Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
So if I'm e-filing do I still need to sign anything physically? This is my first time using tax software instead of paper forms and I'm confused about the whole signature process when it's all online.
For e-filing, you'll create an electronic signature using a Self-Select PIN instead of physically signing. Usually the tax software will ask you to enter a 5-digit number of your choosing plus some identity verification info (like your AGI from last year's return or your date of birth). This PIN acts as your signature.
Don't feel embarrassed about asking this question! I went through the exact same confusion when I filed my first US tax return a few years ago. Those arrow stickers are just guides - you sign directly on the actual signature line on the form, not on the stickers themselves. Your normal signature that you use for bank documents, contracts, etc. is perfectly fine. The IRS isn't looking for calligraphy - they just need a consistent signature that matches what you'd use on other official documents. One thing that helped me was to practice signing my name a few times on scrap paper first, just to make sure I was comfortable with how it looked. And yes, make sure to date it too! The IRS is pretty reasonable about signature variations - they're mainly concerned that you're acknowledging responsibility for the accuracy of your return. You've got this! First-time filing is always nerve-wracking, but you're being smart by asking questions beforehand.
This is such great advice! I'm also a first-time filer and was getting really stressed about the signature thing too. It's reassuring to hear that the IRS isn't expecting perfection. I like your idea about practicing on scrap paper first - I might do that just to build my confidence. Did you have any issues with your first return, or did everything go smoothly once you got past the signature anxiety?
Join the conversation
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As a tax preparer, I wanted to add one small detail that might be useful for your situation. When you're making this transition at the end of the year, you'll actually have paychecks from both pay frequencies on the same W-2 for that tax year. This won't cause any problems with your taxes - the IRS just cares about the total amounts in each box on your W-2. But it might make your final paystub from your old job and your first few from the new job look a bit different in terms of year-to-date totals and withholding amounts. Don't panic if the numbers seem off when you're trying to track your annual withholding across both jobs. Also, since you're switching jobs so late in the year, you might want to check if you'll hit the Social Security wage base ($160,200 for 2023) with your combined income from both positions. It's unlikely at your salary levels, but worth double-checking that SS taxes are being calculated correctly across both employers. The advice about using the IRS withholding calculator is spot on - just make sure to include income from both jobs when you run it!
This is really helpful advice, especially the point about having two different pay frequencies show up on the same W-2! I hadn't thought about how that might look confusing when I'm trying to track my withholding totals throughout the year. The Social Security wage base check is a good reminder too, though you're right that I'm probably well below that threshold. Still, it's smart to verify that both employers are handling the SS calculations correctly. One question - when I use the IRS withholding calculator and need to include income from both jobs, should I estimate what I'll make at the old job through December and then project the new job income? Or is there a better way to handle the calculation when you're switching mid-year (or in this case, end of year)? Thanks for sharing your professional perspective - it's really reassuring to get input from someone who sees these situations regularly!
For the IRS withholding calculator when switching jobs mid/end of year, you'll want to enter your actual year-to-date income and withholding from your current job, then add your projected income from the new position for the remaining period. Since you're switching at the end of December, you'll have nearly a full year of earnings from your current job to input as actual amounts. For the new job, just estimate what you'll earn in that final period - even if it's just one or two paychecks, include that projected amount. The calculator is pretty good at handling these mid-year transitions. It will factor in what you've already earned and withheld, then recommend withholding adjustments for the remainder of the year. In your case, since you're starting so late in the year, the recommendations will mainly apply to your 2024 withholding at the new job. One more tip: save a copy of your final paystub from the old job before you leave. It makes tax season much easier when you have those year-to-date totals handy, especially when you're comparing against your W-2 to make sure everything matches up correctly.
Something else to consider that I don't think anyone has mentioned yet - if you have student loans on income-driven repayment plans, the change in pay frequency (along with your salary increase) might affect your monthly payment calculations when you recertify your income. The loan servicers typically look at your most recent paystubs to calculate your monthly income, and semi-monthly paychecks will show higher per-paycheck amounts than bi-weekly ones. This could potentially bump up your calculated monthly income and affect your payment amount, even though your actual annual income increase is only about $4,500. It's not a huge deal, but if you're on an IBR, PAYE, or similar plan, you might want to time your income recertification carefully or be prepared to provide additional documentation showing your actual annual salary rather than just recent paystubs. Also, if you contribute to an HSA or FSA, make sure to ask about how those contributions are distributed across the 24 semi-monthly paychecks vs your current 26 bi-weekly ones. The per-paycheck deduction amounts will be different, which could affect your take-home pay calculations.
This is such a valuable point about student loans that I wouldn't have thought of! I do have federal student loans on an income-driven plan, and you're absolutely right that the higher per-paycheck amounts could make my monthly income look higher than it actually is when I recertify. I'm due for recertification in March, so I'll need to be strategic about timing and documentation. Do you know if providing a salary letter from HR showing my annual amount would be sufficient, or do most servicers insist on using recent paystubs for the calculation? The HSA contribution point is also really helpful - I'm planning to max out my HSA contribution at the new job, so I'll definitely need to ask HR how they spread that $4,300 across 24 paychecks instead of 26. Even small differences in per-paycheck deductions can add up when you're trying to budget month to month. Thanks for thinking about these less obvious implications of the pay frequency change! It really shows how one simple change can have ripple effects across your entire financial picture.
Join the conversation
Has anyone dealt with reporting these losses on Form 8949? I've got iso exercies that led to AMT, then shares that became nearly worthless. I'm confused about which adjustment code to use when reporting the transaction.
For Form 8949, you'd report this with adjustment code B "Basis as reported to the IRS on Form 1099-B does not reflect the impact of the AMT adjustment. Taxpayer is increasing the basis by the income recognized under AMT." That's assuming your 1099-B shows only your original cost (strike price paid). If no 1099-B was issued because it was a private company acquisition, you'd use code L for "Other adjustment" and include an explanation. In either case, your basis should be the strike price plus the amount included in AMT income.
One thing to be careful about when filing amended returns for AMT credit is to make sure you have all your supporting documentation in order. The IRS may ask for proof of the original stock option exercise, the FMV determination at the time of exercise, and documentation of the final liquidation price. For private company stock, the FMV determination can sometimes be challenged, especially if it was based on a 409A valuation that's significantly different from the eventual acquisition price. Make sure you have copies of the original exercise paperwork, any 409A valuations from around the exercise date, and the acquisition/liquidation documents showing the final per-share price. Also worth noting that if you have multiple years of AMT credit carryforward, you'll want to use them strategically. The AMT credit can only be used when your regular tax exceeds your AMT in a given year, so if you expect higher income in future years, it might make sense to time when you claim certain deductions to maximize the benefit of your AMT credits.
This is really helpful advice about documentation. I'm dealing with a similar situation and wondering - if the 409A valuation I used for AMT purposes ends up being significantly higher than the final acquisition price, could the IRS challenge my original AMT calculation? Should I be worried about potential issues when I file these amended returns to claim the credit? Also, regarding the strategic use of AMT credits - if my income varies significantly year to year (which it does in my field), is there a way to estimate when I'd be most likely to benefit from claiming the credits versus letting them carry forward?
Join the conversation
Watch out for the timing of your backdoor Roth! I messed up last year by waiting too long between making the Traditional IRA contribution and doing the conversion. My $6,000 contribution grew to $6,120 in just a few weeks and that extra $120 was taxable income when I converted! It wasn't the end of the world, but it created some extra tax liability and made the TurboTax entry more complicated. Do the conversion ASAP after making the contribution.
This is good advice. I've done backdoor Roth conversions for several years now and I always make sure to do the conversion within 1-2 days of the contribution. Keeps things clean with minimal earnings to worry about.
Great question! As someone who's been doing backdoor Roth conversions for a few years, I can confirm you're on the right track. Since this is your first Traditional IRA and you're contributing $6,500 of after-tax money, your basis is indeed $6,500. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - when TurboTax asks about your basis, it's essentially asking "how much after-tax money have you put into Traditional IRAs over the years?" Since you're starting fresh with $6,500, that's your answer. Also, make sure you complete the conversion quickly! I see you mentioned submitting the paperwork "later today" - that's perfect timing. The longer you wait, the more chance for earnings that would be taxable upon conversion. TurboTax will automatically generate Form 8606 for you, which tracks your nondeductible contributions. Keep a copy of this form - you'll need it for future years if you continue doing backdoor Roth conversions. The software handles most of the complexity, but double-check that it shows zero taxable income from the conversion (assuming you convert the full amount quickly with minimal earnings). You've got this! The first one is always the most nerve-wracking, but you're being thorough which is exactly the right approach.
Miguel Silva
Welcome to the community! I'm also new here and found this thread incredibly helpful. My partner and I got married in Germany in 2021, and I've been second-guessing our tax filing status ever since some friends told us we were "doing it wrong" by filing as married. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a relief! The consistency across so many different countries really drives home that this is well-established tax law, not some gray area. Whether it's Germany, India, the Dominican Republic, or anywhere else - if the marriage was legal where it happened, the IRS recognizes it. What really helped me understand this better was realizing that tax law operates independently from immigration law and state marriage recognition. My friends who were giving me conflicting advice were thinking about completely different legal contexts, which explains why their advice didn't align with what tax professionals were telling us. I'm definitely going to look up IRS Publication 501 that several people mentioned to read the guidance directly from the source. Sometimes seeing it in black and white from the IRS itself helps quiet those nagging doubts! Thanks to everyone who shared their stories and expertise - this community is amazing for helping navigate these confusing situations. Your accountant was absolutely right, and I'm feeling much more confident about continuing to file as married for our 2025 taxes.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•Welcome to the community, Miguel! I'm also brand new here and your experience with your German marriage really resonates with me. My wife and I got married in Australia in 2023, and I've been having the exact same doubts after some well-meaning relatives told us we were "probably filing wrong" since we hadn't done anything official in the US. This thread has been such an eye-opener! Seeing so many people from different countries - Germany, Australia, India, Dominican Republic, and so many others - all getting the same consistent guidance really hammers home that this isn't some complicated edge case. The IRS has clear, established rules for this situation. Your point about different legal contexts is so important. I think that's exactly what happened with my relatives too - they were thinking about immigration paperwork and state-level stuff, not federal tax law. It makes total sense why there's so much confusion when people mix up these completely separate legal areas. I'm definitely planning to read through IRS Publication 501 as well. Like you said, sometimes you need to see it directly from the source to really put those doubts to rest. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's incredibly reassuring to know there are so many of us navigating this same situation and getting consistent professional advice!
0 coins
Diego Castillo
Welcome to the community! I'm also new here and this thread has been incredibly helpful for my situation. My husband and I got married in Canada in 2020, and I've been worrying about our tax filing status ever since we moved back to the US. Some family members kept insisting we needed to "make it official" here before we could file as married, which had me really stressed. Reading through everyone's experiences from so many different countries - Canada, Germany, Australia, India, Dominican Republic, and many others - has been such a relief! The consistency in the advice is remarkable, and it's clear this is well-established tax policy, not some confusing gray area. What really clicked for me was understanding that federal tax law operates completely independently from immigration requirements or state marriage recognition. My family members meant well, but they were mixing up different legal contexts entirely. For IRS purposes, it's straightforward - valid foreign marriage equals married filing status, period. I'm definitely going to read IRS Publication 501 that several people mentioned to see the guidance straight from the source. Your accountant gave you the right advice, and you should absolutely continue filing as married. Thanks to everyone in this community for sharing your experiences - it's made navigating this situation so much less stressful!
0 coins