


Ask the community...
Don't forget that if you make the 6013(h) election, you need to report ALL worldwide income for BOTH spouses for the ENTIRE year. This includes any foreign bank accounts, investments, etc. that your spouse had before becoming a permanent resident. This catches a lot of people by surprise!
Wait, so even income my wife earned in her home country BEFORE getting her green card would count? We'd have to pay US taxes on that too? That seems unfair since she wasn't even a resident then!
Yes, that's exactly right. When you make the 6013(h) election, you're choosing to be treated as US residents for the ENTIRE tax year. This means all worldwide income from January 1st onward is subject to US tax reporting requirements, even income earned before your wife physically became a resident. It can seem unfair, but the trade-off is that you get to file jointly, which often saves significantly on taxes overall. You may also be eligible for the Foreign Tax Credit if she paid taxes on that income in her home country, which can offset any US tax owed on the foreign income.
Has anyone used TurboTax for the 6013(h) election? I'm not sure if it can handle this situation or if I need to use a different software.
TurboTax can handle it but not super smoothly. You'll need to manually attach the election statement. I used TurboTax last year for this exact scenario and had to write up the statement separately. The premium version did walk me through the dual-status alien questions though!
Another option would be to have the partnership lease your vehicle. You could charge the partnership a fair market rate for the business use of your car. The partnership gets the deduction and you report the lease income, but you can offset that with depreciation, insurance, maintenance, etc. on your Schedule E. Just make sure you have a formal written lease agreement and keep track of business vs. personal use carefully. This approach can sometimes be more advantageous than the standard mileage rate depending on your vehicle's value and operating costs.
That's an interesting approach I hadn't considered! Do you know if there would be any additional tax implications I should be aware of with this method? And would I still be able to claim the standard mileage rate for the personal use of my vehicle on other schedules?
If you go the lease route, you'd be treating the vehicle as rental property on your Schedule E, so you'd need to track and deduct actual expenses rather than using the standard mileage rate. You'd report the lease income from the partnership, then deduct expenses like depreciation, insurance, maintenance, and fuel based on business percentage use. For the portion of your vehicle used personally, you wouldn't be able to claim any deduction since that's considered personal use. The standard mileage rate wouldn't apply once you've chosen to treat the vehicle as rental property. This approach works best for newer, more expensive vehicles where actual expenses exceed what the standard mileage rate would provide.
Has anyone tried just having the partnership reimburse you directly for the miles at a rate BELOW the standard mileage rate, and then claiming the difference on your personal return? My accountant suggested this as a way to split the benefit - partnership gets a deduction for the reimbursement, and you get to claim the difference between the reimbursement rate and the standard rate as an employee business expense.
That approach won't work anymore. Employee business expenses were eliminated as deductions for most people with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Unless you're in certain specific professions (like armed forces reservists, qualified performing artists, etc.), you can't deduct unreimbursed employee business expenses on your personal return.
Just a heads up - the PATH Act delay is actually different from an audit or review. Being held until Feb 15th is just a mandatory waiting period for everyone with those credits. If your refund status hasn't changed by early March, that's when you might have additional verification happening. Last year mine was held beyond the PATH Act date because I had an address change plus EIC claim. They sent me a letter asking to verify my identity. Once I did that online, the refund was released about 10 days later.
So you're saying I shouldn't worry yet? When should I start to panic if I don't see movement? It's already been 3 weeks since I filed and the tracker still just says it's being processed with that PATH Act message.
You definitely shouldn't worry yet! The PATH Act hold means nothing will happen until after February 15th at the earliest. Even then, it can take another 5-7 business days for your return to finish processing and the refund to be approved. I'd say don't start getting concerned until around March 15th. If you haven't seen any movement by then, you might want to contact the IRS to see if there's an additional issue. But right now you're still well within the normal timeframe, especially considering this year's processing volumes. The "being processed" message with the PATH Act reference is exactly what you should be seeing at this point.
Anyone know if this PATH Act thing applies if you amended your return? I initially filed without claiming EIC because I forgot about some freelance income. After I added that income on an amended return, I qualified for EIC. Will my amended return get stuck in that same February 15th holding pattern?
Unfortunately, amended returns with EIC are subject to even longer delays. They not only get caught by the PATH Act hold, but amended returns typically take 16-20 weeks to process regardless. And that's during normal times - with current IRS backlogs, some people are waiting 6+ months for amended return processing.
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - check if your state tax laws follow the federal treatment. I'm in California, and they sometimes have different rules for settlement taxation. What's exempt under federal law isn't always exempt for state tax purposes.
That's a great point I hadn't considered. We're in Oregon. Does anyone know if Oregon generally follows federal guidelines on settlement taxation or if they have their own rules?
Oregon generally follows federal treatment for physical injury settlements, so if your portion qualifies as tax-exempt under federal rules, it should also be exempt from Oregon state income tax. However, the key is still getting clarity on whether your guardian portion maintains the same character as the physical injury settlement. If the federal determination is that it's taxable as guardian fees, Oregon would likely treat it the same way.
Have you asked the attorney who handled the settlement? Our lawyer included specific language in our settlement agreement that explicitly stated the guardian portion was "derivative of and arises from the same physical injuries" specifically to address this tax question. They should have experience with this.
This is definitely the best advice. I'm a paralegal at a firm that handles injury cases, and we always make sure to include specific language about tax treatment of guardian portions. If your attorney didn't do this, they really should have.
Giovanni Greco
One thing nobody mentioned yet - if you work from home, you might qualify for the home office deduction. I'm self-employed and deduct a portion of my mortgage interest, utilities, internet, etc. based on the percentage of my home used exclusively for business. Saved me almost $2,300 last year! But be careful - this gets scrutinized by the IRS, so make sure you really do have a dedicated workspace that's used ONLY for business.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
ā¢Does this work if my employer has me working from home 3 days a week? Or is it only for self-employed people?
0 coins
Giovanni Greco
ā¢Unfortunately, it's currently only available if you're self-employed or run your own business. W-2 employees working from home (even full-time) can't take the home office deduction anymore after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Before 2018, W-2 employees could deduct unreimbursed business expenses (including home office costs) as miscellaneous itemized deductions, but that provision was suspended until 2025. If you're working remotely as a W-2 employee, your best option is to ask your employer about expense reimbursement programs instead of looking for tax deductions.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
anyone else feel like the tax benefits of homeownership are way overhyped? i bought in 2023 and my tax refund was barely different from when i was renting lol. my mortgage interest + property taxes are like $15k but standard deduction is wayyy higher so it literally didn't matter. the only good tax thing is eventually not paying capital gains when i sell...if the market doesn't crash first š
0 coins
Sofia Torres
ā¢I actually think it depends on where you live. In high-tax, high-cost areas (California, New York, etc.), the mortgage interest and property taxes can be substantial enough to make itemizing worthwhile. In my case (Bay Area), my property taxes alone are over $18k, so combined with mortgage interest and charitable giving, itemizing saves me several thousand dollars compared to the standard deduction.
0 coins