IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Leila Haddad

•

Don't forget to check if your state has additional tax breaks beyond the federal ones! I live in Oregon and we have additional credits and deductions at the state level that saved me about $350 last year. Most tax software covers this but sometimes they miss state-specific breaks.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

This is so true. I'm in Illinois and discovered we have a specific education expense credit that's separate from the federal ones. Might be worth looking into whatever state you're in.

0 coins

Hannah White

•

As someone who recently went through this same confusion, I'd recommend starting with the basics that will likely apply to your situation. Since you're taking community college classes, definitely look into the American Opportunity Tax Credit or Lifetime Learning Credit - these can be worth up to $2,500 and $2,000 respectively and are actual credits (not just deductions). Also check if you paid any student loan interest during the year - you can deduct up to $2,500 of that even if you don't itemize. And if you moved for work or had any unreimbursed work expenses (like uniforms, tools, etc.), those might be deductible too. TurboTax will catch the obvious ones if you answer the questions correctly, but it's worth double-checking because sometimes the questions are confusing or you might not realize something qualifies. The IRS website has some good worksheets and tools to help you figure out what applies to your specific situation.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to filing taxes on my own too and had no idea about the student loan interest deduction. Quick question - do you know if there's an income limit for claiming that deduction? And for work expenses, would things like gas money for driving to work count, or is it more specific items like uniforms and equipment?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Great question! Yes, there is an income limit for the student loan interest deduction. For 2025, it starts phasing out at around $75,000 for single filers and is completely eliminated at $90,000, so at your income level you should be fine to claim the full deduction. For work expenses, unfortunately commuting costs like gas money for driving to your regular workplace generally don't qualify. The IRS considers that a personal expense. However, if you drive between multiple work locations during the same day, or travel to temporary work assignments, those miles could be deductible. For a barista position, deductible work expenses might include things like non-slip shoes required by your employer, uniforms that aren't suitable for street wear, or any training materials you had to purchase yourself. The key is that the expense has to be "ordinary and necessary" for your job and not reimbursed by your employer. Keep receipts for anything work-related you buy!

0 coins

How to determine the actual value of K-1 shares for private company buyout offer

A few years back my wife and I invested in her private company during some kind of acquisition deal. Now we're dealing with what seems like a sketchy situation and could use some tax advice. The company has been incredibly opaque about everything related to our investment since day one. My wife left the company about two years ago, and we've since moved to another state. Out of nowhere last week, one of the executives reached out offering to buy our shares. Apparently, he's contacting several former employees with the same offer. Here's the suspicious part - he's claiming our shares are worth exactly what we paid for them 5 years ago. Not a penny more. We're not in any rush to sell, so I can hold these shares indefinitely, but I suspect he's being dishonest about their current value. My specific tax question is: Can I determine the actual value of our privately-held shares using our most recent K-1 forms? We've received quite a collection of forms: Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Arizona Form 165 Schedule K-1 (NR) California Schedule K-1 (568) State of Hawaii Schedule K-1 Form N-20 Idaho Schedule K-1 Form 1062 Illinois Schedule K-1-P and K-1-P(3) Indiana Schedule IN K-1 form IT-20S/IT-65 Montana Schedule K-1 (PTE) Oregon Schedule OR-K-1 Utah Schedule K-1 Form TC-65, Sch. K-1 I'm thinking there must be some way to calculate our shares' actual value from all these forms, but I have no clue where to start. I plan to contact our CPA tomorrow, but since this exec is pushing my wife for an answer now, I wanted to do some investigating on my own first. Any insights would be greatly appreciated!

Arnav Bengali

•

This thread has been incredibly educational to follow! As someone who's dealt with similar private company share situations, I wanted to add one more angle that might be helpful. Since you mentioned receiving K-1s from multiple states (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, etc.), this suggests the company has operations or assets in multiple jurisdictions. This multi-state presence could actually work in your favor for valuation purposes - it often indicates a more substantial business than a simple local operation. Multi-state businesses typically have higher valuation multiples due to geographic diversification and operational complexity. When you're calculating that capitalization of earnings analysis mentioned earlier, you might want to research industry multiples specifically for companies with multi-state operations rather than using single-location business multiples. Also, the administrative complexity of maintaining compliance in all those states suggests significant revenue scale - small businesses rarely justify the compliance costs of multi-state operations unless the income is substantial. One tactical suggestion: when you send that formal written response declining their offer, consider asking them to explain how they determined that a multi-state operation with 5 years of growth is worth exactly what you paid. Force them to defend their methodology in writing. You've built an incredibly strong case here. The combination of financial evidence from the K-1s plus the potential legal issues gives you serious leverage. Don't let them rush you into anything!

0 coins

That's a brilliant observation about the multi-state operations! I hadn't connected the dots between all those different state K-1s and what that implies about the business scale and complexity. You're absolutely right that maintaining compliance in 10+ states isn't something a small operation would do unless the revenue justified those costs. This adds another layer to our valuation argument. When I researched comparable businesses in our industry, I was looking at general small business multiples. But if this is actually a substantial multi-state operation, the valuation multiples could be significantly higher - sometimes 20-30% premium for geographic diversification alone. I love the tactical suggestion about forcing them to defend their methodology in writing. Something like "Please provide your detailed analysis showing how a profitable multi-state business with 5 years of documented growth in earnings and distributions maintains exactly zero appreciation in value." Put the burden on them to justify what's clearly an indefensible position. Between the earnings manipulation through guaranteed payments, the clear evidence of appreciation in our K-1s, the potential fiduciary duty issues, and now this multi-state complexity angle, I feel like we have an overwhelming case. This executive is about to get a very different response than he was expecting! Thank you all for turning what seemed like a hopeless information disadvantage into a position of strength. This community is incredible!

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

Reading through this entire thread has been fascinating - you've essentially conducted a masterclass in private company valuation using K-1 analysis! One final piece that might be worth investigating: check if your K-1s show any "Section 704(c) built-in gain" adjustments. When companies have appreciated assets (real estate, equipment, intellectual property), these adjustments can reveal hidden value that wouldn't show up in the basic income/distribution analysis. Also, since you mentioned this is related to an acquisition deal from when you first invested, there might be earnout provisions or contingent value rights that weren't fully reflected in your initial purchase price but could have matured over these 5 years. Check your original investment documents for any language about additional payments based on future performance milestones. The fact pattern you've uncovered - earnings manipulation, multi-state complexity, clear appreciation indicators, plus potential fiduciary breaches - suggests this executive seriously underestimated your ability to analyze the situation. Your response is going to be a wake-up call for them. Document everything discussed in this thread, get that formal valuation if the numbers justify it, and don't be afraid to mention consulting with legal counsel if they continue playing hardball. Sometimes just mentioning you've researched fiduciary duty issues is enough to shift negotiations dramatically. You've gone from having "no clue where to start" to having a comprehensive strategy backed by solid evidence. Impressive work!

0 coins

What does IRS Code 898 on transcript mean? Partner's $1,055 refund shows as "Applied to non-IRS debt" despite being issued

Can someone help me understand what my partners transcript means? I noticed something weird when looking at his tax refund info. He filed his taxes and got a refund of $1,055 in late February, but when I look at his transcript there's a bunch of codes that don't make sense to me. His transcript shows: RETURN DUE DATE OR RETURN RECEIVED DATE (WHICHEVER IS LATER) Apr. 15, 2025 PROCESSING DATE Mar. 10, 2025 TRANSACTIONS CODE EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION - CYCLE - DATE - AMOUNT 150 Tax return filed - 20250805 - 03-10-2025 - $764.00 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding - 04-15-2025 - -$1,819.00 846 Refund issued - 02-26-2025 - $1,055.00 898 Refund applied to non-IRS debt: - 03-10-2025 - $0.00 $1,055.00 This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data What confuses me is that it shows a tax return filed with a tax amount of $764, withholding of $1,819, then a refund issued on 02-26-2025, and then something about "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" with $0.00 but then his refund amount of $1,055 again. What does all this actually mean? Is part of his refund being taken for something? Did he actually get the full $1,055? The dates are also confusing - some dates like 04-15-2025 are in the future, but the processing date is 03-10-2025 and we're still in early 2025. And what's that "CYCLE" number 20250805 mean? Does the code 898 "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" mean they're taking his refund for something else? But then why does it show $0.00? I'm really confused about what happened with his money.

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation on my transcript and was completely lost until I read through all these explanations. The way everyone broke down the 898 code and those confusing future dates really cleared things up for me. I had the same panic when I saw "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" on mine - I thought the government was secretly taking my money for something I didn't know about! But now I understand it's actually their way of showing they did their due diligence checking for any debts and found nothing to offset. It's crazy how something as simple as "you got your full refund" gets turned into this cryptic code system that makes everyone think something's wrong. The IRS really needs to hire some of you folks to translate their documents into normal human language! šŸ˜‚ Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion - you've probably saved a lot of people from unnecessary stress and confusion!

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

I'm so glad this thread helped you too! It's amazing how many of us have gone through the exact same panic when seeing that 898 code. I was convinced something was seriously wrong until everyone here explained it so clearly. You're absolutely right that the IRS needs better communication - turning "no debts found, here's your full refund" into mysterious codes is just cruel! šŸ˜… This community really is incredible at breaking down these confusing government documents. I'll definitely be bookmarking this thread for future reference!

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

This thread has been so educational! I'm bookmarking it for future reference. The way everyone explained the 898 code and those confusing IRS processing dates really helped demystify what looks like complete gibberish on these transcripts. It's wild that "we checked for debts and found none, so you get your full refund" gets translated into cryptic codes that make everyone panic. The IRS could save so much confusion by just using plain English! But thanks to this amazing community, at least we can help each other decode their ancient hieroglyphics šŸ˜‚ For anyone else stumbling across this thread with similar transcript confusion - this is definitely the place to get answers!

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Did you check the envelope the 1099 came in? Sometimes companies print their EIN on the return address or other materials included with the tax form. Also, if this company has ever paid you before, check last year's 1099 if you have it. One other thing to try - if it's a company with a website, sometimes they include their EIN in the footer of their website or on their "About Us" page if they're government contractors or do certain types of business.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

In my experience working as an admin for a small business, sometimes the EIN is hidden because they messed up and sent you the copy that was supposed to go to the IRS (Copy A is typically red and has the TIN partially masked). If that's the case, they should have another copy to send you.

0 coins

I didn't think about checking the envelope - unfortunately I already tossed it. This is my first time doing work for them so I don't have previous forms. I checked their website but didn't see any EIN listed. You might be right about them sending the wrong copy! The form does have a reddish tint to it, which seems unusual. I'll mention this specifically when I follow up with them again. Thank you both for the suggestions!

0 coins

If you're still having trouble reaching the company and need to file soon, I'd recommend documenting your attempts to get the correct TIN. Keep records of when you called, emailed, or otherwise tried to contact them. This shows good faith effort on your part. You can absolutely file with "unknown" in the payer TIN field as others have mentioned. The IRS is primarily concerned with accurate income reporting. Just make sure you report the full $5,800 on your Schedule C and include a brief note in your tax software or on paper explaining that you attempted to obtain the payer's TIN but it was not provided on the form. Also, since this is freelance income over $400, don't forget you'll need to pay self-employment tax on this amount in addition to regular income tax. Make sure your tax software is calculating that correctly when you enter the 1099-MISC income.

0 coins

Jason Brewer

•

FYI, I've filed the final 990-N for two small organizations and it's super easy! You just go to the IRS website, log in to the e-Postcard system, and there's literally a checkbox for "This is the final return." You check that, enter the dissolution date, and that's pretty much it. The whole process took me maybe 10 minutes.

0 coins

Which IRS website exactly? There are so many different pages and I can never find what I'm looking for on there.

0 coins

You can find the 990-N e-Postcard system at irs.gov/charities-non-profits/annual-electronic-filing-requirement-for-small-exempt-organizations-form-990-n-e-postcard. There's also a direct link to the filing system on that page. Just search for "990-N e-postcard" on the IRS website and it should be the first result.

0 coins

Just want to add that you should definitely not ignore the IRS notice, even for a dissolved nonprofit. I learned this the hard way when I thought I could just let a tiny organization "fade away" without proper closure. The IRS will eventually revoke your tax-exempt status retroactively, which can create complications if anyone ever questions the organization's tax status during the years it was active. Even though your nonprofit only had minimal income, having a clean closure on record protects you from any future issues. The 990-N filing really is straightforward once you know what to do. Since you already transferred the assets to the parent organization in 2023, you have everything you need to complete the final filing. Just make sure to use 2023 as your dissolution date when you file the final return.

0 coins

This is such an important point about not ignoring IRS notices! I'm dealing with something similar right now - inherited the mess from a previous volunteer who just walked away without properly closing things out. Quick question though: when you mention using 2023 as the dissolution date, should that be the exact date the bank account was closed and assets transferred, or just sometime in 2023? I have the bank transfer date but not sure if I need to be that specific on the form. Also really glad to see all the helpful resources people have shared here. As someone new to dealing with nonprofit tax stuff, this thread has been incredibly educational!

0 coins

Prev1...732733734735736...5643Next