


Ask the community...
Another option nobody's mentioned yet is TaxAct. I've used it for the past three years to buy I-bonds with my refund and it works perfectly. Their Premium version is usually around $40-50 for federal (depending on when you file), which is way cheaper than TurboTax. The Form 8888 option appears in the "Refund" section after you've completed your return. You can specify exactly how much you want to allocate to I-bonds and how much to direct deposit. One tip: make sure the name on your tax return EXACTLY matches what you want on the bond. The IRS is super picky about this. If your name is "Robert" but you go by "Bob", use "Robert" on both your return and the bond section.
Does TaxAct force you to enter all those extra details for interest and dividends that the OP was complaining about? I hate when tax software asks for info that isn't actually required on the real forms.
TaxAct does ask for the payer names for interest and dividends, but it doesn't require all the excessive details like addresses and phone numbers. You can just enter the name and amount for each 1099-INT or 1099-DIV. For IRA distributions, you do need to enter each 1099-R separately, but that's actually correct since the distribution codes can be different. It's much less demanding than some of the other software I've tried.
This is exactly why I went back to using an accountant! I tried the DIY route for years and kept running into these exact limitations. Software companies design their products for the most common scenarios and anything slightly unusual gets overlooked. I know paying an accountant seems expensive compared to software, but mine charges $275 and handles everything - including splitting my refund between direct deposit and I-bonds. No frustration, no wasted weekends, and I actually end up with BIGGER refunds because he finds deductions I didn't know about.
Does your accountant e-file for you? I'm wondering if they have access to better tax software than what's available to regular consumers.
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that you need to check your 1099-B from your broker carefully! Often they don't include the correct cost basis for RSUs and you'll need to make an adjustment on your tax return. Most brokers will show a cost basis of $0 for RSUs or an incorrect amount, which means you'll need to manually adjust this on Form 8949 by checking box "B" and entering code "B" in column (f) to indicate that you're correcting the cost basis. Then you enter your actual cost basis (FMV at vesting). This is a super common issue that trips up a lot of people with RSUs.
That's really helpful - I just checked my 1099-B and you're right, the cost basis shown is way off! So I need to use Form 8949 and check box "B" to make this correction? Do I need to include any supporting documentation with my return to explain the adjustment?
You don't need to include any additional documentation with your return to explain the adjustment. The IRS is familiar with this situation for RSUs. Just make sure you keep records of your RSU grant documents, vesting schedules, and the fair market value on vesting dates in case you're ever audited. When completing Form 8949, you'll enter the information from your 1099-B in columns a through e, then in column f enter code "B" (for basis adjustment), and in column g enter the difference between your correct basis and what's reported on the 1099-B. This effectively adjusts the basis to the correct amount for calculating your gain or loss.
I made a horrible mistake with my RSUs last year that cost me thousands. I didn't realize the 1099-B was wrong and just entered everything as-is in my tax software. I basically paid tax twice on the same income - once when it vested (on my W2) and again when I sold the shares because the cost basis was wrong. If anyone else has already filed with this mistake, you can file an amended return (Form 1040-X) to fix it and get a refund. I did this and got back about $2,300 in taxes I shouldn't have paid.
How far back can you amend returns for this kind of mistake? I think I might have done the same thing for the past 3 years š¬
Don't forget to consider amended payroll returns! I went with a company that charged 15% but then completely screwed up our 941-X forms. The IRS rejected our first submission and we had to refile, adding months to the process. Make sure whoever you use has extensive experience specifically with the 941-X amendment process for ERC claims. Also ask about their audit support - what happens if the IRS questions your claim 2 years from now? Good firms offer support through any future audits related to the ERC claim.
What's the 941-X form? My payroll company said they'd handle everything but now I'm worried they might miss something.
Form 941-X is the Adjusted Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return that you need to file to claim the ERC retroactively. It's essentially an amendment to your original quarterly tax filings. Most payroll companies are good with regular payroll processing but many don't have specialized experience with ERC claims on the 941-X. The form requires specific line items to be completed in a certain way to properly claim the credit. I'd recommend asking your payroll company specifically about their experience processing ERC claims via 941-X and what their success rate has been. If they seem vague or uncertain, you might want to consider a specialist firm instead.
Be careful!!! The IRS announced they're putting a moratorium on processing new ERC claims starting September 14, 2023 through at least the end of the year. They're doing this because of the huge number of fraudulent claims. If you haven't filed yet, you might be waiting a LONG time. Make sure whoever you go with is legitimate - the IRS is specifically targeting "ERC mills" that file inappropriate claims. The penalties can be severe. Better to wait and do it right than rush and get caught in their enforcement.
Just want to add something important about Head of Household that nobody mentioned yet. If your sister is still claiming your niece as a dependent, you should make sure she actually legally CAN claim her. The IRS has a "residency test" for claiming a qualifying child - generally, the child must live with the parent/guardian for more than half the year. If your niece lives with you full-time for 9+ months, your sister technically might not be eligible to claim her anymore. The IRS would consider you to have the stronger claim since the child lives with you. This isn't just about who "gets" to claim the dependent - filing incorrectly could trigger audits for both of you.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. So you're saying that based on the residency test, my sister might not actually be eligible to claim my niece anymore since she's been living with me for most of the year? I definitely don't want either of us to get audited. Do you know if there's any exception to this residency test? Like if there's some kind of temporary arrangement or something? We didn't really think about the tax implications when my niece came to stay with me.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. The residency test is pretty clear - a qualifying child must live with the taxpayer for more than half the year. With your niece living with you for 9+ months, your sister likely doesn't meet this requirement anymore. There are some exceptions to the residency test, but they're limited to specific situations like temporary absences (medical care, education, vacation, etc.), children of divorced or separated parents with a formal agreement, or kidnapped children. From what you've described, it doesn't sound like any of these exceptions would apply in your situation. I'd recommend having an honest conversation with your sister about the tax situation. The IRS would consider you to have the stronger claim to be the qualifying taxpayer for your niece based on the residency test.
I went through this EXACT situation with my younger brother! Here's what I learned: For Head of Household, you need: 1) Be unmarried on Dec 31 2) Pay more than half of keeping up your home 3) Have a qualifying person live with you more than half the year The key is that "qualifying person" part. Since ur sister still claims your niece as a dependent, you can't use her to qualify for HOH. Its not just about who lives with who, but who can legally claim who as a dependent. My advice: talk to ur sister. If the kid lives with you full time, YOU should probably be the one claiming her as a dependent, not your sister. Then you'd qualify for HOH plus child tax credits. Would make more sense tax-wise given the actual living arrangement.
This is the right answer! The residency test is super important for determining who can claim a dependent. If the niece lives with OP for most of the year, the sister technically shouldn't be claiming her unless there's a special exception. In my experience, the tax benefits for the person who has the child living with them (HOH status + child tax credits) are usually much better than just claiming a dependent who doesn't live with you. Might be worth both sisters calculating their taxes both ways to see what makes the most financial sense for the family as a whole.
Maya Diaz
Just to add another perspective - even if you weren't required to file for 2014, it's sometimes good to file anyway. I was in a similar situation in college (made about $4,800 in 2015 as a dependent), and I still filed because: 1. I got back all my federal withholding (about $250) 2. It gave me practice with filing taxes 3. It created a record of employment for Social Security purposes 4. It prevented any confusion or letters from the IRS later Since the three-year window for claiming a refund has passed for 2014, the main benefit for filing now would just be for record-keeping and peace of mind. But honestly, if you weren't required to file and don't owe anything, I wouldn't stress about it.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
ā¢Do you know if having unfiled tax returns (even when not required to file) can affect things like financial aid applications or student loans? I'm in a similar situation for 2017 and 2018.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
ā¢Having unfiled tax returns typically won't affect financial aid if you weren't required to file in those years. Most FAFSA forms and financial aid applications have a checkbox indicating "not required to file" for this reason. However, if you were required to file (based on your income and status) but didn't, that could potentially create issues with financial aid verification processes. Some schools select students for verification and may ask for tax transcripts or non-filing letters from the IRS. If you're concerned, you might want to request a "Verification of Non-filing Letter" from the IRS for those years, which confirms you weren't required to file.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
Wait, I'm confused about another situation - if you're a dependent but made more than the minimum ($6,200 in 2014), but had $0 tax liability because of the standard deduction, did you still have to file? I didn't file my 2019 taxes when I made $7,500 as a dependent student...š¬
0 coins
Julia Hall
ā¢Yes, you were likely required to file for 2019. The filing requirement is based on your gross income, not your final tax liability. For 2019, dependents generally needed to file if they earned more than $12,200 in wages OR had unearned income over $1,100 OR if self-employment income was over $400. With $7,500 in wages, you technically may not have needed to file based on the earned income threshold alone. However, if you had any federal tax withheld (check your W-2 box 2), you would want to file to get that money refunded. The standard deduction would likely have eliminated your tax liability, meaning you'd get all withholding back.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
ā¢Thank you for the clarification! I just checked my 2019 W-2 and I had about $850 withheld in federal taxes. So I guess I missed out on getting that back since it's now 2025 and the three-year window has passed? That really sucks... At least I know for the future.
0 coins