


Ask the community...
Something similar happened to me but with Fidelity. Try checking if you had any wash sales during the year. Sometimes when you rebuy a position after selling at a loss, the holding period of the original purchase carries over to the new position in certain calculations. This is why sometimes a position held for just days shows up as long term. I'm not saying that's definitely what happened in your case, but it's worth checking your complete trading history to see if there were previous purchases of the same stock that might be affecting how this is reported.
I hadn't considered wash sales affecting the holding period classification! I'll definitely look back through my history to see if I had previous transactions in this stock. That actually makes a lot of sense because I was actively trading this particular ticker throughout the year, so there's a good chance I triggered some wash sales along the way. Would that really change the Form 8949 category though? I thought wash sales just affected the basis calculation, not the short-term/long-term classification.
Wash sales primarily affect your cost basis by disallowing the loss, but they can also affect holding periods in certain circumstances. If you repurchase shares within 30 days of selling at a loss, the holding period of the original shares can sometimes be added to the new shares. This is a complex area of tax law and brokers often handle it differently. Some brokers calculate everything properly, while others (especially the free trading apps) often make errors in reporting. Your situation sounds like a reporting error rather than a legitimate holding period adjustment, but it's always good to check your complete trading history to be sure.
This exact problem happened to me! It's because of lot relief methods. Did you ever select specific lots when selling partial positions? If not, Robinhood defaults to FIFO (first in, first out), but sometimes their system glitches and applies LIFO (last in, first out) or average cost. If you go to Account > Statements > Tax Documents > Trade Confirmations for 2023, you can see exactly which lots were sold with each transaction. Then compare that to the dates on your 1099-B.
This is the correct answer! Broker lot relief methods are often the source of these discrepancies. I work in accounting and see this constantly with clients who trade actively.
Another thing to consider - the year someone dies, the surviving spouse can still file jointly for that year. The tax benefit of married filing jointly is usually better than filing as single. After that, the surviving spouse might qualify for qualifying widow(er) status for 2 years if they have a dependent child. Lots of people don't know about this filing status option!
I didn't know about the qualifying widow(er) status! That's really helpful information. In this case though, they didn't have dependent children living with them. It sounds like for the 2020 return, they should file jointly without the deceased designation, then for 2021 file jointly with deceased designation, and then for 2022 she would have to file as single. Is that right?
Yes, you've got it exactly right! For 2020, file jointly with no deceased designation since he was alive all year. For 2021, file jointly with deceased designation since that's the year he passed away. Then for 2022 forward, she'll file as single (or head of household if she has qualifying dependents, but it sounds like she doesn't). One thing to note - when filing that 2021 return with deceased status, make sure to write "DECEASED" and the date of death across the top of the return to ensure proper processing. Some tax software handles this automatically, but it's good to double-check.
The preparer probably confused the filing status with the need to indicate the taxpayer was deceased. This happens a lot with less experienced preparers. For 2020, file normal joint return. For 2021, file joint return but with deceased status. If she itemizes deductions, don't forget medical expenses for her deceased spouse can be claimed on the final return.
One thing to consider that nobody's mentioned yet - at your daughter's age, time is her biggest advantage. With a Roth (either IRA or 403b if they offer a Roth option), she'll never pay taxes on all that growth over 40+ years. That's potentially huge! When I was younger I focused solely on the traditional 401k for the immediate tax benefits, but now I wish I'd done more Roth contributions early in my career when my tax rate was lower. The math works out better in most cases for young people to pay the taxes now and enjoy tax-free growth forever.
Is there a calculator or something that shows the break-even point between traditional vs Roth? I always hear conflicting advice and don't know how to figure out which is actually better for my situation.
There's no perfect calculator because it depends on assumptions about future tax rates that nobody can predict with certainty. However, a good rule of thumb is that if you expect your tax rate in retirement to be higher than it is now, go with Roth. If you expect it to be lower, go traditional. For young people early in their careers with relatively low incomes, Roth often makes more sense because they're likely in a lower tax bracket now than they will be in retirement. But everyone's situation is different - factors like pension income, Social Security, and other retirement income sources can affect your future tax situation.
Has anyone considered suggesting a split approach? I contribute 5% to my traditional 403b to get the employer match, then max out my Roth IRA, then go back to the 403b if I can afford more. This gives me tax diversity in retirement.
Just another thing to consider - since this is referral income, you might have some actual business expenses to deduct on your Schedule C. Do you drive to any of these referral jobs? Do you use your personal phone? Do you have any marketing expenses or business cards? All of that could be deductible and lower your taxable income.
Thanks for mentioning this! I do actually use my personal phone to coordinate with the cleaning company about the referrals, and sometimes I drive to meet potential referral clients to assess their needs before connecting them. Would those miles be deductible? And what percentage of my phone bill could I reasonably claim?
Yes, the mileage for driving to meet potential referral clients would absolutely be deductible! Keep a log of those trips with dates, miles driven, and purpose. The current mileage rate for 2025 is 67 cents per mile, which adds up quickly. For your phone, you would deduct the percentage that you use for business purposes. If you use your phone about 30% of the time for these referrals, then you could deduct 30% of your bill. Just make sure you have a reasonable basis for whatever percentage you claim and keep your phone bills as documentation. You might also consider a separate phone line for business if the volume increases.
Zara Rashid
One important consideration - if your client owes back taxes and has limited assets/income, you might want to explore the IRS Fresh Start program options. For substantial back taxes, an Offer in Compromise might be viable if the collection potential is low. I had a client in a similar situation (12 years unfiled), and after we submitted 6 years of returns, we were able to settle a $65,000 tax debt for about $8,500 based on their financial situation. Make sure you fully explore all resolution options once the returns are filed.
0 coins
StarStrider
ā¢This is super helpful! I hadn't even thought ahead to resolution options yet. Any tips on documentation needed for the Offer in Compromise? I suspect my client will have significant tax debt once we figure out all the unfiled years.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
ā¢For the OIC, you'll need comprehensive financial documentation - recent bank statements (3 months), pay stubs, vehicle registrations, property records, investment accounts, retirement accounts, credit card statements, loan statements, and monthly expense documentation. The IRS Form 433-A (individual) or 433-B (business) will be required. The key is accurately documenting your client's collection potential. This includes liquid assets, equity in property, and future income potential minus allowable expenses. If your client has few assets and limited income, that strengthens the OIC position. Make sure to fully document any hardship conditions or special circumstances that would justify accepting less than the full amount owed.
0 coins
Luca Romano
Has anyone considered the potential for Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures in this case? It's mainly for international cases, but might be worth exploring if there's any foreign income or assets involved.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
ā¢Streamlined procedures only apply to international situations with unreported foreign assets/income. If this is purely domestic, it wouldn't qualify. Regular voluntary disclosure through filing the required back returns is the way to go.
0 coins