I took it in English even though Hindi is my first language. The tax terminology is mostly English anyway, so I found the translated version more confusing than helpful when I tried practice questions in Hindi. The technical terms don't always translate well.

This is super helpful advice I hadn't considered. Are there any specific resources you'd recommend for learning about state taxation and these FBAR requirements? Would the regular EA prep courses cover these topics adequately?

Most EA courses touch on FBAR and international reporting but not deeply enough for specializing in international clients. I'd recommend the IRS's own resources on FBAR and Form 8938 requirements as a start (search "IRS FBAR Reference Guide"). For state taxation, each state has different rules, but I'd suggest focusing initially on understanding residency rules and sourcing of income, as these determine filing requirements. The tax foundation website has good comparative information across states. Once you understand the concepts, you can look up specific state rules as needed. Bloomberg Tax and Thomson Reuters also have good continuing education courses on international tax compliance that go beyond what's covered in basic EA prep.

That's interesting! My debt is just mine, but I'm filing single so I guess that doesn't help in my case. But good to know for others. How exactly does that work with the injured spouse thing?

The Injured Spouse Allocation basically separates your tax return into two portions - one belonging to you and one belonging to your spouse. If only one spouse has the debt (like back taxes, child support, etc.), the other spouse can file this form to protect their share of the refund. The IRS uses a formula based on income, withholding, credits, etc. to determine how much of the refund belongs to each spouse. Then only the debtor spouse's portion gets offset while the injured spouse can still receive their share. It's a bit complicated but can be really helpful in joint filing situations where only one person has the debt.

This is actually really smart. Adjust your withholding so you're getting more in each paycheck rather than giving the IRS an interest-free loan that just goes to your debt. Just be careful not to under-withhold too much or you'll end up owing again next year.

That's EXACTLY my situation! The property was just collateral for my business loan but not used in the business. The $380k satisfied about 80% of the loan and they did forgive the rest. So I need to worry about both capital gains tax AND cancellation of debt income?

Yes, you'll need to address both issues on your tax return. The capital gain from the property sale is calculated as the difference between the sale price and your adjusted basis, reported on Schedule D. For the loan forgiveness, you'll need to report this as cancellation of debt income on Form 982. However, there are exceptions that might apply - particularly if you were insolvent at the time of forgiveness or if the debt was related to a qualified business. This is definitely a situation where professional advice is valuable, as proper documentation can make a huge difference in your tax outcome.

This is so important. Question for you - did you use a tax pro to figure this out? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if tax software can handle this complexity or if I need to hire someone.

Thanks for the warning! Do you know where I can figure out if we need to make an estimated payment? The inheritance was about $47,000 and they withheld around $5,600. We both make about $70k each yearly if that helps.

With a combined income of around $140k plus this $47k inheritance, you're looking at potentially being in the 22% federal tax bracket for 2025 (assuming you're married filing jointly and tax brackets stay similar to 2024). At 22%, the tax on $47k would be about $10,340, but they only withheld $5,600. So you might be under-withheld by around $4,740. To avoid a potential underpayment penalty, you could make an estimated tax payment using Form 1040-ES. The IRS website has a withholding calculator that can help determine the exact amount based on your full financial picture.

I used TurboTax last year for this exact situation. It actually does a good job with inherited IRAs. There's a specific section for reporting distributions, and it asks if it's from an inherited account. Just make sure you have the 1099-R form from the financial institution (they'll send it in January/February) and enter everything exactly as shown on that form.

That's a great point about industry differences. Do you think this will lead to changes in how companies structure their operations? Like will we see tech companies suddenly investing in more physical assets in certain jurisdictions just to benefit from those exclusions?

I definitely expect to see behavioral changes in how companies structure their operations. We're already seeing some of our tech industry clients evaluating whether to increase substantive operations in certain jurisdictions. This doesn't necessarily mean building factories, but could involve relocating actual R&D teams or other high-value functions to jurisdictions that still offer competitive advantages while meeting substance requirements. Singapore and Ireland, for instance, are promoting their educated workforces and business-friendly environments rather than just low tax rates. The key is having genuine economic activity that justifies the profit allocation, not just paper arrangements.

You're right about the basic framework. The Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) has priority and allows the parent entity's jurisdiction to collect the top-up tax. The Undertaxed Profits Rule (UPR) is a backstop that kicks in if the parent jurisdiction doesn't have an IIR in place. What makes this complex is the implementation timeline. The EU countries are generally moving forward with coordinated implementation, while the US implementation remains uncertain given the political challenges of passing tax legislation. This creates potential for inconsistent application and even double taxation in some scenarios. For your 8-country structure, you'll need to map out which jurisdictions are implementing which rules and when. The OECD has a hierarchy for which country's rules take precedence, but transitional issues are likely during the rollout phase.