IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

160,000+ people connected since 2021

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I severely underpaid my taxes as a 1099 contractor and now can't afford what I owe... help!!

I'm 26F and have been working as a 1099 contractor for the past few years. Last tax season when I filed for 2023, I had about $40k from a W-2 job and another $40k from 1099 work, so roughly half my taxes were already withheld. After my deductions and write-offs, I only owed around $7,500 which was manageable. Fast forward to this year (2024), I left my W-2 position completely and have been working solely as a 1099 contractor, making approximately $68k. I stupidly assumed my tax bill would be less than last year since my income was lower. BIG MISTAKE. I procrastinated until the last minute to do my taxes using TurboTax, and got absolutely blindsided with a $10k bill AFTER all my business deductions! I was completely shocked and unprepared for this amount. I panicked and made the terrible decision to not file, thinking I'd somehow come up with a solution. Well, it's now months later and I'm still stuck. To make matters worse, I'm in the middle of urgent home repairs (fixing foundation issues, not cosmetic stuff) that HAVE to be completed before winter hits. These repairs have already put me in serious debt, and I have no idea how I'll come up with an extra $10k for taxes. I'm terrified the IRS is going to come after me, put liens on my property, or even take my house. Is it too late to set up a payment plan? What are my options at this point? How screwed am I? I feel so stupid for not consulting with a real tax professional instead of just using TurboTax with no guidance. Any advice would be seriously appreciated!

One important thing nobody's mentioned - as a 1099 contractor, you really need to be making QUARTERLY estimated tax payments to avoid this situation next year. The IRS expects you to pay as you earn throughout the year, not just at tax time. For the rest of 2025, you should calculate roughly 25-30% of your income each quarter and submit estimated payments using Form 1040-ES. The due dates are April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15 of the following year. This way you won't end up with another massive bill next April, plus you'll avoid underpayment penalties which the IRS probably charged you this time too.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice. Do you know if TurboTax can help me calculate how much I should be paying quarterly? Or should I just put aside 30% of everything I make to be safe?

0 coins

TurboTax can give you estimated quarterly payment vouchers based on your previous year's income, but since your situation has changed, it might not be accurate. For simplicity, I'd recommend setting aside 30% of every payment you receive in a separate savings account dedicated to taxes. Then each quarter, calculate your actual tax obligation more precisely (or use a tax calculator online) and make your payment. Whatever is left in the account after your quarterlies can go toward retirement savings or other goals. This approach gives you a buffer and prevents nasty surprises.

0 coins

Don't forget to check if your state requires quarterly estimated taxes too! I made this mistake my first year as a contractor - paid federal quarterlies but completely forgot about state taxes. Got hit with underpayment penalties from my state that could have been easily avoided.

0 coins

This! I'm in California and they're even stricter about estimated payments than the feds. And their penalties are no joke either.

0 coins

How many years should I go back and file for a client with unfiled tax returns?

I've got a new client coming in who hasn't filed tax returns for somewhere between 10-15 years. I pulled his account, tax, and wage transcripts for the past decade. Interestingly, only 2021 shows any reported income, which was from a 1099. I know he has a Schedule C business and has probably been making income that wasn't reported on any 1099s or other official documents. I'm planning to have a detailed conversation with him about how long he's actually been earning income. My main concern is how far back I should file for him. I was thinking the last 6 years would cover the statute of limitations for assessment, but what if he tells me he's been making money 8-10 years ago but we don't have any bank statements to accurately determine how much? This is pretty new territory for me - the longest back tax situation I've worked on before was only 2-3 years. Any guidance from those who've dealt with these multi-year non-filing situations would be super helpful!

One important consideration - if your client owes back taxes and has limited assets/income, you might want to explore the IRS Fresh Start program options. For substantial back taxes, an Offer in Compromise might be viable if the collection potential is low. I had a client in a similar situation (12 years unfiled), and after we submitted 6 years of returns, we were able to settle a $65,000 tax debt for about $8,500 based on their financial situation. Make sure you fully explore all resolution options once the returns are filed.

0 coins

This is super helpful! I hadn't even thought ahead to resolution options yet. Any tips on documentation needed for the Offer in Compromise? I suspect my client will have significant tax debt once we figure out all the unfiled years.

0 coins

For the OIC, you'll need comprehensive financial documentation - recent bank statements (3 months), pay stubs, vehicle registrations, property records, investment accounts, retirement accounts, credit card statements, loan statements, and monthly expense documentation. The IRS Form 433-A (individual) or 433-B (business) will be required. The key is accurately documenting your client's collection potential. This includes liquid assets, equity in property, and future income potential minus allowable expenses. If your client has few assets and limited income, that strengthens the OIC position. Make sure to fully document any hardship conditions or special circumstances that would justify accepting less than the full amount owed.

0 coins

Has anyone considered the potential for Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures in this case? It's mainly for international cases, but might be worth exploring if there's any foreign income or assets involved.

0 coins

Streamlined procedures only apply to international situations with unreported foreign assets/income. If this is purely domestic, it wouldn't qualify. Regular voluntary disclosure through filing the required back returns is the way to go.

0 coins

1099-B Short-term/Long-term categorization issue with stock sales

I'm having a weird issue with my 1099-B from Robinhood that I'm hoping someone here can help with while I wait for their support to get back to me. I was inputting all my trades into FreeTaxUSA and everything seemed fine with my short-term transactions. But when I got to what my 1099-B lists as long-term transactions, something seems off. The form shows a stock purchase with Date Acquired as 07/12/2023 and Date Sold as 07/15/2023 - literally just 3 days apart! I double-checked my trading history in the app and these dates are accurate. FreeTaxUSA flagged this because the dates clearly don't match with how it's being reported on the 1099-B as Form 8949 category D (Long-term). Should I override what the 1099-B says and change it to category A (Short-term), or should I just leave it exactly as reported on the 1099-B even though the dates don't make sense for a long-term classification? Looking deeper, I noticed something even stranger. This particular stock seems to have been split into two transactions. I originally purchased 1250 shares, but the form shows 875 shares as one transaction (the problematic "long-term" one), and the remaining 375 shares as another transaction with identical dates but correctly labeled as short-term. I have a few other trades of this same stock from late October that are handled the same odd way, except those list the acquisition date as "Various" instead of a specific date.

Something similar happened to me but with Fidelity. Try checking if you had any wash sales during the year. Sometimes when you rebuy a position after selling at a loss, the holding period of the original purchase carries over to the new position in certain calculations. This is why sometimes a position held for just days shows up as long term. I'm not saying that's definitely what happened in your case, but it's worth checking your complete trading history to see if there were previous purchases of the same stock that might be affecting how this is reported.

0 coins

I hadn't considered wash sales affecting the holding period classification! I'll definitely look back through my history to see if I had previous transactions in this stock. That actually makes a lot of sense because I was actively trading this particular ticker throughout the year, so there's a good chance I triggered some wash sales along the way. Would that really change the Form 8949 category though? I thought wash sales just affected the basis calculation, not the short-term/long-term classification.

0 coins

Wash sales primarily affect your cost basis by disallowing the loss, but they can also affect holding periods in certain circumstances. If you repurchase shares within 30 days of selling at a loss, the holding period of the original shares can sometimes be added to the new shares. This is a complex area of tax law and brokers often handle it differently. Some brokers calculate everything properly, while others (especially the free trading apps) often make errors in reporting. Your situation sounds like a reporting error rather than a legitimate holding period adjustment, but it's always good to check your complete trading history to be sure.

0 coins

This exact problem happened to me! It's because of lot relief methods. Did you ever select specific lots when selling partial positions? If not, Robinhood defaults to FIFO (first in, first out), but sometimes their system glitches and applies LIFO (last in, first out) or average cost. If you go to Account > Statements > Tax Documents > Trade Confirmations for 2023, you can see exactly which lots were sold with each transaction. Then compare that to the dates on your 1099-B.

0 coins

This is the correct answer! Broker lot relief methods are often the source of these discrepancies. I work in accounting and see this constantly with clients who trade actively.

0 coins

Husband died in 2021 before 2020 taxes were filed. Do I mark him as deceased on the 2020 return?

I'm helping my mother's friend with her taxes and I'm confused about something. Her husband passed away in May of 2021, but they hadn't filed their 2020 tax return yet. The tax preparer she went to marked her husband as deceased on the 2020 return even though he was alive for all of 2020. This doesn't seem right to me. Shouldn't he only be marked as deceased on the 2021 return since that's when he actually passed? I want to make sure she's filing correctly before I give her any advice. Thanks for any help!

Another thing to consider - the year someone dies, the surviving spouse can still file jointly for that year. The tax benefit of married filing jointly is usually better than filing as single. After that, the surviving spouse might qualify for qualifying widow(er) status for 2 years if they have a dependent child. Lots of people don't know about this filing status option!

0 coins

I didn't know about the qualifying widow(er) status! That's really helpful information. In this case though, they didn't have dependent children living with them. It sounds like for the 2020 return, they should file jointly without the deceased designation, then for 2021 file jointly with deceased designation, and then for 2022 she would have to file as single. Is that right?

0 coins

Yes, you've got it exactly right! For 2020, file jointly with no deceased designation since he was alive all year. For 2021, file jointly with deceased designation since that's the year he passed away. Then for 2022 forward, she'll file as single (or head of household if she has qualifying dependents, but it sounds like she doesn't). One thing to note - when filing that 2021 return with deceased status, make sure to write "DECEASED" and the date of death across the top of the return to ensure proper processing. Some tax software handles this automatically, but it's good to double-check.

0 coins

The preparer probably confused the filing status with the need to indicate the taxpayer was deceased. This happens a lot with less experienced preparers. For 2020, file normal joint return. For 2021, file joint return but with deceased status. If she itemizes deductions, don't forget medical expenses for her deceased spouse can be claimed on the final return.

0 coins

Deciding between 401K, 403b, IRA or ROTH for a new full-time employee?

My daughter just got converted to full-time at her job... will be making around $47,000 annually. Her employer offers a match on the first 5% of contributions to their 403b plan (she works at a healthcare facility). I don't recall if they also have a 401K option available. Up until now, I've had her contributing to a traditional IRA (she already has a ROTH from previous years, so she has both accounts established). She's living at home and has minimal expenses right now. I'm looking for advice on where she should focus her retirement contributions going forward. She's our only daughter, so eventually she'll inherit our IRAs, ROTH accounts, brokerage accounts, house, etc. Not sure if that should factor into the planning.

One thing to consider that nobody's mentioned yet - at your daughter's age, time is her biggest advantage. With a Roth (either IRA or 403b if they offer a Roth option), she'll never pay taxes on all that growth over 40+ years. That's potentially huge! When I was younger I focused solely on the traditional 401k for the immediate tax benefits, but now I wish I'd done more Roth contributions early in my career when my tax rate was lower. The math works out better in most cases for young people to pay the taxes now and enjoy tax-free growth forever.

0 coins

Is there a calculator or something that shows the break-even point between traditional vs Roth? I always hear conflicting advice and don't know how to figure out which is actually better for my situation.

0 coins

There's no perfect calculator because it depends on assumptions about future tax rates that nobody can predict with certainty. However, a good rule of thumb is that if you expect your tax rate in retirement to be higher than it is now, go with Roth. If you expect it to be lower, go traditional. For young people early in their careers with relatively low incomes, Roth often makes more sense because they're likely in a lower tax bracket now than they will be in retirement. But everyone's situation is different - factors like pension income, Social Security, and other retirement income sources can affect your future tax situation.

0 coins

Has anyone considered suggesting a split approach? I contribute 5% to my traditional 403b to get the employer match, then max out my Roth IRA, then go back to the 403b if I can afford more. This gives me tax diversity in retirement.

0 coins

This is exactly what I do too! It's called "tax diversification" and it means you'll have both tax-free and taxable income sources in retirement, which gives you flexibility for tax planning. Smart strategy.

0 coins

Prev1...47384739474047414742...5645Next