


Ask the community...
I believe I may have figured this out after experiencing it myself. The TurboTax advance approval and IRS processing are completely separate systems. What's probably happening is: 1. Your return was accepted by the IRS (transmission successful) 2. TurboTax's bank partner approved your advance based on their criteria 3. Your return is likely in the IRS processing queue but hasn't been assigned to a processing batch yet I would suggest checking your transcript weekly rather than daily. In my experience, it might not show any updates for 3-4 weeks, then suddenly update with everything at once. Unless you receive a specific notice from the IRS, this is most likely just normal processing delays during peak season.
I'm sort of in a similar situation, I think? I was approved for the advance but only received about half of what they estimated. My transcript finally updated yesterday after about 35 days of waiting, and it looks like they might be making some adjustments to my return. Maybe check if you qualified for the full advance amount? Sometimes if there's an issue with certain credits, it could possibly delay processing, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
Here's exactly what happens in this situation: Step 1: The bank rejects the direct deposit and returns it to the IRS (3-5 days) Step 2: IRS processes the return and marks it in their system (5-7 days) Step 3: IRS schedules a paper check to be printed (3-5 days) Step 4: Check prints and goes to USPS (2-3 days) Step 5: USPS delivers your check (3-7 days) Total time: 16-27 days from when the deposit failed. Since you already called, you've initiated step 2, which helps speed things up.
I believe the process may be slightly more efficient now, particularly if you've spoken with a knowledgeable agent. In certain cases, the IRS can expedite steps 2-3 when there's a demonstrated financial hardship, though this typically requires additional documentation.
According to IRM 21.4.1.5.7 (Internal Revenue Manual), does the 14-day waiting period for a replacement refund still apply when the original refund was returned due to a closed account? Or is that only for lost/stolen checks?
I had this happen on March 14th this year. Called the IRS on March 16th. My transcript updated on March 23rd showing the rejected direct deposit. A new 846 code with a paper check date appeared on March 30th. Received my check on April 4th. So that was exactly 21 days from my call to check in hand. Your experience may vary, but that's a recent timeline for comparison.
I've been dealing with PATH Act delays since it started. Remember when we could file in January and get our refunds within a week or two? Those days are long gone. I've learned to just assume February 27th is the earliest possible date for any refund with EITC. Why even allow filing before February if they're just going to hold everything anyway? My experience shows that filing early vs. filing February 10th makes zero difference in when you get paid.
Be extremely careful about timing expectations this tax season! On January 30th, 2024, I filed with similar gig income, couldn't access transcripts, and assumed everything was fine. By February 15th, still no transcript access. When I finally reached the IRS on March 2nd, they informed me my return had been flagged for income verification due to a mismatch between my reported 1099 amounts and what their system showed. This delayed my refund by 8 weeks! If you don't see transcript access by February 14th (that's this coming week), I strongly recommend taking proactive steps to check your status rather than waiting.
Don't panic yet. The IRS transcript system and the processing system are separate. Direct from experience: I've filed with gig income for 3 years straight. Transcripts ALWAYS take longer to update than WMR. Check Where's My Refund first. If it shows received, you're good. Most gig workers I know see transcript updates 14-21 days after acceptance. The real concern would be if WMR doesn't recognize your info at all - that would indicate a potential problem.
Omar Fawzi
I'm not convinced the PATH Act is even working as intended anymore. Seems like it just delays EVERYONE's refunds with these credits rather than actually stopping fraud. My friend filed with just standard deductions (no EIC) and got her refund in 8 days, while I'm still waiting after 6 weeks. š Is this really stopping fraud or just punishing people who qualify for EIC?
0 coins
Chloe Wilson
The PATH Act specifically targets EITC, CTC, and AOTC claims due to historically high improper payment rates. According to Treasury Inspector General data, approximately 25% of EITC payments were improper before PATH implementation. The mandated verification period allows for cross-referencing of W-2 and 1099 data against claimed credits. While frustrating for legitimate claimants, the hold period is a procedural necessity within the IRS's Refund Fraud Assessment System (RFAS) and Return Review Program (RRP) frameworks.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
ā¢This is incredibly informative! I had no idea about the specific verification systems they use. The 25% improper payment rate really puts things in perspective - I can see why they implemented these measures even though they're frustrating for those of us waiting.
0 coins