IRS

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

StardustSeeker

โ€ข

Just wanted to share a practical tip that's worked for our family. We established a clear written policy for our kids' custodial accounts that we follow rigorously. We only withdraw for: - Educational enrichment beyond basic schooling - Specialized equipment for talents/interests (sports, music, etc.) - Medical expenses not covered by insurance - College visits and preparation - Special savings for major future expenses (car, first apartment deposit) We document everything and keep all receipts. This approach has kept us safe for years, and we've never had issues with audits or questions. Our accountant reviewed our policy and said it was a solid interpretation of the "benefit of child" standard.

0 coins

Paolo Marino

โ€ข

This is smart but seems overly cautious? I've been making withdrawals from my kid's account for years for various things and never had any issues or questions. Is there actually enforcement of these rules or is it more theoretical?

0 coins

Elijah Brown

โ€ข

Great question about enforcement! While there isn't active day-to-day monitoring of custodial account withdrawals, the enforcement becomes real in a few specific situations: 1. **Child challenges as adult**: Once your child reaches the age of majority, they can legally challenge how you managed their account. If they believe funds were misused, they can take legal action against you as the former custodian. 2. **IRS audits**: If you're audited, the IRS may scrutinize large or frequent withdrawals from custodial accounts, especially if they suspect the funds were used for your benefit rather than the child's. 3. **Divorce proceedings**: Custodial account management often gets scrutinized during divorce cases, particularly if one parent alleges the other misused the child's funds. 4. **Financial aid reviews**: Colleges reviewing financial aid applications may question large withdrawals that don't clearly benefit the student's education. The rules aren't just theoretical - there have been court cases where adult children successfully sued parents for improper use of custodial funds. The key is that while day-to-day enforcement is minimal, the legal framework is there and can be enforced when circumstances warrant it. Better to be overly cautious than face potential legal and financial consequences later.

0 coins

Alexander Zeus

โ€ข

Just to add another perspective - I'm a rideshare driver with W-2 income from my day job. I tried to deduct my entire car using Section 179 last year and ended up getting audited. The IRS was very clear that I could only deduct against my business income (Uber/Lyft 1099s), not my W-2 job. I ended up having to pay back taxes plus penalties because I had claimed too much. Make sure you're working with a tax professional who understands these distinctions before filing! The business use percentage documentation is also super important - I learned that lesson the hard way.

0 coins

Ava Kim

โ€ข

Thanks for sharing your experience! Did you end up being able to carry forward the excess deduction to future tax years? Or did you lose that deduction entirely because of the audit?

0 coins

Alexander Zeus

โ€ข

I was able to carry forward the excess deduction, so I didn't lose it entirely. The IRS adjusted my return to only allow the deduction up to my business income amount for that year, then set up the remainder as a carryforward. I did have to pay interest and a small penalty on the tax I underpaid for that year though. The auditor was actually pretty understanding once I explained I had misunderstood how the deduction worked with dual income sources. The most important thing was that I had good records of my business use percentage - without that, I might have lost the entire deduction.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

โ€ข

Something nobody's mentioned yet - look into whether your business structure matters here. I consulted with my accountant and she recommended I form an S-Corp instead of just filing Schedule C for my 1099 work specifically because of large deductions like vehicles. There are different strategies depending on your business entity type that might help optimize how you handle these deductions. Might be worth consulting with a tax pro who specializes in small business structures before making your final decision.

0 coins

Gabriel Graham

โ€ข

Could you explain the S-Corp advantage more? I'm in a similar situation and trying to decide if I should switch from sole proprietor to S-Corp.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

โ€ข

@Gabriel Graham The S-Corp advantage is that you can potentially have more flexibility with how business income is characterized. With an S-Corp, you pay yourself a reasonable salary subject (to payroll taxes and) then take additional distributions as profits not (subject to self-employment tax .)This can create more business "income to" offset against Section 179 deductions. However, there are tradeoffs - you ll'have additional filing requirements, potential payroll processing costs, and you need to maintain proper corporate formalities. For someone making $65k in 1099 income like the original poster, it might not be worth the complexity unless they expect their business income to grow significantly. I d'definitely recommend running the numbers with a tax professional to see if the potential tax savings outweigh the additional administrative burden in your specific situation.

0 coins

Seraphina Delan

โ€ข

Anybody else think it's ridiculous how cryptic these error codes are? Like why can't TurboTax just say "Hey, your name and SSN don't match what the IRS has" instead of "IND-031-04" which tells me absolutely nothing?? The whole system seems designed to be as frustrating as possible.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

โ€ข

It's because they're just passing through the actual IRS rejection codes. The IRS sends back these cryptic codes and most tax software doesn't translate them well. H&R Block actually does a slightly better job explaining what each code means.

0 coins

I had the exact same error code last month and it drove me crazy! Turned out to be a really simple fix though - I had entered my middle initial as "J" but my Social Security card actually has "James" spelled out completely. Even though both are technically correct, the IRS system is super picky about exact matches. Here's what I'd suggest: Pull out your actual Social Security card (not just rely on memory) and compare every single character of your name field by field. Look for: - Middle names vs middle initials - Periods after initials - Spaces between names - Any Jr/Sr/III suffixes Since you mentioned getting married and changing your name, that's almost certainly the culprit. Make sure you're using the exact format from your updated SS card. The IRS database might still have timing delays even after you updated with Social Security Administration. Don't worry about your refund being delayed too much - once you fix the name mismatch and resubmit, it usually processes pretty quickly!

0 coins

Angelina Farar

โ€ข

Just wanna add one thing - make sure to update your W4 with your employer ASAP for 2026! While there's no penalty for filing differently than your withholding status, it's best to have your withholding match your expected filing status to avoid surprises next year. The new W4 form doesn't even have a "filing status" checkbox anymore - instead it asks about multiple jobs and spouse working, so complete it accurately for best results.

0 coins

Great question and lots of helpful answers here! Just to add one more perspective - I work in HR and help employees with W4 questions all the time. What everyone's saying is absolutely correct: your W4 withholding elections and your actual tax filing status are completely independent. The W4 is just an estimate tool to help your employer withhold approximately the right amount of taxes throughout the year. Your actual filing status is determined by your marital status on December 31st of the tax year. Since you were married by the end of 2025, you have the option to file either "married filing jointly" or "married filing separately" - regardless of what any W4 forms say. One tip from the employer side: when you do update your W4 (which I'd recommend doing soon for 2026), the new form is much more comprehensive than the old one. It considers your spouse's income, multiple jobs, deductions, and credits to give you more accurate withholding. Take your time filling it out completely rather than just checking a box!

0 coins

Tasia Synder

โ€ข

Just to add a practical point about IRC 351 vs 368 - don't forget about liabilities! If you're transferring business liabilities along with the assets, this can affect whether you recognize gain even in a supposedly "tax-free" exchange. Under IRC 351, if the liabilities transferred exceed your basis in the assets, you could recognize gain. For IRC 368 reorganizations, the rules vary by reorganization type, but generally, liabilities assumed by the acquiring corporation don't trigger immediate gain recognition (with some exceptions). Also, if you own 82% of your corporation, consider how much control you want post-transaction. Some IRC 368 reorganizations might allow you to have a continuing equity interest/role in the combined business, while others are better for clean breaks.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

โ€ข

What about my personal basis in the stock I'm trading in? I started the company with about $250k initial investment. Does that factor into calculating any gain I'd recognize from the cash portion of the deal?

0 coins

Tasia Synder

โ€ข

Your personal basis in the stock absolutely factors into calculating the gain on the cash portion. If you receive $1 million in cash and your basis is $250k, you'd recognize a $750k gain on that portion. The stock portion of the exchange may qualify for deferral under IRC 368 depending on which type of reorganization applies. Keep in mind that your initial $250k investment may not be your current basis. If your corporation had retained earnings that were taxed at the corporate level over the years, or if you've made additional capital contributions, these could have increased your basis. Conversely, if you've taken distributions in excess of the corporation's earnings and profits, that might have decreased your basis.

0 coins

Selena Bautista

โ€ข

My accountant told me another important difference - IRC 351 is usually for ongoing businesses where you're contributing property and continuing operations, while IRC 368 reorganizations typically involve a significant change in the business structure, ownership, or operations. Also, don't forget about state tax implications! I almost got killed on state taxes after my federal-tax-free reorganization because my state didn't fully conform to the federal treatment. Make sure you check how your state handles these transactions.

0 coins

Good point about state taxes. I'm in California and they have some weird rules about this. Anyone know if California fully conforms to IRC 351 and 368?

0 coins

Molly Hansen

โ€ข

California generally conforms to federal IRC 351 and 368 provisions, but there are some key differences to watch out for. California doesn't automatically adopt all federal tax law changes, so timing can be an issue if there have been recent federal updates. The bigger issue with California is that they have their own additional requirements for some reorganizations and they're much more aggressive about challenging transactions that look like they're structured primarily for tax avoidance. They also have different rules around installment treatment and depreciation recapture that could affect your state tax liability even in a federally tax-free reorganization. I'd definitely recommend getting California-specific advice because the Franchise Tax Board has been known to take positions that differ from the IRS on these complex transactions. The conformity isn't 100% and the differences can be expensive.

0 coins

Prev1...35923593359435953596...5645Next