


Ask the community...
Does anyone know if the new form has a section for NFT transactions? I sold a few NFTs last year and have no idea how to calculate the gains since the values fluctuate so wildly. My tax software just gives me a blank stare when I try to input them lol.
Thanks for the info! That makes sense they'd be treated as collectibles. Do you happen to know if gas fees for minting NFTs can be included in the cost basis? I spent almost as much on gas as I did on some of the actual NFTs.
Yes, gas fees for minting can absolutely be included in your cost basis! That's an important point many people miss. Any fees directly associated with acquiring the NFT (minting fees, gas fees, marketplace fees) can be added to your cost basis, which reduces your taxable gain when you sell. Keep detailed records of all those transactions and fees - I use screenshots of the transaction confirmations showing the gas fees in case of audit.
My biggest concern with this new form is how they'll handle hard forks and airdrops. Last year I received tokens from three different airdrops and a hard fork. The IRS previously said these are taxable when received, but the value was literally changing by the hour. I hope the new form gives clearer guidance on valuation timing.
According to an article I read last week, the draft form includes specific sections for reporting both hard forks and airdrops with guidance on valuation. They're apparently going with fair market value at time of receipt (defined as when you have dominion and control over the tokens), but there's also a section for indicating if the tokens had no established market at the time of receipt.
Don't forget that if you earn above certain thresholds, there's also the Additional Medicare Tax of 0.9% on earnings above $200,000 for single filers. That's another thing that messes up people's calculations when they're in higher income brackets. Also, you mentioned using tax brackets manually. Make sure you're using the correct tax brackets for the tax year you're calculating. They adjust for inflation each year, so the bracket cutoffs for 2024 are different than 2023.
Thanks for pointing that out! I'm not in that income bracket yet, but good to know for future planning. Do you know if HSA contributions have any special tax implications I should be aware of? I'm trying to max mine out this year.
HSA contributions are pretty much the ultimate tax-advantaged account - they're pre-tax for both federal income tax AND FICA taxes (unlike 401k contributions which are still subject to FICA). Plus, the money grows tax-free and withdrawals for qualified medical expenses are tax-free too. It's basically triple tax-advantaged. One thing to be careful about though - if your HSA contributions are made through payroll deduction, they're automatically pre-tax for everything. But if you contribute directly to your HSA outside of payroll, you'll get the income tax deduction when you file your taxes, but you won't save on the FICA taxes. So payroll deduction is usually better if you have that option.
I had similar problems with my calculations. The issue was that I was calculating taxes on a yearly basis, but my payroll system was calculating them on a per-paycheck basis and then projecting that out. The tax brackets are applied to each paycheck as if that's what you'll make every pay period for the whole year. So if you get paid biweekly and make $4,000 per paycheck, the system calculates taxes as if you'll make $104,000 for the year ($4,000 Ć 26 paychecks). If you have months with 3 paychecks or get a bonus, that throws off the calculation even more.
This is exactly right! Payroll systems use what's called the "aggregate method" or sometimes the "annualized method" where they take your current paycheck, multiply it out to an annual amount, calculate the tax on that annual amount, then divide back down to get the withholding for that specific paycheck. This is why your withholding might be higher on paychecks with bonuses or overtime - the system thinks your annual income just went up dramatically. By year end though, it all evens out when you file your tax return.
I actually did something similar last year with construction equipment. One thing to watch for that my CPA missed initially - if you're financing 90% of the cost but taking 100% of the purchase price as a Section 179 deduction, you need to be careful about the "at-risk" rules. You can only take deductions up to the amount you're personally at risk for. In my case, we had to restructure the loan to make sure I was personally liable for the financed portion in order to claim the full deduction. Otherwise, I would have been limited to deducting just my 10% down payment in the first year. Also, don't forget about state taxes - not all states conform to the federal Section 179 limits, so you might not get the same benefit at the state level.
Thanks for this insight - this is exactly the kind of real-world experience I was hoping to hear about. Did you use a specialized leasing company or did you find and manage your own customers? I'm trying to determine how hands-on I need to be with the day-to-day for this to work properly from a tax perspective.
I worked with a specialized company that handled finding customers and managing the equipment, but I made sure to document my involvement in major business decisions. I maintained records of regular meetings where I reviewed leasing terms, approved maintenance expenses, and made decisions about lease renewals. For tax purposes, material participation is key - I spend about 5-7 hours per week on this business, tracking my time carefully. The leasing company does the daily work, but I'm involved in all significant decisions. My tax advisor recommended this level of involvement to satisfy the active participation requirements, especially since I'm using the losses to offset other income. Document everything - calendar entries, emails, meeting notes - it all helps establish your legitimate business involvement.
Has anyone considered the impact of this strategy on the qualified business income deduction (Section 199A)? I'm in a similar situation and was told that large Section 179 deductions can potentially reduce my QBI deduction, partially offsetting the benefit. Also wondering about how this affects social security tax planning. If you're reducing taxable income dramatically through the S-corp with these equipment deductions, are you also reducing your future social security benefits?
Great point about QBI - this is something to consider. Section 179 deductions do reduce QBI, which can impact your 199A deduction. It's definitely a balancing act. On the Social Security question, remember that W-2 wages from an S-corp are still subject to FICA taxes regardless of the business's profit or loss. If you're taking a reasonable salary from your S-corp, those earnings will still count toward your Social Security earnings record even if the business shows a large loss due to Section 179 deductions.
My wife and I switched from paper filing to TurboTax a few years ago, and I'll admit it's been worth it for us. Our main reason was because we started a small side business selling handmade items online, and the business expense categories were confusing us. The interview-style questions in TurboTax definitely made it easier to understand what we could legitimately deduct. It also automatically imports our W-2s and 1099s which saves time on data entry. That said, if you actually ENJOY doing taxes by hand and understand all the forms well, there's nothing wrong with continuing that way. You're not necessarily missing out on deductions if you're thorough and stay up to date with tax law changes.
How much do you typically pay for TurboTax? Their pricing is so confusing with all the different versions and upsells.
We pay about $150 for the Self-Employed version plus state filing. You're right that their pricing is confusing - they start you on a cheaper version then tell you halfway through that you need to upgrade to handle certain forms. The most annoying part is that they increase the price every year while adding very few new features. We've looked at cheaper alternatives like FreeTaxUSA but haven't made the switch yet because we're already familiar with TurboTax's interface.
Has anyone used a CPA vs tax software and can compare the costs/benefits? I've always used software but wondering if a professional would find more deductions.
I switched from TurboTax to a CPA three years ago and it's been worth every penny. Cost is $350 but she found nearly $2,000 in deductions I was missing related to my consulting work. Plus she provides advice throughout the year, not just at tax time. The biggest difference is that software can only work with the information you provide and the questions it's programmed to ask. A good CPA asks probing questions based on your specific situation and knows the more obscure parts of tax code that might apply to you.
Luca Ferrari
I think everyone's overcomplicating this. The old W-4 is actually pretty straightforward once you understand the basic concept. For line 1, think of allowances as people/situations that reduce your tax: you (1), spouse (1), dependents (1 each). Single with no kids? Just put 1 or 2. Married with 2 kids? Maybe 4. Line 3 is just adding lines 1 & 2 together (and since line 2 is blacked out, it's the same as line 1). Line 4 is OPTIONAL. Only fill this in if you want EXTRA money taken out of each paycheck. Line 5 is only for people who expect to have ZERO tax liability for the entire year. If you're working a regular job, this probably isn't you. That's literally it. Don't overthink it!
0 coins
Nia Wilson
ā¢Is it really that simple though? I've heard that if you don't fill it out correctly, you could end up owing a lot at tax time. Isn't there some worksheet that's supposed to come with this form to help calculate the right number?
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
ā¢Yes, there should be a worksheet that comes with the form, but the basic concept is exactly as I described. The worksheet just helps you be more precise. For most people with straightforward tax situations (single, one job, no dependents), using 1 or 2 allowances works fine. If you want to be super cautious and ensure you get a refund rather than owing, use 1. If you prefer larger paychecks throughout the year and don't mind potentially owing a small amount at tax time, use 2. The more complicated your situation (multiple jobs, working spouse, investment income, etc.), the more important it is to use the worksheet or consult a tax professional. But the fundamental concept of "more allowances = less withholding" remains the same.
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
has anyone considered that maybe the employer's payroll system just hasn't been updated but they're INTERPRETING the old form using the new guidelines? my company did this - they had old forms but were processing them according to the 2020+ rules. might be worth asking HR how they're actually using the info from this form.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
ā¢This is actually a good point. At my company, we used old forms for about 6 months after the change but were converting the information internally. The payroll software was updated but we hadn't ordered new forms yet.
0 coins