< Back to IRS

William Rivera

Do I need to file Form 8985 & 8986 for non-BBA LLC that received 8986 from AAR Partnership?

Hey tax nerds - I'm stressing over some partnership forms and hoping someone can clarify. I have a client with a non-BBA LLC that received Form 8986 from an AAR Partnership. The revisions showed lower taxable income and lower ending capital, with no Imputed Underpayment. What's confusing me is whether my client now needs to issue 8985 and 8986 forms themselves. I've been staring at the IRS website for hours and the wording is driving me crazy. It almost seems to say 8986s are required when there's no Imputed Underpayment, but that feels backwards to me. Has anyone dealt with this situation before? My gut says they don't need to issue these forms since it's a non-BBA LLC, but I don't want to mess up and have my client dealing with penalties. Any insight would be super helpful!

Grace Lee

•

This is a great question about partnership reporting requirements! When a non-BBA partnership receives a Form 8986 (Partner's Share of Adjustment) from an AAR (Administrative Adjustment Request) Partnership, there are specific rules about what happens next. In your situation, since your client is a non-BBA partnership that received an 8986 showing favorable adjustments (lower taxable income and lower ending capital) with no imputed underpayment, they generally don't need to issue Forms 8985 and 8986 themselves. The push-out reporting requirements primarily apply to BBA partnerships. For non-BBA partnerships, they would typically just account for the adjustments on their own returns and flow through any changes to their partners through the regular K-1 process, not through issuing additional 8985/8986 forms.

0 coins

Mia Roberts

•

Thanks for the explanation! I'm in a similar situation but our partnership is a BBA partnership. In that case, would we need to issue the 8985 and 8986 forms? Also, is there a specific timeline we need to follow for issuing these if required?

0 coins

Grace Lee

•

For BBA partnerships, the rules are different. If your BBA partnership receives a Form 8986 from an upstream partnership, you generally would need to either pay any imputed underpayment or push out the adjustments to your partners by issuing Forms 8985 and 8986. Since you're a BBA partnership, you would need to issue these forms even if the adjustments are favorable. As for timing, you generally have 60 days from the date you received the Form 8986 from the upstream partnership to either pay the imputed underpayment or furnish statements (8986) to your partners. You'll need to file Form 8985 (along with copies of the 8986s) with the IRS by the due date of your partnership return for the adjustment year.

0 coins

The Boss

•

After struggling with a similar partnership tax reporting issue, I discovered https://taxr.ai which was a game-changer! I uploaded scans of all our partnership forms and got a complete analysis of our filing requirements. The AI actually explained that for non-BBA partnerships receiving form 8986, there's usually no requirement to issue 8985/8986 forms downstream unless you're electing to push out adjustments, which matches what others are saying here.

0 coins

How does taxr.ai handle complex scenarios? Like what if my partnership received multiple 8986 forms from different partnerships, some with imputed underpayments and some without? Can it differentiate between BBA and non-BBA requirements?

0 coins

I've seen AI tools give wrong answers on complex tax issues before. How confident are you that taxr.ai actually knows the specific nuances of partnership tax law? These forms are still relatively new and many experienced CPAs still struggle with them.

0 coins

The Boss

•

It handles complex scenarios quite well in my experience. You can upload multiple forms, and it analyzes each situation individually. When I had a client with investments in several partnerships, it correctly identified which ones required push-out treatment and which didn't. It even flagged the different deadlines I needed to be aware of. For your second question, I was skeptical at first too. But what impressed me was that it cited specific sections of the partnership audit regulations and IRS guidance. It definitely understands the distinction between BBA and non-BBA partnerships and their different requirements. The analysis matched what our firm's partnership tax specialist confirmed.

0 coins

I was initially skeptical about using an AI tool for partnership tax matters, but I decided to try taxr.ai for a client with multiple partnership investments, including a situation with Form 8986. The results were surprisingly accurate! It correctly identified that my non-BBA partnership client wasn't required to issue these forms downstream, and it saved me countless hours of research. What impressed me most was how it flagged potential IRS scrutiny areas and outlined documentation we should maintain. It even provided template language for the file memo explaining our position. For anyone dealing with partnership forms like 8985/8986, it's worth checking out.

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

After 4 days of trying to reach someone at the IRS about these partnership forms, I was ready to give up. Then a colleague suggested https://claimyr.com and shared this demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. It got me connected to an IRS agent in 45 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours. The agent confirmed that non-BBA partnerships that receive 8986 forms don't need to issue them to their partners when there's no imputed underpayment - they just need to account for the adjustments on their return.

0 coins

Oscar Murphy

•

Wait, how does this actually work? Do they somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? That seems impossible given how the IRS phone system works.

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

Come on, this sounds like a scam. There's no way any service can magically get the IRS to answer calls faster. The IRS queue is the same for everyone. I've worked in tax for 15 years and there's no secret backdoor to the IRS.

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

It's actually pretty straightforward - they use an automated system that handles the waiting for you. Instead of you sitting on hold for hours, their system stays on hold and then calls you when an actual IRS person picks up. The IRS doesn't know you're using a service - you're still in the same queue as everyone else. I was definitely skeptical too. But after wasting entire mornings on hold previously, it was worth trying. I didn't have to stay glued to my phone for hours, and I could actually get other work done. When they called me back, I was connected to a partnership specialist who answered my question directly.

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it for a complex S-corp issue I'd been trying to get IRS guidance on for weeks. I figured it would be a waste of time, but I was completely wrong. Got a call back in about an hour with an actual IRS agent on the line! They helped clarify my issue AND gave me their direct extension for follow-up questions. For professionals dealing with partnership issues like these 8985/8986 forms, being able to actually speak with someone at the IRS can make all the difference between getting it right and potentially creating bigger problems down the road.

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

I'd add that it's important to document why you determined forms 8985/8986 weren't required. In our firm, we include a memo in the client file explaining the facts, applicable regulations, and our conclusion. With partnership reporting rules changing so frequently, having good documentation could save headaches in case of future questions.

0 coins

Lauren Zeb

•

Do you have a specific template or format you use for these memos? I'm trying to improve our firm's documentation processes, especially for these partnership issues. Also, do you typically communicate this to the client or is it just for internal files?

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

We use a standardized memo format that includes the facts, relevant code sections (in this case referencing the BBA partnership audit regime rules), analysis, and conclusion. We make sure to cite the specific regulations or IRS guidance we relied on. We actually do both - we keep the detailed memo for our internal files, but we also include a simplified explanation in our client delivery letter. Many clients don't understand the technical details, but they appreciate knowing we've researched complex issues. It also helps protect us if they ever question why certain forms weren't filed.

0 coins

Has anyone else noticed how poorly written the IRS instructions are for these partnership audit forms? I read the same section of the website 5 times and still couldn't figure out what they were trying to say. It's like they deliberately make things confusing.

0 coins

The Form 8985/8986 instructions are particularly bad. I think part of the problem is these forms were created after the BBA partnership audit rules were implemented, but then they keep making changes. The instructions don't seem to keep up with all the nuances in the regulations.

0 coins

I completely agree with everyone saying the non-BBA partnership doesn't need to issue 8985/8986 forms in this situation. I dealt with this exact scenario last year and spent way too much time second-guessing myself because the IRS guidance is so confusing. What helped me was breaking it down step by step: 1) Your client is non-BBA, 2) They received favorable adjustments with no imputed underpayment, 3) Non-BBA partnerships generally don't have push-out obligations like BBA partnerships do. They just need to account for the adjustments on their own return and flow through any partner-level changes via amended K-1s if necessary. The key thing to remember is that the 8985/8986 reporting requirements were primarily designed for the BBA partnership audit regime. Since your client is outside that regime, they're not subject to those specific reporting obligations. Save yourself the stress - document your reasoning like Ryan suggested and move on!

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

This is exactly the kind of step-by-step breakdown I needed! As someone new to partnership tax issues, I've been overwhelmed by all the different forms and requirements. Your three-point analysis really helps clarify the situation. I'm curious though - you mentioned amended K-1s might be necessary. In what situations would a non-BBA partnership need to issue amended K-1s after receiving favorable adjustments on Form 8986? Is it only if the adjustments are significant enough to materially change the partners' tax positions?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,894 users helped today