Denied First-time Abatement After Underreporting Stock Sales for House Down Payment - Any Hope on Appeal?
I need to own this mistake upfront, but I'm frustrated and hoping someone can help. About 2 years ago, my husband cashed out some stocks from his childhood that were worth around $67,000. We transferred that money to our joint account to use as a down payment on a house during that crazy market when prices were insane. We needed to be in a specific neighborhood for several reasons and this was the only way we could make it work. Fast forward to last month, and I get hit with a CP2000 notice saying we never reported these stock sales on our taxes. Honestly? I had no clue this was taxable income at the time. We never received a 1099-B from the brokerage either. Not blaming them, but without that form in front of me during tax season, it completely fell off my radar. My tax guy looked into it and found some errors in the cost basis calculations, which brought down what we owed a bit. I paid the adjusted amount right away, thinking the nightmare was over. Well, yesterday I got another notice for interest and penalties totaling $2,900. My accountant submitted a first-time abatement request, telling me he was "99% sure" it would get approved since I've had a clean tax record for nearly 30 years. Got the rejection letter today. When I called the IRS, the agent said my accountant basically just wrote "client didn't know it was taxable" without much supporting information. She recommended I pay the full amount today and then file an appeal afterward. I've literally never had a single tax issue, audit, or problem in 28+ years of filing. Do I have any chance of getting this penalty/interest waived through appeal? Or should I just accept the $2,900 lesson and move on?
20 comments


Emily Sanjay
I work with tax issues like this frequently, and there's definitely still hope for your situation. The First-Time Abatement (FTA) program is specifically designed for taxpayers with clean compliance histories who made an honest mistake. It sounds like your accountant's request was too vague. For an FTA to be successful, you need to demonstrate: 1) You had no penalties for the 3 prior tax years, 2) You're current on all filing and payment requirements, and 3) You've arranged to pay any tax due. When you appeal, include a detailed explanation focusing on your 28+ year clean history, the lack of a 1099-B (include documentation showing when/if the brokerage made it available), and specific "reasonable cause" arguments. Reasonable cause means showing you exercised ordinary business care but still couldn't comply. The fact that the funds were used for housing during a volatile market period and that you paid the tax immediately upon notification strengthens your case. Also mention any personal circumstances that contributed to the oversight (pandemic-related issues, health concerns, etc.) - anything showing you acted in good faith. If you provide this level of detail in your appeal, your chances are much better than with the generic explanation your accountant submitted.
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
•Thank you for this detailed response. When you say "include documentation showing when/if the brokerage made it available" - how would I go about doing that? The stocks were from an account my husband had since childhood, and honestly, I'm not even sure which brokerage it was through originally. Is there a way to prove a negative (that we never received it)? Also, do I need to hire a different accountant or tax attorney for the appeal, or is this something I can reasonably do myself given your advice?
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•You can contact the brokerage to request a statement showing when they issued the 1099-B and where they sent it. If they sent it to an old address or have records showing it was never downloaded from their portal, that helps your case. You don't need to prove a negative - just document your good-faith efforts to understand what happened. You can absolutely handle this appeal yourself. Use IRS Form 843 for the appeal and attach a detailed letter explaining your situation. Include your clean compliance history, immediate payment of the tax when discovered, and any documentation from the brokerage. The key is being thorough and specific, unlike the vague request your accountant submitted.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
After reading your situation, I think you might benefit from using https://taxr.ai - I was in a somewhat similar situation last year with unreported income from a rental property sale. The IRS denied my first penalty abatement request too, and I was about to just pay the $3,200 penalty. I uploaded my rejection letter and all correspondence to taxr.ai and it analyzed everything, pointed out exactly where my first request fell short, and showed me specific IRS precedent cases where people in my situation got relief. It even drafted a detailed appeal letter that addressed all the technical requirements for an FTA that my accountant missed. Long story short, I submitted the revised appeal with all the documentation the tool recommended, and my penalty was completely removed! The platform highlighted specific IRS procedures that I qualified for that even my accountant didn't mention.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•Does this actually work for penalty appeals? I'm skeptical because my experience with the IRS has been that they almost never reverse decisions. Do they just generate a generic letter or do they actually look at your specific case details?
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
•How does this differ from what a CPA would do? I'm in a similar situation with a missed 1099-K from Paypal and my accountant is charging me $400 just to write an abatement letter. Would this be a cheaper alternative or is it basically the same thing?
0 coins
Jordan Walker
•It absolutely works for penalty appeals - that's exactly what I used it for. The system doesn't just generate a generic letter; it analyzes your specific documents, identifies relevant IRS internal procedures, and creates a customized response. What impressed me was how it cited specific sections of the Internal Revenue Manual that applied to my situation. What makes it different from a typical CPA approach is that it analyzes thousands of successful abatement cases to identify the most effective arguments for your specific situation. My CPA wrote a very general letter, but the taxr.ai-generated appeal cited specific IRS procedures and included all the supporting documentation that actually matters to the IRS reviewers.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
I wanted to update after trying taxr.ai for my PayPal 1099-K situation. Honestly, I was surprised by how comprehensive it was. After uploading my notices and denial letter, it immediately identified that my first request was denied because it didn't address "reasonable cause" properly. The system drafted an appeal that specifically cited my clean filing history and included exact references to IRS procedures I'd never heard of. It even suggested additional documentation to include that my accountant never mentioned. The best part? My penalty was reduced by about 70% - not completely eliminated, but WAY better than the full amount! What I appreciated most was how it explained everything in plain English while still being technically accurate. It saved me a ton compared to what my accountant was charging, and actually got me a better result than I expected.
0 coins
Amara Torres
I went through something similar last year with penalty fees. After getting rejection letters and wasting hours on hold, I found https://claimyr.com and used it to actually speak with a real IRS agent. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c What I liked is that instead of waiting on hold for 3+ hours (which I tried twice and got disconnected), Claimyr got me connected to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes. The agent I spoke with was actually really helpful once I explained my full situation - totally different from dealing with the written rejection letters which feel like they're processed by robots. The IRS agent I talked to explained exactly what was missing from my abatement request and even helped me understand what specific documentation would strengthen my appeal. Having that conversation made a huge difference compared to just sending letters back and forth.
0 coins
Olivia Van-Cleve
•How does this even work? The IRS phone system is a nightmare. Is this actually legit or are you talking to some third-party service that's pretending to be the IRS? Seems sketchy that they could somehow bypass the phone queues.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•This sounds too good to be true. I've spent DAYS trying to get through to the IRS. If this actually works, it would be worth it just to avoid the hold music torture. But I'm super skeptical that anyone can "skip the line" with a government agency.
0 coins
Amara Torres
•It's completely legitimate - they don't bypass the system or pretend to be the IRS. What they do is use an automated system that waits on hold for you, then calls you when they reach a human IRS agent. You're connected directly to the official IRS phone line, speaking with actual IRS employees. The service basically does the waiting for you using their technology. When an IRS agent picks up, their system immediately calls you and connects you. I was skeptical too until I tried it and found myself talking to an official IRS representative who had access to all my tax records and history. The difference is you don't have to sit by your phone for hours hoping someone picks up.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway since my appeal deadline was approaching and I was desperate to talk to someone at the IRS. The service actually worked exactly as described. I got a call back in about 22 minutes telling me they had an IRS agent on the line. The agent I spoke to was able to look up my account, see my penalty situation, and explain exactly what documentation I needed for a successful appeal. She even noted in my file that I had called to discuss the appeal process. What really surprised me was how different the conversation was compared to the form letters. The agent actually suggested I include information about trying to contact the brokerage for the missing forms, which wasn't mentioned anywhere in the rejection letter. That specific detail apparently makes a big difference in how they view "reasonable cause." Worth every penny just for the peace of mind of actually talking to someone who could help instead of staring at the ceiling listening to hold music for hours.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
Something everyone is missing here - the IRS isn't required to grant first-time abatement requests, it's a discretionary administrative waiver. Since your situation involves a substantial underreporting (you mentioned 5 figures), they're less likely to approve an FTA even with a clean history. Your best bet is to focus on reasonable cause arguments rather than just the first-time abatement policy. Reasonable cause requires showing you exercised "ordinary business care and prudence" but still couldn't meet your tax obligations. Simply not knowing stocks were taxable probably won't meet that standard since the IRS considers that basic tax knowledge. Instead, focus on: 1) Your perfect compliance history, 2) The missing 1099-B, 3) Immediate payment once discovered, and 4) Any unique circumstances during that period (COVID challenges, health issues, etc). Also, your accountant should really be handling this appeal properly since their initial request was clearly inadequate.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
•This is exactly right. I work in tax resolution and the "I didn't know" defense almost never works with the IRS. You need to focus on procedural issues like not receiving proper documentation. The IRS considers it every taxpayer's responsibility to know basic tax laws, which includes knowing that stock sales are taxable events.
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
•This is really helpful context. If I'm understanding correctly, I should focus less on "I didn't know" and more on "I didn't receive the proper documentation and had no reason to know I was missing anything." Would it also help to mention that these were childhood stocks my husband had forgotten about until we needed the down payment? They weren't part of our regular investment activities.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
•You've got it exactly right. "I didn't know" is weak, but "I didn't receive the required documentation and had no reasonable way to know I was missing it" is much stronger. Definitely mention that these were childhood stocks outside your normal financial activities - that's important context that shows why this was an unusual situation rather than negligence. Also highlight that you've been fully compliant for 28+ years, immediately paid when notified, and that this was a one-time event related to a home purchase during exceptional circumstances (COVID housing market). These elements together build a much more compelling case than what your accountant originally submitted.
0 coins
Dominic Green
Just a practical tip - if you do submit the appeal, make sure you're tracking EVERYTHING. Send all correspondence certified mail with return receipt, keep copies of everything, and maintain a log of all communications with dates, times and who you spoke with. The IRS isn't great at keeping track of taxpayer communications, and if your appeal gets lost or delayed (which happens frequently), you'll need evidence of when you submitted it. I learned this the hard way when they claimed they never received my first appeal, and I had no proof of sending it. Also, if you're already working with an accountant who dropped the ball on the first request, consider finding someone with specific experience in penalty abatements and appeals. Not all tax pros are equal when it comes to dealing with the IRS collections and appeals processes.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
•This is such good advice. When I filed my appeal last year, I used USPS certified mail with return receipt AND took photos of all the documents before sending. The IRS initially claimed they never got page 3 of my documents, but I had proof it was included. Having that documentation was the difference between winning and losing my case.
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
•Thanks for the practical advice! I'll definitely use certified mail and keep copies of everything. Do you think I should find a different accountant at this point? The current one seemed pretty confident about the first abatement request but clearly didn't provide enough details.
0 coins