IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Mohammed Khan

β€’

Something similar happened to me, but I discovered you only have 30 days from the date on that CP22E notice to respond if you want to dispute it! After that, they'll start collection procedures. Two options: 1. Call the number on your notice and request more time to gather documents 2. File a formal protest letter if you have all your documentation One thing that helped me was getting an official transcript of my tax account from the IRS website. It shows exactly what they changed on your return and why. In my case, they disallowed one dependent but kept my head of household status.

0 coins

Emily Parker

β€’

Thanks for the info about the 30-day deadline! I think I'm still within that window. How exactly do I get the tax account transcript you mentioned? Does it show specifically which documents they accepted vs. rejected?

0 coins

Mohammed Khan

β€’

You can get your tax account transcript by going to IRS.gov and searching for "Get Transcript Online." You'll need to create an account if you don't already have one. The verification process is pretty strict - you'll need a credit card, mortgage, or loan account number plus a mobile phone in your name. The transcript won't explicitly state which documents were accepted or rejected, but it will show the specific adjustments they made to your return. Look for codes like "420" (examination/audit), "300" (additional tax assessed), or "290" (additional tax assessed after examination). The amounts next to these codes show exactly what changed. The transcript is super helpful because it gives you the exact dollar amounts they adjusted, which helps you understand which credits or deductions were disallowed. That way, you know exactly what documentation to focus on for your reconsideration.

0 coins

Gavin King

β€’

make sure you request the audit reconsideration in writing!! i made the mistake of just calling and they said they had no record even though i talked to someone for like 45 mins. also get certified mail with tracking when you send anything to irs!!

0 coins

Nathan Kim

β€’

This is important advice! I learned this lesson the hard way too. Also make copies of EVERYTHING you send them, including your cover letter requesting reconsideration. They lose stuff all the time and you need proof of what you submitted and when.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

β€’

Something nobody mentioned yet - if you're married and file jointly, your spouse's income will also count toward the QBI phase-out threshold. My wife has W2 income and I have 1099, and her income pushed us over the threshold even though my 1099 income alone wouldn't have. There are specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) that have stricter QBI rules too, so depending on what type of 1099 work you're doing, that could also affect your calculation. Might be worth checking if your field falls under SSTB classification.

0 coins

NebulaNova

β€’

What exactly counts as an SSTB? I'm working as a 1099 consultant in healthcare tech... not direct patient care, but developing software for medical practices. Would that be considered an SSTB?

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

β€’

Healthcare is generally considered an SSTB, but the rules have some nuance when it comes to tech that supports healthcare. If your work is developing software that directly relates to the provision of healthcare services, it might be considered an SSTB. However, if your software is more administrative or could be used across multiple industries but happens to be used in healthcare, you might not fall under SSTB rules. The distinction matters a lot for QBI since SSTBs have stricter phase-out thresholds. I'd recommend getting a professional opinion on your specific situation since the classification can significantly impact your tax liability. The IRS has issued some guidance on this, but there are still many gray areas, especially in tech-related fields that support traditional SSTB industries.

0 coins

Keisha Williams

β€’

I made a mistake on my QBI calculation last year because I didn't realize my W2 income counted toward the threshold. Had to file an amended return which was a huge pain. Just to confirm what others said - yes, it's total taxable income that matters, and yes, retirement contributions like 401k are a great way to reduce that taxable income to maximize QBI. Business expenses also help. According to my accountant, the contribution limits for 401k plans apply across all plans you have in a year, so your calculation for the solo 401k is correct - you subtract what you already contributed to your employer plan.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

β€’

Did the amended return trigger any issues with the IRS? I'm in a similar boat and worried about red flags if I file an amendment.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

β€’

There's also a historical reason for these different tax treatments. The Johnson Amendment (which prohibits 501(c)(3) organizations from endorsing political candidates) was actually introduced by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1954 when he was a senator. The story goes that he was facing opposition from certain nonprofit organizations in Texas that were campaigning against him, so he introduced this amendment to silence them. This wasn't specifically targeted at churches initially, but rather at all 501(c)(3) organizations. Over time, it's become particularly contentious with religious organizations.

0 coins

Freya Andersen

β€’

That's fascinating! I had no idea the prohibition had such a political origin. Has there ever been any serious attempt to repeal the Johnson Amendment? I've heard some politicians talk about it, but nothing seems to happen.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

β€’

There have been several attempts to repeal or modify the Johnson Amendment, most notably during the Trump administration. In 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that he claimed would reduce enforcement of the Johnson Amendment against religious organizations, but legal experts generally agreed it didn't actually change anything substantive in how the law is applied. There were also provisions in early drafts of the 2017 tax bill that would have repealed the Johnson Amendment for churches, but these were ultimately removed from the final version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act due to procedural rules in the Senate. The debate continues, with strong advocates on both sides - those who see it as a free speech issue and those who believe tax-exempt status shouldn't subsidize political speech.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

β€’

The whole system is ridiculous. Churches should be taxed like any other business. They rake in billions tax-free and then have massive political influence anyway through their members. The pastor just tells everyone "I can't explicitly endorse candidate X, but as Christians we should consider issues A, B, and C" which is basically the same thing as an endorsement.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

β€’

Not all churches are mega-churches with huge incomes. Most religious organizations are small community churches, synagogues, mosques and temples that barely keep the lights on. Taxing them would literally shut many of them down and harm the community services they provide like food banks, homeless shelters, and counseling services.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

β€’

Don't forget to consider whether either of you has income-based student loan payments! My husband and I discovered that filing jointly significantly increased his income-based repayment amount because they factored in my income too. We ended up filing separately even though we paid more in taxes because the student loan payment savings more than made up for it.

0 coins

Malik Thompson

β€’

This! My spouse and I actually calculated both ways - the tax savings from filing jointly versus the student loan payment increase from combining our incomes. We saved about $1,400 in taxes by filing jointly, but her income-based repayment would have gone up by $230/month, so filing separately made more sense for us.

0 coins

LunarEclipse

β€’

I hadn't even thought about student loans! My husband is on an income-based repayment plan for his federal loans. I'll definitely need to calculate if the tax benefits of filing jointly would be offset by higher student loan payments. Thank you for bringing this up!

0 coins

One more thing to consider - if either of you has past-due child support, back taxes, or defaulted federal student loans, filing jointly could put your refund at risk of being seized. My friend learned this the hard way when their entire joint refund was taken for the spouse's defaulted loans. Just something to keep in mind if that might apply to your situation.

0 coins

Eli Wang

β€’

Another option to consider: if your husband is a resident of Ecuador for the entire tax year and doesn't have US income, you might qualify for "Nonresident Alien Spouse" treatment. This can sometimes let you file as Head of Household legitimately. Look at Publication 519 (U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens) which explains when you can make a choice to treat a nonresident alien spouse as a resident. It might give you more filing options.

0 coins

Sophia Bennett

β€’

That's interesting! So there might be a way I could still file as Head of Household? Do you know if there are any risks to using this approach with an expired ITIN? Would I need to attach additional forms?

0 coins

Eli Wang

β€’

The Head of Household status would only be available if you meet certain requirements - generally having a qualifying dependent (like a child) living with you and providing more than half their support. If you choose to treat your nonresident alien spouse as a resident alien, you'd both need to file using Married Filing Jointly, not Head of Household. This requires submitting a statement with your return and both spouses signing it. The risk is that your husband would then be taxed on his worldwide income, not just US income. If you don't make this election, then Married Filing Separately is usually the correct status, and you can use his expired ITIN without issue. You might want to include a brief statement explaining the ITIN situation with your return.

0 coins

Cassandra Moon

β€’

I just wanna point out something nobody mentioned - ITINs only expire if they haven't been used on a tax return for 3 consecutive years OR if they were issued before 2013 and haven't been renewed. If you've been listing his ITIN on your returns even as HOH, it might not actually be expired!

0 coins

Zane Hernandez

β€’

That's not completely accurate. ITINs issued before 2013 have been expiring on a rolling schedule regardless of use. ITINs with middle digits 70-87 expired in 2019 and middle digits 88-92 expired in 2020. Middle digits 93-99 expired in 2021.

0 coins

Cassandra Moon

β€’

Thanks for the correction! You're right about the rolling expiration schedule for older ITINs. I forgot about that policy. If the OP's husband got his ITIN recently (within the last 10 years), then it would only expire after 3 years of non-use on a tax return. If it's an older one, it might have expired based on those middle digit schedules regardless of use. The IRS sent notices about those expirations, but if he's abroad, he might have missed them.

0 coins

Prev1...41824183418441854186...5643Next