Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
22 I faced this exact problem last year! What I did was file Form 8606 to declare my non-deductible Traditional IRA contribution. This creates a "basis" in your IRA so you're not taxed twice. Going forward, look into the "backdoor Roth" strategy. Each year you can: 1) Make a non-deductible contribution to your Traditional IRA 2) Convert it to Roth shortly after (not recharacterize - that's different) 3) Document it all with Form 8606 Just be aware of the "pro-rata" rule if you have other pre-tax money in any Traditional IRAs. That can make things more complicated tax-wise.
3 Can you explain the pro-rata rule a bit more? I have some old 401k money that I rolled into a Traditional IRA years ago, plus some non-deductible contributions like OP. Will that mess up the backdoor Roth strategy?
22 The pro-rata rule means the IRS looks at all your Traditional IRA accounts combined when you do a conversion. If you have a mix of pre-tax and after-tax money, you can't just convert the after-tax portion. For example, if you have $50,000 in pre-tax Traditional IRA money from an old 401k rollover, and you add $6,000 in non-deductible contributions (after-tax), your IRAs are now about 89% pre-tax and 11% after-tax. If you try to convert $6,000 to Roth, about 89% of that conversion ($5,340) would be taxable. One workaround some people use is to roll pre-tax IRA funds into a current employer's 401k if possible, which removes them from the pro-rata calculation. Then they can do clean backdoor Roth conversions with just the non-deductible contributions.
9 Is there any downside to just leaving the after-tax money in the Traditional IRA? I'm in a similar situation and honestly thinking about just keeping it there to avoid the hassle.
18 The main downside is that any earnings on that money will be taxed as ordinary income when you withdraw in retirement, rather than being tax-free like they would in a Roth. If you're young and this money will be invested for decades, that's potentially giving up a lot of tax-free growth. Also, tracking basis gets more complex over time if you have a mix of deductible and non-deductible contributions. You'll need to file Form 8606 every year you make non-deductible contributions and keep records potentially for decades.
Join the conversation
Nia Jackson
I went through the Tax Court petition process last year. Here are some tips: 1) If you don't have the 90-day letter, call the IRS (I know, painful) and request a copy. Explain you need it to file a Tax Court petition. 2) The Tax Court petition form is pretty straightforward. Focus on clearly stating why you disagree with the IRS determination. Be specific about which expenses were improperly disallowed and why. 3) Consider using the Tax Court's "small tax case" procedure (check the box for this on the petition) since your amount is under $50,000. It's more informal and doesn't set legal precedent. 4) Include as much documentation as possible with your petition. 5) Be aware that after you file, the IRS will likely transfer your case to their Office of Chief Counsel, and they often reach out to settle before actually going to court.
This is really helpful! For the small tax case procedure, does that mean I don't need to hire a lawyer? I've been worried about the cost of legal representation on top of everything else.
Nia Jackson
ā¢For small tax cases, you don't need to hire a lawyer - many people represent themselves successfully. The process is designed to be more accessible. Judges in these cases tend to be more patient with self-represented taxpayers and will often help guide you through the process. That said, you might want to consider a consultation with a tax professional who has Tax Court experience, even if just for an hour, to review your petition before filing. Some Low Income Taxpayer Clinics (LITCs) offer free or low-cost help if you qualify based on income. Many law schools also run tax clinics where law students supervised by professors can help with Tax Court cases.
Have you tried contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Service? They're an independent organization within the IRS that helps taxpayers resolve problems. If the same auditor is blocking your appeals, that seems like exactly the kind of situation they're designed to help with. You can reach them at 877-777-4778 or find your local office on the IRS website. They can often intervene when normal IRS channels aren't working properly.
The Taxpayer Advocate Service is completely overwhelmed right now. I submitted a request in January and still haven't heard back. They're prioritizing cases where people are facing immediate financial hardship like eviction or utility shutoffs.
Join the conversation
Donna Cline
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - check if your employer is withholding correctly in the first place. My wife and I had a similar problem and after digging through our paystubs, we discovered her employer had accidentally classified her as "Single" despite her W-4 saying "Married Filing Jointly." Ask your HR department for copies of your current W-4s on file and verify the withholding is being calculated correctly based on what you submitted. Sometimes it's a simple clerical error causing the whole problem!
Thank you for this suggestion! I just checked both of our paystubs and mine actually does say "Single" for the withholding status even though I thought I'd updated it. Going to talk to HR tomorrow and get this fixed immediately. This might explain a big part of the problem!
Donna Cline
ā¢Glad you checked! That's likely a significant part of the issue. When you speak with HR, make sure they apply the correction going forward and ask if they can adjust the withholding for the remainder of the year to compensate for the under-withholding from earlier months. If they can't make that adjustment, you might need to specify an additional amount on line 4(c) that's higher than you'd normally need for the remaining months to make up the difference.
Just to clarify something that confused me when I was new to tax stuff: "zero deductions" isn't really the terminology anymore since the W-4 form changed in 2020. The concept of "allowances" was eliminated. Now you specifically indicate multiple jobs, dependents, and additional income. Make sure you're using the current W-4 form and methodology when calculating your withholding. The old mental model of "more allowances = less withholding" doesn't apply to the new system, which might be part of your confusion.
This is super important! I was still thinking in terms of "allowances" for years after the change and it messed up my withholding. The new W-4 is actually more accurate if you fill it out correctly.
Join the conversation
One additional thing to consider - if you had any income from your home country while studying in the US (like rental income, investments, etc.), you might still need to report it on your US tax return, even if you're paying taxes on it in Indonesia already. The US tax system is based on worldwide income for citizens and residents, but for nonresidents (which you likely are as an F-1 student in your first 5 years), you generally only pay US taxes on US-source income. However, you still need to disclose certain foreign accounts if they exceed $10,000 at any point during the year (FBAR requirements). I learned this the hard way when I almost got penalized for not reporting my home country savings account that my parents were contributing to while I was studying here.
CosmicCowboy
ā¢Wait, I do have a savings account back home with about $12,000 in it. My parents put money in there for emergencies. Do I seriously need to report that? What form would I even use for that?
Yes, if your foreign account(s) exceeded $10,000 at any point during the calendar year, you need to file a Foreign Bank Account Report (FBAR), which is FinCEN Form 114. This is separate from your tax return and filed electronically through the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's BSA E-Filing System. This doesn't mean you owe taxes on that money - it's just a disclosure requirement. The deadline is typically April 15, but there's an automatic extension to October 15 if you miss the April deadline. The penalties for not filing can be severe, especially if they consider it a willful violation, so definitely take care of this!
Omar Hassan
Don't forget about state taxes too! Federal and state taxes are separate in the US. Depending on which state your university is in, you might also need to file a state tax return. California (where UCLA is) definitely requires international students to file a state tax return if they earned income in California. You'll likely need to file Form 540NR. The state doesn't always honor the same tax treaty benefits that the federal government does, so you might end up owing state tax even if you're exempt from federal tax. State tax rules can vary widely, so check with your university's international student office for California-specific guidance.
This is so important! When I was at UC Berkeley, I filed my federal taxes correctly but completely forgot about California state taxes. Got a nasty letter about six months later with penalties. Don't make my mistake!
Brooklyn Foley
Don't overlook the possibility that your ownership situation might have changed over the years. I had a similar dispute with my accountant about Form 5471, and it turned out we were both partially right. In my case, there had been a corporate restructuring at the foreign company that slightly changed the ownership percentages, pushing US ownership temporarily over 50% for one tax year. So I did need to file for that year but not for others. Could there have been any changes to the corporate structure or ownership percentages that your CPA is aware of that might have triggered the filing requirement, even temporarily?
0 coins
Avery Saint
ā¢That's an interesting point! I've owned exactly 50% since the beginning with no changes to the ownership structure. The only change in my situation was becoming a US tax resident 4 years ago (I filed the 5471 that first year as required when acquiring stock as a US person). After that, there have been zero changes to ownership percentages or corporate structure.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
ā¢Given there haven't been any ownership changes since your initial filing, your analysis looks even more solid. That initial filing when you became a US resident was correct (Category 3 for acquisition), but the ongoing yearly filings wouldn't be required if you don't meet any of the other categories. One more thing to consider - has the foreign corporation ever made any distributions or dividends to you during these years? Sometimes CPAs file Form 5471 if there are distributions because it provides a cleaner way to report them, even if technically not required. Might explain why they've been insistent on filing it.
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
The issue might be confusion about the "control" test for Category 4 filers. Some CPAs mistakenly believe that exactly 50% ownership constitutes "control" for Form 5471 purposes, but the IRS definition typically requires MORE than 50% for control. Check Section 957(a) of the tax code - a foreign corp is a CFC if more than 50% of the vote OR value is owned by US shareholders. At exactly 50%, you're right at the edge but don't cross the threshold. Your CPA might be filing "protectively" to avoid potential penalties, but that's an expensive approach if it's not actually required. I'd get a second opinion from a CPA who specializes in international taxation, not just a general tax preparer.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
ā¢I work with international business structures and this is 100% correct. The control test for Category 4 requires MORE than 50% ownership, not exactly 50%. This is a common misconception among accountants who don't specialize in international taxation. That said, there's a specific rule for closely held companies where two 50% owners might both be considered to have "control" in certain circumstances. This usually applies when both owners are actively involved in management decisions. Is that the case with your foreign corporation? Do you and the other owner make joint decisions, or does one of you have more operational control?
0 coins