


Ask the community...
Friendly reminder that you should also be setting aside money for self-employment tax! When I first started contracting, I only calculated regular income tax and completely forgot about the additional 15.3% for self-employment tax (Social Security and Medicare). Was a nasty surprise at tax time.
Is that 15.3% on top of regular income tax? Geez, no wonder people say to set aside 25-30% of your contractor income.
Yes, that 15.3% is on top of your regular income tax! It's broken down as 12.4% for Social Security and 2.9% for Medicare. The thing that really caught me off guard is that when you're an employee, you only pay half of this (7.65%) and your employer pays the other half. But as an independent contractor, you're both the employee AND the employer, so you pay the full amount. That's why the general rule of thumb is to set aside 25-30% of your contractor income - it covers both income tax and self-employment tax.
As someone who went through this exact same situation last year, I can tell you that the IRS is actually pretty understanding about first-time contractor mistakes. Here's what I learned: 1. You can absolutely request first-time penalty abatement - it's a real thing and they granted it for me even though I missed the first two quarters. 2. The penalties aren't as scary as they sound. Mine ended up being around $180 for the year, which was way less than I feared. 3. Don't wait! Start making estimated payments immediately. You can make payments anytime through EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System) or IRS Direct Pay. Even if you're late, paying something now reduces the penalty amount. One tip that saved me: if your total tax liability this year will be less than what you owed last year, you might qualify for the "safe harbor" rule and avoid penalties altogether. This often applies to people transitioning from W-2 to contractor work mid-year. Also, make sure you're tracking all your business expenses - mileage, home office, equipment, etc. These deductions can significantly reduce what you actually owe in taxes.
This is really helpful, thank you! Quick question about the safe harbor rule - how do you actually prove that your total tax liability will be less than last year? Do you need to submit some kind of projection to the IRS, or is it something they figure out automatically when you file your return? I'm in a similar situation where I was W-2 for most of last year and only started contracting recently, so this might apply to me too.
Has anyone tried just renting their apartment to their "business" and then having the business pay for it? My buddy claims he does this and writes off 100% of his rent. Sounds kinda shady to me but he swears it works.
That approach is asking for an audit. What your friend is describing is essentially a round-trip transaction that the IRS specifically looks for and disallows. You can't rent your personal residence to your own business as a tax avoidance strategy. The IRS applies what's called "substance over form" - they look at the actual substance of transactions, not just how they're structured on paper. In this case, you're still using the same space for both personal and business purposes, so only the legitimate business portion (used exclusively for business) would qualify for deduction.
Just wanted to add a practical tip that helped me when I was in a similar rent burden situation - make sure you're measuring your home office space correctly for the deduction. I initially just eyeballed it and said "about 15%" like you did, but when I actually measured with a tape measure, my dedicated work area was only 12% of my total apartment square footage. The IRS expects precise calculations, not estimates. Measure the length and width of your exclusive business space, then divide by your total apartment square footage. Keep photos and measurements in your tax files as documentation. Also, remember that hallways, bathrooms, and kitchen don't count toward your total space calculation - only actual livable square footage. This small difference in measurement accuracy could save you from headaches if you ever get audited, and ironically, being more precise actually helped me discover I could claim a slightly higher percentage than I originally thought when I included some storage space I was using exclusively for business supplies.
This is really helpful! I never thought about actually measuring vs. just estimating. Quick question - when you say "livable square footage," does that include closets? I have a small closet in my home office area that I use exclusively for storing business supplies and equipment. Also, did you include the measurements in any specific format when you documented everything, or just basic length x width calculations with photos?
Just make sure you're reporting everything correctly! My brother tried to just "net" his gambling wins and losses a few years back (only reporting the difference) and got hit with an audit. The IRS requires you to report the FULL amount of the 1099-MISC as income, then deduct losses separately on Schedule A if you itemize. Don't make that mistake - the IRS computers will flag the mismatch between your reported income and what Underdog submitted on your 1099.
I went through almost exactly this situation two years ago - had a big 1099-MISC from FanDuel but overall losses for the year from other sites. Here's what I learned the hard way: You absolutely MUST report that full $10,400 as income even though you had net losses. Don't try to just report the "net" - the IRS computers will catch that immediately since Underdog already reported paying you $10,400. The good news is you can deduct your gambling losses, but only if you itemize deductions on Schedule A. You can deduct up to the amount of your winnings ($10,400 in your case), so theoretically you could zero out the tax liability from the gambling income. However, here's the catch that got me - you need to compare your total itemized deductions (including the gambling losses) to the standard deduction. If your standard deduction is higher, you're better off taking that and just paying tax on the $10,400. For the Bovada losses, keep every record you can find - transaction history, bank statements showing transfers, screenshots of your account summary. The IRS doesn't specifically exclude offshore sites, but documentation is absolutely critical. One more thing - don't forget about state taxes! Some states don't allow gambling loss deductions at all, so you might owe state tax on the full amount even if you can offset it federally.
This is really helpful, thanks for sharing your experience! I'm wondering about the documentation part - when you say "every record you can find" for the Bovada losses, how detailed did you need to get? Like did you need to document every single bet, or was it enough to show deposits/withdrawals and maybe monthly summaries? I'm trying to figure out how much work I'm looking at here to get my records together.
Has anyone actually gotten an IRS penalty for HSA over-contributions before? I'm wondering how strict they are about this stuff. I think I might have over-contributed last year but never fixed it and haven't heard anything.
Yes, I got hit with the 6% excise tax for an HSA excess contribution I didn't correct. It wasn't a huge amount (around $75 penalty for my $1,250 over-contribution), but the annoying part was filling out Form 5329. The IRS does check this, especially if your W-2 and HSA provider both report contribution amounts that exceed the limits.
I went through something very similar last year! You're absolutely right that you can still contribute that $150 to get back to your maximum allowable contribution for 2024. As others mentioned, you have until April 15th, 2025 to make 2024 HSA contributions. One thing I'd add is to keep really good records of all these transactions. I created a simple spreadsheet tracking: original contributions, the excess amount, withdrawal date and amount, and then the corrective contribution. This made tax filing much easier and gave me peace of mind if the IRS ever had questions. Also, don't stress too much about the "return of excess contributions" form you already filed - that was correct for the portion that was actually excess. The additional $150 you're putting back in is just you using up your remaining contribution room for 2024, which is totally separate and allowed. Just make sure when you contribute that $150 with Fidelity, you explicitly designate it as a 2024 contribution in their system. Their interface makes this pretty clear during the contribution process.
Zara Rashid
This is such an important discussion that gets oversimplified in political rhetoric. I've been diving into this topic myself recently, and what strikes me most is how many "mandatory expenses" in the US function exactly like taxes but aren't labeled as such. Beyond healthcare premiums and higher education costs that others have mentioned, I've noticed that Americans often pay significantly more for basic services that are government-provided in the UK. Things like public transportation, childcare, and even basic financial services often require private payment in the US. For example, in many UK cities, you have robust public transport systems funded through taxes. In most US cities, you're essentially forced to own a car (with insurance, maintenance, gas taxes, etc.) - that's thousands in mandatory expenses that don't exist to the same degree in the UK. The retirement savings situation is interesting too. UK state pension plus workplace pensions mean less individual pressure to save huge amounts in 401(k)s. Americans effectively have to "tax" themselves extra to make up for less comprehensive social security. When you add up all these hidden mandatory expenses alongside actual taxes, I suspect the total burden is much more similar between the countries than the headline rates suggest.
0 coins
Angelina Farar
ā¢You've really hit the nail on the head with the transportation costs! I never thought about car ownership as essentially a "mandatory tax" but that's exactly what it is in most of America. Between car payments, insurance, gas, maintenance, and registration fees, I'm probably spending $8-10k per year just to get around - money that would go toward public transport taxes in the UK but gets counted as "personal expenses" here. The retirement point is fascinating too. I'm maxing out my 401(k) contributions at $23k per year because I know Social Security alone won't cut it. That's basically a self-imposed 15-20% "retirement tax" on top of everything else. Meanwhile, my friends in the UK seem less stressed about retirement savings because their system is more comprehensive from the start. It really makes you wonder if the "low tax" narrative is just accounting sleight of hand - moving mandatory expenses off the government balance sheet and onto individual budgets, then claiming victory on tax rates.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
This conversation has really opened my eyes to how misleading surface-level tax comparisons can be. I'm a financial planner, and I've seen firsthand how my clients struggle with the "hidden taxes" everyone's discussing here. What really gets me is the psychological impact too. In the UK system, you pay higher visible taxes but then you're basically done - healthcare is covered, education is more affordable, public transport exists. There's a certain peace of mind in that. Here in the US, even after paying your "lower" taxes, you're constantly worried about the next healthcare bill, whether you're saving enough for retirement, if your kids will graduate with crushing debt. It's like death by a thousand cuts - each expense seems reasonable in isolation, but they add up to create this constant financial anxiety that you don't capture in simple tax rate comparisons. I've started telling my clients to think about their "total mandatory expense rate" rather than just their tax rate when making financial decisions. It's eye-opening when you realize that your effective rate of mandatory expenses (taxes + healthcare + transportation + education savings + retirement catch-up) might be 45-50% of income even in "low tax" America. The political rhetoric about tax rates completely misses this reality that ordinary families live with every day.
0 coins
Charity Cohan
ā¢This is exactly what I've been trying to articulate to people! As someone who's relatively new to understanding all this, your point about the "total mandatory expense rate" is brilliant. I never thought to calculate it that way, but when you frame it like that, it makes so much sense. I'm just starting my career and trying to figure out budgeting, and honestly, the constant uncertainty about healthcare costs and whether I'm saving enough for retirement is exhausting. Every financial decision feels like I'm playing defense against some future catastrophe that might bankrupt me. Your comment about "death by a thousand cuts" really resonates. It's not just the money - it's the mental energy spent researching health insurance plans, figuring out 401k allocations, comparing car insurance rates, etc. In the UK system, it sounds like a lot of that cognitive load is just... handled for you through the tax system. Do you have any rough guidelines for what that "total mandatory expense rate" should look like for someone just starting out? I'm trying to get a realistic picture of what I actually need to earn to have the lifestyle that the salary numbers suggest I should be able to afford.
0 coins