


Ask the community...
Have you or your parents kept all the receipts and documentation for these expenses? That's going to be super important regardless of who might be eligible to claim them. My mom tried to claim medical expenses for my sister last year and got audited because she didn't have proper documentation from the treatment facility showing exactly what was paid and when. Make sure whoever claims these expenses has every single piece of paper!
Yes, thankfully my parents are super organized with this stuff. They have every receipt, invoice, and payment confirmation from the treatment center. They even have records of the insurance claims that were denied (which is why they had to pay out of pocket). I guess the bigger question is still whether anyone can actually claim these expenses given that I'm not a dependent. Sounds like I need to look more into that "qualifying relative" test that others mentioned.
That's great that your parents kept everything. Those records will be essential if they end up being able to claim the expenses. Definitely look into the qualifying relative test. The main things they'll need to prove are: 1) that they provided more than half your support for the year, 2) that your gross income was below the threshold (around $4,500 for 2025), 3) that you lived with them all year (though there are exceptions for temporary absences including rehab), and 4) that you're related to them. If you meet all those tests, they might be able to claim both you as a dependent and the medical expenses.
one thing nobody has mentioned is that medical expenses have to be REALLY high to actually be deductible. like they gotta be more than 7.5% of your adjusted gross income AND you have to itemize deductions instead of taking the standard deduction. so if your parents make like $100k, they'd need more than $7,500 in TOTAL medical expenses before they could start deducting anything. and the standard deduction for married filing jointly is like $30,000 for 2025, so their itemized deductions would need to exceed that to be worth it.
I think the issue might be that your HR system is applying the wrong withholding table to your bonus. Bonuses should be withheld at the supplemental wage rate (usually 22% federal), not added to your regular income and then calculated. When they combine them, it makes the system think you make WAY more than you actually do annually. Ask your payroll department specifically if they're using the "aggregate method" or the "flat rate method" for supplemental wages. The flat rate method is usually better for most people because it doesn't cause this weird overwithholding issue you're experiencing.
Thanks for this explanation - I had no idea there were different methods for withholding on bonuses. Do you know if I can specify which method I want them to use, or is that entirely up to my employer?
It's technically up to your employer which method they use, but many payroll departments will accommodate your preference if you ask nicely. The flat rate method is actually easier for them to administer anyway. If they won't change their method, your other option is to adjust your W-4 withholding around the time you know you'll receive a bonus. You could increase your allowances temporarily for that pay period to offset the overwithholding. Just remember to change it back afterward!
Has anyone ever tried to calculate their "blended tax rate" manually to check if payroll is doing it right? I tried following some online calculator but got totally confused between marginal vs effective rates.
The blended or "effective" tax rate is just your total tax paid divided by your total income. So if you made $100,000 and paid $18,000 in federal income tax, your effective federal rate would be 18%. What confuses most people is that we have marginal tax brackets - different rates that apply to different portions of your income. Your first ~$12,950 is tax-free (standard deduction), then 10% on the next chunk, 12% on the next chunk, etc. Your highest marginal rate (the rate on your last dollar earned) might be 24%, but your overall effective rate will be much lower.
Here's another option nobody mentioned - if you're dealing with standard Workforce Intuit payroll PDFs, you can use Python with a library called camelot-py. It's specifically designed for extracting tables from PDFs and works WAY better than generic converters for financial documents. I wrote a simple script that pulls data from all our payroll PDFs and dumps it into a usable format. Happy to share the code if anyone's interested - just the basic version that works with standard Workforce layouts.
I'd definitely be interested in seeing that code! My Python skills are pretty basic but I can probably figure it out with some examples. Would it work for someone who's not a developer but can follow instructions?
Absolutely! It's actually pretty straightforward, even for Python beginners. The code is about 25 lines and mainly uses the camelot library which does most of the heavy lifting. You just need to install Python (if you don't already have it), then pip install camelot-py and pandas. I'll set up a simple version that works with the standard Workforce Intuit format and share it via DM. It basically loops through a folder of PDFs, extracts the tables, and outputs them to either CSV or Excel. You'll just need to point it to your folder of PDFs by changing one line in the code. I've documented it well with comments so you can see what each part does.
Have you considered just asking your Workforce Intuit account rep to add the Excel export feature? We had the same problem and after enough complaining they actually added it to our account for no additional cost. Might be worth a shot before trying all these workarounds.
We tried that route and got a flat "no" - they said it was an enterprise-only feature and wanted an extra $5k per year to upgrade our whole account just for that functionality. Total ripoff.
For anyone interested in maximizing their Roth, don't forget about the "Mega Backdoor Roth" if your employer 401k allows after-tax (not just Roth) contributions and in-plan conversions or in-service distributions. This is separate from the regular backdoor Roth strategy and lets you potentially put up to $40k+ extra into Roth accounts depending on your plan limits and employer contributions. Not many employer plans support this but it's worth checking if yours does.
Is there any way to do the Mega Backdoor Roth if your employer plan doesn't allow after-tax contributions? I've heard about using Solo 401ks but I'm not sure if that would work for someone with just a regular W-2 job and no side business.
Unfortunately, you need a 401k plan that specifically allows after-tax contributions (beyond the regular pre-tax or Roth 401k limits) to do the Mega Backdoor Roth. Without that plan feature, this strategy isn't available. If you have any self-employment income, even from a small side business or freelance work, you could potentially establish a Solo 401k with the right provisions. However, this only works with actual self-employment income - you can't use a Solo 401k for your W-2 income from your main employer.
I'm actually more concerned about Congress changing the Roth rules in the future. After seeing these billionaire Roth accounts, there's been talk about new restrictions or caps. Anyone worried the government will change the tax-free withdrawal promise before we retire? That's what keeps me from going all-in on Roth strategies.
ShadowHunter
Don't forget the option to use R&D credits to offset payroll taxes if you're a qualified small business! This is huge for startups that don't have income tax liability yet. You can apply up to $250,000 of your R&D credit against your Social Security portion of payroll taxes each year. To qualify, you need less than $5 million in gross receipts for the credit year and no gross receipts for any tax year before the 5-tax-year period ending with the credit year. You make the election on Form 6765 and then claim the credit quarterly on your Form 941.
0 coins
Javier Torres
ā¢Wait this is amazing! We definitely qualify based on those requirements. Does this mean we could potentially reduce our payroll tax burden instead of waiting until we're profitable to use the credits? Our payroll taxes are a huge expense right now.
0 coins
ShadowHunter
ā¢Yes, that's exactly what it means! Instead of the R&D credit just carrying forward until you have income tax liability, you can use up to $250,000 of it immediately against the employer portion of Social Security taxes (the 6.2% you pay on employee wages). This is particularly valuable for startups and small businesses that are still in growth mode and not yet profitable. You'll claim the credit quarterly when you file your Form 941 payroll tax returns. The election has to be made on a timely filed tax return (including extensions), so make sure your tax preparer knows you want to make this election when they prepare your business return.
0 coins
Diego Ramirez
Be careful - the documentation requirements for R&D credits got much stricter in 2024! The IRS released new guidance requiring contemporaneous documentation created at the time of the research. You can't just create documentation after the fact when preparing your tax return.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
ā¢This is super important. We got audited last year and the IRS disallowed almost half our claimed R&D expenses because our documentation wasn't specific enough about the technological uncertainties we were trying to resolve. Make sure you have detailed lab notes, design documents, and meeting minutes that clearly show the experimentation process.
0 coins