IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm dealing with a similar situation and wanted to share what I learned from my tax preparer. The key thing to remember is that RSUs and SSARs are handled differently for tax purposes, but both should already be included in your Box 1 wages. For your specific situation with the $7,500 SSAR sale, you absolutely need to find the original exercise documentation to determine your cost basis. This is critical because without it, you might end up paying taxes twice - once when the SSARs were exercised (already included in a previous year's W2) and again when you report the sale. A few places to check for this information: 1. Your company's equity portal (Fidelity NetBenefits, E*TRADE, etc.) 2. Email confirmations from when you exercised the SSARs 3. Previous year tax documents if you exercised them recently 4. Contact your HR department - they should have records of all equity transactions Don't guess at the cost basis or leave it blank on Form 8949. The IRS will assume zero basis if you don't provide it, which could result in paying tax on the full $7,500 sale amount even though you already paid income tax when the SSARs were exercised.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! I'm new to dealing with equity compensation and had no idea about the double taxation risk. Your point about the IRS assuming zero basis is particularly scary - that could result in a huge tax bill. I'm going to check all those sources you mentioned, starting with my company's equity portal. I think I remember getting some emails when I first started receiving stock grants, but I probably deleted them thinking they weren't important. Lesson learned about keeping all tax-related documents! One quick question - if I find the exercise documentation but it's from multiple different exercise dates, how do I figure out which specific shares I sold? Do I need to use FIFO (first in, first out) or can I choose which lots to report?

0 coins

Great question about lot identification! You typically have a choice between FIFO (first in, first out), LIFO (last in, first out), or specific identification if you can document which exact shares you sold. Most brokerages default to FIFO unless you specify otherwise. The key is being consistent and having documentation to support your choice. If your brokerage statement shows specific lot information (like "sold 100 shares from 03/15/2022 grant"), use that. Otherwise, FIFO is the safest approach since it's the default method. Your cost basis will be the exercise price per share (from your SSAR exercise confirmation) multiplied by the number of shares sold. Make sure to keep all your exercise confirmations - you'll need them not just for this year's taxes but potentially for future sales too. Also, check if your company's equity portal has a "tax center" or "cost basis" section. Many of the major administrators (Fidelity, E*TRADE, Morgan Stanley) now provide downloadable reports that show exactly what basis to report for each sale, which makes filing much easier.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

I went through this exact same confusion with RSUs and SSARs last year, so I totally understand the frustration! Here's what I learned that might help: The Box 14 amounts on your W2 are indeed already included in your Box 1 income - they're just there for informational purposes to help you understand what types of compensation you received. So you don't need to report the $4,050 RSU or $19,250 SSAR amounts separately as additional income. For the $7,500 SSAR sale, you absolutely need to find your original exercise documentation to determine the cost basis. Without it, you'll likely overpay taxes since the IRS will assume zero basis if you don't provide proper documentation. A few tips from my experience: - Check your company's stock plan website (like Fidelity NetBenefits or E*TRADE) - they usually have a "Tax Documents" or "Cost Basis" section - Search your email for confirmations from when you exercised the SSARs - Contact your company's stock plan administrator directly - they're required to maintain these records The key thing to remember is that you already paid income tax on these SSARs when they were exercised (they would have appeared in a previous year's W2), so you only owe capital gains tax on any appreciation from the exercise date to the sale date. Don't leave the cost basis blank on Form 8949 - it could cost you thousands in unnecessary taxes!

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for breaking it down so clearly! I'm new to this community and dealing with my first year of stock compensation, so posts like this are a lifesaver. I had no idea that leaving the cost basis blank could result in the IRS assuming zero basis. That's terrifying! I'm definitely going to dig through my emails and check our company's stock portal immediately. One thing I'm curious about - you mentioned that SSARs would have appeared in a previous year's W2 when exercised. How can I tell which year that was if I can't remember when I exercised them? Should I be looking through old W2s to try to match up the amounts, or is there an easier way to figure out the timeline? Also, does anyone know if there's a statute of limitations on requesting these records from the stock plan administrator? I'm worried that if the exercise was several years ago, they might not still have the documentation.

0 coins

Great question! As others have confirmed, you can absolutely contribute to both a SEP IRA and Roth IRA in the same tax year - they have completely separate contribution limits and eligibility rules. For 2025, you can contribute up to 25% of your net self-employment income to your SEP IRA (maximum $69,000) AND up to $7,000 to your Roth IRA since you're under the $153,000 income threshold. With your $109k income, you're in a perfect position to take advantage of both. Your accountant might have been thinking of the rule that prevents contributing to both traditional and Roth IRAs beyond the combined $7,000 limit, but SEP IRAs operate under completely different rules as employer-sponsored plans. One thing to keep in mind: make sure you're calculating your SEP contribution correctly using the actual formula (it works out to about 20% of net self-employment income, not a straight 25%). And consider prioritizing the Roth while you're eligible, since tax-free growth is hard to beat!

0 coins

This is such a helpful summary! I'm in a similar situation as the original poster - had to reduce my income this year due to some business changes, and I've been wondering if I could take advantage of being back under the Roth IRA threshold. One follow-up question: if I'm planning to contribute to both accounts, does the timing matter? Should I max out the Roth first since there's a deadline, or can I contribute to both throughout the year without any issues?

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Great question about timing! You can contribute to both accounts throughout the year without any issues. For Roth IRAs, you have until the tax filing deadline (April 15, 2026 for 2025 contributions) to make your contribution, and SEP IRAs actually have an even more flexible deadline - you can contribute up until your tax filing deadline including extensions (so potentially as late as October 15, 2026). That said, I'd personally recommend maxing out the Roth IRA first if you have to choose, since you're only temporarily under the income threshold. Once your business recovers and your income goes back up, you might lose Roth eligibility again, but you'll always be able to contribute to your SEP IRA as long as you have self-employment income. Plus, getting that $7,000 into tax-free growth as early in the year as possible gives you more time for compounding. You can always adjust your SEP contribution later in the year once you have a better sense of your final business income numbers.

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

I went through this exact same situation last year! Your accountant was probably mixing up the rules - it's a pretty common confusion. You can absolutely contribute to both a SEP IRA and Roth IRA in the same year since they operate under completely different sets of rules. With your $109k income, you're eligible for the full $7,000 Roth IRA contribution (under the $153k threshold), and you can also contribute up to about 20% of your net self-employment income to your SEP IRA. Just remember that the SEP calculation isn't a straight 25% - it works out to closer to 20% due to how the math works. I'd definitely prioritize maxing out that Roth IRA while you're eligible again. Tax-free growth is incredibly valuable, and once your business bounces back and your income increases, you might lose that opportunity. The SEP IRA will always be there as long as you have self-employment income. Sounds like you might want to find a new accountant who's more familiar with self-employment retirement planning! This is pretty basic stuff for someone working with freelancers.

0 coins

This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the same situation! I'm curious - when you were prioritizing the Roth IRA contributions, did you find it better to make the full $7,000 contribution early in the year, or did you spread it out monthly? I'm trying to figure out the best approach since my freelance income can be pretty irregular month to month. Also, completely agree about potentially needing a new accountant. It's concerning when they're not familiar with basic self-employment retirement rules. Do you have any recommendations for finding someone who specializes in freelancer/self-employed tax situations?

0 coins

I'm experiencing this exact same situation! My status just changed to "Under review - additional information may be requested" yesterday morning and I've been checking my account every few hours since then. This thread has been incredibly reassuring to read through. What really helps is understanding that the IRS is conducting way more of these routine verification checks this year due to their increased funding and system upgrades. It makes so much sense that most of these aren't full audits but rather automated flags for specific items on tax returns. Anna's detailed experience with the CP75 letter gives me such realistic expectations - 10 days to receive the actual correspondence and 6 weeks total to resolve what turned out to be simple charitable deduction verification. That timeline is so much more manageable than the months-long process I was imagining! I'm going to follow everyone's advice and organize all my tax documents this weekend. Having everything in one place (W-2s, 1099s, receipts for any deductions) will definitely help me feel more prepared and less anxious while waiting to see if they actually need anything from me. The waiting and uncertainty is definitely the hardest part, but seeing all these positive outcomes from people who initially thought they were facing something serious has really put my mind at ease. This community support makes dealing with IRS stress so much more manageable - thank you all for sharing your experiences!

0 coins

I'm so glad I found this discussion as a new member! I'm literally going through the exact same thing - my status changed to "Under review" just this morning and I immediately started panicking. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a relief. It's really eye-opening to learn about the IRS's increased funding and system upgrades that are causing way more routine verification checks this year. I had no idea that was happening, which explains why so many of us are seeing these status changes recently. Anna's CP75 timeline is incredibly helpful - knowing it could take 10 days to get a letter and 6 weeks total for resolution makes this feel so much more manageable. And the fact that it was just charitable deduction verification rather than a full audit is really reassuring for those of us in the early stages of this process. I'm definitely going to organize my documents this weekend like everyone suggests. Better to be prepared now than scrambling later if they do request something. This community has been amazing for providing real-world experiences and practical advice during what could otherwise be a very stressful situation!

0 coins

I'm going through the exact same thing right now! My status changed to "Under review - additional information may be requested" about 2 weeks ago and I was initially terrified. This thread has been incredibly helpful and reassuring. What really put my mind at ease was learning that the IRS received significant funding increases and upgraded their processing systems, which explains why so many more people are experiencing these status changes this year. It makes perfect sense that they're conducting more routine verification checks rather than full audits. Anna's detailed timeline with the CP75 letter was especially valuable - knowing it took 10 days to receive correspondence and 6 weeks total for resolution of something as straightforward as charitable deduction verification really helps set realistic expectations. I followed everyone's advice and organized all my tax documents last weekend (W-2s, 1099s, receipts for deductions, etc.) and it definitely helped reduce my anxiety during this waiting period. Even though I haven't received any correspondence yet, having everything ready gives me peace of mind. The hardest part is definitely the uncertainty and waiting, but reading all these positive outcomes has reminded me that patience is key. Most of these "under review" statuses seem to resolve without major issues, and many people don't even need to submit additional documentation. Thanks to this community for sharing real experiences and practical advice - it makes navigating IRS stress so much more manageable when you know you're not alone!

0 coins

I just joined this community and I'm so grateful I found this thread! I'm dealing with the exact same "Under review" status change that happened to me just 3 days ago. As someone completely new to this situation, I was absolutely panicking until I read through everyone's experiences here. What's been most helpful is understanding that the IRS is conducting way more of these routine checks now due to their increased funding and system modernization. I had no idea this was happening on such a large scale this year - it really explains why so many of us are seeing these status changes. Anna's CP75 experience breakdown is exactly what I needed to hear as a newcomer to this process. The 10-day timeline for receiving actual correspondence and the 6-week resolution for something as simple as charitable deduction verification makes this feel so much less overwhelming than what I was imagining. I'm definitely going to organize my documents this weekend following everyone's advice. It seems like the best thing to do while waiting is to get all my W-2s, 1099s, and receipts in one place so I'm prepared if they do need anything. Thank you all for creating such a supportive space for people going through this stress. As a new community member, it's amazing to see how you all help each other navigate these IRS situations with real experiences and practical guidance!

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

As someone who's been through the partnership rental property learning curve, I wanted to add one more consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet - the potential impact of state-level partnership tax requirements. Depending on where your partnership properties are located and where you're personally resident, you might need to file partnership returns and/or personal returns in multiple states. Some states require partnership-level filings even for small partnerships, and others have different rules for how rental losses can be utilized at the state level compared to federal. For example, some states don't allow the $25,000 passive loss exception that's available federally, while others have their own versions with different income thresholds. With your partnership generating significant losses through depreciation, these state-level differences could meaningfully impact your overall tax situation. I'd recommend asking your tax preparer to walk through the state tax implications early in the process, rather than discovering surprises when your returns are being prepared. In my case, we ended up owing state taxes in a state where we thought we'd have no filing requirement, simply because the partnership owned property there. Also, keep in mind that if any partner moves to a different state during the year, it can complicate the state tax picture even further. Worth planning for these scenarios now while you're getting your systems set up.

0 coins

This is such an important point that often gets overlooked until it's too late! I'm just starting out with partnership real estate and hadn't even considered the multi-state filing requirements. A few follow-up questions: 1) Is there a minimum threshold of rental income or property value that triggers state filing requirements, or does any ownership in a state potentially create obligations? 2) How do you typically find out about these state-specific rules - is this something most tax software handles automatically, or do you need to research each state individually? 3) You mentioned discovering unexpected state tax obligations - were there penalties involved, or just additional taxes owed? I want to make sure we're proactive about this from the beginning rather than dealing with compliance issues later. Thanks for bringing this up - it's exactly the kind of detail that could easily slip through the cracks!

0 coins

Grace Johnson

•

@Logan Greenburg Great questions! Let me share what I ve'learned: 1 State) filing thresholds vary significantly. Some states like California require partnership filings if you have ANY income sourced there, regardless of amount. Others have minimum thresholds $1,000+ (in some cases .)For individual partners, you might trigger filing requirements with as little as $1 of state-sourced income. Property ownership alone can create nexus even without rental activity. 2 Most) standard tax software doesn t'handle multi-state partnership issues well - it s'designed more for simple situations. You really need either specialized partnership tax software or a CPA familiar with multi-state issues. Each state s'department of revenue website has the rules, but they re'often buried in technical publications. I ended up paying for a consultation with a multi-state tax specialist just to map out our obligations. 3 In) my case, we caught it during the preparation process so avoided penalties, but we did owe about $800 in unexpected state taxes. The bigger issue was the ongoing compliance burden - now we file in three states every year. Some states also have penalties that can be substantial $200+ (per partner in certain states even) for small amounts of income. Pro tip: If your partnership spans multiple states, budget for higher tax prep fees and consider whether the partnership structure still makes sense versus individual ownership in each state.

0 coins

Welcome to the world of partnership rental real estate taxation! As a newcomer myself, I can definitely relate to feeling overwhelmed by all the moving pieces. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier is to start tracking everything from day one - not just the obvious expenses, but also your time and involvement in management decisions. The difference between "active participation" and "material participation" can literally save you thousands in taxes, but only if you can document it properly. Also, don't be surprised if your first year feels chaotic from a tax perspective. Between waiting for K-1s, figuring out basis calculations, and potentially dealing with multiple state filings, there's a steep learning curve. But once you get through the first year and understand how everything flows together, it becomes much more manageable. The good news is that rental real estate partnerships can be incredibly tax-efficient when structured and managed properly. Just make sure you're working with professionals who understand the complexity - this isn't really a DIY situation for most people. The savings from proper planning and compliance far outweigh the cost of good professional help. Looking forward to hearing how your first tax season goes with the partnership!

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

@Amara Oluwaseyi Thank you for the encouragement! It s'reassuring to hear from someone who s'been through this process recently. Your point about tracking everything from day one really resonates - I m'already realizing how many small decisions and time investments could potentially impact my tax situation later. I m'curious about your experience with the first year chaos you mentioned. Did you end up having to file extensions, or were you able to get everything sorted by the regular deadline? Also, when you mention working with professionals who understand the complexity, did you find it better to have the partnership use one tax preparer for the partnership return and then each partner use their own for personal returns, or is it more efficient to have everyone work with the same firm? One thing I m'still wrapping my head around is how to balance being conservative with tax planning versus potentially missing out on legitimate deductions. There seem to be so many areas where the rules have exceptions and special cases - it s'easy to see how you could either be too aggressive or too cautious and end up in the wrong place either way. Thanks for sharing your experience - it s'helpful to know others have navigated this successfully!

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

•

@Hattie Carson Great questions! For my first year, we definitely had to file extensions. Our partnership s'accountant needed extra time to properly allocate depreciation and handle some mid-year property improvements that complicated the calculations. I d'say plan for an extension - it s'really common with rental partnerships. Regarding tax preparers, we initially tried having the partnership use one firm and partners use their own, but it created coordination problems. The partnership s'CPA would make assumptions about allocations that didn t'align with what our individual preparers expected. We switched to having everyone use the same firm for year two, and it s'been much smoother. They understand how all the pieces fit together and can optimize across both the partnership and individual returns. On the conservative vs. aggressive question - I ve'found it s'better to err on the side of being well-documented rather than conservative. For example, if you qualify for active participation, claim it, but make sure you have detailed records of your involvement. The tax code actually provides significant benefits for rental real estate when you meet the requirements - you just need to be able to prove you meet them. A good tax professional will help you identify what you re'entitled to while keeping you within safe bounds. The key is building systems now for tracking your involvement and expenses, so when opportunities arise, you have the documentation to support them.

0 coins

I just want to thank everyone who contributed to this thread - it's been incredibly helpful! I was in the exact same boat with my daughter's Coverdell ESA and her commuter college situation. Based on all the advice here, I called the financial aid office this morning and got their official Cost of Attendance breakdown. They confirmed that for off-campus students, they budget $9,800 for housing and $4,200 for food/meals per academic year. This gives me clear guidelines for what I can withdraw from the Coverdell ESA. The financial aid counselor also mentioned that many parents don't realize they can use these funds for off-campus housing when there are no dorms available. She said as long as we stay within their published figures and keep good records, we should be fine. One tip she gave me: save a copy of the Cost of Attendance document with the date you accessed it, since schools sometimes update these figures mid-year. This way you have proof of what the official allowances were when you made your withdrawals.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

This is such great practical advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation for my son who's starting at a community college next fall. They don't have any dorms either, and I've been worried about how to handle the Coverdell ESA withdrawals properly. Your tip about saving the Cost of Attendance document with the date is brilliant - I never would have thought about schools potentially updating those figures mid-year. That could definitely cause problems if you're audited later and the numbers don't match what you originally used. Did the financial aid office give you any guidance on how to handle expenses that might vary month to month, like utilities? I'm wondering if I should budget conservatively or if there's some flexibility as long as the annual total stays within their guidelines.

0 coins

Debra Bai

•

Great question about monthly variations in expenses! I actually asked the financial aid counselor about this exact issue since our utilities can swing pretty dramatically between summer and winter months. She explained that the IRS looks at your total annual withdrawals versus the school's annual allowances - they don't expect you to match exactly month by month. So if you have a high electric bill in January due to heating costs but a lower bill in April, that's perfectly normal and acceptable. The key is keeping your total annual room and board withdrawals within the school's published figures ($9,800 + $4,200 = $14,000 in our case). She recommended setting up a simple spreadsheet to track monthly expenses and running totals throughout the year, which helps you stay on budget and provides great documentation. One thing she warned about: don't try to "catch up" by withdrawing extra in December if you've been under-budget all year, since that could look suspicious. It's better to withdraw based on actual expenses as they occur, even if some months are higher or lower than others. The flexibility is definitely there as long as you're reasonable and well-documented!

0 coins

This spreadsheet tracking idea is really smart! I'm just getting started with my son's Coverdell ESA and feeling overwhelmed by all the documentation requirements. Would you mind sharing what columns you include in your tracking spreadsheet? I want to make sure I'm capturing everything I might need for tax purposes or potential audits. Also, when you say "withdraw based on actual expenses as they occur" - are you making monthly withdrawals from the Coverdell ESA, or do you pay out of pocket first and then reimburse yourself periodically? I'm trying to figure out the most efficient way to handle the timing of withdrawals versus when expenses are actually due.

0 coins

Prev1...790791792793794...5643Next