My accountant told me most software engineers aren't SSTBs unless your primarily doing consulting. He said to track hours for each type of work. Anybody using Quickbooks for this? How do you categorize your services?

I've been dealing with this exact issue for the past two years with my software engineering business. What really helped me was creating a simple tracking system where I log my activities daily - either "Development" (coding, testing, implementation) or "Consulting" (meetings, architecture discussions, recommendations without implementation). The IRS looks at the substance of what you're actually doing, not just your job title. If you're spending most of your time writing code and building solutions, you're likely in the clear for QBI. But if you're mostly in meetings giving advice without actually creating the software yourself, that could be problematic. One thing that caught me off guard - even project management and client communication can blur the lines. I now make sure my contracts explicitly state that I'm being hired to "develop and implement software solutions" rather than just "provide software consulting services." The language matters more than you'd think. Have you considered restructuring how you bill clients? Breaking out development work separately from any advisory work could help establish a clear pattern that most of your business is non-SSTB.

I've dealt with this exact scenario multiple times, and here's what I've learned works best: Don't panic about amending prior years unless you discover actual tax liabilities were missed. Start by creating a "bridge schedule" that reconciles from the incorrect prior year balance sheet to what it should have been. Document every adjustment with supporting evidence - bank statements, loan documents, asset purchases, etc. Then make a single correcting entry to retained earnings with a detailed explanation attached to the current year return. The key is transparency with the IRS. Include a statement explaining that you're correcting prior period errors discovered upon review, show your methodology, and demonstrate that no additional tax is owed. I've never had an issue with this approach as long as the documentation is solid. One red flag to watch for: if this "error" actually represents unreported income, then you do need to consider amendments. But if it's truly just sloppy bookkeeping with no tax impact, fix it going forward and move on. The IRS cares more about getting the right tax than perfect balance sheets from prior years.

I've been through this nightmare before with a client who had similar balance sheet issues. Here's what worked for me: First, get your hands on every bank statement, loan document, and financial record you can find for the past 3-4 years. You need to trace where that $668K actually went. In my case, it turned out to be a combination of unrecorded asset purchases, informal loans to shareholders that were never documented, and some legitimate distributions that just weren't recorded properly. The approach I took was similar to what Owen suggested - I created a comprehensive reconciliation showing the flow from the incorrect prior year balances to what they should have been, then made a single adjustment in the current year. I included a detailed memo with the return explaining the nature of the corrections. One thing I'd add: before you do anything, have a frank conversation with the client about what transactions actually occurred. Sometimes owners know exactly where the money went but the previous accountant just didn't record it properly. Other times, there are skeleton in the closet that need to come out before you can fix anything. Also, consider the state tax implications if you're in a state that follows federal S-Corp treatment. Some states have their own rules about how balance sheet corrections should be handled. The good news is that if this is truly just accounting errors with no additional tax owed, the IRS is usually reasonable about letting you fix it going forward rather than reopening multiple years.

Has anyone dealt with FATCA reporting requirements for foreign accounts? I'm worried about this because I've heard the penalties for non-compliance are crazy high. I have about $75K in my foreign account that I want to transfer to the US.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the step-up in basis consideration. Since you acquired the foreign property before becoming a US tax resident, you might want to consider getting a professional appraisal of the property's fair market value as of the date you became a US resident (when you got your green card). While you won't get a full step-up in basis like US citizens do at death, having this valuation documented could be crucial for calculating your actual taxable gain. The IRS generally uses your original purchase price as the basis, but if you made significant improvements or if the property appreciated substantially before you became a US resident, having that documentation could save you thousands in taxes. Also, make sure to keep detailed records of any improvements you made to the property over the years, as these can be added to your cost basis and reduce your taxable gain. This includes major renovations, additions, or significant repairs that added value to the property.

As someone who's been researching tax strategies for high earners, I'd strongly recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional who isn't selling these investments. I've seen too many colleagues get burned by complex tax strategies that sounded great in presentations but fell apart under scrutiny. One thing that concerns me about Neil Jesani's approach specifically is that when someone markets primarily to one profession (dentists/doctors), it often means they're exploiting our lack of investment knowledge rather than offering genuinely superior opportunities. We're easy targets because we have high incomes but limited time to do proper due diligence. Before considering any mineral rights investment, I'd suggest: 1) Get an independent analysis of the investment's economics (not just tax benefits) 2) Understand the full fee structure 3) Ask what happens if tax laws change 4) Consider simpler alternatives like maximizing defined benefit plans or conservation easements The fact that you're asking these questions here shows you're being smart about it. Don't let FOMO or aggressive sales tactics rush you into something this complex.

I appreciate everyone sharing their real experiences here. As someone who's been through IRS audits before (unrelated to mineral investments), I can't stress enough how important it is to have bulletproof documentation if you're going to pursue these strategies. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing tax shelter-like investments, especially those marketed to high-income professionals. Even if the deductions are legitimate, you need to be prepared to defend them. This means keeping detailed records of: - Your profit motive beyond tax benefits - All due diligence you performed - Documentation showing this is a real business investment, not just a tax scheme I'd also suggest looking into the IRS's "Listed Transactions" and "Transactions of Interest" lists to see if similar structures have been flagged. The last thing you want is to unknowingly participate in something the IRS has already identified as abusive. One final thought: remember that aggressive tax strategies often have a shelf life. What works today might not work tomorrow, and you could be stuck in an illiquid investment that no longer provides the benefits you bought it for. Sometimes the boring approaches (maxing out retirement accounts, establishing a cash balance plan) are boring for a reason - they work consistently over time.

One thing nobody has mentioned - if you do file separately, make sure you're both consistent in how you file. If one of you itemizes deductions, the other MUST also itemize - you can't have one person take the standard deduction and the other itemize. This rule trips up a lot of people filing MFS.

I completely understand your frustration - being financially responsible while your spouse underwitholds is incredibly unfair. Filing separately is definitely possible, but you'd likely lose significant money in the process. The biggest issue with MFS is that you'll both face higher tax brackets and lose access to many credits and deductions that joint filers get. For example, the Child Tax Credit phases out at much lower income levels for MFS ($75,000 vs $150,000 for joint), so you might not get the full $2,000 per child credit you're counting on. Here's what I'd suggest: calculate both scenarios (joint vs separate) using actual numbers to see the total tax impact. Often couples find they're paying $2,000-$5,000 more by filing separately. If filing jointly saves money overall, that savings could cover his tax debt and still leave you both better off. The real solution though is establishing clear financial boundaries. If you file jointly but he continues underwithholding, consider requiring him to adjust his W-4 or set aside money monthly to cover his portion of any tax liability. You shouldn't have to subsidize his poor tax planning, regardless of your filing status.