Can I hire myself as a contractor for my S Corp: tax implications?
Okay so I've been looking into this for awhile - I have an S Corp that I started last year when I got some good contracting gigs in IT consulting. Been running everything through it, but now I'm wondering about structuring how I get paid. If I hired myself as a contractor (instead of being on payroll), would that work out tax-wise? Specifically, could my S Corp take the expense, and then I'd just pick up that income on my 1040 as self-employment income? Would I be subject to self-employment tax that way? I'm trying to figure out the most efficient way to handle this for 2025 taxes. Any insight would be super helpful since I'm still figuring out this whole business owner thing!
22 comments


Samantha Johnson
This isn't going to work the way you're thinking. As the owner of an S Corporation, the IRS expects you to be paid a "reasonable salary" as an employee of the corporation. The S Corp should withhold payroll taxes, issue you a W-2, and make the appropriate payroll tax deposits. If you try to pay yourself as a 1099 contractor instead, you're creating what's known as a "substance over form" issue. The IRS would likely reclassify those payments as wages subject to employment taxes anyway. Plus, you'd potentially be paying more in self-employment taxes (15.3%) than you would through proper payroll (where the company pays half). The proper structure is: S Corp pays you a reasonable W-2 salary, and then any additional profits can be distributed as non-wage distributions (not subject to SE tax).
0 coins
Nick Kravitz
•So does this mean you can NEVER do contract work for your own S Corp? What if i have a separate side business as a sole prop and want to bill some project work to my S Corp? Is that always disallowed?
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
•You generally cannot be both an employee and independent contractor to the same business for the same type of work. The IRS looks at the relationship between the worker and the business, not how you label it. If you have a genuinely separate business that provides different services than what your S Corp does, it might be possible in limited circumstances. But even then, the IRS would scrutinize this arrangement closely. They're specifically looking for situations where people try to avoid payroll taxes by mischaracterizing the employment relationship.
0 coins
Hannah White
After getting audited last year over this exact issue, I found that using taxr.ai saved me a ton of headache trying to sort out S Corp compliance. I had structured my payments all wrong (tried the contractor route too) and ended up with penalties. I uploaded my corp docs to https://taxr.ai and got a detailed analysis on proper owner compensation requirements for S Corps. It specifically highlighted where I was making mistakes with self-payments and what the reasonable salary requirements were for my industry.
0 coins
Michael Green
•How does this work exactly? Can it tell you what a "reasonable" salary should be? Because thats the part I struggle with the most for my s-corp.
0 coins
Mateo Silva
•Seems interesting but did it actually help with the audit itself or just for planning going forward? I'm dealing with some questionable advice I got from my previous accountant.
0 coins
Hannah White
•It actually analyzes financial data for your specific industry and provides customized salary recommendations based on your role and responsibilities. The report shows comparable salary ranges which is exactly what the IRS looks for when determining if your compensation is "reasonable." The service helped me during my audit by providing documentation that supported my amended filings. I was able to show the IRS agent that I was making good-faith efforts to correct my previous mistakes, which definitely helped reduce some of the penalties they were considering.
0 coins
Michael Green
I wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after asking about it earlier. I uploaded my S Corp's profit and loss statements and description of my duties, and the report I got back was eye-opening. Turns out I was massively underpaying myself compared to industry standards, which is a huge red flag for the IRS. The report showed exactly what percentage of profits should be allocated to my salary based on my actual work functions and industry benchmarks. It saved me from potentially making the same mistake the original poster was considering. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to navigate S Corp compensation issues.
0 coins
Victoria Jones
I've been in your shoes dealing with S Corp compliance and trying to figure out the proper way to pay yourself. After 3 days of trying to get through to the IRS for clarification (kept getting disconnected), I finally used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. When I finally got connected, the agent confirmed what others have said - you absolutely cannot pay yourself as a contractor when you're an officer of your S Corp. They actually have specific audit triggers that look for this exact situation.
0 coins
Cameron Black
•Is this legit? How does it actually get you through to the IRS when nobody else can get through?
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
•Yeah right, sounds like snake oil to me. I've tried everything to get through to the IRS and nothing works. How could this possibly be different? And even if you do get through, is the advice from a random IRS phone person even reliable for this kind of specialized business question?
0 coins
Victoria Jones
•It basically uses an automated system to dial repeatedly and navigate the phone tree until it gets a spot in line, then it calls you to connect. It's not magic - just automated persistence in dealing with their system. When you consider the time value of making those calls yourself, it's a no-brainer. The IRS representatives are absolutely qualified to answer these kinds of questions. The person I spoke with was from their business tax department and specifically dealt with S Corporation compliance issues. She gave me crystal clear guidance backed by specific IRS publications that I could reference.
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
I need to apologize for my skepticism about Claimyr. After my frustrated comment, I decided to try it anyway out of desperation. Got connected to an IRS agent in about 90 minutes instead of the days I was spending trying on my own. The agent confirmed everything about S Corp compensation requirements and actually guided me through the proper correction process for my previous misclassified payments. She specifically warned me that treating yourself as a contractor for your own S Corp is a major red flag in their system and practically guarantees an audit. Saved myself a lot of trouble and probably thousands in penalties.
0 coins
Isaiah Thompson
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that when you own more than 2% of an S Corp, you're already considered self-employed for certain purposes (like health insurance). But that DOESN'T mean you can pay yourself as a contractor. You still need to be on payroll as an employee. The whole benefit of an S Corp is avoiding SE tax on a portion of your income - by paying a reasonable salary (subject to employment taxes) and taking the rest as distributions (not subject to SE tax). If you just pay yourself as a contractor, you're nullifying the main tax advantage!
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
•What counts as "reasonable"? Like if my business makes $300k, can I pay myself $50k salary and take $250k in distributions?
0 coins
Isaiah Thompson
•There's no exact formula because "reasonable" depends on your industry, skills, responsibilities, time commitment, and what similar positions would pay in your market. A $50k salary against $300k in profits would likely be considered too low in most circumstances. The IRS specifically looks for S Corps paying artificially low salaries to avoid payroll taxes. A common rule of thumb is that your salary should be at least 30-40% of your profits, but that varies widely. Some tax pros suggest looking at Bureau of Labor Statistics data for comparable positions in your industry and geographic area.
0 coins
Alexander Evans
I did exactly what you're asking about last year and ended up getting a notice from the IRS. Had to refile and pay penalties plus interest. Even my accountant missed this! S-corp owners HAVE to be W-2 employees if they're performing services. end of story.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
•How much were the penalties? I think I might have messed this up last year but haven't heard anything from the IRS yet.
0 coins
Alexander Evans
•I had to pay about $3700 in penalties plus the additional employer-side payroll taxes I should have been paying all along. Plus I had to amend my personal return since I had incorrectly filed Schedule C income. The bigger hassle honestly was correcting all the paperwork and getting back in compliance. The IRS actually told me I was lucky they caught it early - apparently the penalties get much worse if they determine you're intentionally trying to avoid payroll taxes. They were reasonable since I could show it was a legitimate misunderstanding.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Just wanted to chime in as someone who made this exact mistake when I first started my S Corp. I thought I was being clever by avoiding payroll taxes, but it backfired spectacularly. The IRS has very specific rules about S Corp shareholder-employees - if you're providing services to the corporation (which you clearly are as an IT consultant), you MUST be treated as an employee with proper W-2 wages. The "reasonable salary" requirement exists specifically to prevent what you're thinking about doing. The whole point of an S Corp is that you pay employment taxes on your salary, then take additional profits as distributions (which aren't subject to SE tax). If you could just pay yourself as a contractor, everyone would do it to avoid payroll taxes entirely. My advice: set up proper payroll for yourself immediately. Yes, it's more paperwork and you'll pay both sides of payroll taxes on your salary portion, but it's the only compliant way to do this. The tax savings on your distributions will more than make up for it, and you'll avoid the audit risk and penalties that come with trying to game the system.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•This is really helpful advice, thank you! I'm curious - when you say "reasonable salary," did you find any good resources for determining what that should be for IT consulting work? I'm worried about setting it too low and getting flagged, but also don't want to pay more payroll taxes than necessary. Did you use any specific benchmarking tools or just go with what similar W-2 positions pay in your area?
0 coins
Yara Abboud
•@f95cd05f9a9d Great question! When I went through this, I ended up using a combination of approaches. First, I looked at Bureau of Labor Statistics data for IT consultants in my metro area - that gave me a baseline range. Then I researched what similar W-2 positions were paying on sites like Glassdoor and Indeed. The key thing I learned is that your salary should reflect what you'd reasonably pay someone else to do the same work you're doing for the S Corp. So if you're doing high-level consulting work that would command $80-100k as a W-2 employee, you can't justify paying yourself $40k just to minimize payroll taxes. I ended up settling on about 60% of my total S Corp income as salary, with the rest as distributions. That felt defensible based on the market data I gathered. My CPA said that ratio was reasonable for someone who's essentially the sole revenue generator for their consulting practice. The IRS publication 15-A has some guidance on this, and definitely document your reasoning in case you ever need to justify it later!
0 coins