IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Gavin King

•

Has anyone used TurboTax for their Airbnb? I'm trying to figure out if I should just do it myself instead of paying these crazy accountant fees. My situation is pretty simple - just one apartment that I rent out on weekends, and I only provide basic cleaning between guests.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

I used TurboTax for my Airbnb last year. It asks you questions about what services you provide to guests, then recommends Schedule C or E based on your answers. For a simple setup like yours, it would probably work fine. Since you only provide basic cleaning between guests, TurboTax will likely guide you to Schedule E. Just be prepared to enter info about your property's original purchase price, improvements, etc. for the depreciation calculations.

0 coins

I've been dealing with a similar situation and wanted to share what I learned after doing a deep dive into this. The IRS Publication 527 (Residential Rental Property) actually has specific guidance on this exact issue. The key test is whether you provide "substantial services" to your guests. Things like daily maid service, regular meal service, or concierge-type services would put you on Schedule C. But if you're just providing the typical Airbnb setup (cleaning between guests, basic amenities, maybe some snacks), that's Schedule E territory. One thing that really helped me understand this was looking at the self-employment tax angle. Schedule C income gets hit with the 15.3% SE tax, while Schedule E doesn't. So if your accountant correctly moved you from C to E, you're actually saving money on taxes even though the prep fee went up. The fee increase does sting though - maybe ask your accountant for a breakdown of what additional work Schedule E requires so you understand where that extra cost is coming from?

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

This is really helpful! I hadn't thought about the self-employment tax angle at all. So if I'm understanding correctly, even though my accountant's fee went up dramatically, I might actually be saving money overall by not having to pay that extra 15.3% SE tax on Schedule E? That would definitely make me feel better about the situation. I'm going to ask them for that breakdown you suggested - I think part of my frustration was just not understanding why the fee jumped so much without any explanation. Thanks for mentioning Publication 527 too, I'll definitely check that out to better understand the rules myself.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Has anyone used TurboTax to enter multiple 1099-NECs from the same company? Does it flag this as an issue or let you enter them normally? I'm in the same boat as OP but worried the software will think I'm entering a duplicate by mistake.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

I used TurboTax last year when I had three 1099-NECs from related companies. It handles it just fine! When you enter a new 1099-NEC, it asks for the EIN (the TIN) of the payer, so it recognizes they're different forms even if the company names are similar. No issues at all, just enter them one after another.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

I had a very similar situation last year with multiple 1099-NECs from what appeared to be the same company. After some research, I discovered that many businesses operate through different legal entities or subsidiaries for various reasons - tax optimization, liability protection, or different service lines. The key thing to remember is that each 1099-NEC with a different TIN represents a separate legal entity, even if they share the same business name. You absolutely should report both forms exactly as they were issued to you. The IRS matches your tax return against the 1099s they receive, so everything needs to align perfectly. A few things to double-check on your forms: - Verify your SSN is correct on both forms - Make sure your name and address match exactly - Look at Box 4 to see if any federal income tax was withheld on either form For your Schedule C, you'll report the combined income from both forms as part of your total self-employment income. Keep good records showing the breakdown by entity in case you ever need to provide documentation to the IRS. This is actually quite common in the freelance world, so don't stress too much about it. Just make sure you're reporting everything accurately!

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

This is really helpful! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now where I got two 1099-NECs from what I thought was one client. Your point about checking Box 4 for withholdings is something I hadn't thought of - I'll definitely verify that. Quick question though - when you say "keep good records showing the breakdown by entity," what exactly do you recommend keeping? Just copies of the 1099s themselves, or should I also document which projects/invoices correspond to each entity? I want to make sure I'm prepared if the IRS ever asks questions about why the same company name appears twice.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

I went through this exact same confusion last year! TurboTax generated vouchers for me totaling over $3,000, but when I actually calculated what I needed based on the safe harbor rules, it was only about $800. The key thing to understand is that those vouchers are just TurboTax's conservative estimate - they're not official IRS requirements. The software tends to overestimate because it's trying to make sure you don't get hit with penalties, but it often doesn't properly account for your existing withholding situation. Since you mentioned your additional tax will likely be around $2,500, I'd suggest calculating what you actually need to pay based on the safe harbor rules others mentioned. If you already have a W-2 job with withholding, you might not need to make estimated payments at all, or at least much smaller ones than what TurboTax suggested. I ended up getting a huge refund because I followed TurboTax's voucher amounts blindly. This year I'm being much more strategic about it.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the same situation! I'm curious - when you calculated your actual safe harbor requirement, did you use the 100% of prior year tax rule or the 90% of current year rule? And how did you factor in your existing W-2 withholding? I'm trying to figure out the best approach since I also have regular withholding from my day job that might already cover most of what I need.

0 coins

I used the 100% of prior year tax rule since it was the most straightforward for me to calculate. For the W-2 withholding part, I looked at my last paystub from the previous year to see how much total federal tax was withheld, then estimated what would be withheld for the current year based on my expected salary. The calculation was basically: (Prior year total tax) - (Expected current year W-2 withholding) = Amount I need to cover with estimated payments. In my case, my W-2 withholding was already covering about 85% of my prior year tax liability, so I only needed to make up the difference with quarterly payments. That's why the actual amount was so much lower than what TurboTax suggested - the software didn't properly account for how much I was already having withheld from my regular job.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective as someone who's been through the estimated payment confusion multiple times - the 1040-ES vouchers are essentially TurboTax's "worst case scenario" calculation to make sure you don't get penalized. Here's what I wish someone had told me when I first encountered this: Start by figuring out if you even need to make estimated payments at all. If you have a regular W-2 job and your withholding from that job covers at least 90% of this year's expected tax liability (or 100% of last year's), you might not need the quarterly payments. For your situation with an estimated $2,500 in additional tax, check your current withholding rate from your main job. You might find that increasing your W-4 withholding slightly is much simpler than dealing with quarterly vouchers. Also, keep in mind that the IRS safe harbor rules are designed to be flexible. You don't have to pay exactly $1,150 per quarter - you just need to make sure you're meeting the minimum requirements to avoid penalties. Many people successfully pay unequal amounts throughout the year based on when they actually earn the extra income.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I needed to hear! I think I've been overthinking this whole thing. You're right that I should start by checking if I even need estimated payments at all. I do have a W-2 job, so I'll look at my current withholding situation first. The idea of just adjusting my W-4 instead of dealing with quarterly payments sounds much more manageable. Thanks for breaking it down in such a straightforward way - it's reassuring to know the safe harbor rules are designed to be flexible rather than the rigid system I was imagining.

0 coins

Based on the discussion here, it seems like there's a lot of nuance to this decision. I'm a tax preparer and I've seen several clients in similar situations. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the audit risk factor - the IRS does flag Schedule C gambling businesses more frequently for examination. That said, if you have the documentation and can demonstrate all 9 factors of the business test, it's absolutely legitimate. The key is being able to prove your profit motive and systematic approach. I'd suggest keeping a detailed log not just of your wins/losses, but also your decision-making process, strategy adjustments, and time spent on research/analysis. Also worth noting: if you do get audited and they reclassify it as a hobby, you'd owe back taxes plus penalties and interest on the self-employment tax you didn't pay. So make sure you're confident in your position before filing as a business. A consultation with a CPA who specializes in this area would be money well spent.

0 coins

Mason Stone

•

This is exactly the kind of professional perspective I was hoping to find! The audit risk factor is definitely something I need to weigh carefully. You mentioned keeping a log of decision-making process and strategy adjustments - could you elaborate on what that might look like? I already track my wins/losses meticulously, but I'm not sure how to document my "systematic approach" in a way that would satisfy an IRS examiner. Also, do you have any rough estimate of how much more likely a Schedule C gambling return is to be audited compared to reporting it as hobby income?

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

Great question! For documenting your systematic approach, I recommend keeping a business journal that includes things like: daily/weekly strategy reviews, notes on why you chose specific games or betting opportunities, records of bankroll management decisions, analysis of your performance metrics, and documentation of any training or skill development activities. Think of it like a trading journal that day traders keep. You should also document your business planning - set annual profit goals, track your progress against those goals, and note any adjustments to your approach based on results. Keep records of any professional development (books, courses, coaching) and networking with other professional gamblers. As for audit rates, I don't have exact statistics, but anecdotally I'd say Schedule C gambling returns get flagged maybe 3-4 times more often than typical hobby gambling returns. The IRS has gotten better at identifying these through data matching and algorithmic screening. However, if your documentation is solid and your approach truly is businesslike, an audit isn't necessarily something to fear - it's just expensive and time-consuming to defend your position. The key is making sure you can tell a coherent story about why this is a business, not just a profitable hobby.

0 coins

This is a fascinating discussion! I've been following professional poker for years as a hobby, and the tax implications have always intrigued me. One thing I'm curious about - for those who have successfully filed as businesses, how do you handle the psychological/emotional aspect that the IRS sometimes considers? I've read that they look at whether you derive personal pleasure from the activity as a factor in the business vs. hobby determination. It seems like with gambling, there's always going to be some element of enjoyment involved, even if you're approaching it systematically. How do you document that your primary motive is profit rather than recreation? Do you need to somehow prove you don't enjoy what you're doing, or is it more about demonstrating that profit is the dominant motive despite any incidental enjoyment? Also, has anyone dealt with the question of how "games of chance" vs "games of skill" affects the business classification? I imagine poker has a stronger case than something like slot machines, but I'm wondering if the IRS makes those distinctions when evaluating these cases.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

As someone who just passed my EA exams last month, I wanted to add my recent experience to this great discussion! The timeline can definitely be compressed if you're motivated - I completed all three parts in just 3 months while working full-time at a tax prep firm. What really helped me was creating a structured study schedule and sticking to it religiously. I studied 2 hours every morning before work (5:30-7:30 AM) and 1-2 hours in the evenings. Weekends were longer sessions, usually 4-5 hours each day. The key was treating it like a part-time job - non-negotiable time blocks. For study materials, I used a combination of Gleim and the IRS's own publications. The IRS Enrolled Agent Study Guide is free and incredibly comprehensive. Many people overlook it, but it's written by the same organization that creates the exams, so the content alignment is perfect. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: don't underestimate the continuing education requirements after you pass. You need 72 hours every 3 years, with specific requirements for ethics credits. Factor that ongoing commitment into your decision, though it's absolutely manageable and keeps you current on tax law changes. The job market feedback here is spot-on. I already have three firms interested in hiring me specifically because of the EA credential, and I haven't even received my enrollment card yet! The specialized nature of the EA really does set you apart in the tax field. My advice: if you're serious about tax work as your career focus, don't hesitate on the EA. The ROI is fantastic and much faster than pursuing a full CPA if tax is your primary interest.

0 coins

Wow, completing all three EA exams in just 3 months while working full-time is incredibly impressive! Your study schedule sounds intense but clearly effective. The 5:30 AM start time shows real dedication - I'm definitely not a morning person, but maybe I need to reconsider my approach. Thanks for mentioning the free IRS Enrolled Agent Study Guide! I had no idea that existed and have been looking at expensive prep courses. It makes total sense that materials from the organization creating the exams would be well-aligned with the content. The point about continuing education is really important and something I hadn't fully considered. 72 hours over 3 years actually sounds reasonable when you break it down, and staying current with tax law changes would be valuable regardless. It's encouraging to hear you already have job interest even before getting your enrollment card. That really speaks to how much demand there is for EAs right now. Your success story is definitely motivating me to move forward with this path rather than continuing to overthink the decision. One quick question - when you used both Gleim and the IRS materials, did you find any significant gaps between them, or did they complement each other well? I'm trying to figure out if I should invest in a commercial prep course or if the free IRS materials might be sufficient given my background in tax prep.

0 coins

I've been following this discussion with great interest as someone who's been in tax preparation for about 4 years and considering the same decision. The collective experiences shared here are incredibly valuable and much more helpful than the generic advice I've found elsewhere online. What strikes me most is the consistent theme of EA being the right choice for tax-focused careers, with real salary progressions that show tangible ROI. Seeing people go from the $50-60K range to $80-95K within a few years of getting their EA is compelling evidence that this credential truly opens doors. The timeline discussions have been particularly helpful - it seems like 3-6 months is realistic depending on your study approach and existing knowledge base. I'm encouraged by those who managed it while working full-time, since that's exactly my situation. I'm also impressed by the point about unlimited practice rights across all states. As someone who might be interested in remote work eventually, that's a huge advantage over state-specific licensing requirements. Based on everything I've read here, I think I'm ready to commit to the EA path. The specialized focus aligns perfectly with my career interests, and the market demand seems strong. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread has been more valuable than months of research elsewhere! Now I just need to decide between the study programs mentioned. The free IRS materials sound like a great starting point, potentially supplemented with one of the commercial courses if needed.

0 coins

Prev1...986987988989990...5643Next