Disregarded Entity Status for Foreign-Owned Delaware LLC Investing in US Stocks - Reporting Requirements?
Hi all, I'm a foreigner (EU resident) who owns a single-member LLC registered in Delaware that's currently classified as a disregarded entity for US federal tax purposes. My LLC mainly operates in software development and doesn't conduct any business activities within the United States. I'm thinking about having my LLC invest in some US stocks and bonds - nothing major, just some small stock positions to generate passive income. I have a couple questions about this: 1. Would these investment activities potentially affect my LLC's status as a disregarded entity? I'm particularly concerned since the LLC has foreign ownership. 2. I know that foreign-owned disregarded entities typically need to file Form 1120 and Form 5472. If I start making these US investments, will there be additional reporting requirements or any special considerations when filing these forms? Some extra context: - There's a tax treaty between the US and my EU country of residence - I have several other business interests outside the US - My LLC has an account with one of the major digital banks in the States Would really appreciate input from anyone familiar with this situation! If you can point me toward specific IRS guidelines or resources on this topic, that would be super helpful too. Thanks in advance!
19 comments


Mia Alvarez
Your LLC's disregarded entity status won't change just because you're investing in US stocks and bonds. That classification is based on your entity structure (single-member LLC) and your election choices, not on the types of investments you make. However, the reporting requirements get tricky for foreign-owned single-member LLCs. You're correct that you'll need Form 5472 and a pro-forma Form 1120, but with passive investment income, you'll also likely need to file Form 1042 and potentially Form 8833 to claim treaty benefits. The biggest concern here is that passive investment income (dividends, interest, etc.) is typically subject to withholding. While the standard withholding rate is 30%, your tax treaty may reduce this - but you need to properly document this with the correct forms. I'd also recommend documenting the separation between your software business activities and investment activities. Clear accounting records will be important if questions arise about effectively connected income versus passive investment income.
0 coins
Carter Holmes
•Thanks for the detailed info! I'm in a similar situation but wasn't aware of Form 1042. Does the foreign owner need to file a personal US tax return (1040NR) as well, or is the LLC filing enough? Also, would using an investment platform like Interactive Brokers vs a US bank account make any difference in terms of reporting?
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•The owner generally doesn't need to file Form 1040NR unless they have effectively connected income from US sources or are otherwise required to file a US personal return. The LLC filings (pro-forma 1120 and 5472) satisfy the entity reporting requirements, while Form 1042 addresses the withholding obligations. The choice of investment platform doesn't fundamentally change your reporting obligations, but it may affect how withholding is handled. Both Interactive Brokers and US banks will typically require a W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E to establish your tax status and treaty benefits. What matters more is keeping clean records of all transactions and ensuring you're properly documenting your claim to treaty benefits.
0 coins
Sophia Long
After dealing with this exact headache last year, I found using https://taxr.ai invaluable for sorting through the form requirements. My situation was almost identical - foreign-owned Delaware LLC with investments in US securities. The platform analyzed my situation and clarified exactly which forms were needed. Turns out I needed not just the 5472 and pro-forma 1120, but also had to file Form 8833 for treaty benefits on my dividend income. The system flagged that I was missing documentation for reduced withholding rates under my country's tax treaty. It also helped me understand the difference between effectively connected income vs passive investment income - critical distinction for foreign-owned LLCs. Saved me from potentially serious reporting errors.
0 coins
Angelica Smith
•How does taxr.ai handle the treaty provisions? I'm from Germany and our treaty has specific clauses about dividend withholding that confused my accountant. Can it really interpret treaty specifics correctly?
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
•Did you have to provide bank statements or other financial docs? My situation sounds similar but I'm concerned about sharing sensitive financial info with online services. How detailed did you need to get with your investment info?
0 coins
Sophia Long
•The system handles treaty provisions by analyzing the specific treaty between your country and the US. For Germany specifically, it correctly identified the reduced withholding rates for dividends (generally 15% instead of 30%) and walked through the documentation requirements to claim those benefits. It was more accurate than my previous accountant on those details. You do need to provide some financial information, but not full bank statements. It asks for summary information about income types and sources. I provided total dividend amounts and interest income, but didn't need to upload actual statements. You can be somewhat general about investment amounts while still getting accurate guidance on form requirements.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
Just wanted to update that I tried taxr.ai after reading about it here. It was actually really helpful for my situation! I'd been getting conflicting advice about whether my UAE-owned Delaware LLC needed to file Form 8621 for some mutual fund investments. The system confirmed I needed Form 5472 and pro-forma 1120 as expected, but also flagged that several of my investments were PFICs (Passive Foreign Investment Companies) which required additional reporting. None of the accountants I spoke with had caught this! It also clarified when I could claim treaty benefits for certain types of income. The documentation was detailed enough that my accountant could follow it directly for filing. Definitely worth checking out if you're in a similar situation.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
I went through similar headaches with my Sweden-owned Delaware LLC. After trying for WEEKS to reach the IRS for clarification on treaty provisions, I found https://claimyr.com and used their service to actually get through to a human at the IRS. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Instead of waiting on hold forever, they managed to get me connected with an IRS representative who specialized in international tax issues. The agent confirmed that my passive investments wouldn't change my disregarded entity status but warned me about proper reporting of dividends and interest income. They also flagged that I needed to ensure any US bank or broker had my correct W-8BEN-E on file to apply treaty rates automatically, otherwise I'd have to reclaim overwithheld amounts later.
0 coins
Lucas Bey
•How long did it take to actually get through to someone? I've been trying for months about my Singapore-US situation and literally can't get past the automated system. Did they connect you with someone who actually understood international tax issues?
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•This sounds too good to be true. The IRS international line is notoriously impossible to reach. Why would this service work when calling directly fails? Seems sketchy that they claim to get priority access somehow.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
•I got through to an actual IRS representative in about 27 minutes. The crazy part is I'd already spent hours across multiple days trying on my own without success. The person I spoke with definitely understood international issues - they specifically discussed the US-Sweden treaty provisions applicable to my situation. The service works because they use technology to navigate the IRS phone tree and hold systems. They're not claiming "priority access" - they're just using a system that continually redials and navigates the phone tree until it gets through, then connects you when a human answers. It's basically doing the frustrating part automatically instead of you wasting hours on hold. It's not some secret backdoor - just automation of the painful calling process.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
I need to apologize for my skepticism about Claimyr. After another failed attempt to reach the IRS yesterday (2+ hours on hold before being disconnected), I decided to try the service. It actually worked. Got connected to an IRS international tax specialist in about 35 minutes. The agent confirmed that my foreign-owned Delaware LLC's disregarded entity status wouldn't change with passive investments, but advised me on some reporting nuances I hadn't considered. The key takeaway: I needed to ensure any reportable transactions between my foreign self and the LLC (including capital contributions for investments) are properly documented on Form 5472. The agent also explained how the substantial presence test might impact my situation if I visit the US frequently. Definitely worth the service fee compared to the hours of frustration trying to call directly.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
Don't forget about state-level considerations! Your Delaware LLC may be federally disregarded, but Delaware still requires annual reports and franchise tax payments regardless of your investment activities. Also, depending on how much passive income your LLC generates from investments, you might trigger economic nexus in other states if the stocks/bonds are from companies based there. Some states have started to get aggressive about claiming tax jurisdiction based on investment income sourced to their state. Make sure you keep your registered agent in Delaware current too - if you miss service of process notices, you could face default judgments.
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
•Thanks for bringing up the state-level considerations! I hadn't thought about potential economic nexus in other states based on investment sources. Do you know if there's a general threshold for this? Like would a few thousand in dividend income from a California-based company trigger filing requirements there? And yes, I'm keeping my registered agent current in Delaware and paying the annual franchise tax. Just want to make sure I don't accidentally create tax obligations in multiple states.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•The thresholds vary by state, but most states have minimum amounts before economic nexus kicks in. For California specifically, the threshold is pretty high - typically $500,000 in sales into the state. Dividend income specifically is usually sourced to your place of residence rather than where the company is headquartered, so a few thousand in dividends from California companies likely wouldn't trigger filing requirements. The bigger concern would be if your software activities were somehow directed at customers in specific states. That's much more likely to trigger economic nexus than passive investment income. Just keep good records of where your income is coming from, and if the investment income grows substantially, it might be worth consulting with a state tax specialist.
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
One thing nobody's mentioned - watch out for FDII (Foreign-Derived Intangible Income) calculations if your software business starts generating significant income. The presence of investment assets on your books can affect the deemed tangible asset calculations that go into FDII deductions if you later elect to be treated as a corporation. Also, make sure your operating agreement clearly separates business activities from investment activities. This becomes important if the IRS ever questions whether your passive investments are actually part of your active business model.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•Can you explain more about FDII? I thought that only applied to C-corps, not disregarded entities. Would the foreign owner need to make an election to be treated as a corporation for this to apply?
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
•You're absolutely right - FDII only applies to C-corps. I was getting ahead of myself thinking about potential future elections. For a disregarded entity, the FDII provisions wouldn't currently apply unless the owner made an election to treat the LLC as a corporation for tax purposes. The main point about separating business and investment activities in the operating agreement still stands though. Even for a disregarded entity, clear documentation helps if there are ever questions about whether investment income should be treated as effectively connected income versus passive income, which affects withholding and reporting requirements. Thanks for catching that - don't want to confuse anyone about current vs potential future tax elections!
0 coins