


Ask the community...
You may want to also contact your local post office about this. I had a similar situation and found out that sometimes mail carriers will "correct" addresses based on their knowledge of who lives where, and this can actually make problems worse. My mail carrier saw a name they recognized but with a slightly wrong address, and "helpfully" delivered it to me instead of returning it to sender. This made the problem persist longer because the IRS never got the returns that would have triggered them to fix the issue.
This is a really good point! The post office sometimes does "address corrections" based on carrier knowledge which can mask the real problem. Would talking to the postmaster help or is there a specific form for this too?
Talking to your regular mail carrier first is usually helpful, but if that doesn't work, yes - speaking with the postmaster at your local post office is the next step. There's actually a form called PS Form 3575Z "Employee-Generated Change of Address" that they can use to stop automatic "corrections" to specific addresses. The key is making sure they understand that redirecting the mail is masking a problem rather than solving it. Once my postal carrier understood the situation, they started marking the mail as "addressee unknown" and returning it, which eventually forced the IRS to fix their records.
In the meantime while yr waiting for the IRS to fix this, u might want to write "RETURN TO SENDER - NO SUCH PERSON AT THIS ADDRESS" in big red letters on any future notices. That's wat the postal regulations say to do, and its more likely to trigger a proper address investigation than just saying "wrong address
Don't forget that with the service business where you're going to client locations, you can also deduct mileage! That can actually end up being worth more than the home office deduction depending on how much you drive. I'm in a similar situation and the mileage deduction was huge for me last year - like $12k in deductions.
Thanks for mentioning that! I've been tracking mileage but wasn't sure if I could claim it all since some of it is just going to initial consultations that don't always turn into jobs. Can I deduct those trips too?
Absolutely you can deduct mileage for consultations! Any driving you do for business purposes - including potential clients who don't end up hiring you - is deductible. Those are legitimate business development activities. Just make sure you keep a good mileage log with dates, destinations, and purpose of trips. I use an app that automatically tracks my drives and lets me categorize them as business or personal. Makes it super easy come tax time and gives me something solid if I ever get audited.
I was scared to take the home office deduction for years because I heard it was an "audit flag" but my accountant finally convinced me it was leaving money on the table. As long as you have a legit office that's exclusively used for business, you should absolutely take it. And document everything - take pics of your office, keep receipts for all office equipment, etc.
Something important that hasn't been mentioned yet: If you're trading in a tax-advantaged account like an IRA or 401k, the wash sale rule doesn't matter at all! All the trades happen inside the account and don't trigger any immediate tax consequences. I learned this the hard way after spending way too much time stressing about wash sales in my Roth IRA. Since you don't pay taxes on gains within the account anyway, the wash sale rule is completely irrelevant. The problem only exists in taxable brokerage accounts where each sale is a reportable tax event. Just wanted to mention this in case anyone else was confused like I was!
Wait, so if I'm trading in my Roth IRA I don't need to worry about this at all? That's a huge relief for part of my portfolio! What about trading between a regular brokerage account and an IRA? Could that trigger wash sales?
You're completely safe trading within your Roth IRA - no wash sale concerns there! Trading between accounts is where you need to be careful. The IRS considers trades across different accounts you own when applying the wash sale rule. So if you sell something at a loss in your brokerage account and then buy it within 30 days in your IRA, you could trigger a wash sale. What makes this particularly bad is that the disallowed loss gets added to the cost basis in your IRA, where it essentially disappears forever since IRAs don't benefit from cost basis adjustments.
Does anyone recommend any specific tax software that handles wash sales correctly? I tried using FreeTaxUSA last year and it was a nightmare trying to manually figure out all the wash sales from my trading.
TurboTax Premier has been decent for me with handling wash sales, but only if your brokerage provides a correct 1099-B with wash sales already calculated. If you're using a broker that doesn't adjust for wash sales on their forms, you're basically on your own with any software. I've heard H&R Block's premium version is also good for investors, but haven't tried it myself.
3 Just a heads up - I serve on the board of a nonprofit that issues stipends, and there's a lot of confusion even on the organizational side. The rules for how to report different types of payments are incredibly complex. For educational stipends specifically, if they're provided primarily to further your education (rather than being compensation for services), they should typically be reported on a 1098-T or sometimes a 1099-MISC Box 3, not a 1099-NEC. If the stipend was specifically to cover your educational expenses with no work requirement attached, it might qualify as a scholarship/fellowship grant. The organization should be able to provide you with a letter clarifying the nature of the payment.
15 This is really helpful! So what form should my theater company have used when they gave me a $2,000 "educational stipend" to attend workshops while I was also working as their part-time marketing coordinator? They lumped it all together on one 1099-NEC.
3 It depends on whether the stipend was contingent on your employment. If you had to work as their marketing coordinator to receive the educational stipend, then it's more likely considered compensation and the 1099-NEC might be appropriate. However, if the stipend was truly separate and would have been provided regardless of your marketing work, then it should have been reported differently - potentially on a 1099-MISC Box 3 as "Other Income" which isn't subject to self-employment tax. Your theater company should have documentation about the purpose and conditions of the stipend that would help clarify this distinction.
19 Has anyone actually had success getting an organization to reissue a corrected tax form? My university issued me a 1099-NEC for a research stipend that should have been on a 1098-T, but their accounting department keeps saying "that's just how we report it" and refuses to fix it. I'm going to end up paying hundreds extra in self-employment tax!
5 I work in university administration (not accounting) and unfortunately this happens a lot. Your best bet is to escalate to the department chair or dean who approved your stipend, not just talk to accounting. Have them clarify in writing that it was an educational stipend not contingent on services, then take that to accounting. If they still won't budge, you can file your taxes correctly with Form 8275 explaining the discrepancy, but it might trigger a review. Another option is to contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service - they can sometimes intervene when organizations report incorrectly.
Zainab Ahmed
One thing to consider - if your expenses were substantial, you might want to consult with a tax professional before filing. In my experience (former corporate accountant), large discrepancies between 1099s and what you report can sometimes trigger automated reviews. Make sure you're categorizing the expenses properly on Form 8275. For business expense reimbursements that shouldn't be taxable, you'll want to cite the specific section of tax code (Sec. 62(a)(2)(A) and Sec. 132(a)(1)) that exempts employee business expense reimbursements under accountable plans from taxation.
0 coins
AstroExplorer
ā¢Thanks for mentioning the specific tax code sections! That's super helpful. Do you think I should also include a brief letter explaining the situation in more detail, or is the Form 8275 enough on its own?
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
ā¢The Form 8275 should be sufficient on its own if completed properly. There's a section for "Detailed Explanation" where you can provide a concise summary of the situation. Keep it factual and reference those tax code sections. If you want to provide additional context, you can include a brief statement in the "Explanation" section of Schedule 1 where you offset the 1099-MISC income. Something like "See Form 8275 - Reimbursed employee business expenses incorrectly reported as income on 1099-MISC." But don't attach a separate letter - that's not standard procedure and might actually complicate processing.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
Has anyone dealt with this exact situation before? I'm wondering what the timeline looks like. If OP files with Form 8275 disputing the 1099-MISC, does the IRS typically follow up quickly, or might this drag on for months?
0 coins
Yara Abboud
ā¢I went through this last year with a former client who incorrectly sent me a 1099 for reimbursed expenses. I filed Form 8275 with my return in February 2024, and didn't hear anything until June when I got a letter asking for documentation. I sent in all my receipts and expense reports, and by August they sent a determination letter saying they agreed with my position. So about 6 months total from filing to resolution.
0 coins