


Ask the community...
Don't forget that when you take the Standard Deduction, you CANNOT also itemize deductions on the same return. It's either/or, not both. I learned this after trying to claim both my $12,400 standard deduction AND my mortgage interest and charitable donations. Tax software flagged it as an error. You have to pick whichever gives you the bigger tax break. For most people, the Standard Deduction is higher than their itemized deductions would be, which is why like 90% of taxpayers take the Standard Deduction now.
There are some exceptions to this though! Even if you take the standard deduction, you can still deduct things like student loan interest, IRA contributions, self-employment taxes, and health insurance premiums if you're self-employed. These are called "above-the-line" deductions and they work differently.
Absolutely right! Those "above-the-line" deductions reduce your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) directly and you can claim them regardless of whether you take the Standard Deduction or itemize. This is why tax terminology is so confusing for beginners - there are "deductions" that aren't affected by the Standard Deduction vs. itemizing choice. Thanks for pointing that out!
Honestly I didn't understand the standard deduction until I actually did my taxes for the first time. TaxAct software asked if I wanted to "itemize" and showed me what items would qualify. My donations were like $600, and I had some small work expenses maybe $1000, and the software straight up told me "these don't add up to more than the standard deduction so you should take the standard deduction." Made the decision super easy.
One thing to consider with the closer connection exception - make sure you're calculating your days correctly for the substantial presence test! I messed this up initially. Remember it's: - All days present in current year - 1/3 of days present in prior year - 1/6 of days present in 2nd prior year I thought I was under the threshold but had miscounted my days from previous years. Double check your calculations!
Wait this is confusing me. So if I was in the US for 120 days this year, 90 days last year, and 60 days the year before, how do I calculate this? Is it 120 + (90/3) + (60/6)?
Yes, you've got it right! For your example it would be: 120 + (90/3) + (60/6) = 120 + 30 + 10 = 160 days. Since that's less than 183, you wouldn't meet the substantial presence test based on those numbers. But remember, if you're in the US at least 31 days in the current year AND you hit or exceed 183 days with this calculation, then you meet the substantial presence test and would be considered a US resident for tax purposes unless you qualify for exceptions like the closer connection.
Honestly, the closer connection exception saved me a ton of headache. I'm from Australia and was working on a project in the US that kept getting extended. Filed Form 8840 last year and had no issues. One tip - document EVERYTHING. I kept copies of foreign utility bills, property tax statements, club memberships, and even church donations back home. Never needed to provide them, but having that documentation ready gave me peace of mind.
Are both loans actually mortgages? Or is one a home equity line of credit? Also, is the employer loan being reported as some kind of benefit on your W-2? Sometimes employer loans come with benefits that might be taxable which could offset the interest deduction.
Both are definitely mortgages - we used them simultaneously to purchase the home (one conventional loan and one through the employer's first-time homebuyer assistance program). The employer loan doesn't show up anywhere on the W-2, it's a completely separate arrangement with its own 1098. I'm wondering if it's because the employer loan has a much lower interest rate (2.5% compared to 3.25% on the main mortgage), and that's somehow affecting the overall calculation? Could a lower rate on the second mortgage somehow reduce the total benefit?
That's interesting. Even with the lower rate, more interest should still be more deduction. The fact that it's an employer loan makes me think there might be some fringe benefit taxation going on behind the scenes. Check if the interest rate on the employer loan is below market rate. If it is (which 2.5% would likely qualify as), the IRS can consider the difference between your rate and the market rate as taxable income - essentially treating the below-market rate as a benefit from your employer. This "imputed income" might be what's reducing your refund when you add the second 1098.
Has anyone checked if the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) is getting triggered? I had something similar happen where adding more deductions actually increased my AMT liability which offset the benefit. Worth checking that section of your return.
This is a really good point. AMT can definitely cause this kind of counterintuitive result. The software should tell you if AMT is being applied though - there's usually an AMT worksheet or form that appears.
19 Be careful about the pro-rata rule! Everyone keeps saying your backdoor Roth conversion isn't taxable, but that's only completely true if you don't have any other pre-tax IRA money anywhere (Traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE IRAs). If you have other IRA accounts with pre-tax money, the conversion gets taxed proportionally. For example, if you have $95,000 in pre-tax IRA funds and do a $5,000 non-deductible contribution followed by a conversion, about 95% of your conversion would actually be taxable. The IRS looks at all your IRAs together when calculating this (called the pro-rata rule). Form 8606 handles this calculation. This trips up a lot of people and some tax preparers too.
7 This is super important info - I had no idea! If you have existing Traditional IRA money, is there any way to still do a backdoor Roth without triggering this pro-rata rule? I've got about $30k in an old Traditional IRA.
19 Yes, there's a workaround! If your employer's 401(k) plan accepts rollovers from IRAs, you can roll your existing pre-tax IRA funds into your 401(k) before doing the backdoor Roth. Since 401(k)s don't count in the pro-rata calculation, this effectively zeroes out your pre-tax IRA balance. This only works if your 401(k) plan allows for incoming rollovers from IRAs, so you'll need to check with your plan administrator. If this is possible, you could roll the $30k into your 401(k), then do a clean backdoor Roth conversion without pro-rata tax consequences. Timing matters though - you'd need to complete the rollover to the 401(k) before December 31 of the tax year you're doing the conversion.
21 Has anyone successfully gotten the IRS to correct this issue AFTER filing returns where the CPA incorrectly taxed the entire backdoor Roth conversion? I just realized my returns from 2021-2023 all have this same mistake.
4 You can file amended returns (Form 1040-X) for the previous years where this mistake was made. You'll also need to include Form 8606 for each of those years to establish your non-deductible basis. The statute of limitations for amending returns and claiming refunds is generally 3 years from the original filing date, so your 2021-2023 returns should all still be eligible for amendment.
NebulaNinja
I went through the OIC process last year without using any service. Got accepted with a $5,200 settlement on $34K owed. Key things I learned: 1. The IRS looks at your FUTURE earning potential, not just current situation 2. Document EVERYTHING - every expense, every asset, every debt 3. Be realistic about what you can pay - they have standard calculations 4. Follow up regularly - things get lost in their system constantly The process took 9 months from submission to acceptance. The 5% figure is absolutely false. Official IRS stats show acceptance rates between 30-40%.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience! Do you think having the previous counter offer will help his case? Also, did you have to provide any special documentation that might not be obvious?
0 coins
NebulaNinja
ā¢The previous counter offer is absolutely golden - it shows the IRS was already willing to settle. He should definitely include all documentation from that previous interaction and reference it prominently in his new submission. As for non-obvious documentation, medical bills were huge in my case. The IRS allows for necessary medical expenses, but most people don't document them thoroughly enough. Have him gather EVERY prescription, doctor visit, and medical expense for the past year. Also, if he has any unusual expenses that aren't on the standard IRS forms (like caring for an elderly parent, special education needs for children, etc.), he needs to document these with receipts and explanations. The IRS can be surprisingly reasonable about legitimate unusual expenses if they're properly documented.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
Community Tax is overpriced for what they do. They'll charge thousands for what you can do yourself or with reasonably priced help. The 5% claim is definitely a scare tactic to justify their fees. I've worked with several clients who successfully submitted OICs. The biggest mistake people make is not properly documenting their financial situation or submitting incomplete paperwork. The IRS actually provides detailed guidelines on what they're looking for.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
ā¢What tax software would you recommend for someone wanting to DIY an Offer in Compromise? Can regular software like TurboTax handle this or do you need something special?
0 coins
Sofia Morales
ā¢I used TaxSlayer last year and it doesn't have OIC forms. Had to do those manually. Not sure about other programs though.
0 coins