IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone actually had their taxes rejected because of Form 8332 issues? Our decree says we alternate claiming our daughter each year, and we've been doing that for 2 years without any forms. I claim odd years, he claims even years. No issues so far, but now I'm nervous after reading this thread!

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

YES! This happened to me in 2023. I claimed my son per our agreement (we have true 50/50 custody but I earn less), and my return was accepted initially. But 3 months later, I got a letter from the IRS saying my ex had also claimed him, and since he had higher income with equal custody time, they allowed his claim and disallowed mine. I had to repay the Child Tax Credit plus interest, and it was a whole mess with my state taxes too. Should have had the Form 8332 signed. Lesson learned the expensive way.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year and wanted to share what I learned. The key thing to understand is that your divorce decree and IRS rules are completely separate systems that don't automatically talk to each other. Even though your decree says you each claim one child, the IRS has their own "tiebreaker" rules for determining the custodial parent when custody is truly 50/50. Since you mentioned equal physical custody, they'll look at who has higher adjusted gross income to determine who gets the right to claim the children. Here's what I'd recommend: First, carefully count the actual overnight stays for each child to make sure you really do have exactly 50/50 custody. Sometimes what we think is "equal" isn't when you count every single night. Second, if it truly is 50/50 and your ex has higher income, he technically has the right under IRS rules to claim both children unless he signs Form 8332 releasing his claim to one child. Your ex is wrong about not needing any forms - the IRS doesn't care what your divorce decree says if their rules determine a different custodial parent. Don't risk it. I'd suggest getting professional help to review your specific situation, because getting this wrong can result in rejected returns, penalties, and having to pay back tax credits with interest.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

This is really helpful advice about counting the actual overnight stays! I'm in a similar situation and just assumed our "50/50" custody was exactly equal, but now I'm realizing I should actually count every single night to be sure. One question - when you say "getting professional help," do you mean a tax professional or family law attorney? I'm trying to figure out if this is more of a tax issue or a legal issue since it involves both the IRS rules and our divorce decree. My ex is being stubborn about signing any forms, so I want to make sure I approach this the right way. Also, did you end up needing Form 8332 in your situation, or did the actual night count end up being different than true 50/50?

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

As someone who recently went through this exact process with my small tech consulting business in Amsterdam (also a V.O.F.), I completely understand your frustration! The W-8BEN-E is genuinely one of the most confusing tax forms out there. Here's what I learned that might help: For a Dutch V.O.F., you're essentially dealing with a pass-through entity similar to a US partnership. The key sections you need are Part I (basic info), Part III (treaty benefits), and Part XXIX (signature). For Part I line 5, definitely select "Partnership" since that's how the IRS views a V.O.F. For the TIN fields - you can leave the US TIN blank since you don't need one for basic consulting. For foreign TIN, use your KVK number including any leading zeros. Skip GIIN entirely unless you're somehow a financial institution (which you're not). The treaty benefits section (Part III) is where you'll claim Article 7 from the US-Netherlands tax treaty at 0% withholding rate, assuming you're just providing remote consulting services with no permanent establishment in the US. One thing that really helped me was printing out the form and physically crossing out all the sections that don't apply - it made the relevant parts much clearer. You're basically filling out maybe 15% of the actual form. The whole process took me about 2 hours once I figured out what applied to us, and our US client accepted it without any issues. Feel free to ask if you have specific questions about any of the sections!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience with the Amsterdam V.O.F.! It's incredibly helpful to hear from someone who's literally been in the exact same situation. Your tip about physically crossing out irrelevant sections is brilliant - I think that visual approach will really help me focus on what actually matters instead of getting overwhelmed by all the sections that don't apply to us. I'm curious about one thing you mentioned - when you filled out Part I line 5 as "Partnership," did you run into any questions from your US client about providing additional partnership documentation? I'm wondering if they might ask for our partnership agreement or other proof that we're structured as a V.O.F., or if the W-8BEN-E form itself was sufficient for their records. Also, regarding the 2-hour timeframe you mentioned - was that including the time to research and understand the form, or just the actual completion time once you knew what to fill out? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for how long this might take us!

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

The 2-hour timeframe was just for actually filling out the form once I understood which sections to complete - the research phase took me much longer! I probably spent a full day reading through IRS publications and forum posts like this one before I felt confident enough to actually start filling it out. Regarding additional documentation, my US client never asked for our partnership agreement or any proof of our V.O.F. structure. The W-8BEN-E form was completely sufficient for their needs. I think most US companies are used to dealing with these forms and trust that foreign businesses are accurately representing their entity type. The form itself serves as the certification they need for their withholding obligations. One practical tip I forgot to mention: make sure whoever signs the form in Part XXIX has their signature match any other documents you might send to the US client. It's a small detail, but consistency in business relationships always looks more professional.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

I went through this exact same process with my small consulting business in Belgium last year, and I totally feel your pain with the W-8BEN-E! It's honestly one of the most intimidating forms I've ever encountered. What really helped me was breaking it down into just the essentials for a simple EU consulting business like yours. For your Dutch V.O.F., you're looking at completing maybe 4-5 sections total out of the entire form. The key is understanding that most of those complex sections are for financial institutions, large corporations, or entities with complicated ownership structures - none of which apply to a small 3-person consulting firm. Here's what made it click for me: think of the form as the IRS trying to cover every possible type of foreign entity in one massive document, but your V.O.F. is actually a pretty straightforward case. You're a transparent partnership providing services remotely - that's about as simple as it gets from a US tax perspective. One thing I wish someone had told me upfront: don't try to understand every section of the form. Focus only on Parts I, III, and XXIX, and you'll have everything you need. The rest is just noise for your situation. Once I adopted that mindset, what seemed like an impossible task became totally manageable. Your US client will be familiar with receiving these forms from foreign consultants, so they'll know exactly what to do with it once you submit it. You're definitely not the first Dutch V.O.F. they've worked with!

0 coins

This perspective is really reassuring! You're absolutely right that trying to understand every section of the form is what makes it so overwhelming. I've been getting stuck reading through all the complex sections that probably don't even apply to our situation. Your point about the US client being familiar with these forms from other foreign consultants is particularly comforting - I was worried we might be creating extra work for them or that they'd question our completion of the form. It's good to know this is probably routine for them. Quick question: when you completed your Belgian form, did you have any second thoughts about your choices after submitting it, or did you feel confident you'd filled it out correctly? I'm trying to gauge whether it's normal to have some lingering uncertainty even after completing it, or if there's a clear "yes, this is definitely right" feeling once you finish. Also, did your Belgian business structure translate pretty directly to one of the US entity classifications, or did you have to do some research to figure out the best match?

0 coins

Has anyone used TurboTax for AMT calculations with stock options? I heard it doesn't handle the AMT credit carryforwards correctly and I'm worried I'll mess something up. Would I be better off with H&R Block or going to a CPA?

0 coins

I've used TurboTax Premier for my AMT situations the past 3 years and it actually does handle AMT calculations pretty well, including the credit carryforwards with Form 8801. It asks all the right questions about ISO exercises and walks you through the calculations. The biggest issue is that it doesn't do a great job explaining WHY you're paying AMT or helping you plan for next year. It just does the math correctly. If your situation is super complicated or you have multiple option exercises throughout the year, a good CPA might be worth the money for the planning advice alone.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience! That's reassuring to hear that TurboTax can handle the basic calculations. I think I'll try using it first since my situation isn't super complex, and if I run into issues or have questions about planning, I might consult with a CPA for an hour or two rather than having them do my whole return.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

I went through a similar situation last year with ISOs and AMT, and I wish I had understood the mechanics better beforehand. Let me try to fill in some gaps that might help you. The key thing to understand about your $143,000 ISO exercise is that the "bargain element" (difference between what you paid and fair market value) gets added back as an AMT preference item. So if you exercised options with a strike price of $10 and the shares were worth $20, that $10 difference per share becomes AMT income even though it's not regular taxable income until you sell. With your $187,000 salary plus the ISO adjustment, you're definitely going to be in AMT territory. The good news is that your mortgage interest is still mostly deductible under AMT (unlike state taxes), and your charitable deductions will help both calculations. One thing that helped me was using the AMT Assistant worksheet from IRS Publication 909 to do a rough calculation before year-end. It's not perfect, but it gave me a ballpark figure. The key is understanding that you'll likely owe AMT this year, but you'll generate AMT credits that can be recovered in future years when your regular tax exceeds AMT. For planning purposes, if you still have unvested options, consider the timing of future exercises more carefully. Spreading them across multiple years can help minimize the AMT impact compared to doing large exercises all at once.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for breaking down the ISO mechanics so clearly! I think I was getting confused because I kept reading about "bargain elements" without understanding that it's literally just the difference between strike price and FMV that gets added to AMT income. One follow-up question: when you mention using IRS Publication 909 and the AMT Assistant worksheet, did you find it accurate enough to base year-end planning decisions on? I'm trying to decide whether I should exercise some additional options before December 31st or wait until next year. With the calculations being so complex, I'm worried about making the wrong choice based on rough estimates. Also, did you end up recovering most of your AMT credits in subsequent years, or are you still carrying some forward?

0 coins

Has anyone considered switching from C-corp to S-corp for their rental LLC? Our accountant mentioned it could help avoid potential PHC issues altogether since S-corps don't face PHC tax. We have a similar setup with 4 properties that we self-manage.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

We made that switch two years ago and it simplified things a lot. No more worrying about PHC status, and the pass-through taxation is more straightforward. Our tax prep fees actually went down slightly too. Just remember there's a deadline to make the S election - generally March 15th for existing corps.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience! That's really helpful. Did you have any issues with the transition? I've heard there can be complications if the C-corp has accumulated earnings or built-in gains.

0 coins

Great question! Based on your description, your LLC likely doesn't qualify as a PHC. The key test is whether 60% or more of your adjusted ordinary gross income comes from "personal holding company income" (like dividends, interest, royalties). Active rental income from properties you manage yourself typically doesn't count as PHC income under IRC Section 543. Since you're handling showings, tenant screening, maintenance coordination, and day-to-day operations, the IRS would likely view this as an active trade or business rather than passive investment activity. The management fees you pay yourselves are actually a good practice that further demonstrates the active nature of your business. Just make sure those fees are reasonable and properly documented. One thing to watch: if you ever start receiving significant passive income (like interest from large cash reserves or dividend income), that could potentially push you closer to the 60% threshold. But with just rental income from actively managed properties, you should be fine. Keep good records of your management activities as others have mentioned - it's always smart documentation to have!

0 coins

Quick tip: save EVERYTHING. Not just receipts but also: - Emails about assignments related to the festival - Published articles you wrote based on festival attendance - Business cards from contacts you made - Festival program with notes on screenings you attended for work - Photos of you working (conducting interviews, etc) I got audited 2 yrs ago for exactly these kinds of deductions and having this documentation saved me thousands!!! The IRS agent specifically mentioned how impressed they were with my record keeping.

0 coins

I never thought about keeping the festival program with notes! That's brilliant. Do you just write on it while you're there or do something more formal?

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

I keep all my receipts in a shoebox lol. Would that work or do i need to be more organized?

0 coins

Great question! I've been doing freelance entertainment journalism for about 5 years now and have deducted similar festival expenses. The key is proving legitimate business purpose - which it sounds like you definitely have. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given: consider getting assignments lined up BEFORE you go if possible. Having pre-arranged assignments or contracts with your publication partners creates much stronger documentation than just "I'll write about whatever I see." Even informal email confirmations work. Also, track your time carefully. I use a simple spreadsheet noting which screenings were for work vs personal enjoyment, interview times, writing sessions, etc. This helps with the allocation everyone mentioned and shows the IRS you're taking the business aspect seriously. The amounts you mentioned ($2500 pass, $800 flights, $1800 hotel) seem totally reasonable for Tribeca, especially if this generates significant income for you. Just make sure you can show a pattern of earning from this type of work - the IRS gets suspicious if someone claims huge deductions but minimal related income. One last tip: if you're interviewing filmmakers, try to schedule those during off-peak hours when possible. Having business meetings during "work hours" vs only attending evening screenings helps establish the professional nature of your trip.

0 coins

This is really solid advice about getting assignments lined up beforehand! I'm actually new to freelance journalism (just started last year) and I'm wondering - do you think it matters if the assignments are paid vs. unpaid? I have a couple of smaller sites that might give me press credentials but don't pay much, and then some paid gigs that are more flexible about what I cover. Would mixing both types of assignments strengthen or weaken my case for deductions? Also, how detailed do you get with the time tracking? Like do you note down every 30-minute block or just general "morning: interviews, afternoon: screenings" type entries?

0 coins

Prev1...905906907908909...5643Next