


Ask the community...
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - when you respond to your CP2000, make sure you're also checking if the cost basis was reported correctly on your 1099-B. Sometimes brokerages don't include the portion that was already taxed as compensation. For example, if you received $65K in RSUs (reported on W-2) and immediately sold them, your 1099-B might show $65K proceeds but $0 cost basis, making it look like you had $65K in capital gains. In reality, your cost basis should be $65K, resulting in $0 capital gain. If this is the case, you need to file Form 8949 with your response, listing the transaction and checking box "B" to indicate that the basis was reported incorrectly to the IRS. Then enter the correct basis and code "B" in column (f) to indicate you're adjusting the basis.
Does checking box B on Form 8949 trigger any kind of audit or extra scrutiny from the IRS? I need to make this adjustment but I'm worried about raising red flags.
Checking box B on Form 8949 doesn't increase your audit risk. It's a legitimate adjustment that's specifically designed for situations like this where the reported basis is incorrect. The IRS is very familiar with RSU basis adjustments, especially for tech employees. What actually increases audit risk is not reporting these transactions properly and having discrepancies between your 1099-B and your tax return. By correctly documenting the basis adjustment, you're actually reducing your chances of future notices or audits because everything is clearly explained and properly reported.
Has anyone successfully negotiated penalty abatement for a CP2000 related to RSUs? I'm in a similar situation and they're charging me both underpayment penalties and interest.
I got first-time penalty abatement for mine last year. Call the IRS and specifically ask for "first-time penalty abatement" if you haven't had any penalties in the past 3 years. They waived about $900 in penalties for me, though I still had to pay the interest.
Another thing to check - when you bought your home, did the previous owner have any exemptions that might have kept the taxes artificially low? Sometimes seniors, veterans, or disabled homeowners get significant tax breaks that disappear when the property changes hands. This could explain why your tax bill jumped so much while neighbors stayed stable.
You know what, this might be exactly what happened! I just pulled up the previous owner's info from our closing documents and it shows they owned the home for over 30 years. They were definitely senior citizens. So their assessment might have been frozen or reduced for years while property values increased around them?
That's almost certainly what happened then. Many states have "senior freeze" programs that cap or greatly reduce tax increases for elderly homeowners, especially those who've been in their homes a long time. When the property sells, the new assessment reflects current market value without those protections. Your neighbors who haven't had recent sales might still be benefiting from various exemptions or assessment caps that keep their taxes lower. It's not that you're being targeted unfairly - you're just seeing the true current tax rate while others might be protected by various programs. Since you're relatively new owners, make sure you've applied for any homestead exemptions available in your area. You typically need to own and occupy the home as your primary residence to qualify, but it can provide significant savings.
Has anyone successfully appealed their assessment WITHOUT hiring a lawyer? The quotes I'm getting are like $1500 which seems ridiculous for potentially saving $500-600 in taxes...
I did my own appeal last year and got my assessment reduced by $32k! Just gathered sales data for similar homes in my neighborhood that sold for less than my assessment value. Photos help too if you have issues with your property (drainage problems, cracked foundation, etc). You def don't need a lawyer for the basic appeal process.
Another option is to file Form 4852 as a substitute for the incorrect 1099-MISC. It's actually designed for missing or incorrect forms. You'll need to provide your best estimate of the correct amount and explain how you determined it (bank deposits, invoices, etc). I had to do this two years ago when a client refused to correct a 1099 that double-counted a payment. Never heard anything from the IRS about it.
Thanks for mentioning Form 4852 - I didn't know that was an option! Does it work the same for 1099-MISC as it does for W-2s? And did you still need to attach an explanation letter or did the form itself cover everything?
Form 4852 works for both W-2s and 1099s, though it's more commonly used for W-2s. The form itself includes sections where you explain the discrepancy and how you calculated the correct amount. I still attached a short explanation letter with mine just to be extra clear, along with copies of my invoices and bank statements showing the actual payments received. Better to provide too much documentation than not enough when you're contradicting what's been reported to the IRS.
Something similar happened to me last year. Turns out the agency included some payments from the previous year in my 1099. Check if that might be what happened in your case - government accounting systems sometimes process December payments in January but count them toward the wrong tax year.
I work in government accounting and can confirm this happens ALL THE TIME. Our fiscal year is different from the calendar year and our ancient software regularly messes up 1099s because of December/January payment processing. Always worth asking if this is what happened.
I got my Masters of Taxation online from a different university in 2019. Personally, I think the content knowledge is the same whether online or in-person. The bigger question is whether you're disciplined enough to keep up with an online program without the structure of physical classes. One tip if you do go online - join tax-focused LinkedIn groups and professional organizations. The biggest disadvantage I found was missing out on networking opportunities that come naturally in a classroom. I had to be more proactive about making connections in the industry.
That's a really good point about self-discipline. Did you work while getting your degree? I'm considering working part-time in a tax preparation office while studying to get some practical experience alongside the theory.
I worked full-time at a regional accounting firm while getting my degree, and it was definitely challenging to balance both. The upside was that I could immediately apply what I was learning to real client situations, which reinforced the concepts. Working part-time at a tax prep office while studying is an excellent idea. Tax season will be intense, but you'll gain invaluable practical experience that will make the academic concepts click. Plus, having that experience on your resume alongside your Masters will make you much more marketable when you graduate.
What tax software do most online Masters programs teach? I'd hate to spend all that time learning on a platform that isn't widely used in practice.
Most programs I've seen don't focus on specific software but rather on tax concepts and research skills. They might use CCH or RIA for research databases, but the actual tax preparation software varies. My program had optional workshops for UltraTax and ProSeries, but it wasn't part of the core curriculum.
Kylo Ren
The biggest physician-specific financial mistake I've witnessed (as someone who helps with physician financial planning) is improper tax planning for practice transitions. When doctors buy in or sell their practice shares, the structure of the deal can have MASSIVE tax implications. Had a client who got hit with an unexpected $180K tax bill because his buy-in wasn't structured correctly. The practice valued their accounts receivable at zero during his buy-in, which meant when those payments came in, they were taxed at ordinary income rates instead of being treated as return of capital. Also, many doctors dismiss the importance of timing major financial decisions around their tax situation. Sometimes delaying a transaction by just a few weeks (into January of the next tax year) can save tens of thousands.
0 coins
Justin Chang
ā¢That's terrifying! I'm not looking at partnership yet, but what questions should I be asking when the time comes to make sure I don't get blindsided? And should I have both a CPA and attorney review any practice buy-in?
0 coins
Kylo Ren
ā¢You absolutely should have both a healthcare-specialized CPA and attorney review any practice buy-in agreement before signing. The key questions to ask include: How are accounts receivable valued and taxed? Is the buy-in structured as stock or asset purchase? What's the allocation between goodwill (capital gains tax rate) versus other assets (ordinary income tax rate)? What retirement plan obligations am I assuming? Always get a pro forma tax return showing the estimated tax impact of the transaction before proceeding. Many physicians focus only on the monthly payment amount without understanding the tax consequences, which can sometimes double the effective cost of the buy-in.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
As someone who helps physicians with disability insurance, the biggest mistake I see is inadequate protection of their high incomes. Many doctors have group disability through their employer that looks good on paper but has terrible definitions of disability for specialists. True example: I had a neurosurgeon client with "own occupation" coverage through his hospital, but the fine print defined "own occupation" as "physician or surgeon" rather than "neurosurgeon." When he developed essential tremors, he couldn't perform surgery, but the insurance company denied his claim because he could technically still work as a general physician!
0 coins
Jason Brewer
ā¢This is really important. I got individual disability insurance during residency (cheaper when you're young) with specialty-specific language. My colleague waited until attending salary and not only pays 3x what I do, but had developed mild hypertension by then, resulting in a policy exclusion for any cardiac-related disability. Terrible situation to be in as a surgeon.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
ā¢Exactly right. Purchasing disability insurance during residency or fellowship is one of the smartest financial moves physicians can make. The premiums are significantly lower when locked in at a younger age, and you're more likely to qualify for clean coverage without exclusions before developing the common health issues that come with age and medical practice stress. The specialty-specific language is absolutely critical. The difference between a policy that pays if you can't perform your specific surgical specialty versus one that only pays if you can't work as any type of doctor can literally be millions of dollars over your career. It's one area where physicians should never cut corners or delay.
0 coins