IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One thing nobody's mentioned - you should double check that this client is actually going to issue you a 1099-NEC. Some companies mistakenly think that categorizing someone as a "vendor" means they don't need to issue a 1099. If they paid you $600+ they're required to, but sometimes companies mess this up. If they don't send one, you still need to report all the income anyway. Just keep good records of all payments they made to you. And you might want to politely remind them now that they need to issue you a 1099-NEC by January 31st.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Thanks for bringing this up! I'm definitely worried they won't send the 1099 now. Should I just email them and explicitly ask if they'll be sending a 1099-NEC since I'm classified as a vendor in their system? I have all my payment records but would obviously prefer to have the official form.

0 coins

Yes, I'd recommend sending them a polite email asking for confirmation that they'll be issuing you a 1099-NEC for the 2024 tax year. Something like: "I understand I'm classified as a vendor in your system, and I just wanted to confirm you'll be issuing a 1099-NEC for tax purposes since the payments exceeded $600 this year." If they come back and say they don't issue 1099s to vendors, you can politely inform them that IRS rules require a 1099-NEC for independent contractors/vendors who were paid $600 or more for services. Sometimes the accounting department just needs a friendly reminder about the requirements.

0 coins

Just a quick tip: Some companies incorrectly use the term "vendor" for any external service provider in their accounting system, when they actually mean independent contractor. Their terminology doesn't change your tax status. However, definitely check with the other two clients as well. And start keeping track of your business expenses carefully - office supplies, software subscriptions, home office expenses if you qualify, etc. Those can really add up and reduce your taxable self-employment income.

0 coins

Do you need a different form to track expenses for a vendor vs a contractor? I always get confused about this stuff.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

An important thing nobody has mentioned yet - look into whether you need to file state taxes as well as federal. Some states consider you a resident even after you move abroad if you haven't established residency elsewhere. What was your last state before moving to the UK? Some states like California and Virginia are notorious for trying to claim expats as tax residents. Also, be aware of FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) requirements. Your UK bank may have already reported your accounts to the IRS, which is why it's important to get compliant with your filings.

0 coins

This is a really good point about state taxes. I'm originally from California and they kept trying to claim me as a resident for tax purposes for years after I moved to France. I had to provide extensive documentation proving I had no intention of returning to California. Also, the FATCA thing is real - my French bank made me fill out a W-9 form once they realized I was a US citizen, and they definitely report my account information to the US authorities.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

California is particularly aggressive about maintaining tax residency. They look for any connection (driver's license, voter registration, family ties, etc.) to claim you're still a resident. Other problematic states include New York, Virginia, and New Mexico. The FATCA reporting is a double-edged sword for expats. On one hand, it means the IRS likely already knows about your foreign accounts, which increases the importance of proper filing. On the other hand, it's caused some foreign banks to refuse US clients altogether due to the reporting burden. It's unfortunately part of the reality of being a US citizen abroad.

0 coins

Drake

•

Does anyone know if the UK-US tax treaty helps with avoiding double taxation on investment income specifically? I'm also a US citizen in the UK, and while my UK employment income seems covered, I'm confused about how my US-based investments are treated.

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

The UK-US tax treaty does help with investment income but it's complicated. Generally, you can claim foreign tax credits in the US for taxes paid to the UK on the same income. For US-source investment income like your US investments, you'll typically pay US tax on those first, then declare them on your UK return and get credit for the US tax paid. For dividends specifically, the treaty usually reduces withholding rates. Interest and capital gains have their own rules too. I recommend keeping very clear records of all taxes paid in both countries so you can properly claim credits.

0 coins

Old tax debt from $55K ballooned to $190K in 10 years - what are my options now?

So about 10 years ago I had a business that was doing pretty well. Made enough to rack up about $65K in taxes for one year - roughly $53K federal and $12K state. Then the business started struggling. I made the risky choice of using tax money I owed (all 1099 self-employment taxes) to try keeping the business afloat rather than just paying the tax bill and closing up. Well, that gamble didn't work out, and I've been carrying this tax burden for over a decade now. Currently, I'm looking at owing around $85K to the feds, but what's crazy is the state is claiming I owe something like $135K... which seems impossible based on the original amount. I basically buried my head in the sand all this time. I did try talking to the IRS about 3 years after everything fell apart to set up payments, but they wanted $2,500 monthly when I wasn't even bringing in that much personally. They told me to just pay what I could, but I'd heard about this '10-year statute of limitations' where they only have a decade to collect before it becomes uncollectable. So I figured waiting it out was my best option. But here we are 10 years later, and I'm not sure where I stand. Seems weird to call the IRS like "hey it's been 10 years, are we good now?" During this time, I've scraped by (still filed and paid my current year taxes), but never touched that huge old bill. I can't keep any real money in bank accounts because tax liens occasionally hit and clean me out. They've done this twice, both times getting less than $120. They haven't hit me again recently, probably because they know there's nothing there. I'm tired of living like this. I either want to know how much longer this cloud hangs over me, or find a solution to settle and move forward. I've heard about offers in compromise, but I'm basically broke. I can't magically produce $25-35K for a settlement offer. My credit is destroyed. The only positive is I've got another business starting to gain traction, and I want to resolve this old mess so I can move forward properly. Any advice on what path I should take? Can't afford a tax attorney right now. Just looking for guidance on possible resolution options that I can research further. Thanks for any help!

Have you considered bankruptcy? Tax debts CAN sometimes be discharged in bankruptcy contrary to what most people think. If the taxes are more than 3 years old, you filed the returns more than 2 years ago, and the taxes were assessed more than 240 days ago, they might be eligible for discharge in Chapter 7. Even if they can't be discharged, Chapter 13 bankruptcy could force both the IRS and state into a reasonable payment plan based on what you can actually afford.

0 coins

This is actually not entirely accurate. While some taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy, there are strict requirements. Self-employment taxes specifically have additional complications because they include both income tax and what would normally be FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare). The FICA portion is much harder to discharge. Also, filing fraudulent returns or willful evasion will prevent discharge regardless of timing. Given that OP deliberately chose not to pay the taxes to fund their business instead, a bankruptcy judge might view that as willful evasion.

0 coins

I worked for a state tax agency for 8 years. Here's what's happening with your state tax bill: most states have much higher penalty and interest rates than the IRS, and many states (unlike the IRS) compound interest. This is why your state bill has grown more dramatically. For state taxes, I'd recommend requesting a penalty abatement first. Many states have first-time abatement programs similar to the IRS, and some even have hardship programs if you've been in difficult financial circumstances. Don't assume the 10-year rule applies to your state. Some states like California and Kentucky have much longer collection periods (20 years and unlimited, respectively). You need to check your specific state's rules.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

7 One thing to consider - if you both intended to operate as separate businesses that just happened to collaborate on a project in 2023, and only later decided to formalize as a partnership in 2024, you could potentially justify the Schedule C route. But from your description, it sounds like you intended to be partners from the beginning. The key question is: what was your intent when spending that money in 2023? If you always intended to be in business together rather than individually, it's a partnership regardless of when you got the EIN.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

1 You make a good point about intent. We definitely went into this planning to be partners from day one - we split costs 50/50, made decisions together, and had a handshake agreement about profit sharing. So it sounds like we really should file as a partnership for 2023. If we do file Form 1065 for 2023 now, how complicated is the process for a business that technically existed but had no income, only startup expenses?

0 coins

StarStrider

•

7 Since your intent was clearly to operate as partners from the beginning with your 50/50 cost splitting and shared decision-making, filing Form 1065 for 2023 is definitely the correct approach. Filing a Form 1065 for a startup year with only expenses isn't particularly complicated. You'll report zero income and list all the qualified business expenses on the appropriate lines. The form will show a loss, which will flow through to each partner's K-1 based on your ownership percentages. Make sure to include a statement that clearly identifies these as startup costs under IRC Section 195. The main challenge is just categorizing all your expenses correctly.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

20 Has anyone used TurboTax Business to file a late 1065? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if their software lets you file for previous tax years or if I need to use something else.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

11 I used TurboTax Business for a late 2022 partnership return last year. You need to buy the software for the specific tax year you're filing for (so 2023 TurboTax Business for a 2023 return). They keep previous years' versions available for download on their website specifically for late filings.

0 coins

Liam Murphy

•

One thing nobody has mentioned yet - make sure you're also taking advantage of claiming "Head of Household" status since you're supporting your family as the sole income earner. It gives you a better tax rate and higher standard deduction than just married filing jointly.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

That's not correct. You can't claim Head of Household if you're married (unless you're legally separated or meet very specific requirements). If he's married and living with his wife, Married Filing Jointly is the correct status, not Head of Household.

0 coins

Liam Murphy

•

Oh shoot, you're right - I was mixing up the requirements. For some reason I was thinking Head of Household was for anyone supporting dependents, but you're correct that married couples living together can't use it. Thanks for the correction! Married Filing Jointly would indeed be the right status in this case.

0 coins

Have you considered having your wife do some kind of small side gig that earns under $600 per year? If she does that, you could potentially contribute to a spousal IRA for her which might give you some additional tax benefits. Just an idea to optimize your tax situation further!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Actually, your spouse doesn't need earned income for you to contribute to a spousal IRA as long as you file jointly and have sufficient earned income yourself. It's one of the few exceptions to the "earned income" requirement for IRA contributions.

0 coins

Prev1...47004701470247034704...5644Next