Thanks for this info! That's really helpful. Would it be better to wait until March then? Or is mid-February generally safe enough? I'm trying to balance getting it done early vs avoiding problems.

Mid-February is typically safe enough in my experience. By then, the IRS has usually worked out most of the early filing season kinks. March is completely fine too if you're not in a rush. Anytime between mid-February and the April deadline should give you smooth processing. Just make sure if you're filing a protective return that your statement is very clear about your intentions and the legal basis for your position. That clarity is more important than the exact filing date.

Yes, attaching a PDF statement works fine! I did this last year. Just make sure you title it clearly like "Form 1120-F Protective Filing Statement" and reference it somewhere in the return itself if possible. The IRS does look at properly labeled attachments.

That's interesting! So are you saying the IRS doesn't strictly apply the $1,470 monthly limit that the SSA uses? My daughter has Down syndrome and occasionally works more hours for special events, but we still provide over 90% of her support.

That's right - while the IRS and SSA both use the term "substantial gainful activity," the IRS focuses more on the overall support situation rather than rigidly applying the monthly earnings limit. If you're providing 90% of your daughter's support, you're well within the requirements to claim her as a dependent. The key test for the IRS is whether you provide more than half of your dependent's total support for the year. The SGA question becomes more relevant if they're earning enough that they might be supporting themselves. Even with occasional higher earnings for special events, it sounds like your situation clearly meets the support test.

There are different SGA thresholds for blind individuals versus non-blind individuals with disabilities. In 2023, the threshold was $2,460 per month for blind individuals and $1,470 for non-blind. Doesn't matter what type of disability otherwise - physical, cognitive, etc all fall under the same threshold as long as they're not blind.

If I file an amended return just for the stimulus credit, will that affect any other parts of my tax situation from that year? I'm worried about opening a can of worms or triggering an audit.

Filing an amended return for just the Recovery Rebate Credit shouldn't affect other aspects of your tax situation if that's the only change you're making. You'll need to complete the entire 1040-X form, but you'll only be changing the specific line related to the credit. The amendment itself doesn't increase your audit risk if the claim is legitimate. Just make sure you have documentation showing you were eligible and didn't receive the payment. The IRS should have records of which payments were issued to you, but having your own bank statements as backup is always smart.

You can check your IRS online account instead. Go to irs.gov and look for "View Your Account." You'll need to create an ID.me account if you don't have one, but once you're in, you can see all the payments that were issued to you including all stimulus payments. It's actually more reliable than the old GetMyPayment tool was.

Thanks for the suggestion. It wasn't identity theft - my dad knowingly let my sister use the card to help her out, so we can't go that route. He's on SSDI, not SSI, so that's somewhat reassuring. I'm still concerned about how this might impact his tax situation though, especially since he's normally not required to file due to low income. Does the 1099-C automatically mean he must file now, even with SSDI being his only income source?

If your dad is only receiving SSDI and is single, he generally wouldn't need to file a tax return unless his total income exceeds the standard deduction (which is $14,600 for 2024 if he's over 65). The 1099-C amount would count toward that threshold. So if his SSDI benefits plus the $8,200 canceled debt amount is less than the standard deduction, he still wouldn't be required to file. However, if it puts him over that threshold, then yes, he would need to file - but should definitely look into the insolvency exception in that case.

Form 8275 seems risky to me. I've heard it's like waving a red flag at the IRS saying "look at me!" Wouldn't it be better to just file Form 982 and only provide additional explanation if they actually question it?

Thanks for pointing this out! My income was definitely below those limits in 2021 (around $65k) so I was eligible for the full contribution. I think I might have been confused about how much I actually contributed - just double checked and it was exactly $6k, not $8k like I initially wrote. My memory isn't what it used to be lol. If I'm understanding everyone correctly, since the Roth contribution doesn't affect my tax liability and my income was too high for the Saver's Credit but below the Roth income limits, there's really no benefit to amending my return. Does that sound right?

That's exactly right. If your contribution was $6k (within the limit), your income was below the Roth IRA income thresholds but above the Saver's Credit limit, there's really no reason to amend your return. The IRS already has the information from the Form 5498 that your financial institution filed, and since Roth contributions don't impact your tax liability, you're good to go. One less thing to worry about!

Can you explain what a "backdoor Roth conversion" is? I keep hearing about it but don't really understand the concept or why it matters for record keeping.