


Ask the community...
I went through almost the exact same situation last year! My company's payroll system automatically switched my state tax withholding when they temporarily moved me to a different cost center, even though I never actually relocated. Here's what I learned from my experience: Don't wait for your payroll department to fix this - they probably won't, especially if it's outsourced. The fastest path is to handle it yourself through tax filings. You'll definitely want to file in both states. In your home state, report all income as earned there. For the state where taxes were incorrectly withheld, file a non-resident return showing zero income actually earned in that state. Most tax software can handle this multi-state situation pretty easily. The key is having good documentation. Save any emails about the reassignment error, your actual work schedules showing you were at your home location, and anything that proves this was a payroll mistake. I attached a simple one-page letter with my non-resident return explaining the error, and it made the process much smoother. It took about 8 weeks to get my refund, but I recovered every dollar that was incorrectly withheld. The states deal with these payroll errors all the time, so don't stress too much about it. Just be thorough with your documentation and clear in your explanation of what happened.
This is exactly the kind of real-world advice I was looking for! Eight weeks seems like a reasonable timeframe for getting the refund. I'm curious about the one-page letter you mentioned - did you include specific details like the exact dates of the payroll error, or keep it more general? Also, when you filed the non-resident return showing zero income earned in that state, did you still have to pay the filing fee for that state's return, or do they typically waive it when it's clearly an error like this? I'm feeling much more confident about tackling this now that I've heard from so many people who've successfully resolved similar situations!
I work for a CPA firm and we see this exact situation several times a year. The good news is that it's completely fixable, and you have multiple options depending on how cooperative your payroll company is. First option (cleanest): Push harder for a W-2C from your payroll company. The person telling you they "can't make changes after W-2s are issued" is either misinformed or trying to avoid the work. W-2C forms exist specifically for this purpose. Ask to speak with a supervisor and reference IRS Publication 15-A, which clearly states that employers must correct W-2s when there are errors in state tax allocation. Second option (if W-2C isn't possible): File in both states as others have mentioned. Your home state gets all the income reported, and you file a non-resident return in the wrong state claiming zero income earned there. Include a brief explanation letter with documentation of the payroll error. Pro tip: If you're using tax software, most major programs (TurboTax, H&R Block, etc.) have specific workflows for handling incorrect state tax withholding due to payroll errors. Look for "multi-state filing" or "payroll error correction" in the help sections. The key is acting quickly since you're approaching filing deadlines. Don't let the payroll company drag this out past April 15th, as that could complicate things unnecessarily.
This is incredibly helpful information! As someone who's been lurking in this community for a while but never posted, I really appreciate seeing such detailed professional advice. The reference to IRS Publication 15-A is exactly the kind of specific citation I need when pushing back against the payroll company. I'm dealing with a similar situation where my employer's system incorrectly allocated some of my income to a state where I've never worked. The payroll company gave me the same runaround about not being able to issue corrections after W-2s are distributed. Now I know exactly what publication to reference when I call them back tomorrow. Quick question - when you mention acting quickly due to filing deadlines, are there any specific deadlines I should be aware of beyond the standard April 15th federal deadline? Do some states have different deadlines for non-resident returns or amended filings? Thanks again for sharing your professional expertise with the community!
Anyone know if there's a difference in how this tax code works in Scotland? I'm moving to Edinburgh next month but my job contract mentions 1242L.
Scotland has slightly different income tax rates and bands compared to the rest of the UK, but the basic concept of the tax code works the same way. Your 1242L code will still give you the same personal allowance of £12,420, but the Scottish tax rates will apply to income above that threshold. You should see an 'S' prefix added to your tax code (so it would become S1242L) once your employer updates your details with HMRC to show you're a Scottish taxpayer.
This is really helpful - I'm in a similar situation as the original poster! I just want to add that it's worth checking if your employer offers any salary sacrifice schemes (like cycle to work, pension contributions, or childcare vouchers) as these can actually reduce your taxable income and potentially save you money. With the 1242L code, any salary sacrifice contributions get deducted before tax is calculated, which means you pay less income tax and National Insurance. For example, if you sacrifice £100 per month for pension contributions, that's £100 less of your salary that gets taxed. It's definitely worth asking HR about these options when you start your new job, as they can make a real difference to your take-home pay beyond just understanding your tax code.
This is such great advice! I hadn't even thought about salary sacrifice schemes. Just to clarify - if I'm already on the 1242L code, would participating in something like a pension scheme change my tax code, or would it just reduce the amount that gets taxed at each payroll? I want to make sure I understand how this works before I start asking HR questions and looking uninformed on my first week!
Has anyone actually gone through this with Fidelity HSA? Their investment platform seems especially complicated for figuring out the earnings on excess contributions.
I went through this with Fidelity last year. Their HSA specialists were actually pretty helpful. Call the number on the back of your card but ask specifically for an "HSA contribution specialist" rather than taking the first rep you get.
I dealt with this exact situation last year with my HSA through Bank of America. The key thing that helped me was creating a detailed spreadsheet tracking my contributions by date and the corresponding investment performance for each batch. What I did was go back through my HSA statements and identify exactly when I made the excess contribution (let's say it was my last $500 contribution in November). Then I tracked how my investments performed from that date forward until I discovered the issue. The pro-rata method others mentioned is correct, but I found it helpful to also document everything step-by-step in case the IRS ever questions it. I kept screenshots of my account balances, contribution dates, and the final calculation. One tip: when you call your HSA provider, specifically use the phrase "return of excess contributions with net income attributable" - this is the exact terminology they need to hear to process it correctly for tax reporting purposes. Don't let them just process it as a regular distribution or you'll get hit with taxes and penalties you shouldn't owe. The whole process took about 3 weeks from calculation to getting the money back, but it was worth doing it right to avoid tax headaches later.
This is super helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and hadn't thought about creating a detailed spreadsheet to track everything. The tip about using the specific phrase "return of excess contributions with net income attributable" is gold - I bet that's why I keep getting transferred around when I call my provider. Quick question - did you have to provide Bank of America with your own calculations or did they do the pro-rata calculation themselves once you used the right terminology? I'm worried about getting the math wrong and then having issues down the road.
Has anyone tried creating an informal entity like "Smith Family Rentals" and using that on the platform instead? Our accountant suggested that approach for our vacation rental, and the platform accepted it even though it's not an actual legal entity. Then we just split everything 50/50 on our individual returns with explanation statements.
That could potentially create more problems than it solves. Using a name that implies a business entity when there isn't one legally established could cause confusion during an audit. The IRS might question if you should have been filing as a partnership if you're presenting yourselves as a business entity to other parties.
I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation! My spouse and I co-own a rental property that we inherited, and we've been getting conflicting advice about whether we need to form a partnership or can just handle it as co-owners. From what I've researched, the IRS Publication 541 specifically addresses this. It states that "a joint undertaking merely to share expenses does not create a partnership." Since you're just collecting rent and sharing expenses (not providing substantial services like property management beyond basic maintenance), you should qualify for simple co-ownership treatment. The approach that @MoonlightSonata described sounds solid - having one person report the full 1099-K income then deducting the co-owner's share as an expense. This way the numbers match exactly what the IRS receives from the platform, but each owner only pays tax on their actual share. One thing to consider: make sure you keep detailed records of how expenses are split and document your ownership agreement somewhere (even if it's just an informal written agreement between you and your sister). This will be helpful if the IRS ever has questions about the arrangement. Have you considered asking the rental platform if they can at least put both names on the account, even if the 1099-K can only go to one person? That might help establish the co-ownership paper trail.
Mia Roberts
Don't forget about potential foreign exchange implications! If you're sending USD to a foreign sub that operates in another currency, you'll need to account for forex gains/losses on those intercompany loans. This can get messy depending on the functional currency of each entity and how often exchange rates fluctuate.
0 coins
The Boss
ā¢Good point. We deal with this with our German subsidiary. Do you have any practical advice for handling the currency translation? We've been using monthly averages but our auditors are questioning if we should be using spot rates for each transaction.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
ā¢For currency translation on intercompany loans, you generally have flexibility in choosing your method as long as you're consistent. Monthly averages are acceptable under ASC 830, but spot rates at transaction dates can be more precise if you have the systems to track them. The key is documenting your policy and sticking to it. Since you're dealing with irregular funding amounts, I'd recommend using spot rates for each drawdown if possible - it gives you better matching of the economic reality and is harder for auditors to challenge. Just make sure your loan agreements specify which currency the obligation is denominated in and how you'll handle the translation. Also consider whether you want to designate the intercompany loan as a hedge of your net investment in the foreign subsidiary under ASC 815 - this can help manage some of the P&L volatility from forex movements.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of considering your state tax implications as well. Many states have their own rules around intercompany transactions and transfer pricing that don't always align with federal treatment. For example, some states require separate accounting for intercompany interest income/expense, and others have specific addback requirements that could affect your state tax liability. California and New York are particularly aggressive in this area. Also, since you mentioned this is your first time dealing with international tax at scale, I'd strongly recommend getting a transfer pricing study done by a qualified professional if your transaction volumes are significant. The IRS has been increasingly focused on intercompany pricing audits, especially for tech companies with IP development across multiple jurisdictions. Having proper documentation upfront is much cheaper than trying to reconstruct it during an audit.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mazrouei
ā¢This is really helpful - I hadn't thought about the state tax implications at all. We're incorporated in Delaware but have operations in California, so this could definitely impact us. Do you know if there are any good resources for understanding how different states treat intercompany interest? Also, at what transaction volume threshold would you typically recommend getting a formal transfer pricing study? We're probably looking at around $2-3M annually in total transfers to the foreign sub.
0 coins