IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just a heads up - I do similar advantage play and got audited last year. The biggest issue wasn't the gambling itself but that I wasn't filing quarterly estimated tax payments. Since there's no withholding on gambling winnings (unlike a regular job), the IRS expects you to make quarterly payments if you're going to owe a significant amount. If you're making $40K profit, you definitely need to be making estimated tax payments throughout the year. Otherwise, you'll get hit with underpayment penalties on top of the taxes you owe.

0 coins

How much is considered "significant" for quarterly payments? I'm doing some low-level advantage play (maybe $5-8k profit this year) and haven't been making quarterly payments.

0 coins

Generally, you need to make quarterly estimated payments if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in taxes when you file your return. With $5-8k in profit, you're probably looking at owing somewhere in the $1,200-2,400 range depending on your tax bracket and other income. The safe harbor rule is that if you pay at least 90% of this year's tax liability OR 100% of last year's tax liability (whichever is smaller) through estimated payments and withholding, you won't get hit with penalties. If your adjusted gross income was over $150k last year, you need to pay 110% of last year's liability. I'd recommend calculating your expected tax liability now and making a payment for Q4 if you haven't been doing quarterlies. Better to be safe than deal with underpayment penalties later.

0 coins

This is a really complex situation and I appreciate everyone sharing their experiences. As someone who's dealt with similar tax issues, I want to emphasize a few key points: First, the distinction between hobby gambling and professional gambling is crucial for your tax strategy. If the IRS considers you a professional gambler (based on factors like regularity, time invested, expertise, and profit motive), you'd report your income on Schedule C and could deduct business expenses like travel, equipment, and even home office costs. However, you'd also pay self-employment tax. Second, for advantage play specifically, the IRS has been paying more attention to this activity recently. The systematic nature of bonus hunting and arbitrage betting can actually work in your favor for establishing professional status, but it also means you need bulletproof documentation. Third, regarding the services mentioned here - while they might be helpful, make sure any tax professional you work with understands the specific nuances of advantage play. Not all CPAs are familiar with how promotional offers, cashback, and arbitrage betting should be categorized. Finally, consider setting aside 25-30% of your profits for taxes from the start. Gambling income is taxed as ordinary income, so depending on your bracket, you could be looking at a significant tax bill. The quarterly payment advice mentioned earlier is spot-on - don't wait until next April to deal with this. Good luck with your tax planning!

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

This is really helpful context, especially about the professional vs hobby distinction. I'm curious about the self-employment tax aspect - if someone qualifies as a professional gambler, are they looking at the full 15.3% SE tax on top of regular income tax? That seems like it could actually make the tax burden higher than treating it as hobby gambling, even with the additional deductions available. Also, when you mention the IRS paying more attention to advantage play recently, are you referring to specific audits or policy changes? I want to make sure I'm prepared for any increased scrutiny given the scale of my activities.

0 coins

I just went through this exact situation with my Swiss bank account. The key thing to understand is that even though you're an NRA with just $1,350 in interest, you absolutely need to file Form 1040-NR because the bank issued a 1099-INT instead of the proper 1042-S. Here's what I learned from my experience: First, don't waste more time trying to get the bank to reissue the form - they almost never cooperate once the 1099-INT is already sent. Second, when you file your 1040-NR, make sure to check if your home country has a tax treaty with the US that reduces the withholding rate on interest income. The most important part is documentation. Include a copy of your W-8BEN form with your return and write a brief explanatory statement that you're an NRA, the bank erroneously issued a 1099-INT despite your W-8BEN submission, and cite the specific tax treaty article if applicable. This creates a clear paper trail showing you acted in good faith. Even though it seems like overkill for such a small amount, filing properly protects you from potential penalties and ensures you only pay the correct treaty rate (which could be 0%, 10%, or 15% depending on your country) rather than the default 30% withholding rate for NRAs.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

This is incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - I'm originally from India and moved back there in 2023. I received a 1099-INT for about $900 in interest from my US savings account. The bank also messed up my W-8BEN processing despite me submitting it months before the tax year ended. I'm trying to figure out the US-India tax treaty provisions for interest income. Do you know if India has similar favorable rates like some of the European countries mentioned here? Also, since India uses a different tax year (April to March), do I need to do anything special when filing the US 1040-NR for the calendar year 2024? Your point about documentation is really reassuring - I have email chains with the bank where they kept saying they'd "look into it" but never actually processed my W-8BEN properly. Sounds like including those screenshots should be sufficient proof of my good faith efforts.

0 coins

I had a nearly identical situation when I moved back to Australia in early 2023! My US bank sent me a 1099-INT for about $1,100 in interest despite me submitting a W-8BEN form twice. The bank kept giving me the runaround about "processing delays" but never issued the correct 1042-S. Here's what I ended up doing: I filed Form 1040-NR and claimed the benefits under the US-Australia tax treaty, which exempts most bank interest from US withholding tax (0% rate under Article 11). The key was being very explicit in my filing - I attached my W-8BEN copy, included screenshots of my correspondence with the bank, and wrote a clear statement explaining I was an Australian resident and the bank had incorrectly issued a 1099-INT. The IRS processed everything smoothly and I didn't owe any US tax on the interest. The whole process took about 6 weeks from filing to resolution. Don't let the bank's mistake stress you out - just file properly with good documentation and you should be fine. The treaty provisions are there specifically for situations like this! One tip: when you reference your home country's tax treaty, be specific about the article number. It makes the IRS processing much smoother when they can quickly verify your treaty claim.

0 coins

@Dmitry Volkov Thanks for sharing your Australia experience! This gives me a lot of confidence about handling my own situation. I m'actually moving back to New Zealand next month but still have my US accounts open, so I want to make sure I handle this correctly going forward. Quick question - when you mention being specific "about the article number, did" you just write something like claiming "exemption under Article 11 of the US-Australia Tax Treaty in" your explanatory statement? I want to make sure I reference the US-New Zealand treaty correctly when I eventually need to file. Also, did you need to provide any proof of your Australian residency, or was the W-8BEN and explanatory statement sufficient for the IRS? Your 6-week timeline is really encouraging - I was worried this kind of situation might trigger a lengthy review or audit!

0 coins

As a new member to this community, I'm incredibly grateful to have found this thread while navigating my own Schedule C paper filing situation! I submitted my return on March 8th after e-filing issues with my business equipment depreciation schedules, and the wealth of real-world timelines and practical advice shared here has been invaluable. Based on everyone's experiences, I'm planning for the 8-12 week processing window, with potential additional delays due to Schedule C complexity. I've already implemented several strategies mentioned here: set up my IRS online account for detailed tracking, gathered documentation for potential Form 3911 filing after 28 days, and started researching bridge financing options through local credit unions. One additional resource I discovered this week is that some Small Business Administration district offices offer free consultation sessions specifically for cash flow management during tax processing delays - they can help identify interim funding sources and create contingency plans for business operations. I'm also planning to explore the congressional representative inquiry route since I have some critical vendor payments due in early May. Thank you all for creating such a supportive and informative community - it's made this stressful process much more manageable knowing there are concrete steps to take and multiple pathways for getting assistance!

0 coins

Sasha Reese

•

@Camila Jordan Welcome to the community! As another newcomer who s'been following this amazing thread closely, I m'really impressed by how proactive you re'being with multiple strategies right from the start. Your March 8th filing date means you re'just getting into the initial waiting period, but it s'smart that you re'already setting up all these backup plans. The SBA district office consultation idea is brilliant - I hadn t'thought of that resource for cash flow management during processing delays. Since you mentioned equipment depreciation schedule issues caused your e-filing problems, I m'curious if that might put you in a similar category to some of the other Schedule C complications people have mentioned here that tend to add extra review time. The combination of IRS online tracking, Form 3911 prep, credit union bridge financing research, and congressional inquiry planning sounds like a comprehensive approach. I m'dealing with my own paper filing delays and have found this community incredibly helpful for understanding realistic timelines and available options. Definitely keep us posted on how the SBA consultation goes and whether the congressional route proves effective for your vendor payment situation - that information could be really valuable for others facing similar business-critical deadlines!

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

As a new community member, I'm incredibly thankful to have discovered this comprehensive discussion while dealing with my own Schedule C paper filing challenges! I submitted my return on February 22nd after encountering e-filing rejection due to business mileage calculation discrepancies that couldn't be resolved electronically. The detailed timelines and practical strategies shared here have been absolutely invaluable for managing my expectations and planning next steps. Based on everyone's experiences, I'm preparing for the 6-12 week processing window with potential Schedule C-related extensions. I've already set up my IRS online account for enhanced tracking beyond the basic "Where's My Refund" tool, and I'm approaching the 28-day mark where Form 3911 becomes an option. What's particularly helpful is seeing the range of backup financing strategies mentioned - from credit union bridge loans to SBA emergency funding options. I'm also intrigued by the congressional representative inquiry approach for business hardship situations, as I have some critical quarterly tax payments and equipment lease renewals that depend on this refund timing. The community support and real-world data sharing here has transformed what felt like an impossible waiting game into a manageable situation with concrete action steps. Thank you all for creating such a resourceful environment!

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

Based on my experience dealing with similar situations, I'd lean toward these NOT being substantially identical for wash sale purposes, but it's definitely a gray area worth being careful about. The key differences that support treating them as distinct securities: inverse ETFs like TSLS use daily rebalancing and swap agreements to achieve their inverse exposure, while put options give you a direct contractual right with specific strike prices and expiration dates. The risk profiles and behaviors are meaningfully different - especially the time decay on options vs the compounding effects of daily resets on leveraged/inverse ETFs. That said, if you're looking to harvest the loss for tax purposes while maintaining a bearish Tesla position, you might consider waiting the full 31 days to be completely safe, or alternatively, look into other bearish strategies like shorting Tesla directly or buying puts on a different but correlated stock. The conservative approach would be to wait, but many tax professionals would likely support the position that these are different enough instruments. Just make sure you document your reasoning in case of questions later.

0 coins

This is really helpful analysis! I'm curious though - if I do decide to proceed with buying puts after selling the inverse ETF, should I be documenting the specific differences between these instruments somewhere in case the IRS ever questions it? Like keeping records of the daily reset feature vs options decay characteristics you mentioned? Also, when you mention "correlated stock" puts as an alternative, would something like puts on other EV companies potentially avoid wash sale issues while still giving me similar bearish exposure to the EV sector that Tesla dominates?

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

Yes, definitely document everything! I keep a trading journal that notes the specific characteristics of each position - for inverse ETFs I document the daily reset mechanism, expense ratios, and how they use derivatives/swaps. For options I note strike prices, expiration dates, time decay (theta), and how the delta changes. This creates a paper trail showing you understood these were fundamentally different instruments. Regarding correlated stocks - puts on other EV companies could work, but be careful about correlation levels. Tesla and say, Rivian or Lucid, might move together but they're definitely separate companies with different risk profiles. The IRS looks at whether securities are "substantially identical" to the specific security you sold at a loss, not just similar sector exposure. EV sector puts would likely be fine from a wash sale perspective since you're not buying puts on Tesla itself. Just keep in mind your actual investment thesis - if you specifically think Tesla is overvalued vs other EV companies, then broader EV puts might not give you the exact exposure you want. Another option could be waiting 16-20 days after selling TSLS, then buying shorter-term Tesla puts that would expire before the 30-day window closes. That way you get some of the bearish exposure you want while staying completely clear of wash sale rules.

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

I actually dealt with this exact scenario last year with TSLS and Tesla puts. After consulting with my tax advisor, we determined they're likely different enough to not trigger wash sale rules, but I took a hybrid approach to be extra safe. Instead of buying Tesla puts immediately, I waited about 15 days after selling TSLS at a loss, then bought shorter-term puts that would expire before the 30-day wash sale window closed. This gave me the bearish Tesla exposure I wanted while staying completely clear of any potential wash sale issues. The key insight my advisor shared was that even if you believe the securities are substantially different (which they probably are), the safe harbor of waiting 31 days eliminates any gray area risk. Since you're dealing with tax loss harvesting, it's worth being conservative. One thing to consider - if you're convinced Tesla is overvalued, the 30-day wait might actually work in your favor if the stock continues declining. You could potentially get better put prices or find that Tesla has dropped further, validating your bearish thesis.

0 coins

This happened to me too and it's definitely one of the most frustrating tax issues to deal with! The key thing to understand is that your return is getting rejected because somewhere in your tax software you indicated you had marketplace coverage or received premium tax credits, not because you're actually missing a required form. Here's what I'd recommend doing step by step: 1. Go back into your tax software and find the health insurance/ACA section 2. Look for any question asking about marketplace coverage, healthcare.gov, state exchanges, or premium tax credits 3. Make sure you're answering "NO" to anything about purchasing coverage through the marketplace 4. Double-check that you've indicated you had employer coverage instead The most common mistake is accidentally saying "yes" to questions about being eligible for premium tax credits or advance payments. Even if you technically could have been eligible, if you didn't actually receive them because you had employer coverage, the answer should be "no." Also check if there's a question about whether anyone in your household shopped for or enrolled in marketplace coverage - even browsing without purchasing can sometimes trigger the 1095-A requirement if you answer incorrectly. Once you fix that checkbox, your return should go through immediately on resubmission. Don't give up on e-filing yet - it's much faster than going the paper route once you get the software answers right!

0 coins

This step-by-step breakdown is incredibly helpful! I'm new to filing taxes and got completely overwhelmed when my return was rejected. I had no idea that browsing Healthcare.gov without actually buying anything could cause this kind of problem. Your point about the eligibility questions is really eye-opening - I definitely remember answering "yes" to something about being eligible for premium tax credits because I thought it was asking if I was allowed to apply for them, not whether I actually received them. Since I have insurance through my part-time job, I should have answered "no" to all the marketplace-related questions. I'm going to follow your steps exactly and go through each health insurance question carefully. It's such a relief to know this is fixable and I don't have to deal with paper filing as a first-time filer. Thanks for taking the time to write out such clear instructions!

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

I went through this exact nightmare scenario last year and completely understand your frustration! The good news is this is almost certainly just a checkbox error in your tax software, not an actual missing form issue. Since you confirmed with the Marketplace that you don't have coverage through them, the problem is definitely in how you answered the health insurance questions in your tax prep software. Here's what to look for specifically: 1. Any question asking if you purchased insurance through Healthcare.gov or a state marketplace - should be "NO" 2. Questions about receiving Premium Tax Credits or Advance Premium Tax Credit payments - should be "NO" 3. The tricky one: questions about being "eligible for" premium tax credits - this should also be "NO" if you had employer coverage That third one trips up a lot of people because technically many people with employer insurance could still be eligible for marketplace subsidies depending on their income, but if you didn't actually receive them, the answer is no. Also check if there's a question about anyone in your household shopping for or comparing marketplace plans - even if you just browsed without buying, some software interprets this as marketplace involvement. Once you find and fix that specific checkbox, your return should be accepted immediately on resubmission. Don't lose hope with e-filing - it's much faster than paper once you get the software straightened out!

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

This is such a comprehensive explanation, thank you! I'm currently stuck in this exact situation and your breakdown of the three types of questions is really helpful. I think I definitely fell into that trap with question #3 - I remember thinking "well, I probably could qualify for credits if I wanted to apply" rather than "did I actually receive any credits this year." It's so confusing how the tax software phrases these questions! I have employer insurance and never got any kind of credit or subsidy, so clearly all my marketplace-related answers should be "no." I'm going to go back through my return tonight and be really careful about those eligibility questions. Quick question - if I find the wrong checkbox and fix it, do I need to delete my previous submission attempts first, or can I just resubmit the corrected version? I've already been rejected twice and don't want to mess anything up further!

0 coins

Prev1...598599600601602...5645Next