


Ask the community...
I went through this exact situation with about $30k in back taxes. Here's what I learned: you don't necessarily need a lawyer right away, but you DO need someone who understands tax resolution. Start with a free consultation with a tax attorney AND an enrolled agent (EA) or CPA who specializes in tax resolution. Compare their approaches and fees. Many offer payment plans. For me, an EA ended up being the best value - they got my penalties reduced through abatement (saved about $5k) and set up a manageable payment plan. They charged me $1,800 total, which was WAY less than the attorney quotes I got ($5k+). Whatever you do, DO NOT use one of those "tax relief" places that advertise on radio/TV. Complete ripoffs charging thousands for what you could do yourself.
Did the enrolled agent help negotiate a lower amount overall or just handle the payment plan? Wondering if it's actually possible to get the IRS to accept less than what they say you owe.
The EA didn't get the actual tax amount reduced - that's rarely possible unless there are actual errors in how your tax was calculated. What they did get reduced were the penalties, which in my case had added about $7k to my original tax bill. They managed to get about $5k of those penalties removed through the first-time penalty abatement program and reasonable cause arguments. They also made sure I was claiming all legitimate business deductions that I had missed on my original filings, which lowered the taxable income and therefore the tax due. This is different than "negotiating" with the IRS - it's just proper tax preparation that I had failed to do correctly.
Has anyone used an Offer in Compromise? I've heard you can settle tax debt for pennies on the dollar but it sounds too good to be true.
I tried for an OIC but got rejected. They look at your income, expenses, assets... basically if they think you CAN pay (even over time), they won't accept less. Those radio ads are super misleading. Like 40% of OICs get accepted, and usually for people with serious hardships or very little income/assets compared to their debt.
Thanks for sharing your experience. That's pretty much what I suspected - those ads do sound way too good to be true. I guess I'll look more into payment plans instead since I do have a steady income. Did you end up with an installment agreement after your OIC was rejected?
Fun fact: The IRS actually tried to create a system like what you're describing! It was called "Return Free Filing" and was proposed back in the early 2000s. The tax prep lobby (mainly Intuit which owns TurboTax) spent over $20 million lobbying against it. They even got Congress to pass the Free File agreement which basically banned the IRS from creating its own filing system as long as tax companies offered a "free" option (which they then deliberately made hard to find and limited in functionality). Look up "ProPublica TurboTax lobbying" if you want to get really angry about it. There was a huge exposé a few years back. So the direct answer to your question of "why isn't this a thing" is simple: corporate profits over public good.
That's incredibly frustrating to learn! I had no idea there was actually a proposed system that got killed by industry lobbying. I just looked up that ProPublica article and wow... the fact that other countries have been doing this for decades while we're stuck manually entering numbers that the government already has is ridiculous. Do you know if there's any movement to revive this idea? Seems like the kind of common sense thing that both political parties could potentially get behind.
There have been several attempts over the years, most recently the Tax Filing Simplification Act that's been introduced a few times but hasn't passed. The current administration has made some promises about simplifying the tax filing process, but meaningful change faces the same powerful lobbying obstacles. The Free File agreement was actually modified in 2019 after the ProPublica reporting, removing the provision that explicitly prevented the IRS from creating its own system. That's a start, but there's still strong resistance. The best hope is continued public pressure and awareness - the more people understand that better options exist and are being deliberately blocked, the more momentum builds for change.
In Australia, we have exactly what you're describing. It's called "myTax" through the ATO (Australian Tax Office). Most income, interest, dividends, government payments, health insurance, and charitable donations are pre-filled in the system. You just review it, add any deductions they don't know about, and submit. Takes about 15-30 minutes for most people. I moved to the US last year and was SHOCKED at how backwards the tax filing system is here. I spent hours gathering documents that the IRS already had and paying for software to do what should be a free government service. The craziest part is I ended up getting a letter from the IRS months later saying I calculated something wrong anyway - so they clearly have all the info and know the correct numbers! Why make me figure it out first?
Don't forget about the wash sale rule if you're thinking about tax loss harvesting! If you sell Mullen at a loss but buy it back within 30 days before or after the sale, you can't claim the tax loss. This applies to "substantially identical" securities too. I learned this the hard way when I sold my Tesla shares at a loss last year and then got excited when it dipped further a week later and bought back in. My tax software flagged it as a wash sale and I couldn't deduct the loss.
Thanks for mentioning this! If I do sell, is there any problem with just putting that money into a total market index fund instead? Or would that still trigger this wash sale thing?
Putting the money into a total market index fund would be perfectly fine and wouldn't trigger the wash sale rule. The rule only applies to "substantially identical" securities, which a diversified index fund definitely is not compared to an individual stock like Mullen. This is actually a smart strategy many investors use - they harvest the tax loss from individual stocks or sector funds, then immediately reinvest in broader index funds to stay invested in the market while avoiding wash sales. Just make sure you don't buy back into Mullen or any security that's too similar to it within that 30-day window before or after your sale.
Just a thought - since you and your spouse are grad students with presumably low income, check if you're in the 0% capital gains tax bracket (income under ~$89k for married filing jointly). If so, you might also want to strategically sell some winners alongside your losers. You could realize gains at 0% tax rate while offsetting with your Mullen losses.
This is actually brilliant advice that most people overlook. The 0% capital gains bracket is massively underutilized. I did exactly this last year when I was between jobs.
I've worked as a tax preparer and here's something people don't realize: the IRS is actually pretty reasonable about payment plans. The key is communication! They'd much rather have you filing and paying something than avoiding them completely. One thing to consider - if your income has changed significantly, you might qualify for an Offer in Compromise where you pay less than the full amount. It's not easy to qualify, but worth looking into if you're truly in financial hardship. Whatever you do, don't use those "pennies on the dollar" tax resolution companies you see advertising on TV. They charge thousands upfront and often deliver nothing.
Thanks for this advice. My income has actually decreased quite a bit since 2022 (lost my higher paying job). Would that potentially help me qualify for an Offer in Compromise? And is that something I can apply for myself or do I need a professional?
Yes, a significant decrease in income could definitely help qualify you for an Offer in Compromise. The IRS looks at your current income, expenses, asset equity, and future earning potential to determine if you can reasonably pay the full amount owed. You can absolutely apply yourself using Form 656, though it's a complex process requiring detailed financial documentation. There's a $205 application fee, but it's waived if you meet low-income certification guidelines. If you decide to go this route, be extremely thorough with your financial information. The IRS rejects most offers that are incomplete or don't accurately reflect your ability to pay. There are good resources on the IRS website to help you through the process if you want to try it yourself.
I dunno if this helps but I didn't file for like 4 years and then got hit with a huge bill. I just called the IRS and said I can't pay it all and they put me on a payment plan for like $120/month. Super easy. Just file ur returns and call them.
Dylan Wright
Just curious - have you already received a letter from the IRS explaining the hold, or are you just hearing about a potential "issue" from your accountant? In my experience with the ERC process (we claimed about $320k), communication is really spotty. Our claim was held up for 11 months before we finally got an official letter explaining what was happening.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•We haven't received any official letters from the IRS about this yet. Our accountant just called saying his contact at the IRS mentioned there's some kind of "hold" on our claim during a call about something totally unrelated. Super frustrating to get such vague information! We're filing Form 843 to try to get some interest on the delayed amount, but not sure if that will just complicate things further.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
•That's pretty typical unfortunately. The IRS is seriously understaffed for handling ERC claims, especially the larger ones that get flagged for review. I wouldn't recommend filing Form 843 while your claim is still pending - that could actually create a duplicate file in their system and potentially cause more delays. What worked for us was having our accountant file Form 911 (Taxpayer Advocate Service request) after the 9-month mark, which at least got us assigned to someone who could provide updates.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
Has your company received any prior ERC payments, or is this the first/only claim you've submitted? The reason I ask is because the IRS has been treating first-time claims with much more scrutiny lately due to all the fraud.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
•This is super important! My accounting firm has seen a huge difference in processing times between clients who received earlier ERC payments versus those filing for the first time in 2022-2023. First-time claims over $200k are getting flagged for manual review almost automatically now.
0 coins