IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One thing to consider - if youre close to making itemizing worth it, donating some stuff to charity before the end of the year could push u over the edge! I was in a similar spot last year and cleaned out my closet, got a receipt from Goodwill for like $350 in donated clothes and that was enough to make itemizing better than standard deduction for me.

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

That's actually smart! Do you need any special documentation for those donations or just the receipt they give you?

0 coins

Hey there! I went through almost the exact same situation last year - tons of medical bills eating up a huge chunk of my income and feeling totally lost about whether to itemize or not. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track everything. I made columns for: date, provider, amount paid, and whether it was qualified medical expense. Then I calculated exactly what 7.5% of my AGI was and could see how much of my medical expenses actually exceeded that threshold. The key insight I learned: even if your medical expenses seem huge, you need to subtract that 7.5% floor first, then see if what's left PLUS any other itemizable deductions (state taxes, charitable donations, etc.) beats the standard deduction. In my case, I had about $8,000 in medical bills on a $35,000 income, but after subtracting the 7.5% threshold ($2,625), I only had $5,375 in deductible medical expenses - which wasn't enough to beat the standard deduction when combined with my other deductions. Since you're living with parents and don't have mortgage interest, you'll mainly be looking at medical expenses + state/local taxes + any charitable donations. Run the math both ways before deciding!

0 coins

This is super helpful! I'm definitely going to create that spreadsheet - having everything organized like that sounds way better than my current pile of receipts. Quick question though - when you calculated your AGI, did you include any pre-tax deductions from your paycheck like health insurance premiums? I have those taken out and wasn't sure if that affects the 7.5% calculation.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation with my vacation rental and this thread has been incredibly helpful! Based on what I'm reading, it sounds like the key is first determining whether your property falls under the 7-day rule (making it a business activity) or if it's a traditional rental activity. For traditional rental activities with longer average stays, the active vs passive participation distinction matters a lot for the $25,000 loss allowance. But for short-term rentals with average stays of 7 days or less, you're looking at material participation tests instead since it's considered a business activity. One question I still have - if you have multiple short-term rental properties, do you evaluate the participation tests for each property individually, or can you combine your activities across all properties? I manage three different Airbnb units and I'm not sure if my management time gets pooled together or evaluated separately for each property.

0 coins

Great question about multiple properties! From what I understand, if you have multiple short-term rental properties that are all considered business activities (under the 7-day rule), you can generally group them together as one activity for material participation purposes. This means your management hours across all three Airbnb units would be combined when applying the material participation tests. However, there are some specific rules about what constitutes an "appropriate economic unit" for grouping rental activities together. Generally, properties in the same geographic area or managed in a similar way can be grouped. Since you're managing all three as Airbnbs, they would likely qualify for grouping. This is actually beneficial because it means if you spend 100+ hours total managing all three properties combined, you might meet the material participation test even if you don't spend that much time on any single property. You should definitely confirm this with a tax professional though, as the grouping rules can get complex depending on your specific situation.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

This is such a helpful discussion! I'm in a similar boat with my mountain cabin rental and the distinction between active vs passive participation has been driving me nuts too. What really helped me was tracking all my management activities in detail - even the time spent reviewing financial reports, approving repairs, and communicating with the property management company. I realized I was doing way more "active participation" work than I initially thought. One thing I learned the hard way is that the average rental period calculation is crucial. My cabin has some week-long rentals mixed with weekend stays, so I had to carefully calculate the average to determine if the 7-day rule applied. It turned out my average was 8 days, so I stayed in the traditional rental activity category where active participation mattered for the $25k loss allowance. The income phase-out is also something to watch carefully - if you're close to that $100k-$150k range, it might be worth timing some income or deductions to maximize your rental loss deduction eligibility.

0 coins

This is really helpful, especially the point about tracking activities in detail! I'm curious about the average rental period calculation - how exactly did you calculate that? Do you count each individual booking separately, or is there a specific method the IRS requires? I have a mix of 2-night weekend stays and some longer 10-14 day bookings, and I'm not sure if I should be doing a simple average of all booking lengths or if it needs to be weighted by revenue or something else. Getting this calculation right seems critical for determining which rules apply to my situation. Also, great point about timing income around that phase-out range - I hadn't considered that strategy but it makes a lot of sense if you're right on the border.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

I've been going through this exact same situation with my asset protection partnership, and paper filing has worked perfectly for me. One thing I want to emphasize that others have touched on but is really important: make absolutely sure you're sending to the correct IRS processing center for your state. The mailing addresses change periodically, and using an outdated address can cause significant delays or even result in your return being considered not filed. I learned this the hard way my first year when I used an address from an old instruction booklet I found online. Also, regarding the complexity of Form 1065 - while it does look intimidating at first glance, for a minimal activity partnership like yours, you'll probably only need to fill out the basic information sections. Most of the scary-looking schedules and additional forms are for partnerships with complex business operations, multiple types of income, or special situations that likely don't apply to a simple asset protection setup. I'd recommend downloading the current year's form and instructions from IRS.gov and just walking through it section by section. You might be surprised at how much of it you can skip entirely for your situation.

0 coins

Emma Garcia

•

This is such valuable advice, Aidan! The point about checking for current mailing addresses is something I definitely wouldn't have thought to verify - I probably would have just used whatever address I found first online. Do you happen to know how often these addresses typically change, or is there a reliable way to make sure you're always using the most current one? Your point about the form complexity is really reassuring too. When I first looked at Form 1065, I got pretty overwhelmed by all the different schedules and sections. It's encouraging to hear that for a simple asset protection partnership, most of it might not even apply. Did you find any particular sections that were consistently the most relevant for minimal-activity partnerships, or any that were commonly confusing that I should pay extra attention to when I'm going through it?

0 coins

Great question, Emma! The IRS typically updates mailing addresses annually, and sometimes more frequently. The most reliable way to get the current address is always to download the most recent Form 1065 instructions directly from IRS.gov - never rely on cached versions or third-party sites. I check this every year, even if I think nothing has changed. For minimal-activity partnerships, the sections you'll definitely need are: basic partnership info (pages 1-2), Schedule K (partner shares), and Schedule K-1s for each partner. The parts that trip people up most are usually the "other income" and "other deductions" lines - just leave them blank if they don't apply to you. Also, don't overthink the "principal business activity" code - there's a specific code for "investment clubs" or you can use the general "other investment" category. The IRS isn't expecting a novel-length explanation for asset protection partnerships. One last tip: the IRS instructions actually have a helpful checklist on the last page for what to include with your mailing. Following that exactly has saved me from having to resubmit anything.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

I've been mailing Form 1065 for our family limited partnership for the past three years, and it's definitely a legitimate option. The IRS absolutely allows paper filing for partnerships under 100 partners. A few things I wish someone had told me when I started: 1. **Timeline is everything** - Start early because paper processing can take 4-6 months. I usually mail mine by early February to avoid any stress about processing delays. 2. **Documentation is your friend** - I keep a filing folder with copies of everything: the completed return, certified mail receipt, return receipt, and any correspondence. This saved me when I needed to prove timely filing for a state issue. 3. **State vs Federal timing** - Check your state's requirements. Some states want to see federal acceptance before processing state returns, which can create a timing crunch with paper filing. 4. **Simple partnerships stay simple** - For asset protection with minimal activity, you're probably looking at just the basic 1065, Schedule K, and K-1s. Don't let all those other schedules intimidate you. The cost savings versus tax software has been worth it for our straightforward situation. Just budget extra time for any follow-up and you should be fine!

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

This is incredibly helpful advice, Caleb! I'm just getting started with my first partnership filing and your timeline recommendation is exactly what I needed to hear. Starting in early February makes so much sense given the processing delays everyone has mentioned. Your point about state vs federal timing is something I hadn't even considered - I'll definitely need to check Florida's requirements since that's where our partnership is registered. Do you happen to know if most states are flexible about this timing issue when you're paper filing federal, or is it pretty much a state-by-state thing that I'll need to research individually? Also, I really appreciate the reassurance about keeping it simple. It's easy to get overwhelmed looking at all the different forms and schedules, but it sounds like for basic asset protection partnerships, the core filing really is pretty straightforward once you know which parts actually apply to your situation.

0 coins

Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact same confusion when I first got into real estate investing. The salvage value question really threw me for a loop too, because it seems like such a fundamental part of depreciation in theory, but then you find out the IRS basically ignores it for real property! One thing I learned the hard way - make sure you're being conservative with your land/building allocation. I initially tried to minimize the land portion to maximize my depreciable basis, but my accountant warned me that being too aggressive could trigger scrutiny. The property tax assessment method mentioned by others is solid because it's defensible and based on third-party valuations. Also, if you're planning to hold this property long-term, don't forget about depreciation recapture when you eventually sell. All that depreciation you're claiming now will be taxed at up to 25% when you sell, even if the rest of your gain qualifies for lower capital gains rates. It's still worth taking the depreciation (better to have the deduction now and pay later), but good to plan for it. The IRS publications mentioned are definitely worth reading, but honestly, having a good CPA who specializes in real estate is invaluable. The rules get complex fast, especially when you start looking at things like cost segregation, Section 1031 exchanges, and passive activity limitations.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive overview I needed as someone just getting started with real estate depreciation! The point about being conservative with land/building allocation is particularly valuable - I can see how it would be tempting to minimize land value to maximize depreciation, but triggering an audit definitely isn't worth the risk. The depreciation recapture warning is something I hadn't fully considered either. So essentially, I'm borrowing tax savings from my future self when I sell, but at least I get the time value benefit of having those deductions now rather than later. Your point about having a CPA who specializes in real estate really resonates. Even with all the great information in this thread, I can already tell there are so many interconnected rules and strategies that having professional guidance will be essential. I'll definitely make sure to find someone with specific real estate experience when my current CPA gets back or if I need to find someone new.

0 coins

This has been such an educational thread! As someone who's been dealing with similar real estate tax questions, I wanted to add a few practical tips from my experience: First, when you're doing that land/building allocation, don't overlook getting a professional appraisal if the numbers are significant. Yes, it costs money upfront, but having that third-party validation can be worth it if the IRS ever questions your allocation. I learned this after initially relying solely on property tax assessments and later wishing I had stronger documentation. Second, regarding the cost segregation discussion - if you're not ready to invest in a full engineering study right away, you can still do some basic component identification yourself. Things like carpeting, window treatments, removable fixtures, and specialized lighting often qualify for 5-7 year depreciation instead of the full 39. Just document everything well and be prepared to justify your classifications. Finally, I'd recommend setting up a good record-keeping system now for all your property-related expenses and improvements. When you eventually do sell or do a cost segregation study, having detailed records of what you spent on various components will be invaluable. I use a simple spreadsheet that tracks each expense by category and depreciation class - saves tons of headaches later. The tax planning benefits of understanding these depreciation rules properly are huge, especially when you start scaling up to multiple properties. Worth the time investment to get it right from the beginning!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice! The point about getting a professional appraisal for stronger documentation really makes sense, especially for larger properties where the allocation could make a significant difference in depreciation deductions. I'm curious though - when you mention doing basic component identification yourself before investing in a full cost segregation study, how detailed do you need to get with the documentation? Is it sufficient to have photos and purchase receipts, or does the IRS expect more technical specifications for things like specialized lighting and fixtures? I want to make sure I'm setting myself up properly from the start without going overboard on documentation that might not be necessary.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

I just went through this process 3 weeks ago and can confirm - you do NOT need to call back after completing online verification! I was in the exact same situation as you. Got the 5071C letter, completed the ID.me verification online, and spent days worrying if I needed to take additional steps. My refund showed up exactly 10 days later without any further action on my part. The confusion your friend experienced might be because some people receive different types of verification letters or have issues during the online process that require follow-up. But if your online verification went smoothly and you received a confirmation, you're all set. The IRS systems are actually pretty good at updating automatically once you complete the required verification steps. Don't overthink it - follow exactly what your letter says and nothing more. The online verification through the letter is designed to be a complete solution, not just the first step in a longer process.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

This is so helpful to hear from someone who just went through it! I'm a newcomer here and have been stressing about this exact same situation. Got my letter last week and completed the online verification, but like everyone else, I keep wondering if I'm missing a step. It's reassuring to know the 10-day timeline is pretty consistent across different people's experiences. The IRS really should make their process clearer to avoid all this confusion, but at least this community helps fill in the gaps!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm so grateful to find this thread! I'm currently in the exact same situation - received my 5071C letter yesterday and completed the online ID.me verification this morning. Reading everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring. It sounds like the consensus is pretty clear: if you successfully complete the online verification through the letter, you're done and don't need to call back. The confusion seems to stem from different types of verification letters and processes, but for the standard 5071C letter with online verification, no additional steps are required. I'm going to follow the advice here and resist the urge to call the IRS just to double-check. Based on the timeline shared by others, I should expect to see my refund processed within the next 9-14 days. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is a lifesaver for navigating these confusing IRS processes!

0 coins

Prev1...968969970971972...5644Next