


Ask the community...
Make sure you're documenting EVERYTHING during this process. Keep a log of every call with date, time, agent ID numbers if possible. Save copies of EVERYTHING you send them (and use certified mail or keep fax confirmations). The IRS is notorious for "losing" documentation. In my experience, what likely happened is either: 1) PayPal reported gross transaction volume instead of net income, 2) There were transfers between accounts that got counted as income, or 3) They got your information mixed up with someone else entirely. I've seen all three happen.
Thanks for the advice about documentation. I'm starting a spreadsheet now to track everything. Do you happen to know if I should respond to the specific address on the deficiency notice or is there a better department to contact directly?
Always respond to the exact address on the deficiency notice - that's crucial. It should go to the specific department handling your case. Make copies of everything you send, and I strongly recommend using certified mail with return receipt so you have proof of delivery. For extra protection, you might also want to fax the same documents (if a fax number is provided) and keep the confirmation page. The IRS operates in silos, so documentation sent to the wrong department might as well have never been sent at all.
Whatever you do, DO NOT IGNORE this letter like I did! I thought my accountant was handling it and turns out they weren't. The 90-day window to petition Tax Court is absolute - if you miss it, you'll have to pay the full amount and then sue for a refund in federal court which is WAY more complicated. With a discrepancy this large, it's almost certainly a reporting error. Check if PayPal sent you a 1099-K and what amount they reported. The IRS might be counting personal transfers, business expense reimbursements, or even loan repayments as taxable income.
Just wanted to add that if your income is that low, you should also look into the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) which is specifically designed for lower income working people, especially those with children. With 3 dependents and an income of $2,400, you might qualify for a significant EITC refund in addition to any Child Tax Credit you receive! The EITC is fully refundable too, meaning you get it even if you don't owe any taxes.
Thank you for mentioning this! I had no idea about the Earned Income Tax Credit. Would I need to fill out additional forms to claim this, or is it something that's automatically calculated when I file my taxes?
You don't need to fill out any additional forms! When you file your tax return, the EITC is calculated on Schedule EIC which is included in most tax preparation software automatically. The software will ask you questions about your dependents and income, then determine your eligibility and calculate the credit amount. For tax year 2025, with three qualifying children and your income level, you could potentially receive a substantial refund through the EITC. It's designed specifically to help working people with low to moderate income, especially those with children.
Something nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you're filing as the correct status! With dependents, you might qualify as "Head of Household" instead of "Single" which gives better tax rates and a higher standard deduction. For 2025 filing, Head of Household standard deduction should be around $20,800 versus $14,600 for Single filers. This won't affect your Child Tax Credit directly, but it does impact your overall tax situation.
This is so important! I filed as Single for years before realizing I qualified as Head of Household with my dependent. Missed out on hundreds in refunds. Just make sure you meet the requirements - generally you need to pay more than half the cost of keeping up a home for yourself and a qualifying dependent.
I used to work in payroll and this sounds like your employer is having cash flow problems. They're essentially using your first check of the month as an interest-free loan. They don't withhold taxes so they can pay you the full amount, then they catch up on the withholding with the second check when (presumably) they have more cash on hand to cover payroll AND tax remittance. Super sketchy and definitely not proper payroll practice. The overtime issue is a separate and clear violation. Document everything! If they're cutting corners on payroll, they might not be remitting those withheld taxes to the government either, which can cause YOU problems down the road.
Wait, how could this cause ME problems if they don't remit the taxes they're withholding? I thought once it's withheld from my check, it's their responsibility to send it to the IRS? Could I end up owing those taxes again?
If your W-2 at the end of the year shows that taxes were withheld but the company never actually sent those funds to the IRS, you could potentially face issues. The IRS will expect those tax payments based on what's reported on your W-2. While you can prove the withholding through your paystubs, it creates a complicated situation where you might initially appear delinquent on tax payments. It's one of those situations where you'd eventually get it sorted out, but it can cause significant headaches, potential notices from the IRS, and time spent proving that the withholding occurred. In extreme cases of employer fraud, employees sometimes have to file Form 8919 (Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages) to properly report and pay these taxes that should have been handled by the employer.
Has anyone considered that this might be a "semi-monthly" pay schedule rather than biweekly? With semi-monthly, you get paid twice a month (like on the 15th and last day of month) regardless of weekdays, while biweekly is every two weeks (26 paychecks per year). The amount per check would be more consistent with semi-monthly, and some payroll systems handle withholding differently for the two checks in a semi-monthly system. Still doesn't excuse the lack of proper paystubs or overtime pay though.
That's actually a good point. My company does semi-monthly (5th and 20th) and the first check of the month has different withholding than the second. But we definitely get paystubs for both! And they certainly pay overtime when applicable. The real red flag to me is the missing paystub - that's not legal anywhere I know of.
22 Honestly? At $95k with education expenses and a 401k rollover, I'd go with a CPA for at least this year. I'm a DIY person normally, but when I had a similar situation (grad school + job change), I used a CPA and she found nearly $3,000 more in my refund than TurboTax's estimate. TurboTax is fine for simple returns, but it's only as good as the info you put in. A good tax pro knows what questions to ask that you might not even think about. Plus they can help set you up for better tax planning next year.
9 Do you have any tips for finding a good CPA that won't charge an arm and a leg? I've called around and gotten quotes between $350-600 which seems really high.
22 For finding an affordable CPA, check with your local Chamber of Commerce or ask colleagues who are in similar financial situations. Many smaller accounting firms or independent CPAs charge less than the big tax prep chains while providing more personalized service. Another option is to look for an Enrolled Agent (EA) rather than a CPA. EAs specialize specifically in taxes and often charge less than CPAs while still having excellent tax knowledge. For your situation, an EA might be perfect since you don't need full accounting services, just tax expertise.
3 Has anyone used the paid version of TurboTax with the live CPA assistance? Wondering if that's a good middle ground - cheaper than a full CPA but still get professional advice?
16 I used TurboTax Live last year for my return which included some freelance work and education expenses. It was decent - you get to video chat with a CPA who reviews your return, but I found the experience a bit rushed. The CPA spent about 15 minutes on my return which wasn't enough to dig deep into potential optimizations.
Keisha Brown
Former tax preparer here. Just a friendly warning - if you've been getting notifications for YEARS and ignoring them, you may already be in the collections process. At this point, you should: 1) Open and read every single notice you've received 2) Find out if there are any liens or levies already filed against you 3) Get professional help IMMEDIATELY Also, the IRS has something called Substitute for Return (SFR) where they file a return on your behalf if you don't file. These are almost always TERRIBLE for you because they don't include deductions or credits you might be entitled to. If they've done SFRs for you, you'll need to replace those with actual returns.
0 coins
StormChaser
ā¢Thanks for the heads up. I was afraid of that. I just checked my credit report and there are no liens showing up yet, so maybe I caught it in time? Would the liens definitely show on my credit report or could they exist without showing up there?
0 coins
Keisha Brown
ā¢Tax liens don't always show up on credit reports anymore - the credit bureaus changed their policies a few years back. The absence on your credit report doesn't guarantee there's no lien. You should request an "Account Transcript" from the IRS for each tax year to see exactly where you stand and what actions they've taken. You can request these online through the IRS website if you can create an account, or your tax professional can request them for you with proper authorization. These transcripts will show if they've filed SFRs, assessed penalties, or initiated collection actions.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
I've been watching this thread since I'm in a similar situation (8 years unfiled). Has anyone dealt with the Fresh Start program? I've heard it can help reduce penalties?
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
ā¢The Fresh Start Initiative can definitely help in your situation. It expanded options for installment agreements and offers in compromise. One key benefit is penalty abatement - especially for first-time non-filers. You might qualify to have some penalties reduced or removed entirely.
0 coins