Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I dealt with this exact situation recently. Make sure you file Form 8606 for BOTH tax years - one for 2020 (to report the nondeductible contribution) and one for 2021 (to report the Roth conversion). The 2020 form establishes your basis of $6,000, and the 2021 form reports the conversion and calculates the taxable amount. Since your rollover IRA existed when you did the conversion, you'll need to use the pro-rata formula to determine how much is taxable. Pro-rata formula: (Nondeductible contributions ÷ Total IRA balance) × Amount converted = Nontaxable portion For example, if your total IRA balance (including the rollover IRA) was $46,000 when you converted $6,000, then: $6,000 ÷ $46,000 × $6,000 = $782.61 would be the nontaxable portion, and the rest would be taxable.
But wait, wouldn't the timing matter here? If they did the conversion before rolling over the 401k, then the pro-rata rule might not apply since there was only after-tax money in the IRA system at conversion time, right?
You're absolutely right, the timing is crucial. I missed that detail. If the Roth conversion happened before the 401k rollover, then there would only be the $6,000 nondeductible contribution in the IRA system at that time. In that case, the entire conversion would likely be nontaxable. The pro-rata rule looks at all IRA balances as of December 31 of the year of conversion, but there's an exception for funds that weren't in the IRA system at the time of conversion. If the 401k rollover happened after the conversion, the rollover wouldn't affect the taxability of the conversion.
Has anyone else had problems with FreeTaxUSA calculating Form 8606 correctly? Last year it kept showing my conversion as fully taxable even though I had basis in my traditional IRA.
I had issues with it too. You need to make sure you enter your "basis" from prior years correctly. There's a specific screen where you enter the total nondeductible contributions you've made in previous years. If you skip that or enter zero, it assumes everything is taxable.
Join the conversation
$600 is definitely on the higher side. I'd recommend shopping around a bit. H&R Block quoted me $350 for a similar situation (multi-state, 3 W-2s, and some investment stuff). Just make sure whoever you go with is experienced with multi-state returns and early withdrawals from retirement accounts.
Thanks for the suggestion! Did H&R Block handle your multi-state situation well? I've heard mixed things about them for more complicated situations.
They did okay with my multi-state stuff, but I had to be really proactive and double-check their work. The person I got was relatively new and missed allocating some of my income correctly between states at first. After I pointed it out, they fixed it, but it made me wonder what else might have been missed if I hadn't been paying attention. If you go with H&R Block or similar, try to get their more experienced preparers and ask specifically about their experience with multi-state returns and early retirement withdrawals. The quality really varies depending on which preparer you get assigned to.
Former tax preparer here! To give you a different perspective - yes, $600 is within the normal range for your situation. The multi-state issue alone typically adds $150-200 to the base price at many firms, and early IRA withdrawals add complexity because we have to determine if any exceptions apply to reduce the penalty. Four W-2s isn't a big deal by itself, but combined with everything else, your return requires significantly more time than an average one.
Is there anything the OP could do to reduce the cost? Maybe organizing documents in a specific way or doing some of the prep work themselves?
Join the conversation
Consider doing a 1031 exchange if you're interested in owning other real estate! You can defer paying capital gains tax if you reinvest the proceeds into a "like-kind" property. You'd need to identify the new property within 45 days of selling and complete the purchase within 180 days, but it could save you a lot in taxes.
My brother tried to do a 1031 exchange last year and it was a complete nightmare with all the timing restrictions. Make sure you have a qualified intermediary lined up BEFORE you sell if you go this route!
Is no one going to mention that $87,000 for 35 acres that was supposedly "worthless" sounds suspiciously low if a mining company is interested? You might want to get your own appraisal or consult with a lawyer before accepting their first offer. Mining companies typically don't make offers unless they know something valuable is there.
THIS! My cousin sold some "worthless" land in Wyoming to a mining company for what seemed like a great price, only to find out later they discovered a major lithium deposit. Do your homework before selling!
Oh wow, I hadn't even thought about that! I was just excited about getting money for land I thought was worthless. Maybe I should look into what exactly they're mining for and get a second opinion on the value. Thanks for bringing this up - definitely don't want to get taken advantage of!
Join the conversation
Most companies these days structure these as taxable cash payments because the formal HRAs require a lot more administration and paperwork. You can easily check by looking at your first paystub after the reimbursement kicks in - if they're withholding taxes from it, there's your answer! Also worth asking if they offer a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan instead, which can make these benefits pre-tax. But honestly, even with taxes taken out, $375/month is still free money if you're already covered elsewhere.
Can you explain what a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan is? Never heard of this before. Is this something I should specifically ask my HR about?
A Section 125 Cafeteria Plan (named after the section of the tax code) allows employees to pay for certain benefits with pre-tax dollars. It's essentially a menu of benefit options where you can choose between taxable benefits (like cash) and non-taxable benefits (like health insurance, FSAs, etc.). Yes, definitely ask your HR if they have this plan option. If they do, and you opt for the cash option within this plan, it might be structured in a way that reduces your tax burden. But be aware that most small to medium companies don't have this set up because it's administratively complex. Still worth asking though!
My company does this too! They call it a "health stipend" and deposit $400/month into my checking account for waiving coverage, but they absolutely do withhold taxes on it. It shows up on my paystub as "Benefit Waiver Pay" and gets taxed just like regular income. I did the math and even after taxes, I still come out ahead by about $3200/year by staying on my wife's insurance and taking the taxable payment. Just be prepared that $375/month will probably be more like $250-275 after taxes depending on your tax bracket.
This matches my experience too. My employer gives $320/month for declining their insurance, and it's definitely taxed. Shows up as "Benefit Opt-Out Pay" on my paystub.
Emma Davis
Something else to consider - if you're going to buy that Samsung just for product photos, make sure you're not already taking other deductions for photography equipment. The IRS might question why you need both a DSLR camera AND an expensive phone for the same business purpose. It's totally fine if you have legitimate different uses (phone for quick social media content, DSLR for high-res product listings), but be prepared to explain the business necessity for multiple photography tools. I've been audited before and they definitely look at these patterns.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•Thanks for bringing this up! I actually don't have any camera equipment yet - I've been using my ancient phone which takes terrible photos. The new phone would be my only photography equipment. Do you think that makes the case stronger for it being a legitimate business expense?
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Yes, that definitely strengthens your case for the business expense deduction. When it's your only photography equipment and directly tied to improving your product listings, it's much easier to justify as a necessary business expense. Just make sure to keep good documentation - save your current product photos, then take new ones with the new phone to show the improvement. This before/after comparison can be extremely helpful if you're ever questioned about the business necessity. Also keep any feedback from customers or analytics showing that better photos improved your sales conversion rate.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Quick tip on the VAT part - make sure you're actually VAT registered before trying to claim input VAT! Depending on your country, you might not need to register until you hit a certain revenue threshold. If you're not registered, you can't reclaim the VAT, but you can still take the full cost (including VAT) as a business expense for your income tax.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•This is super important! In the UK the VAT threshold is £85,000 - are you anywhere near that with your Amazon sales? If not, you probably aren't VAT registered yet.
0 coins