


Ask the community...
I dealt with this exact K-1 nightmare last year. One option nobody's mentioned yet is to talk to the partnership itself. Sometimes they can make a special tax distribution just to cover the taxes on phantom income. In my case, I showed the managing partner my tax projection and they agreed to distribute enough cash to cover the extra tax burden. Also, check if your partnership agreement has any provisions about tax distributions. Some partnerships are required to distribute at least enough to cover each partner's tax liability on allocated income.
I never even thought about asking for a tax distribution! My brother is the managing partner, so maybe he'd be open to this. Do you know if there are any specific terms or language I should use when asking about this? And did you have to show any specific documentation to support your request?
Just be straightforward and show him your tax projection from your accountant that displays the difference between your distributed income and your taxable income from the K-1. The term you want to use is "tax distribution" - it's a common concept in partnership agreements. I showed my managing partner a simple spreadsheet showing my K-1 income, my tax bracket, and the resulting tax liability compared to my actual distributions. Many partnership agreements actually require tax distributions specifically to avoid this situation, so check your agreement too.
Has your accountant discussed form 8582 with you? That's the form for calculating passive activity limitations. Sometimes accountants miss opportunities to group activities together to meet material participation standards. You might also want to check if you qualify for the real estate professional exception if this is a real estate partnership.
Another important thing to consider for your American Legion is whether the gaming income is from members vs. non-members. The IRS treats income differently depending on the source. If your pull tabs and 50/50 raffles are exclusively for members, the income might qualify as "exempt function income" under section 512(a)(3)(B) rather than being subject to UBTI. This is especially true for veterans' organizations since socializing among members is considered part of your exempt purpose. Keep solid records of member vs. guest participation! We learned this the hard way at our post.
This is really helpful! We do track who's playing but never thought to separate member vs. guest gaming income. Do we need to track that separately on our books? And does it matter if the guests are paying the members who brought them, or paying directly?
Yes, you should definitely track member vs. non-member income separately in your books. This makes it much easier if you ever get audited, and helps with completing your 990 accurately. The IRS specifically looks at this breakdown for veterans' organizations. For your second question, it matters who's actually putting the money in. If the guests are paying directly for their own gaming activities, that's considered non-member income. If members are paying on behalf of their guests, that could be considered member income. The safest approach is to consider all guest payments as non-member income and track it that way. Better to be conservative with this.
Has anyone filed Form 990-T for their veteran's organization for gaming? I'm wondering what expenses we can deduct if some of our pull tab income does end up being taxable.
Yes, we file 990-T for a portion of our gaming income. You can deduct directly connected expenses - so for pull tabs, that includes the cost of the pull tabs themselves, any specific equipment for them, allocated space costs for the area where they're sold, and the portion of that paid employee's time spent on pull tabs. Just make sure you have a reasonable allocation method that you apply consistently.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - check if you're still within the timeframe for a "corrective distribution" for your 2022 overcontribution. If you took the distribution before your filing deadline (including extensions) for 2022, you can avoid the 6% excise tax completely, even if Vanguard coded it incorrectly on the 1099-R. For the earnings portion, you generally need to include those as income in the year you made the contribution (2022), not when you took the distribution (2023). If your 1099-R doesn't separately show the earnings, you might need to contact Vanguard to get that breakdown. The most critical form here is Form 5329 where you'll need to show you corrected the excess contribution. Even with an incorrect distribution code, you can still properly document this with an attached statement explaining the situation.
Thanks for this info! I did take the distribution in February 2023, which was before my filing deadline for 2022 taxes. But I'm confused about reporting the earnings - my 1099R doesn't break out what portion was earnings vs. principal. Does this mean I need to amend my 2022 return now to report those earnings? Or can I handle everything on my 2023 return?
Since you took the distribution before your 2022 filing deadline, you should definitely avoid the 6% excise tax, which is good news. For the earnings portion, yes, technically those earnings should be reported on your 2022 tax return, which would mean filing an amendment if you've already filed for 2022. You'll need to contact Vanguard to get the breakdown of principal vs. earnings from that distribution. Ask specifically for the "net income attributable" or NIA related to the excess contribution amount. This might not be reflected correctly on your 1099-R if the distribution wasn't properly coded.
Heads up - I went through this exact same mess with Fidelity last year. Make sure you also check if you qualify for the "self-certification" procedure under Revenue Procedure 2021-30. If your correction doesn't fully meet all the technical requirements for a proper return of excess contribution, you might still qualify for relief under this procedure. It essentially lets you "self-certify" that you intended to follow the rules for proper correction even if there were some procedural errors along the way. You'll need to file a specific statement with your return, but it could help avoid penalties even if Vanguard didn't process everything perfectly.
Something nobody's mentioned yet: if you're really desperate for tax deductions but don't want to get a mortgage, consider increasing your charitable giving. It's a much better financial move than paying interest to a bank! You get to support causes you care about AND get a tax deduction. Plus you're not enriching a financial institution. Just make sure you donate enough (along with other potential itemized deductions) to exceed the standard deduction amount.
That's actually a really thoughtful suggestion. We do give to our church and a couple local charities already, but hadn't thought about the tax angle. Would bunching donations in alternating years work better to get over the standard deduction threshold?
Yes, bunching donations is exactly what many financial planners recommend! For example, if you normally donate $5,000 per year, you could instead donate $10,000 every other year. This might push you over the standard deduction threshold in donation years (when you itemize) while taking the standard deduction in off years. Another option is a Donor Advised Fund, where you contribute a larger amount in one year for the tax deduction, but distribute the actual donations to charities over multiple years. This gives you the tax benefit immediately while allowing you to support charities gradually.
My accountant actually laughed when I asked this same question last year lol. She said getting a mortgage for the tax deduction is like buying something you don't need just because it's on sale - you're still spending money unnecessarily! She also pointed out that with the higher standard deduction now ($27,700 for married filing jointly in 2023), many people don't even benefit from the mortgage interest deduction unless they have a really big mortgage or tons of other itemized deductions. You'd need more than $27,700 in itemized deductions for it to even matter.
Noah Irving
Does anyone know if the court ruling affects the penalties for non-compliance? I heard the penalties were supposed to be pretty severe - like $500/day and potential criminal charges for willful violations. If the courts eventually uphold the CTA, could they still enforce penalties for the time period when we thought we didn't have to file?
0 coins
Vanessa Chang
β’As I understand it, if the injunction is eventually overturned and the BOI requirements are upheld, FinCEN would likely establish new compliance deadlines rather than trying to enforce the original ones retroactively. It would be pretty unreasonable to penalize businesses for non-compliance during a period when a court order explicitly stated they didn't have to comply. The penalties are indeed significant - civil penalties of $500 per day for violations, plus potential criminal penalties including imprisonment for willful violations. But these would only apply to violations of whatever new deadlines might be established if the CTA is ultimately upheld.
0 coins
Noah Irving
β’That makes sense, thanks for the clarification! I was worried we might get caught in some kind of legal trap if we don't file now but then the requirements come back later. I'll just keep our information ready but hold off on filing until there's more clarity.
0 coins
Madison King
My accountant told me to just go ahead and file the BOI reports anyway despite the injunction, saying "better safe than sorry." Does that make any sense to anyone? FinCEN is still accepting filings through their website, but I'm not sure if there's any benefit to filing when it's not currently required.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
β’I think your accountant is being overly cautious. While FinCEN's system remains operational and you technically *can* still file, there's no legal requirement to do so while the injunction is in effect. There's no penalty for not filing right now. Unless you have some very specific business reason for wanting your beneficial ownership information on file with the government during this period of uncertainty, I'd recommend waiting to see how the legal situation resolves. Just keep your information organized so you're ready if/when the requirement comes back.
0 coins