


Ask the community...
Quick tip that saved me last year: If you're setting up a SEP for the first time, remember that some brokerages take several days to process new account applications. Don't wait until April 14th to start the process! I use Vanguard and it took about 7 business days from application to being able to fund my account. Also, keep in mind that the 25% limit is really closer to 20% of your net profit due to the way the calculation works. There's a specific formula the IRS uses that reduces your maximum contribution.
Thanks for the tip about account setup timing! I was thinking of using Fidelity - has anyone had experience with how long their SEP setup process takes? I definitely don't want to miss the deadline because of administrative delays.
I haven't used Fidelity specifically for a SEP, but my buddy set one up with them last year and I believe it took about 3-4 business days to complete. Still, I'd recommend giving yourself at least two weeks before the deadline just to be safe. The other thing to consider is that even after the account is set up, transfers from your bank can take a few additional days to clear. Electronic transfers are typically faster than mailing a check, but even those can take 1-3 business days depending on your bank and the brokerage.
One thing nobody's mentioned - make sure you're calculating your contribution correctly if you have an LLC or S-Corp! The rules are different depending on how your business is structured. With my S-Corp, I pay myself a salary and the SEP contribution limit is based on my W-2 wages, not my total business profit.
This is an important point. Are you saying if I'm an LLC taxed as an S-Corp and I pay myself $60,000 in salary but the business makes $120,000 in profit, my SEP contribution would be limited to 25% of the $60,000 salary, not the full $120,000?
Exactly right! With an S-Corp election, your SEP contribution is limited to 25% of your W-2 wages, not the business profits. So in your example with $60,000 salary, your max SEP contribution would be around $15,000 (25% of $60k), even though the business made $120,000 total. This is why many S-Corp owners also consider Solo 401(k)s instead of SEPs - with a Solo 401(k), you can contribute as both employee and employer, potentially allowing for higher total contributions. The employee portion can be up to $22,500 (for 2023) plus 25% of your W-2 wages as the employer contribution. Make sure to discuss this with your accountant since the optimal salary vs. distribution split for S-Corps involves balancing self-employment tax savings against retirement contribution opportunities.
I hope someone can clarify a side question about taxes - if my single-member LLC has a brokerage account and earns dividends or capital gains, do I need to make quarterly estimated tax payments? Or can I just settle up at tax time?
Yes, you should generally make quarterly estimated tax payments if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in taxes from your LLC income (including investment income from the brokerage account). Since a single-member LLC is a pass-through entity, all that investment income flows to your personal tax return. If those dividends and capital gains are substantial, you'll want to make quarterly payments to avoid an underpayment penalty. The safe harbor is generally paying either 90% of current year tax or 100% of prior year tax (110% if your AGI was over $150,000).
Just want to add my experience here - I had the exact same confusion when setting up my LLC brokerage account last year. The key thing that helped me understand was realizing that "owner EIN" vs "LLC EIN" is really about tax filing context, not about which number to use for account setup. For your brokerage account, you definitely want to use the LLC's EIN that you already obtained from the IRS. That's the correct identifier for your business entity. The confusion about "owner's EIN" typically comes up in tax discussions where the IRS is explaining that single-member LLCs report income on the owner's personal return rather than filing a separate business return. One tip: when you're filling out the brokerage application, make sure to select "LLC" as your entity type rather than "Individual" - this will help ensure they process everything correctly with your LLC EIN. I initially started filling it out as an individual account and ran into issues until I switched to the business account option. Also keep your EIN confirmation letter handy - most brokerages will ask for it during the verification process along with your Operating Agreement.
This is really helpful advice! I'm just getting started with my single-member LLC and haven't opened a brokerage account yet, but this thread has been incredibly informative. The distinction between entity selection and tax treatment makes so much more sense now. Quick question - when you mention selecting "LLC" as the entity type, did you have to provide any additional documentation beyond the EIN letter and Operating Agreement? I'm wondering if there are any other forms or certificates I should prepare in advance. Also, did your brokerage require you to have a separate business bank account before opening the investment account, or could you set up the brokerage account first?
Has anyone actually dealt with form 8965 recently? I thought this was phased out years ago when the individual mandate penalty went to zero. My tax software didn't even include this form when I filed my 2022 taxes.
Form 8965 was used for tax years 2014 through 2018 to claim exemptions from the individual health insurance mandate. After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the federal penalty to $0 starting in 2019, the form became obsolete for federal taxes. However, as others have mentioned, states like California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and DC have their own individual mandates with penalties. If OP lives in one of these states, they might need to deal with state-specific health insurance reporting requirements, though the specific forms would be different from the federal Form 8965.
Thanks for explaining! That makes sense why my software didn't include it. Sounds like the IRS computer systems might be triggering an outdated notice or possibly this is for a state requirement. Either way, proving coverage should resolve it.
I had this exact same issue with my 2022 return! The IRS system automatically flagged my return because there was a mismatch between what they expected to see for health coverage reporting and what was actually filed. Here's what worked for me: First, gather all your health insurance documentation - insurance cards, EOB statements, premium payment records, anything that shows continuous coverage through 2022. Then write a clear letter explaining that you maintained qualifying health coverage through your employer for the entire tax year. The key is to be very specific in your response. Include your SSN, the notice number, and tax year at the top of your letter. State clearly: "I maintained qualifying health insurance coverage through my employer [Company Name] for the entire 2022 tax year and respectfully request removal of the individual shared responsibility penalty." Make copies of everything before you send it, and use certified mail to the address on the notice. I got my penalty reversed within about 6 weeks. The IRS computers sometimes miss the electronic reporting from employers or insurance companies, but once a human reviews your documentation, it gets sorted out pretty quickly. Don't stress too much - this is more common than you'd think, especially when employer reporting systems have glitches!
One thing to consider is that MTM doesn't just eliminate long-term capital gains treatment - it also affects wash sale rules. With MTM, wash sale restrictions don't apply to you anymore, which can be a huge advantage for active traders who frequently trade the same securities. Last year, I had significant losses that were disallowed due to wash sales. If I had MTM status, I could have claimed all those losses immediately. Just something else to factor into your decision.
That's a great point about wash sales! How difficult was the process of establishing trader status with the IRS? Did you have any issues proving you met the requirements?
As someone who went through the MTM election process last year, I want to emphasize how important it is to get professional guidance on this decision. The tax implications are complex and can significantly impact your overall tax liability. One critical point that hasn't been fully addressed - if you're considering MTM for 2025, you need to make that election by the due date of your 2024 tax return (including extensions). You can't just decide mid-year in 2025 that you want MTM treatment. Also, regarding your NVDA shares - the previous comment about them being "marked to market" at year-end 2024 is correct. Any unrealized gains on December 31, 2024 would be treated as if you sold and repurchased them on January 1, 2025. This is called the "deemed sale" rule. For your specific situation with substantial NVDA gains, I'd strongly recommend running the numbers both ways - selling in 2024 to lock in long-term capital gains treatment versus keeping them and having them converted to ordinary income under MTM. The difference in tax rates (0%, 15%, or 20% for long-term capital gains versus up to 37% for ordinary income) could be substantial depending on your income level. The entity structure option (LLC/S-Corp) is possible but adds complexity and costs. You'd need to ensure proper business purpose and substance, maintain separate books and records, and the entity would need to qualify for trader status independently.
This is really helpful information, especially about the election deadline. I'm new to understanding trader tax elections and wasn't aware that the MTM election for 2025 needs to be made by the 2024 tax return due date. One question - you mentioned running the numbers both ways for the NVDA shares. Is there a general rule of thumb for when MTM makes sense versus sticking with capital gains treatment? I'm trying to understand at what point the benefits of avoiding wash sale rules and unlimited loss deductions outweigh losing the preferential long-term capital gains rates. Also, regarding the entity structure complexity you mentioned - what kind of ongoing costs should someone expect if they go the LLC route for separating trading activities?
Connor Gallagher
I actually just filed my taxes for a similar situation. One thing to consider is whether the meal credits were specific to the hotel restaurants or if they could be used anywhere. If the credits only worked at hotel restaurants, I would treat them as "meals provided during travel" and reduce my per diem. If they were general credits that could be used anywhere (like a credit card statement credit), then they're more like a discount on the overall trip and might not reduce your per diem. Hope that helps!
0 coins
Amara Eze
ā¢Thanks for this insight! In my case, the credits could only be used at the hotel restaurants or room service. Based on what you and others have said, it sounds like I should reduce my per diem by the amount I actually used from those credits. The credits couldn't be used for anything except food and beverages, so they definitely fall into the "meals provided" category. Did you run into any issues with documentation when you filed? I'm wondering what kind of records I should keep beyond my hotel folios.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
ā¢For documentation, I kept copies of all my hotel folios showing the credits, plus receipts showing how much of the credits I actually used. I also created a simple spreadsheet showing my calculation of the adjusted per diem (standard amount minus credit used). Most important is to be consistent and have a clear explanation for your calculation if you're ever questioned. The IRS mainly wants to see that you have a reasonable basis for your deduction and you're not double-dipping. As long as you can show how you arrived at your numbers and why it's fair, you should be good.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
This is a great discussion with some really helpful perspectives! As someone who travels frequently for work, I've learned that the key is always being able to document your reasoning clearly. Based on everything shared here, it sounds like the consensus is that you should reduce your standard meal allowance by the actual value of the hotel meal credits you used (not just what was offered). Since your credits were restricted to hotel restaurants only, they definitely qualify as "meals provided during travel." One additional tip I'd add: when calculating your adjustment, make sure to account for any taxes or gratuities that weren't covered by the credits. If you used $150 of credits but paid an additional $30 in tips and taxes out of pocket, you might be able to factor that into your calculation. Keep detailed records of everything - your hotel folio, receipts showing credit usage, and a simple calculation sheet explaining your math. The IRS appreciates transparency, and having a clear paper trail will give you confidence in your filing.
0 coins