IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Aisha Khan

•

Just wanted to add my voice to this incredible thread as another newcomer going through the exact same situation! Filed February 13th, verified March 1st, and got my 570 code last Friday with no 971 - seeing the pattern here! šŸ˜… Like everyone else, I was completely panicked when I first saw that code. The IRS representative gave me the standard "120-day review" line, and I honestly thought I had somehow made a major error on my return. But finding this discussion has been absolutely life-changing for my stress levels! Paolo's pattern analysis and Miguel's professional insights have been game-changers - the fact that 570-without-971 cases typically resolve in 4-8 weeks rather than the full 120 days is so reassuring. It's incredible how this community has essentially created the most comprehensive guide to these reviews that I've found anywhere online. The official IRS resources are so vague compared to the real-world experiences everyone has shared here. What really strikes me is how many of us have nearly identical timelines and experiences. It definitely makes this feel like a routine verification process rather than something we did wrong. Based on my timeline, I should be seeing movement in the next few weeks, which is so much better than the scary 120-day timeframe I was initially preparing for. I'm definitely going to start tracking my "as of" date like so many others have mentioned, and I'm so grateful to have found this supportive community right at the beginning of my journey. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share their experiences - you've turned what felt like a really overwhelming situation into something manageable with realistic expectations. I'll absolutely report back when my case resolves to keep building this amazing database! šŸ™

0 coins

Zainab Yusuf

•

Hi Aisha! šŸ‘‹ Welcome to this amazing community! I just discovered this thread today after getting my own 570 code yesterday (filed March 5th, verified March 19th), and I have to say your experience sounds exactly like what I went through initially - that immediate panic followed by relief after reading everyone's shared experiences here! Your timeline actually looks really promising - you're already several weeks into the process, which puts you right in that window where Paolo's research and Miguel's professional insights suggest you should start seeing movement soon. The consistency of everyone's experiences with the 570-without-971 pattern is so reassuring! What amazes me most about this thread is how it's become the definitive resource on these reviews. Like you said, the official IRS communications are so unhelpful compared to the real-world timelines and insights everyone has shared. When I first heard "120-day review" I was devastated, but seeing that most people resolve in 4-8 weeks has completely changed my perspective. I'm definitely taking everyone's advice about tracking the "as of" date and limiting transcript checks to avoid driving myself crazy. It's so comforting to know we're all going through this together and that the community support is here throughout the process. Looking forward to hearing when your case resolves - you might be one of the next success stories! Thanks for adding your timeline to this incredible database. šŸ™

0 coins

Simon White

•

Just wanted to join this incredible community as another newcomer experiencing my first 120-day review! Filed February 5th, verified February 24th, and got my 570 code this week with no 971 - definitely seeing the familiar pattern everyone has described! šŸ˜… Like so many others here, I was absolutely terrified when I first saw that code and heard the "120-day review" speech from the IRS representative. I immediately started spiraling, convinced I had made some major error on what seemed like a straightforward return. But discovering this thread has been such a game-changer for my understanding and stress levels! Paolo's pattern analysis showing that 570-without-971 cases typically resolve in 30-60 days is incredibly reassuring, and Miguel's professional confirmation of the 4-8 week timeline has given me so much more realistic expectations. It's amazing how this community has essentially reverse-engineered the IRS process and created a better resource than anything official I've found. What really strikes me is how consistent everyone's experiences have been - it definitely makes this feel like a routine verification process rather than something to panic about. Based on my timeline (about 3 weeks post-verification), it sounds like I should hopefully see movement in the next few weeks rather than months. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about tracking my "as of" date for early indicators and limiting my transcript checking to maintain sanity! Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - you've transformed what felt like a scary unknown into something manageable. I'll absolutely report back when my case resolves to add another data point to this amazing resource. This community support means everything to someone navigating this for the first time! šŸ™

0 coins

Hi Simon! šŸ‘‹ Welcome to what has truly become the most supportive and informative community I've encountered online! I'm also completely new here - just joined today after getting my own 570 code this morning (filed March 8th, verified March 22nd). Like you and everyone else, no 971 code, and I was absolutely panicking until I found this incredible thread! Your timeline is really encouraging - you're already 3+ weeks post-verification, which based on Paolo's research and Miguel's professional insights puts you right in that sweet spot where movement should start happening soon. The pattern everyone has identified with 570-without-971 cases resolving in 4-8 weeks rather than the full 120 days has been such a relief to understand! What amazes me most is how this community has essentially created the definitive guide to these reviews through shared experiences. The official IRS communications are so vague and scary compared to the real-world timelines and insights everyone has contributed here. When I first heard that "120-day review" speech today, I was devastated, but reading through all these experiences has completely transformed my understanding of what's actually happening. I'm definitely going to follow everyone's advice about tracking the "as of" date and limiting my obsessive transcript checking! It's so comforting to know we're all going through this journey together with such amazing community support. Looking forward to hearing when your case resolves - based on your timeline, you might be one of the next success stories to celebrate! Thanks for sharing your experience and adding to this incredible database. šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the helpful responses! This has been incredibly informative. I just checked my pay stubs from last year and confirmed that my STD premiums were being deducted pre-tax through our cafeteria plan, which means my benefits will indeed be taxable. I also went back and looked at my STD payment statements more carefully (thanks for that tip!) and found that they did withhold about 20% for federal taxes, so at least I won't get completely blindsided come tax time. One more question though - since the STD payments had taxes withheld, will I receive a W-2 from the insurance company, or will this just be included in my regular W-2 from my employer? I want to make sure I'm not missing any tax documents when I file.

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

Great question! Since your STD benefits had taxes withheld, you should receive a separate tax document from the insurance company - typically a 1099-R or sometimes a W-2 depending on how they handle it. This won't be included in your regular employer W-2. The insurance company that paid your STD benefits is required to report the taxable income and withholdings to the IRS, so they'll send you the appropriate form showing both the gross benefit amount and the taxes that were withheld. Make sure to keep an eye out for this document - it's usually mailed by January 31st. If you don't receive anything by early February, definitely contact the insurance company directly to request it. You'll need this form to properly report the income and claim credit for the taxes that were already withheld on your behalf.

0 coins

Just wanted to add one more important point that I learned the hard way - if you're receiving STD benefits and they're taxable, you might want to consider making quarterly estimated tax payments if not enough is being withheld. I received STD benefits a few years ago that had minimal withholding, and even though I knew they were taxable, I didn't realize how much it would bump me into a higher tax bracket. Ended up owing a significant amount plus underpayment penalties when I filed. If your STD payments are substantial and you're worried about owing taxes, you can either ask the insurance company to withhold more (if they allow it) or make estimated payments directly to the IRS. Form 1040ES has the vouchers and instructions for quarterly payments. Just something to consider so you don't get hit with surprise penalties on top of the tax bill!

0 coins

This is such an important point that often gets overlooked! I had no idea about the quarterly payment option when I was dealing with my STD situation. The underpayment penalties can really add up if you're not careful. For anyone reading this who might be in a similar situation - how do you calculate how much to pay quarterly? Is there a rule of thumb for what percentage to set aside, or do you just have to estimate based on your tax bracket? I'm hoping I never need STD again, but it would be good to know for future reference.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

As someone who just went through this transition last year, I can't stress enough how important it is to keep detailed records of all your investment transactions throughout the year. I use a simple spreadsheet to track dividends, capital gains/losses, and rental income by month. One thing that caught me off guard was that you need to include estimated state disability insurance (SDI) payments in some states if you're self-employed through investments. Also, don't forget that if you have a rental property, you might be subject to self-employment tax on that income depending on how actively you manage it. The IRS has a really helpful worksheet in Publication 505 that walks through the calculation step by step. I found it much clearer than Form 1040-ES itself. And definitely set up automatic reminders for the quarterly due dates - missing one can be expensive!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I wish I'd had when I started! The record-keeping point is so important - I learned that lesson the hard way during my first year of investment-only income. Quick question about the rental property self-employment tax you mentioned - I have a single rental that I manage myself (finding tenants, handling repairs, etc.). How do you determine if you're "actively" managing it enough to trigger SE tax? I've been treating it as passive income but now I'm wondering if I should be paying SE tax on it for my quarterly estimates. Also, thanks for the Publication 505 tip - the IRS publications are usually more helpful than their forms but I never know which ones to look for!

0 coins

I went through this exact transition about 18 months ago when I left my corporate job to manage my portfolio full-time. Here's what I wish someone had told me from day one: The key is getting organized early. I set up a simple system where I track all investment income monthly and calculate a running estimate of my tax liability. This way I'm never surprised by how much I owe. For the fluctuating income issue, I found it helpful to base my quarterly payments on a conservative estimate of my annual income, then make an additional "true-up" payment in January if I had a particularly good year. This approach keeps me compliant with the safe harbor rules while avoiding massive surprises at tax time. One thing that really helped was opening a separate "tax savings" account where I automatically transfer 25-30% of any significant gains or dividends. This way the money is already set aside when quarterly payments are due. Also, don't overlook the rental property income - depending on your level of involvement, you might need to pay self-employment tax on that income in addition to regular income tax. I made that mistake my first year and had to file an amended return. The learning curve is steep but definitely manageable once you get a system in place. Feel free to ask if you want more specifics about any part of the process!

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

This is such solid advice! I'm just starting out with investment-only income and the separate tax savings account idea is brilliant. I've been dreading the quarterly payments because I never know if I'm setting aside enough. Quick question about the 25-30% you mentioned - is that a flat rate you use regardless of whether it's dividends, short-term gains, or long-term gains? I know they're taxed differently but I'm not sure if I should be calculating different percentages for each type of income or if a blanket percentage works fine for the savings account approach. Also, did you run into any issues with the "true-up" payment in January? I'm worried about accidentally triggering underpayment penalties if I don't get the timing right.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

As a newcomer to this community, I'm absolutely amazed by the wealth of practical knowledge shared in this thread! Reading through everyone's real-world experiences has been incredibly valuable for understanding how these disability dependency situations actually work in practice. What really stands out to me is the consistent theme of "preparation without proactive submission" - keeping all your documentation organized and ready, but not overwhelming the IRS with paperwork upfront. The realistic timelines people have shared (3+ months for potential verification requests, 6-9 weeks for processing) are so much more helpful than the vague guidance you typically find elsewhere. I'm particularly grateful for the clarification about Social Security benefits not counting toward the gross income limit - that seems like such a critical detail that could completely change someone's eligibility calculation. And hearing from multiple members that subsequent years become much smoother once you're verified gives great confidence about the long-term process. While I don't currently have this specific situation, this discussion has really opened my eyes to how many tax opportunities might exist that people simply don't know about. The emphasis everyone has placed on digital documentation organization seems like solid advice for any complex tax scenario. Thank you all for creating such a supportive environment where people can learn from actual experiences rather than trying to navigate official publications alone. This is exactly the kind of community wisdom that makes complex tax situations manageable!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly impressed by the depth of practical knowledge and supportive atmosphere here! This thread has been absolutely invaluable for understanding the real-world mechanics of disability dependency claims. What strikes me most is how everyone's experiences consistently point to the same strategic approach: thorough preparation without upfront submission. The IRS operates on that "trust but verify" model several members mentioned, which means keeping comprehensive documentation organized and accessible, but not flooding them with paperwork initially. The timeline insights shared here are pure gold - knowing that verification requests typically come 3+ months after filing, with processing taking 6-9 weeks, completely changes how I'd approach planning for this situation. And the clarification about Social Security benefits not counting toward the gross income threshold is the kind of crucial detail that could make or break someone's eligibility decision. I don't currently have this exact situation, but reading through all these experiences has made me realize how many potential tax opportunities might exist that people simply aren't aware of. The consistent emphasis on digital documentation organization seems like valuable advice for any complex tax scenario, not just disability dependents. Thank you all for sharing your real-world experiences so openly and creating such a welcoming space for people navigating these challenging situations. This community truly demonstrates how shared knowledge can demystify even the most complex tax scenarios!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Mikayla! As someone who's also new here, I'm continually amazed by how generous everyone is with sharing their practical experiences and hard-won knowledge. Your summary of the "trust but verify" approach really captures the essence of what I've learned from this thread too. What I find most valuable is how this discussion has transformed what seemed like an intimidating bureaucratic process into a manageable series of steps. The consistent experiences across multiple members - from initial filing through potential verification - create such a clear roadmap for anyone facing this situation. I'm also taking away the broader lesson about documentation organization that keeps coming up. Even though I don't have a disability dependency situation currently, the digital organization strategies everyone has mentioned seem like they'd be invaluable for any complex tax scenario. It's one of those foundational practices that could save so much stress down the road. Thanks for adding your thoughtful perspective to this fantastic discussion! This community really shows how much easier these challenges become when people share their real-world insights and support each other through the learning process.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

Great question about state taxes! I'm in Colorado, so we do have state income tax here. I hadn't even thought about how that might affect my W4 calculations - I've been so focused on just getting the federal part right. Does the state tax situation change how I should fill out the federal W4, or is that something I handle separately? I assume Colorado has its own withholding form I'll need to complete as well? This is exactly the kind of detail that makes me nervous I'm missing something important!

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

@bd276eb65883 You're right to be thinking about both! Colorado does require a separate state W4 form (DR 0004), but the good news is it doesn't complicate your federal W4 calculations. Handle them as two separate forms. For federal, stick with the advice others have given - married filing jointly, use the multiple jobs worksheet or check box 2(c), and consider that extra $25-50 weekly withholding in step 4(c) to be safe. For Colorado state, you'll want to make sure you're withholding enough to cover that 4.4% flat rate on your combined income. The Colorado Department of Revenue has its own withholding calculator that can help you figure out the right amount for the state form. Since you're new to the US tax system, I'd recommend using one of the tools others mentioned (like the IRS withholding calculator or taxr.ai) to double-check your federal numbers, then handle Colorado separately. Better to be conservative and get a small refund than owe at tax time!

0 coins

Ryan Vasquez

•

Welcome to the US tax system! As someone who's helped many newcomers navigate this, I completely understand your confusion about the W4 - it's one of those forms that seems simple but has lots of nuances. Given your situation (married, combined income ~$175k, spouse with variable commission income), here's what I'd recommend for your W4: **Step 1:** Select "Married filing jointly" **Step 2:** This is crucial for your situation. I'd actually recommend using the Multiple Jobs Worksheet (option 2b) rather than just checking box 2c. With your spouse's variable commission income and the significant difference in your earnings ($60k vs $115k), the worksheet will give you more accurate withholding calculations. **Step 3:** Skip if no dependents **Step 4c:** Based on your income levels, I'd suggest starting with $40-50 additional withholding per weekly paycheck. This should help ensure you don't owe at tax time. **Important tip:** Since your spouse already has good withholding (getting refunds), you might want to coordinate with them. Sometimes it's more effective to adjust withholding on the higher earner's paychecks rather than spreading it across both. Don't forget you'll also need Colorado's DR 0004 form for state withholding! The IRS withholding calculator at irs.gov/W4App is really helpful for your specific situation - just have both your recent pay stubs ready when you use it.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm curious about your point regarding coordinating withholding with my spouse. Since they're already getting refunds and their income is higher, would it make more sense for them to increase their withholding instead of me adjusting mine? Also, when you mention the Multiple Jobs Worksheet being better for variable commission income - does that worksheet account for the fact that commission earnings can swing pretty dramatically month to month? My spouse's income can vary by $15-20k between their best and worst quarters, which makes it hard to predict our total annual income. I definitely want to use the IRS calculator as you suggested, but I'm wondering if I should use an average of my spouse's commission earnings or try to estimate conservatively (using lower commission projections) to avoid underwithholding?

0 coins

Prev1...756757758759760...5644Next