69130aba881c I'm so glad you found this thread before making the same mistake I did! You're absolutely right to be cautious about those programs advertising "thousands of practice questions" - I learned the hard way that quantity doesn't equal quality when it comes to EA exam prep. Regarding the aggressive timeline, you raise a great point. I was initially motivated by wanting to get through all three parts quickly, but after experiencing how different the actual exams can be from study materials, I'm reconsidering that approach. The stress of feeling unprepared during the actual exam wasn't worth the time savings. For Part 3, I'm actually considering pushing my test date back a bit to give myself more time with the Passkey materials and really understand the concepts rather than rushing through. The 18-month window gives us plenty of flexibility, so there's no need to create unnecessary pressure. My advice based on what I've learned: invest in quality materials upfront (Passkey seems to be the consensus choice), give yourself adequate time to truly understand concepts rather than just memorize, and don't be afraid to adjust your timeline if you need more preparation time. Better to be over-prepared than to repeat my experience of feeling lost during the exam!
0 coins
Hannah Flores
Thank you so much for sharing your detailed experience with the SEE exam preparation! As someone who's just starting to research the EA path, your honest breakdown is incredibly valuable and definitely saved me from making some expensive mistakes. Your story about spending 90+ hours on practice materials that didn't match the actual exam is both eye-opening and frustrating. It really highlights how misleading some study programs can be with their marketing claims. The fact that you had literally memorized 250+ practice questions and still felt completely unprepared for the real exam shows just how important it is to choose materials that actually reflect what's tested. I'm definitely going to start with Passkey Books based on your recommendation and all the positive feedback in this thread. It sounds like the key difference is focusing on understanding tax concepts rather than just drilling random practice questions. One question about your experience - when you felt lost during Part 2 but still managed to pass using "test-taking instincts," were there any specific strategies that helped you work through questions when the content didn't match what you'd studied? I'm trying to prepare for the possibility that I might encounter unfamiliar material despite using better study resources. Also, I noticed you mentioned doing research after your Part 2 experience and finding recommendations for Passkey. Are there any other resources or communities you'd recommend for EA candidates to connect with others going through the same process? Thanks again for taking the time to share such a comprehensive account of your journey. This kind of real-world insight is exactly what newcomers like me need to hear!
0 coins
Ella Thompson
•@637728e9f9f9 Welcome to the EA journey! I'm just starting out myself but have been following this thread closely. Your question about test-taking strategies when encountering unfamiliar material is really smart - even with the best prep materials, there's always a chance of seeing something unexpected. From what I've gathered from various posts here and other EA communities, some general strategies include: carefully reading each question multiple times to identify the core tax concept being tested (even if the specific scenario is unfamiliar), eliminating obviously incorrect answers first, and looking for keywords that might point to specific tax code sections or principles you do know. For EA community resources, I've found the EA subreddit pretty helpful, and there are some Facebook groups specifically for SEE exam candidates where people share recent test experiences and study tips. The IRS also has official EA resources on their website that are worth bookmarking. @ce65d8d68218's experience really emphasizes how crucial it is to understand underlying principles rather than just memorizing scenarios. That seems to be the key difference between materials that actually prepare you versus those that just give you false confidence with irrelevant practice questions. Looking forward to hearing about everyone's continued progress with their EA studies!
0 coins