IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Yara Campbell

•

I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm in a very similar situation - owing around $3,200 for the past two years and getting increasingly worried about potential IRS enforcement actions. What I find really valuable about all the responses here is the consistent theme that being proactive is key. It seems like the IRS system is designed to encourage self-correction rather than immediate punishment, which is actually pretty reasonable when you think about it. The percentage-based analysis that several people mentioned really opened my eyes. I never considered that my underwithholding rate matters more than the absolute dollar amount. At my income level, I'm probably in that "monitoring" category that was mentioned rather than immediate enforcement. I'm planning to use the IRS withholding calculator this week and submit a new W-4. Reading about everyone's experiences here - especially those who took proactive action and avoided any lock-in letters entirely - has convinced me that waiting and worrying is much worse than just fixing the issue now. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences and professional insights!

0 coins

I'm so glad to see someone else in a similar situation! Your $3,200 for two years puts you right in that same category as many of us here. What really struck me from this whole discussion is how the IRS system actually seems more reasonable than I initially feared - they're not just trying to catch people in gotcha situations, but rather encouraging compliance. The percentage analysis was eye-opening for me too. It makes so much sense that they'd focus on the rate of underwithholding rather than just raw dollars. Someone making $200k owing $3k is very different from someone making $50k owing the same amount. I actually went ahead and used the withholding calculator yesterday after reading all these responses, and it was much easier than I expected. Turns out I needed to add about $120 per paycheck in additional withholding to get on track. Already submitted my new W-4 this morning! The peace of mind is incredible compared to the constant worry I'd been carrying around. Definitely recommend just getting it done - the anticipation was so much worse than actually taking action.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

This entire discussion has been incredibly enlightening! I'm in a similar boat - owing around $4,000 each year for the past three years and constantly stressed about whether the IRS would eventually send a lock-in letter to my employer. What really stands out to me from all these responses is how the IRS system seems more nuanced and reasonable than I initially thought. The percentage-based approach makes complete sense - they're looking for patterns of systematic underwithholding rather than just punishing people who made estimation errors. I'm particularly grateful for the real-world experiences people shared, especially those who actually spoke with IRS agents through Claimyr or took proactive steps to fix their withholding. It's reassuring to hear that the IRS generally prefers voluntary compliance and that taking action now can essentially "reset" your status with them. Based on everything I've read here, I'm convinced that the anxiety of waiting and wondering is far worse than just taking action. I'm going to use the IRS withholding calculator this week and update my W-4 immediately. The peace of mind will be worth it, and it sounds like proactive compliance is the best protection against any future enforcement actions. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and experiences - this community discussion has been more helpful than hours of trying to research this topic on my own!

0 coins

How do I properly report iShares Silver Trust (SLV) ETF on my 1099-B for tax filing?

I've been banging my head against the wall trying to figure this out and Google has been surprisingly unhelpful! I purchased some SLV (iShares Silver Trust) back in 2019 and haven't sold any of my original shares. However, on my 1099-B from my broker, there's this weird section labeled: **UNDETERMINED TERM TRANSACTIONS FOR NONCOVERED TAX LOTS.** ISHARES SILVER TRUST |**1 c- Datesold ordisposed**|**Quantity**|**1 d- Proceeds &6- Reported(G)ross or (N)et**|**Cost or other basis**| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |12/31/19|0|0.21|\-| **Fees and Expenses**ISHARES SILVER TRUST |Date|Amount|**Transaction type**| |:-|:-|:-| |12/31/19|\-0.21|Gross proceeds investment expense| From what I've researched, it seems like iShares Silver Trust sells tiny amounts of the underlying silver each month to cover management expenses, which then gets passed through to shareholders. When I try to import this into TurboTax, it asks me a bunch of questions about these transactions and I'm completely lost on how to report them on my 1099-B. Some of the TurboTax questions I'm stuck on: - *"What type of investment did you sell?"* (I didn't personally sell anything - the management did it. I selected "Mutual fund, Index fund, or ETF") - *"Date this investment was acquired."* (12/31/2019?) - *"Date sold or disposed."* (12/31/2019?) Are these considered Long-term or Short-term transactions? Is the cost basis $0.21 making this essentially a wash? Or should I put the $0.21 under "I paid sales expenses that aren't included in the sale proceeds reported on the form"? Or is there a completely different way I should be handling this? Really appreciate any guidance here! This feels like it should be simpler than it's turning out to be.

Zoe Walker

•

Does anyone know if this is handled differently if the SLV is in a Roth IRA instead of a taxable account? I've got the same tiny transactions showing up but they're in my retirement account. Do I even need to report these at all?

0 coins

If your SLV holdings are in a Roth IRA, you don't need to report these transactions on your personal tax return at all! That's one of the benefits of retirement accounts - all the activity inside them (including these small ETF expense transactions) is tax-sheltered. The broker may still provide a 1099-B showing these transactions for informational purposes, but they should be marked as being from a retirement account. You can safely ignore them when preparing your personal tax return. Only taxable account transactions need to be reported.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been dealing with similar SLV reporting issues for years and never understood what those tiny transactions meant. One additional tip for anyone using TurboTax specifically - when you get to the section asking about "Date acquired," make sure you use the actual date you purchased your SLV shares, not the 12/31 disposal date. I made this mistake initially and it threw off the short-term vs long-term classification. Also, if you have multiple purchases of SLV throughout the year, these expense transactions typically use a "first in, first out" (FIFO) method to determine which specific shares are being disposed of for expense purposes. So if you bought SLV in March and again in August, the December expense transaction would likely be attributed to your March purchase. The good news is that regardless of which shares are technically disposed of, the tax impact is still essentially zero since the proceeds equal the proportional cost basis. But getting the dates right helps ensure everything matches up properly with your broker's records.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

Thanks for the FIFO clarification! That's really helpful. I actually have multiple SLV purchases throughout 2019 and was wondering how the broker determines which shares get "disposed of" for these expense transactions. So if I understand correctly, even though it's using FIFO for determining which specific shares, I still report the same $0.21 proceeds and $0.21 cost basis regardless of which purchase lot it came from? The math works out the same either way since we're matching proceeds to basis?

0 coins

I'm also dealing with a similar estate situation and wanted to add something that might be helpful - if you're working with any estate sale companies or auction houses to dispose of other assets, they often have connections with certified auto appraisers who specialize in estate valuations. When we were settling my grandfather's estate, the estate sale company we used recommended an appraiser who was very familiar with IRS requirements for date-of-death valuations. He provided exactly the kind of detailed documentation that would satisfy the IRS, complete with market comparables and condition assessments. The cost was reasonable (around $300) and having that professional appraisal gave us complete confidence when filing Form 1041. Even though online tools like KBB are generally accepted for modest losses like yours, if you want absolute peace of mind or if the vehicle has any unique characteristics (high mileage, accident history, modifications, etc.) that might affect its value, a professional appraisal could be worth considering. The appraiser we used also provided guidance on how to properly document the stepped-up basis for Schedule D, which was invaluable. Your approach of treating this as a deductible capital loss for the estate is definitely correct based on everything discussed in this thread. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

That's a great suggestion about connecting with estate sale companies for appraiser referrals! I hadn't thought about that avenue, but it makes perfect sense that they would work with appraisers who understand estate valuation requirements. Your point about unique characteristics affecting value is particularly relevant. Even though my uncle's 2018 Camry was rarely driven, it did have some minor cosmetic issues from sitting in the garage for extended periods. An online valuation tool might not fully capture those condition factors, whereas a professional appraiser could properly document how they affect the fair market value. The $300 cost you mentioned seems very reasonable for the peace of mind and professional documentation it provides. Given that we're claiming a $2,300 loss, having that level of professional backing might be worth the investment, especially since it comes out to only about 13% of the loss amount. Thanks for sharing your experience with the appraiser providing Schedule D guidance too - that kind of expertise in the actual tax reporting requirements could be really valuable for someone like me who's new to estate administration.

0 coins

I'm currently serving as executor for my late grandmother's estate and this entire discussion has been incredibly valuable for understanding how to handle vehicle sales on Form 1041. What I found most helpful was the consistent explanation that once a vehicle becomes part of an estate, it loses its "personal-use" character completely. This means the normal IRC Section 165(c)(3) limitations that prevent individuals from deducting personal property losses simply don't apply to estates, since an estate is a separate taxpayer that doesn't personally use anything. For your 2018 Camry situation, you're absolutely on the right track. The $2,300 loss should be fully deductible on Schedule D using the stepped-up basis from the date-of-death fair market value. Make sure to keep good documentation of that valuation - whether from KBB/Edmunds for a straightforward case like yours, or a professional appraisal if you want extra certainty. One practical tip I learned from my estate attorney: when completing Schedule D, be descriptive in your asset description (like "2018 Toyota Camry - inherited vehicle") to make it clear to the IRS what type of transaction this is and why you're using stepped-up basis. The fact that your uncle rarely drove the vehicle actually works in your favor for documentation purposes, since low mileage vehicles typically hold their value better, making your loss claim more supportable. Best of luck with your filing!

0 coins

One thing that confuses me about these IRA recharacterizations is how they're treated for tax purposes in the year you do them. If the OP did the recharacterization in 2024, does that mean they report it on 2024 taxes even though it was correcting a 2023 contribution?

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

It gets a bit complicated. The recharacterization itself isn't taxable, but it essentially treats the contribution as if it had originally gone into the Traditional IRA. The 6% penalty applies to 2023 because that's when the excess contribution occurred. However, the conversion from Traditional back to Roth (the backdoor part) is a 2024 taxable event and would be reported on 2024 taxes. You'd receive a 1099-R for that conversion.

0 coins

I went through almost the exact same situation last year and want to share what worked for me. The key thing to understand is that even though you missed the deadline, your recharacterization is still valid - you just can't avoid the penalty. Here's what I did: Filed Form 1040-X to amend my 2023 return, included Form 5329 to pay the 6% excess contribution penalty, and reported the $600 in earnings as income for 2023. The penalty only applies to the contribution amount, not the gains. For 2024, I reported the backdoor Roth conversion normally using the 1099-R forms I received. Make sure to file Form 8606 to track your non-deductible traditional IRA basis - this is crucial to avoid being taxed twice on the conversion. The whole process took about 8 weeks to get processed, but the IRS accepted everything without issues. Don't stress too much - this is more common than you think and the IRS has clear procedures for handling it. Just make sure you file that amended return sooner rather than later to get the penalty paid and behind you.

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! I'm curious about the timeline you mentioned. When you say it took 8 weeks to get processed, was that for the amended return or the penalty payment specifically? I'm trying to figure out if I should expect any follow-up correspondence from the IRS or if they just process it quietly once everything is submitted correctly. Also, did you include any explanation letter with your Form 1040-X about the reasonable cause, like Yara mentioned above? I'm wondering if it's worth trying for the penalty waiver or if I should just accept it and move on.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm planning to launch my own cooking channel next month and was completely overwhelmed by the tax implications. Reading through everyone's real-world experiences has given me so much clarity. I love the practical approaches people have shared - from the photo documentation idea to the "portions created for content" method. It sounds like the key is being consistent, reasonable, and honest about the primary purpose of purchases. One question I still have: for those of you who've been doing this for a while, have you ever been questioned by the IRS about your food deductions? I'm curious if this is something that commonly triggers audits or if it's generally accepted as long as you have good documentation. I want to make sure I'm prepared for any potential scrutiny down the road. Also, for anyone who started small like I'm planning to - did you set up a separate business bank account right away, or wait until you had more substantial income? Trying to figure out how "official" to make everything from day one versus gradually scaling up the business structure as the channel grows.

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Great questions. I've been running my cooking channel for about 3 years now and have never had any issues with the IRS regarding food deductions. From what I understand talking to other creators and my accountant, food expenses for cooking channels are pretty standard and accepted as long as you're not being ridiculous about it. Regarding the business bank account - I'd definitely recommend setting one up right away, even before you make your first dollar. It makes everything so much cleaner for tax purposes and shows you're treating this as a legitimate business from day one. Most banks offer free business checking accounts, and it'll save you headaches later when you're trying to separate business and personal expenses. The documentation habits you build early will serve you well. Start with whatever system works for you - even a simple notebook - but be consistent from the beginning. It's much harder to go back and recreate records than to just build good habits from day one. Good luck with your launch!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm finding this discussion incredibly valuable! I've been considering starting a baking channel and was worried about the tax implications of ingredient costs. Reading through everyone's experiences, it seems like the consensus is that proper documentation and being reasonable about the primary purpose test are key. I particularly appreciate the practical tips like photographing ingredients before use and tracking which videos they're used for. One thing that gives me confidence is seeing that established creators haven't had issues with the IRS as long as they maintain good records. The "portions created for content" approach makes perfect sense - if I'm baking a dozen cupcakes specifically to film a tutorial, the fact that my family enjoys eating them afterward shouldn't disqualify the business expense. I'm definitely going to start with a separate business account and simple spreadsheet tracking from day one. Better to build good habits early than try to clean up records later. Thanks to everyone for sharing your real-world experiences - this thread is going to save me a lot of stress and guesswork!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Your baking channel sounds like it'll be a great addition to the creator space. I'm also relatively new here but have learned so much from this discussion. The documentation approach everyone's described really takes the guesswork out of what can be a stressful tax situation. I love that you're planning to start with proper systems from day one - that's definitely the smart approach. Baking ingredients can get expensive quickly (especially quality chocolate, vanilla, specialty flours), so having a clear system to track legitimate business expenses will probably save you significant money come tax time. One thing I'm curious about for baking specifically - do you plan to factor in the cost of ingredients for test batches? Like if you need to perfect a recipe before filming, would those "practice" ingredients also be business expenses since they're necessary for creating quality content? Just thinking through some of the nuances that might be specific to baking versus general cooking content.

0 coins

Prev1...461462463464465...5643Next