< Back to IRS

Nia Harris

Can I write off a camera lens as a W2 employee creating social media content?

So I'm trying to figure out if I can deduct the cost of a camera lens on my taxes and keep getting mixed information. I work part-time for a vacation rental company creating their social media content. Every shift I'm using my personal camera and a couple of lenses to shoot photos and videos for their properties. I've been eyeing this new lens that would seriously upgrade the quality of my work, but it's definitely not cheap - like painfully expensive lol. Since I use my camera equipment exclusively for this job (I'm a W2 employee, not freelance), I'm wondering if this could be considered a tax deduction as a business expense? I know basically nothing about tax rules and deductions honestly. I just want to figure this out before dropping a ton of money on new equipment. If anyone has experience with this specific situation I'd really appreciate the insight! Is this something I can write off or am I out of luck because I'm a W2 employee? Thanks in advance for any help!

GalaxyGazer

•

Unfortunately, the rules changed significantly after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. As a W2 employee, you can no longer deduct unreimbursed employee business expenses on your federal tax return. Before 2018, you could deduct these expenses as itemized deductions on Schedule A if they exceeded 2% of your adjusted gross income. Your best option would be to see if your employer would purchase the lens for you or reimburse you for it. If they reimburse you through an "accountable plan," you wouldn't have to report the reimbursement as income. Otherwise, if you purchase it yourself, you can't deduct it on your federal return. A few states still allow these deductions on state tax returns (like California), so depending on where you live, you might get some tax benefit at the state level, but nothing federally.

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

This is so frustrating. I'm a professional photographer with tons of equipment I buy for work but since I'm W2 I can't deduct any of it. What if the OP started a small side business doing photography outside their main job and used the same equipment? Would it be deductible then?

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

If the OP started a legitimate side business providing photography services, then yes, they could potentially deduct business expenses (including the camera lens) on Schedule C. The key is that it must be a genuine business with profit motive, not just a hobby. The IRS looks at factors like whether you operate in a businesslike manner, your expertise, time and effort invested, expectation of appreciation in value, success in similar activities, history of income/losses, and your financial status. Using the equipment for both W2 work and your self-employment is fine, but you'd need to allocate the expense based on percentage of business vs. personal use. Just make sure to document everything well - receipts, business purpose, and how you determined the business-use percentage.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

I was in literally the same situation last year! After struggling with my taxes, I found this AI tool called taxr.ai that analyzed my tax situation and told me exactly what I could write off. It confirmed what the other commenter said - W2 employees can't deduct unreimbursed business expenses anymore at the federal level. But! The tool helped me realize I could start a legitimate side business with my photography equipment and deduct the expenses that way. I just had to make sure I was actually trying to make a profit and tracking everything properly. Check out https://taxr.ai - it asks specific questions about your situation and gives personalized advice. Way clearer than trying to interpret IRS gibberish on my own!

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

How exactly does that work though? Can you just decide to start a "business" and then write off all your camera stuff? Seems like that would be a red flag for an audit.

0 coins

Does it actually work for photographers specifically? I have so many questions about depreciation vs. Section 179 and when I can deduct what percentage. Does it handle all that or is it more general?

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

You absolutely cannot just "decide" to call your hobby a business to get tax deductions. The IRS has specific criteria for what constitutes a business versus a hobby. You need legitimate profit motive, business records, separate accounts, and you need to operate like a real business. It's not about gaming the system - it's about properly classifying what you're doing. Yes, the tool does handle photographer-specific scenarios! It walks through equipment depreciation options, helps you understand Section 179 limitations, and explains when immediate expensing makes more sense than depreciation. It also helps with tracking mixed-use equipment and calculating correct business-use percentages. It's pretty comprehensive for creative professionals.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up and say I tried that taxr.ai site and it was super helpful for my photography business questions! I was confusing myself trying to figure out if I should depreciate my new camera gear or use Section 179 to expense it all at once. The tool walked me through a decision tree that considered my income projections and other deductions. It even pointed out that I need to be using my equipment for business more than 50% of the time to qualify for Section 179, which I didn't realize. Definitely saved me from making some mistakes on my taxes. Thanks for recommending it!

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

If you're having trouble getting straight answers about this tax situation, you might need to talk directly to an IRS agent. I spent WEEKS trying to get through on the phone about a similar business expense question. Finally found this service called Claimyr that got me connected to an actual IRS representative in about 15 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours. I used https://claimyr.com and they have a demo video at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c showing how it works. The IRS agent I talked to confirmed everything about the W2 employee deduction limitations but also explained some exceptions that might apply in certain states. Saved me so much time and frustration compared to reading contradictory info online.

0 coins

Wait how does this actually work? They somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? That sounds impossible with how backed up the IRS is...

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Sounds like a scam. Nobody can "skip the line" with a government agency. They probably just connect you to some random person pretending to be IRS.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

It's not about "skipping the line" - they use a system that continuously redials and navigates the IRS phone tree until they get through, then they connect you. Think of it like having a robot assistant doing the waiting for you. When they get a human, you get a call to connect with the actual IRS agent. It's completely legitimate. They don't connect you to "some random person" - you're speaking with actual IRS employees. The service just handles the frustrating part of getting through the phone system. Once connected, you can verify you're speaking with a real IRS agent, and everything is handled directly between you and the IRS from that point forward.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I had a complicated question about business expenses that Google couldn't answer clearly. The service actually worked exactly as described - they called me back when they reached an IRS agent, and I was connected to a legitimate IRS employee who verified my identity and everything. The agent explained that while W2 employees can't deduct unreimbursed expenses anymore, I could potentially renegotiate with my employer for either 1) them to purchase equipment directly, or 2) set up an accountable reimbursement plan. Saved me hours of frustration and got me definitive answers. Sometimes it's worth admitting when you're wrong!

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Have you considered asking your employer to purchase the lens directly? Since you're using it exclusively for their business, you could make a business case for why it would improve your content quality and benefit their marketing. Many companies have equipment budgets for exactly this purpose. If they won't buy it outright, another option is to ask for a raise or bonus specifically to cover the cost. While that would be taxable income, it's better than nothing and acknowledges your investment in professional equipment.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

I honestly didn't even think of that approach! That's actually a really smart idea. My boss is pretty reasonable and has mentioned wanting to upgrade our visual content. I could probably put together some example shots showing what we could do with the new lens vs what we're limited to now. Do you think I should just ask directly or put together some kind of formal proposal? I've never asked for company equipment before.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

I'd suggest a simple but professional approach. Create a one-page document that includes: 1) The specific lens you want with its cost, 2) 3-4 bullet points on how it will improve the content you create, 3) A couple examples/mockups showing the difference if possible, and 4) A brief mention that it would be exclusively used for company work. Present it as you being proactive about improving your work output rather than just asking for expensive gear. If they decline to purchase it outright, that's when you can suggest the alternative of a performance bonus or equipment stipend. Many companies actually prefer owning their equipment for accounting and asset management reasons.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Everyone's talking about tax deductions, but what about depreciation? Even if you can't deduct it as a W2 employee, if you do start a side hustle you should look into depreciating expensive equipment over time vs. taking an immediate Section 179 deduction. Sometimes spreading it out makes more sense tax-wise depending on your income situation.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

You're totally right about considering depreciation vs. Section 179. For camera equipment specifically, it's usually 5-year property under MACRS depreciation. If your income fluctuates year to year, taking the bigger Section 179 deduction upfront might not be optimal if you'll be in a higher tax bracket in future years.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

This is such a common frustration for creative professionals! I went through the exact same thing when I was doing marketing photography as a W2 employee. The tax law changes really hurt employees who invest in their own equipment. One thing that worked for me was approaching my manager with a "business case" presentation. I showed specific examples of how the new lens would improve our content quality - like being able to shoot in lower light conditions for evening property shots, or getting sharper detail shots of amenities. I also researched what our competitors were doing visually and showed how better equipment could help us stand out. My company ended up creating an "equipment stipend" as part of my compensation package. It wasn't a full reimbursement, but it covered about 60% of the lens cost and they structured it so it wasn't taxable income for me. Worth asking if your company has any flexibility with equipment allowances or if they'd consider it a business investment rather than an employee expense. If that doesn't work, definitely look into the legitimate side business route that others mentioned. Just make sure you're actually marketing services and trying to make a profit - the IRS is pretty strict about hobby vs. business classification.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,132 users helped today