IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ava Thompson

•

I'm going through a similar situation right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I filed my SS8 back in October and I'm still waiting for the determination, but seeing everyone's success stories gives me hope. One thing I wanted to add for anyone else dealing with this - make sure you keep paying estimated taxes if you're still doing similar work elsewhere. I made the mistake of assuming my SS8 filing meant I could stop making quarterly payments, but that only applies to the specific employer relationship you're disputing. Also, has anyone dealt with the situation where you worked for multiple companies during the same tax year, but only one of them misclassified you? I'm trying to figure out how to handle the mixed W2/1099 situation when filing my amended returns if my determination comes back favorable. The documentation advice here is gold - I've been keeping everything in both digital and physical copies just to be safe. Better to over-document than under-document with the IRS! @Mateo Sanchez - definitely share this info with your former coworkers if you feel comfortable doing so. Worker misclassification often affects multiple people at the same company, and they deserve to know their rights. You could always just mention that you went through the SS8 process and let them research it themselves if they're interested.

0 coins

Great advice about continuing quarterly payments for other work! I made a similar mistake when I first filed my SS8 - stopped making estimated payments thinking the whole process would resolve quickly, then ended up owing penalties. For your mixed W2/1099 situation, you'll only need to amend the portions related to the misclassified employer. Your properly issued W2s from other employers stay the same, and you'll just be removing the 1099 income from the disputed employer and replacing it with W2 wages (once you get your determination). The IRS is pretty good at handling these mixed situations. One tip that saved me a lot of headache - create separate folders for each employer when organizing your documents. That way when you're filling out forms, you can easily distinguish between the legitimate contractor work and the misclassified employment. It also helps if the IRS has any follow-up questions about your specific case. Keep us posted on your determination! The waiting is definitely the hardest part, but sounds like you're being really thorough with your documentation which will pay off in the long run.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Just wanted to jump in and say congratulations on your SS8 victory! As someone who's been helping people navigate tax issues for years, I can tell you that getting a favorable SS8 determination is no small feat - the IRS really scrutinizes these cases. A few additional tips based on what I've seen work well: 1. When you file Form 8919, consider requesting a paper check for your refund rather than direct deposit. Worker classification refunds sometimes get flagged in the electronic system, and paper checks tend to process more smoothly for these specific cases. 2. If you have any old email communications with your employer about work schedules, performance reviews, or company policies that applied to you, include copies with your amended returns. These really help establish the employer-employee relationship beyond what's already in your SS8 determination. 3. Keep a detailed log of your filing dates and confirmation numbers. With worker classification cases, it's not uncommon for the IRS to request additional documentation months later, and having everything tracked helps immensely. The fact that you were there for 18 months with clear control indicators (schedule, equipment, supervision) makes your case very strong. That $4,900 recovery estimate mentioned earlier sounds about right based on your self-employment tax amount. Best of luck with the process - you've already done the hardest part by getting that determination!

0 coins

This conversation has been absolutely fantastic! As someone new to navigating private school expenses, I'm amazed by how many legitimate tax benefit options actually exist that I had no idea about. The 529 plan strategy for K-12 expenses is definitely my top priority to research now. The fact that you can contribute and withdraw almost immediately while still getting state tax benefits completely changes my perspective on these accounts. I always thought they were only worthwhile for long-term college planning. I'm also going to look into my state's specific education tax credits and programs. Reading about the Educational Improvement Tax Credit programs has opened my eyes to how much these benefits can vary by location - there might be opportunities right in my backyard that I've never heard of. One practical step I'm taking away is to contact my child's school about separating care costs from educational costs on their billing. Even small amounts that qualify for FSA treatment could add up to meaningful savings. The documentation advice throughout this thread has been invaluable too. It's clear that success with these programs depends on staying organized and understanding exactly which expenses qualify under which programs. I'm definitely going to start tracking everything systematically from now on. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences and specific examples. This community has provided more practical guidance than countless hours of trying to research tax code on my own!

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

Welcome to the community! I'm also relatively new to exploring education tax benefits and this thread has been such a revelation. Like you, I had completely written off any possibility of tax relief for private school costs. What really resonates with me is your point about the documentation and organization aspect. After reading through everyone's experiences, it's clear that the families who are successfully maximizing these benefits are the ones who stay on top of record-keeping and understand the specific requirements for each program. I'm planning to start with the 529 immediate contribution/withdrawal strategy as well, since it seems like the most accessible option while I research what my state specifically offers. The retroactive capability that Carmen mentioned is particularly appealing - knowing you can still take action for this tax year even if you're just discovering these options now. Your idea about contacting the school for expense breakdowns is smart too. It sounds like many schools are familiar with these requests and can provide the documentation needed for FSA or other programs. Every bit of legitimate tax savings helps when you're dealing with these significant education costs. Thanks for adding your perspective to this incredible discussion - it's been so helpful to learn from everyone's real-world experiences rather than trying to navigate the complex tax code alone!

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

This has been such an incredibly educational thread! I'm new to this community and in a very similar situation with my kids at a private academy. Reading through everyone's real-world experiences has been more helpful than anything I've found in my own research. What really strikes me is how many legitimate options actually exist that most families (myself included) never hear about. The 529 K-12 withdrawal strategy is definitely something I need to implement immediately - I had no idea you could contribute and withdraw almost instantly while still getting state tax deductions. I'm also fascinated by how state-specific many of these benefits are. It really emphasizes the importance of researching what's available in your particular location rather than just assuming the federal limitations apply everywhere. The Educational Improvement Tax Credit programs some of you mentioned sound particularly worth investigating. One thing I'm taking away is the critical importance of organization and documentation. It seems like the families who successfully maximize these benefits are the ones who carefully track which expenses go under which programs and maintain detailed records. I'm definitely going to start being much more systematic about this. For anyone else just discovering these options like me - it's encouraging to know that many of these strategies can be implemented retroactively for the current tax year, so we don't have to wait until next year to start seeing some relief. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and specific examples. This community is invaluable for navigating these complex financial decisions!

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

Great question about LLC classification elections! I've dealt with similar situations and wanted to add a few practical considerations. For your first scenario, while Connor's advice about the 75-day limitation is correct, there's actually another option worth considering. Since you haven't filed any returns yet and have an extension in place, you might want to explore whether your situation qualifies for "late election relief" under Rev. Proc. 2009-41. This allows retroactive elections up to 3 years and 75 days from the desired effective date if you can show reasonable cause. Given that all partners are voluntarily relinquishing their interests and you're dealing with a loss situation, you might have a strong reasonable cause argument. The key is including a detailed explanation with Form 8832 about why the election is late and why it's reasonable under the circumstances. One more thing to watch out for: if you go the deemed liquidation route that CosmicCowboy mentioned, make sure to properly handle any Section 754 election considerations if there are any inside/outside basis differences, though with an $8K loss this probably isn't relevant. For your second scenario, Emma's point about updating the operating agreement is crucial - the IRS will look at the substance of the arrangement, not just the form, so proper documentation is essential.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about the late election relief option! I hadn't heard of Rev. Proc. 2009-41 before. For the reasonable cause statement, what kind of specific language or documentation would strengthen the case? Also, you mentioned Section 754 elections - even though my situation involves a loss, would there be any scenarios where this could still be relevant? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything that could come back to bite me later. The point about substance over form for the second scenario is well taken. Beyond updating the operating agreement, are there any other documentation requirements the IRS typically looks for to validate the partnership classification?

0 coins

For the reasonable cause statement under Rev. Proc. 2009-41, you'll want to be very specific about the circumstances. In your case, I'd focus on: (1) the unanimous agreement of all partners to transfer their interests to one member, (2) the fact that only one member actually contributed to basis or participated in operations, (3) the administrative burden and cost of filing partnership returns when there's effectively only one economic owner, and (4) the fact that no returns have been filed yet, so there's no inconsistent reporting. Include documentation like the partnership agreement amendments showing the interest transfers, written consents from all partners, and any evidence that the other partners never actually contributed capital or participated in operations. Regarding Section 754 - even with a loss, if there's any difference between the inside basis of partnership assets and the outside basis of the departing partners' interests, a 754 election could be relevant. But in your situation with partners who never contributed to basis, this is probably not a concern. For the partnership validation in your second scenario, beyond the operating agreement, maintain records of: capital contribution documentation (bank records, property transfer docs), meeting minutes showing partnership decisions, separate partnership bank accounts, and any contracts or agreements signed in the partnership name. The IRS wants to see that you're actually operating as a partnership, not just calling it one on paper.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

This is incredibly thorough guidance - thank you! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now where we need to file late election relief, and your breakdown of what to include in the reasonable cause statement is exactly what I needed. One follow-up question: when you mention including "written consents from all partners," does this need to be a formal resolution, or would email confirmations from the departing partners be sufficient? Also, for timing purposes, should these consents be dated before filing Form 8832, or can they be contemporaneous with the filing? The point about maintaining partnership operation records is really important too. I've seen too many cases where the IRS challenged partnership status because the taxpayers treated it like a sole proprietorship in practice, even though they had the right paperwork.

0 coins

Benjamin, I feel your pain on this one! I went through something similar with my consulting business a few years back. The 5-year waiting period is brutal, but you do have some legitimate options beyond just waiting it out. Based on what you've described, I'd focus on the "reasonable cause" exception that others have mentioned. The fact that you revoked the S election when your business income was minimal ($40k) and you had a full-time job suggests you made a reasonable business decision at the time - not a tax avoidance scheme. Now that your circumstances have completely changed (full-time business, $180k projected income), you have a strong case for demonstrating that the original revocation wasn't primarily for tax benefits. The IRS has approved similar requests when taxpayers can show genuine business reasons. I'd recommend documenting everything: your income levels in 2023, your employment status change, projections for this year, and any advice you received that led to the original revocation. This paper trail will be crucial for your letter ruling request. The private letter ruling route isn't cheap (around $3,000-$7,000 in fees), but with your projected income level, the S corp tax savings would likely justify the cost. Just make sure you work with someone experienced in these types of requests - the formatting and arguments matter a lot. Don't give up! The IRS rejection letter is just their standard response, but exceptions do exist for situations like yours.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the documentation piece you mentioned - when you say "any advice you received that led to the original revocation," does that include informal advice from online sources or forums? Or are they looking for more formal documentation like correspondence with tax professionals? I'm asking because honestly, a lot of my decision-making back then was based on articles I found online and general guidance rather than formal professional advice. I'm wondering if that actually hurts or helps my case for the "reasonable cause" exception. Also, do you have any sense of typical timelines for private letter ruling responses? I know the IRS has been backed up with everything lately.

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

Great question about documentation! For the reasonable cause exception, the IRS actually prefers to see evidence of your decision-making process, even if it wasn't from formal professional advice. Online articles, forum discussions, or even notes you made at the time can help establish that you were trying to make an informed business decision rather than engaging in tax avoidance. The key is showing your thought process was legitimate given your circumstances at the time. If you relied on general guidance suggesting S corp elections weren't beneficial for small side businesses, that actually strengthens your case - it demonstrates you were making a reasonable business decision based on available information. As for timelines, private letter rulings are currently taking 6-12 months depending on complexity. The IRS has been slower across the board, but business entity rulings seem to move a bit faster than some other types. You can request expedited processing if you have a compelling reason (like pending quarterly filing deadlines), though that doesn't guarantee faster processing. One tip: if you do pursue the PLR route, consider filing it sooner rather than later. The closer you get to your original revocation date + 5 years, the less compelling your "change in circumstances" argument becomes.

0 coins

Benjamin, I've been following this thread and wanted to add another perspective based on my experience with S corp elections. You mentioned you've been relying on "random internet advice" - that's actually more common than you think, and it might work in your favor for the reasonable cause exception. The IRS recognizes that small business owners often make decisions based on general guidance available at the time. What matters is that you made a rational business decision given your circumstances (part-time business, minimal income, full-time employment). One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the timing of your quarterly estimated payments. Since you're projecting $180k this year and currently operating as an LLC, you're facing self-employment tax on the full amount. That's roughly $25k+ in SE tax alone that S corp status could help reduce significantly. Given the urgency of your tax situation, I'd actually recommend pursuing multiple approaches simultaneously: 1. File for the private letter ruling as others suggested 2. Consider the new entity approach (with proper legal structure to avoid substance-over-form issues) 3. Document everything about your 2023 decision-making process while it's still fresh The cost of professional help now is likely far less than the tax consequences of staying in LLC status for another 2+ years. Don't let the initial rejection discourage you - the IRS form letters rarely tell the whole story about available options.

0 coins

This is really solid advice, Samuel! The point about self-employment tax is huge - I hadn't fully calculated that impact. At $180k, we're talking about a significant difference between LLC and S corp treatment. I'm curious about your suggestion to pursue multiple approaches simultaneously. Wouldn't filing for a new entity while also requesting a private letter ruling for the existing entity potentially conflict with each other? I'm worried the IRS might view that as contradictory or undermining the "reasonable cause" argument. Also, do you have any experience with the documentation process for these situations? I'm trying to piece together what I was thinking back in 2023, but I didn't keep great records of my research process at the time.

0 coins

I wanted to share my experience from last tax season since I was in a very similar situation. My partner and I received state cash assistance for about 8 months in 2023, and I was equally confused about the documentation requirements. After calling both the IRS helpline and our state's assistance office, I can confirm what others have mentioned - TANF benefits are indeed non-taxable and you won't receive a 1099-G for them. What really helped me was keeping a simple folder throughout the year with any correspondence from the state assistance program, even though none of it ended up being tax-relevant. It gave me peace of mind during filing season to be able to double-check that nothing in those documents indicated taxable income. Also, since you mentioned this is your first joint filing, don't forget to update your direct deposit information if you're expecting a refund - learned that lesson the hard way when our refund got delayed because we hadn't updated our banking details after marriage!

0 coins

Thank you for sharing your real-world experience! It's so helpful to hear from someone who went through this exact situation. Your point about keeping a folder of correspondence is brilliant - even if the documents don't end up being tax-relevant, having everything organized must have made the whole process much less stressful. I never would have thought about the direct deposit issue after marriage either, so that's a great heads up! It sounds like you really had your documentation system figured out, which is something I should definitely implement for future tax seasons.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

As a fellow newcomer to the tax world, I really appreciate this thread! Reading through everyone's experiences has been so educational. I'm in a similar situation where I received some state assistance last year and was worried about missing required documentation. It's reassuring to learn that TANF benefits don't generate tax forms and aren't considered taxable income. The analogy about it being like a gift from family really helped it click for me. I've bookmarked the IRS Interactive Tax Assistant tool mentioned earlier - seems like a great resource to have on hand. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise here!

0 coins

Prev1...614615616617618...5643Next