IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Amara Okonkwo

•

I'm dealing with the same exact issue right now! Got my 570 code last Friday and it's been keeping me up at night honestly. Filed January 31st with just W-2 income, standard deduction, expecting about $3,100 back. What's really helped me is reading through all these comments - seems like this is way more common this year than usual. I've been spiraling thinking something was wrong with my return, but hearing that most of these resolve in 3-6 weeks without any action needed is actually pretty reassuring. The hardest part is not knowing WHAT they're reviewing exactly. But based on what everyone's sharing, it sounds like it's usually just routine verification stuff - matching W-2s, checking employer records, that kind of thing. I've decided to follow the advice about checking twice a week instead of daily because I was literally refreshing my transcript like 10 times a day šŸ˜‚ Going to give it until mid-March before I start really panicking. Hoping we all see some movement soon! Stay strong everyone - sounds like patience is key here even though it absolutely sucks when you need that money! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

I totally get the sleepless nights! 😰 Same boat here - filed early Feb and just discovered my 570 code yesterday. Your comment about checking 10 times a day really hit home because I've been doing the exact same thing! It's like we can't help ourselves when we're stressed about money. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a relief though - sounds like this is just the new normal for early filers this year. Really appreciate you sharing that you're giving it until mid-March before panicking, that's a good timeline to keep in mind. We got this! šŸ™

0 coins

I'm going through the exact same nightmare right now! Filed on February 2nd with just my W-2 and standard deduction, expecting around $2,700 back. Just saw the 570 code pop up on my transcript this morning and immediately started panicking. Reading through all these comments is honestly the first time I've felt any relief since seeing that code. It's crazy how many of us are dealing with this same situation - makes me think it's just something with their systems this year rather than individual problems with our returns. The part about it being routine income verification makes total sense, especially for us early filers. Our employers probably haven't gotten all their quarterly stuff processed yet, so the IRS is just being extra careful before releasing refunds. I was literally about to call in sick to work so I could spend the day on hold with the IRS, but after reading everyone's experiences, I think I'll give it a few weeks first. Sounds like most of these resolve automatically without us having to do anything, which is honestly what I was hoping to hear. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories - this community is a lifesaver when you're stressed about money! šŸ™

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

I went through this exact situation about 8 months ago when a drunk driver totaled my car. Got a settlement of $19,200 for a vehicle I originally bought for $21,800. I was super anxious about the tax implications until my accountant explained that since the insurance payout was less than my original purchase price and the car was 100% personal use, there was absolutely no taxable income to report. The key thing that helped me was understanding that this isn't considered "income" by the IRS - it's just partial recovery of money you already spent. You're not making a profit, you're just getting back some of what you lost. One tip I'd add: if you financed the car and still owed money on the loan, make sure you understand how the insurance company handles the payout. In my case, they paid the lender directly for the remaining loan balance and sent me a check for the difference. The total amount (loan payoff + my check) is what matters for tax purposes, not just the check you receive. Keep all your paperwork organized - original purchase docs, loan information, insurance settlement letters, everything. Having a complete paper trail gives you confidence and makes things much easier if you ever need to explain the situation to a tax preparer or the IRS.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

That's a really important point about how the insurance company handles the payout when you still have a loan! I didn't even think about that distinction. My car is almost paid off but I still owe about $3,000 on it. So if the insurance settlement is $18,500 and they pay my lender $3,000 directly, then send me $15,500, I need to consider the full $18,500 amount when comparing to my original purchase price for tax purposes, right? This is exactly the kind of detail that could trip someone up if they're not careful. Thanks for bringing it up! I'm definitely going to make sure I get documentation showing the total settlement amount, not just focus on the check I receive.

0 coins

@Ellie Perry Yes, exactly right! You need to consider the full $18,500 settlement amount what (they pay the lender plus what you receive when) comparing to your original purchase price for tax purposes. The fact that the insurance company splits the payment between you and your lender doesn t'change the total amount of the settlement. This is actually a really common source of confusion. I ve'seen people think they only need to report the portion they personally received, but that s'not correct. The IRS looks at the total insurance recovery amount regardless of how it s'distributed. Make sure to get a settlement statement from your insurance company that shows the breakdown - total settlement amount, amount paid to lender, amount paid to you. This documentation will be super helpful for your tax records and makes it crystal clear what the full settlement value was. It s'great that you re'thinking through these details now rather than trying to figure it out later when you re'doing your taxes!

0 coins

This is such great information from everyone! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now - my car was totaled in a parking lot accident last week and I'm waiting to hear back on the settlement amount. From everything I've read here, it sounds like as long as the insurance payout is less than what I originally paid for the car (which it almost certainly will be since I bought it 3 years ago), I won't have any tax liability since it was purely personal use. One question I haven't seen addressed - does it matter if you made modifications to the car after purchase that increased its value? I had a premium sound system installed about a year after buying the car that cost around $2,500. Would that be added to my original "basis" in the vehicle when determining if there's any taxable gain? Or do personal modifications like that not count? I'm definitely going to follow everyone's advice about keeping detailed documentation and requesting the valuation report from insurance. This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding what's normally a pretty stressful financial situation!

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar boat with uneven income this year. One additional consideration I wanted to mention for anyone dealing with retirement account conversions or rollovers - make sure you understand the timing rules for when the income is considered "received" for estimated tax purposes. For traditional IRA to Roth conversions, the taxable income is generally considered received on the date of the conversion, not when you originally contributed to the traditional IRA. This matters for the annualized method calculations because it determines which quarter the income gets allocated to. Also, if you're doing a series of smaller conversions throughout the year to manage your tax bracket (rather than one large conversion), you'll need to track each conversion date separately for your quarterly calculations. I learned this the hard way when I assumed I could just lump all my conversions into one quarter for simplicity. The documentation advice from Hugh Intensity is spot on too - keep records of every conversion date and amount. Your brokerage should provide statements showing the exact dates, but it's worth keeping your own spreadsheet as backup.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

This is such valuable information about conversion timing! I hadn't even thought about the "received" date being different from contribution dates. That actually explains some of the confusion I was having with my calculations. Your point about multiple smaller conversions is really important too. I was considering doing exactly that - spreading conversions across quarters to stay in lower brackets - but I hadn't realized each one would need to be tracked separately for the annualized method. That could actually make the calculations much more complex. Do you happen to know if there's a minimum conversion amount that makes sense from a paperwork/complexity standpoint? I was thinking about doing monthly small conversions, but if each one creates a separate tracking requirement, maybe quarterly larger conversions would be more manageable? Also, did your brokerage provide any guidance on optimal timing for tax purposes, or did you have to figure that out on your own?

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

I've been following this thread closely as someone who's dealt with similar estimated tax challenges. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the importance of understanding the "required annual payment" safe harbor rules when using the annualized method. Even if your calculations show you owe nothing for Q1-Q3, you still need to ensure your total payments for the year meet either 90% of your current year tax liability OR 100% of last year's tax (110% if your prior year AGI exceeded $150,000). The annualized method helps you time these payments correctly, but you still need to meet one of these thresholds to avoid penalties. For those dealing with large conversions or rollovers in Q4, this is especially important because your "current year tax" might be significantly higher than your prior year. In that case, paying 100% of last year's tax might be your safest bet, and you can make that entire payment in Q4 when you actually have the income to support it. Also, regarding the question about multiple small conversions - from a tax planning perspective, spreading conversions across the year can be beneficial for bracket management, but each conversion does create a separate line item for your annualized calculations. Most tax professionals recommend quarterly conversions as a good balance between tax optimization and administrative complexity.

0 coins

This is such an important point about the safe harbor rules! I think a lot of people (myself included) get so focused on the quarterly calculations that we forget about the annual requirements. Your explanation about the 90% current year vs 100% prior year rule is really helpful. In my case, with the large Roth conversion in Q4, my current year tax is going to be way higher than last year. So paying 100% of last year's tax sounds like the much safer approach, especially since I can make that payment when I actually have the conversion income to cover it. One follow-up question - when you say "you can make that entire payment in Q4," do you mean I could literally make zero payments for Q1-Q3 and then pay 100% of last year's tax liability all in one Q4 payment? That seems almost too simple, but if it satisfies the safe harbor requirements, it would definitely be easier than trying to estimate quarterly amounts with such uneven income. Also, thank you for the guidance on quarterly vs monthly conversions. That makes total sense from a complexity standpoint.

0 coins

This has been such a helpful discussion! I really appreciate everyone taking the time to share their experiences and insights. You've all given me a lot more to consider than I initially thought about. A few key takeaways I'm getting: 1. Unfortunately, I can't deduct the loss from surrendering, which is frustrating but good to know definitively 2. I should call my insurance company to get a complete policy illustration and understand all riders/benefits before deciding 3. The guaranteed interest rate from 1965 might actually be competitive with today's rates 4. Life settlements could potentially get me more than surrender value 5. I need to verify ownership status since my grandfather originally started the policy I think my next steps will be to call the insurance company to get all the policy details, then possibly explore the life settlement option if the ownership is clear. The creditor protection and guaranteed rate aspects might also make keeping it worthwhile. Thanks again to everyone - this community is incredibly knowledgeable! I'll update this thread once I've gathered more information from my insurance company.

0 coins

Great summary of all the options! One more thing to consider when you call your insurance company - ask them about any loan provisions in the policy. Some older whole life policies allow you to borrow against the cash value at very favorable rates (sometimes as low as 5-6% fixed). If your policy has this feature, you could potentially access some of the cash value without surrendering the policy entirely. This would let you get some liquidity while keeping the death benefit and any valuable riders in place. Just make sure to understand how loans affect the death benefit if that's important for your beneficiaries. Also, when you get that policy illustration, pay special attention to any "paid-up additions" or dividend history. Policies from that era sometimes have accumulated quite a bit of additional coverage from reinvested dividends that might not be immediately obvious from the basic surrender value quote.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

This is exactly the kind of complex situation where getting professional guidance upfront can save you from costly mistakes. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like you have several viable paths forward that could be better than just surrendering at a loss. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - when you call your insurance company, also ask about "reduced paid-up" options. This is different from just reducing the death benefit. With reduced paid-up, you stop paying premiums entirely and convert the policy to a smaller paid-up policy using the existing cash value. This eliminates ongoing premium costs while preserving some death benefit and potentially valuable policy provisions. Given that your policy has 60 years of history, there might be some really valuable legacy features built in that modern policies simply don't offer. The fact that you've kept it active all these years despite being "underwater" suggests there might be compelling reasons to explore alternatives to surrendering. Definitely document everything when you call - policy numbers, rider details, guaranteed rates, loan provisions, etc. Having all that information will help you make a more informed decision and also be valuable if you do decide to explore the life settlement route.

0 coins

This is such valuable advice about the reduced paid-up option! I had no idea that was even a possibility - being able to stop paying premiums while keeping some death benefit sounds like it could be a perfect middle ground for OP's situation. The point about documenting everything during the insurance company call is really smart too. With all these different options (surrender, reduce death benefit, policy loan, reduced paid-up, life settlement), having all the specific numbers and features will be crucial for making the right comparison. I'm curious - do reduced paid-up policies typically maintain the same creditor protection benefits that @c4bc2da0165f mentioned earlier? And would the guaranteed interest rate still apply to whatever cash value remains after the conversion? These older policies seem to have so many nuances that aren't immediately obvious. @61d990d64ed3 definitely sounds like you have more options than you initially realized! This thread has been incredibly educational.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year! Had an LLC sitting dormant for 2 years and was stressed about the tax implications. Here's what I learned from my experience: First, you're probably fine on the federal level. Since you had zero income, expenses, or transactions, there's typically no federal tax filing requirement. However, I'd still recommend sending a simple letter to the IRS if you got an EIN, just to formally notify them you're closing the business. The real gotcha is usually at the state level. Most states charge annual franchise taxes or require annual reports regardless of business activity. I got hit with about $800 in back fees in my state just for having the LLC registered, even though it never conducted any business. My suggestion: Before you start the dissolution process, check your state's business entity database online (usually through the Secretary of State website) to see if your LLC is still in "good standing" or if it was already administratively dissolved for non-compliance. If it was auto-dissolved, that might actually save you some headaches and fees. Also, call your state's business filing office directly - they're usually pretty helpful in explaining what you owe and what steps you need to take. Some states have streamlined processes for dissolving inactive entities that can reduce penalties. Good luck cleaning up those loose ends!

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the administrative dissolution you mentioned - if an LLC was automatically dissolved by the state for non-compliance, does that typically clear you of any back fees and penalties, or do those still follow you even after the administrative dissolution? Also, when you called your state's business filing office, were they able to give you a clear breakdown of exactly what you owed upfront, or did you have to dig through multiple departments to get the full picture of your obligations?

0 coins

Olivia Clark

•

I'm in a very similar boat - formed an LLC about 2 years ago with grand plans that never materialized, and now I'm trying to figure out how to properly close it down. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful, especially learning about the state-level requirements that I completely overlooked. One thing I'm wondering about that I haven't seen addressed yet: if you never opened a business bank account (like the original poster), does that make the dissolution process any simpler? I literally did nothing with my LLC except file the formation paperwork and get an EIN, so there are zero financial records, no bank accounts, no business credit cards - nothing. Also, for those who mentioned sending a letter to the IRS about closing the EIN, is there a specific format or address for that letter, or do you just send it to your local IRS office? I want to make sure I do this step correctly since it seems like good practice even if it's not strictly required. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences - this thread is way more helpful than anything I found on the official IRS website!

0 coins

Great question about the bank account! Not having a business bank account actually does simplify things quite a bit - it's one less loose end to tie up and confirms you truly had zero financial activity. You won't need to worry about closing business accounts, reconciling statements, or dealing with any banking-related tax documents. For the EIN closure letter, there isn't a super strict format, but you'll want to include: your LLC name, EIN, business address, the date you're closing, and a simple statement that the business is ceasing operations. Send it to the IRS address for your area - you can find the specific address on the IRS website under "Where to File" based on your state. Some people also include a copy of their state dissolution paperwork just for completeness. Since you literally only filed formation papers and got an EIN, your situation is probably one of the cleanest dissolution scenarios possible! Just focus on the state requirements since that's usually where the gotchas are hiding.

0 coins

Prev1...614615616617618...5643Next