IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone used the IRS website's interactive tax assistant for this? I thought there was a tool that helps determine which forms you need based on your business situation. Might be worth checking before paying for outside help.

0 coins

Mei-Ling Chen

•

I tried using the IRS interactive tools for my small business and found them frustratingly limited. They're okay for basic questions but not great for specific form requirements for business scenarios. For something like Form 4562, you'd be better off reading the actual form instructions directly from the IRS website.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation with my small business LLC. After reading through all these responses, I decided to double-check my own filing requirements since I've been relying on my accountant's advice without questioning it. Turns out I should have been filing Form 4562 for equipment I purchased two years ago but never did. My accountant at the time said it wasn't necessary, but based on what everyone's sharing here (especially the former IRS agent's explanation), I think I need to amend those returns. For anyone in a similar boat - the IRS Publication 946 (How to Depreciate Property) has detailed explanations about when Form 4562 is required. It's pretty clear that if you're claiming depreciation on business assets, especially in the first year they're placed in service, you need the form. @Natalie Khan - I'd definitely push your accountant for a specific written explanation of why they think you don't need it. If they can't provide a solid reason based on your actual situation, it might be time to get a second opinion. The consistency issue that Lena mentioned is really important - suddenly changing your filing pattern could definitely raise flags.

0 coins

@Freya Larsen Thank you for mentioning Publication 946! I just looked it up and you re'absolutely right - it s'much clearer than what I was finding in my online searches. The publication explicitly states that Form 4562 is required for the first year you claim depreciation on any asset, and then lists the specific exceptions which (are pretty limited .)I m'definitely going to print out the relevant sections and bring them to my meeting with our accountant next week. Having the official IRS publication as backup should help me get a proper explanation for their reasoning. If they still can t'justify why we don t'need it, I think it s'time to find someone new. It s'frustrating that we re'already dealing with amending returns due to the previous issues, and now we might have another problem to fix. But better to get it right than face potential audit issues down the road.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

One thing that might help clarify this for you - think of your S Corp as essentially "transparent" for tax purposes. The IRS basically pretends it doesn't exist when calculating your personal taxes. Your $140k salary gets reported on your W-2 and taxed as regular wages. The remaining $335k gets reported on Schedule K-1 and flows to your personal return as pass-through income. Then your TOTAL income ($475k plus any other personal income) determines which tax brackets apply to different portions. So yes, most of your income will likely fall into higher brackets, but remember that tax brackets are marginal - you don't pay 37% on all $475k, just on the portion that exceeds the 37% bracket threshold. Also definitely look into that QBI deduction mentioned earlier - as a design business, you should qualify for up to 20% deduction on the pass-through portion, which can significantly reduce your effective tax rate on that $335k. Just make sure your total taxable income doesn't push you into the phase-out ranges where the deduction gets limited.

0 coins

Beth Ford

•

This is such a helpful way to think about it! The "transparent" analogy really clarifies how S Corp taxation works. I've been getting confused thinking the corporation had its own tax rate that somehow affected my personal brackets. So just to make sure I understand the QBI deduction correctly - if I qualify for the full 20% on that $335k pass-through income, that would be a $67k deduction? That seems almost too good to be true. Are there specific requirements for design businesses to qualify, or income limits I need to worry about with my total income level?

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

As someone who's navigated S Corp taxation for several years, I can confirm that the explanation about "transparent" taxation is spot-on. Your $140k salary is treated as regular W-2 income, and the $335k pass-through goes on your personal return via Schedule K-1. Regarding the QBI deduction - yes, potentially getting 20% of $335k ($67k deduction) is correct, but there are important limitations to consider with your income level. Design businesses can be tricky because they might be considered "Specified Service Trade or Business" (SSTB) under the tax code, which phases out the QBI deduction for high earners. With your total taxable income likely exceeding $383,900 (2024 threshold for single filers), you'll be in the phase-out range where the deduction gets reduced and potentially eliminated entirely for SSTB income. The phase-out is complete at $433,900 for single filers. However, if your design business involves creating products rather than just providing personal services, or if you have significant tangible property/equipment, you might avoid the SSTB classification. This is definitely something to discuss with your accountant - the QBI rules are complex and the distinction can save you thousands in taxes.

0 coins

I ran into the EXACT same issue last year with my software startup! I ended up adding my wife as the second responsible official even though she has zero involvement in the business. The IRS approved it without any questions. One piece of advice: make sure whoever you list has a clean tax history. The IRS does background checks on responsible officials, and if they have any tax compliance issues in their past, it could delay or derail your application.

0 coins

Did you need to update your corporate bylaws or file any additional paperwork to add your spouse as an officer? Or did you just list them on the IRIS application without changing any corporate documents?

0 coins

I did need to update my corporate records to make my wife officially a corporate officer - specifically I made her the Secretary while I remained President/Treasurer. I created board minutes documenting this appointment and updated my stock certificates/ledger. You should definitely have corporate documentation backing up whoever you list as a responsible official. The IRS may not always check, but if they do audit you later, you want your corporate records to match what you submitted on your application. I used a corporate record keeping template from my formation service to make sure everything was properly documented.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

I went through this exact same headache about 6 months ago with my consulting business! The two responsible official requirement really catches solo founders off guard. Here's what worked for me: I made my business attorney my second responsible official. Since they already had access to all my corporate documents and understood the compliance requirements, it made sense. They charge me a small annual fee ($150) to maintain this role, but it's worth it for the peace of mind. The key thing is that the second person needs to have legitimate authority within your business structure. Just listing a random family member without proper corporate documentation could create issues later if the IRS audits your application. Make sure whoever you choose is properly appointed as an officer in your corporate records with documented board resolutions. Don't abandon your C corp structure over this - it's too valuable for liability protection and future fundraising. The workaround is much easier than starting over!

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation as a solo founder and was leaning toward just using my spouse, but having a business attorney handle this role makes a lot of sense. They'd already understand the legal implications and compliance requirements. Quick question - did your attorney need to go through any specific vetting process with the IRS, or was it pretty straightforward once you had the corporate documentation in place? I'm wondering if using a professional versus a family member changes how the IRS reviews the application.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

I think everyone is overlooking a simple solution. If the traditional IRA contribution was made in 2022 and you've already filed your 2022 taxes without taking a deduction, you may be within the timeframe to recharacterize that contribution as a Roth contribution instead (assuming your income doesn't exceed Roth limits). Recharacterization is different from conversion and avoids the pro rata issue entirely. You'd need to contact Fidelity quickly though, as there are time limits.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Recharacterization has to be done by the tax filing deadline plus extensions for the year the contribution was made. So for 2022 contributions, that would have been October 16, 2023 if they filed an extension. If they're past that date, this option is unfortunately no longer available.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

This is exactly the kind of IRA maze that trips up so many people! You're definitely not alone in this confusion. The pro rata rule is one of those tax provisions that seems designed to make retirement planning as complicated as possible. From what you've described, you're in a classic catch-22 situation. The IRS treats all your traditional IRAs (including SEP IRAs) as one big bucket for pro rata calculations, so you can't just cleanly extract that $10k of after-tax money without paying taxes on a portion of it. A few thoughts on your options: 1. The Solo 401(k) strategy others mentioned is solid if you have self-employment income from your business. You can roll the pre-tax SEP money into it, leaving only the after-tax traditional IRA funds for conversion. 2. If you're comfortable with the tax hit, you could just do the conversion anyway and pay taxes on the pro rata portion. With $67k total and $10k after-tax, you'd pay taxes on roughly 85% of whatever you convert. 3. Consider whether you actually need to do anything right now. That $10k will grow tax-deferred, and when you eventually take distributions in retirement, only the growth portion will be taxable (assuming you properly track the basis with Form 8606). The most important thing is making sure you file Form 8606 for any year you made non-deductible contributions. This creates the paper trail the IRS needs to track your after-tax basis. What's your timeline for needing to resolve this? That might help determine the best approach.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

This is really helpful perspective, especially about potentially just leaving the money alone for now. I hadn't considered that the growth would still be tax-deferred even on the after-tax contribution. One question though - if I do decide to go the Solo 401(k) route, are there any downsides I should be aware of? Like higher fees or administrative burden compared to keeping everything in IRAs? My business is pretty small (just me) so I want to make sure I'm not creating unnecessary complexity. Also, you mentioned Form 8606 - I'm pretty sure I didn't file this last year when I made the non-deductible contribution. How bad is it that I missed this, and what's the best way to fix it?

0 coins

Sean O'Brien

•

This is such a comprehensive thread with excellent solutions! I wanted to add one more tip that might help others in the future - if you're using H&R Block desktop version, check if there's a "Backup/Restore" feature that creates a backup file of your tax data. Sometimes these backup files are in a format (like .xml or .dat) that can be opened with text editors or imported into Excel using Data > From File. I discovered this accidentally when I needed to recover some data after a software crash. The backup file contained all my tax information in a structured format that was much easier to parse than trying to copy from the interface. That said, the Fidelity direct export approach that @Javier Garcia mentioned is definitely the gold standard here. For anyone dealing with investment transactions, always check your brokerage first - they usually have the cleanest, most accurate data exports available. Hope this helps save someone else the hours of frustration I went through last year!

0 coins

That's a really clever approach with the backup files! I never would have thought to look there. For anyone trying this method, be careful when opening backup files in text editors - make sure to make a copy first so you don't accidentally corrupt your original tax return data. I'm definitely bookmarking this thread for next year. Between the Fidelity direct export, the Forms View tip, the Review/Summary section, and now the backup file approach, there are so many good alternatives to manual data entry. It's amazing how many workarounds exist when tax software doesn't play nice with copy/paste functions!

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

Wow, this thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's been putting off dealing with my investment transactions because of this exact issue, I'm amazed at all the creative solutions everyone has shared. I just tried the Fidelity direct export approach that @Javier Garcia mentioned and it worked perfectly! I had no idea my brokerage had a CSV export option for tax documents. Downloaded all my 1099-B data in about 2 minutes and it imported cleanly into Excel with all the columns properly formatted. For anyone still reading this thread - definitely start with checking your brokerage's website first before trying to wrestle data out of tax software. It's so much cleaner and more accurate than any workaround method. Thanks to everyone who contributed solutions here. This community is awesome for saving each other time and frustration during tax season!

0 coins

This is such a great example of how community knowledge-sharing really works! I love how this thread evolved from the original frustration with H&R Block's copy limitations to discovering that the real solution was going directly to the source data at Fidelity. It's a perfect reminder that sometimes we get so focused on solving the immediate technical problem (how to copy from tax software) that we miss the simpler approach (getting the data from where it originated). The brokerage export method is not only cleaner but also eliminates any potential transcription errors that could happen with OCR or manual entry. This thread should definitely be bookmarked by anyone dealing with multiple investment transactions. Between all the different approaches shared here - from the Forms View and Review sections to the creative backup file method - there are solutions for pretty much every scenario. Thanks for sharing your success with the Fidelity export! It's always encouraging to hear when these suggestions actually work in practice.

0 coins

Prev1...453454455456457...5643Next