IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Luca Ferrari

β€’

Worth noting that if you do qualify for TTS, you'll need to make quarterly estimated tax payments on your trading income. This includes both income tax and self-employment tax. I got hit with an underpayment penalty my first year because I didn't realize this.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

β€’

What's the threshold for having to make quarterly payments? Is it a certain dollar amount or percentage of your expected tax bill?

0 coins

Generally, you need to make quarterly estimated payments if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in tax when you file your return. The safe harbor rule is that you need to pay either 90% of the current year's tax liability OR 100% of last year's tax liability (110% if your prior year AGI was over $150,000). Since crypto trading profits can be unpredictable, I'd recommend using the annualized income installment method if your trading income varies significantly quarter to quarter. This lets you base each quarterly payment on your actual income for that period rather than estimating the full year upfront. The self-employment tax component makes this especially important for traders since that's an additional 15.3% on top of regular income tax rates.

0 coins

Great discussion here! I'm in a similar situation as a crypto day trader and wanted to share what I've learned from my CPA about TTS qualification. The key factors they emphasized were: 1. **Frequency and regularity** - You need to trade on a substantial, regular, and continuous basis. Your 20-50 trades per week sounds like it could qualify, especially if you're doing this consistently throughout the year. 2. **Time commitment** - The "substantial" requirement typically means spending several hours daily on trading activities, including research and analysis (not just executing trades). 3. **Intent to profit from short-term price movements** - This is crucial for crypto traders since you need to show you're trading to capture market swings, not holding for long-term appreciation. One thing I learned is that you should start keeping detailed records NOW if you plan to claim TTS for 2025. Document your daily trading time, maintain separate accounts for trading vs. investment activities, and keep receipts for all business expenses. The IRS scrutinizes TTS claims heavily, especially for newer asset classes like crypto. Also consider consulting with a tax professional who has experience with crypto TTS claims before making the election. The self-employment tax implications can be significant, so you want to make sure the Schedule C deductions outweigh that additional tax burden in your specific situation.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

β€’

This is really helpful, thanks for the detailed breakdown! I'm curious about the record-keeping aspect you mentioned. What specific documentation did your CPA recommend for tracking daily trading time? I've been keeping trade logs but haven't been documenting my research and analysis time. Also, when you mention "separate accounts for trading vs. investment activities" - does this mean I need completely different exchange accounts, or can I just maintain separate records showing which trades were for business vs. investment purposes? I have some crypto that I'm holding long-term alongside my day trading activities.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

β€’

Has anyone actually disputed the AMT forms with the IRS? I exercised ISOs last year, held for 8 months, then sold. I didn't report any AMT adjustment on Form 6251 since I figured the disqualifying disposition meant I just pay ordinary income tax on the gain. My accountant agreed with this approach. The IRS hasn't questioned it so far but I'm still nervous about it.

0 coins

That approach sounds correct to me. If you exercised and sold in the same tax year, there shouldn't be an AMT issue regardless of the holding period. The AMT problem happens when you exercise in one year and sell in another. You essentially handled it the right way by just reporting the ordinary income.

0 coins

Just want to add some clarity on the AMT credit situation since it seems like there's some confusion in the thread. When you exercise ISOs and trigger AMT, you do get AMT credits that can be used in future years - but these credits can only offset regular tax liability, not AMT liability in future years. The key thing to understand is that AMT credits are essentially a way to recover the "prepayment" you made through AMT. However, you can only use these credits when your regular tax exceeds your AMT in future years, and only up to the difference between the two. For Anna's situation with $58,750 of potential AMT income ($23.50 spread Γ— 2,500 shares), the actual AMT impact depends on her total income, deductions, and other AMT adjustments. The AMT exemption for 2025 is $85,700 for single filers, so if this ISO exercise is her only major AMT adjustment, she might not even trigger AMT. My recommendation would be to model this out with actual numbers including your other income sources. The exercise-and-sell-same-year strategy that others have mentioned really is the cleanest approach if you don't need to hold for the long-term capital gains treatment.

0 coins

Aiden Chen

β€’

I'm a chronic procrastinator on EVERYTHING, not just taxes. I recently read that for many people, perfectionism is actually the root cause of procrastination - we put things off because we're afraid we won't do them perfectly. Taxes trigger this big time since mistakes can be costly!

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

β€’

That makes so much sense! I wait because I'm afraid I'll miss something or mess up, so I convince myself I need "just a bit more time" to get everything perfect. Then suddenly it's April 14th and I'm doing a rushed job anyway.

0 coins

As a fellow tax professional, I completely feel your pain! The April rush is absolutely insane every year. I've found that procrastination often comes down to a few key factors: 1. **Loss aversion** - People hate parting with money, so if they think they'll owe, they delay as long as possible 2. **Complexity overwhelm** - Tax forms feel intimidating, so people avoid starting 3. **Optimism bias** - Everyone thinks "it won't take that long" so they keep pushing it off I've started implementing a few strategies that have helped reduce the last-minute chaos: - Early bird pricing (20% discount for clients who file before March 1st) - Late fees for appointments scheduled after April 10th - Year-round tax planning meetings to keep clients engaged The psychological aspect is real though. Most people treat taxes like going to the dentist - necessary but unpleasant, so they avoid it until absolutely forced to deal with it. Hang in there, we're almost through another tax season! And definitely switch to decaf after 6pm - your sleep is more important than that extra cup of coffee! πŸ˜…

0 coins

Emma Davis

β€’

I went through something similar with my tax refund last year. What worked for me was splitting up the transfers into smaller amounts over several days. Instead of trying to move everything at once, I did multiple transfers just under the daily limit. Also, some of these financial apps have different limits for different transfer methods. For example, I couldn't transfer more than $500 per day to my bank through ACH, but I could do an instant transfer for a small fee with a higher limit. Might be worth the fee if you need the money urgently for medical expenses.

0 coins

This sounds incredibly frustrating, especially when you need the money for medical expenses! Based on what you've described, this is almost certainly a banking/financial institution issue rather than an IRS problem. Once the IRS shows your refund as deposited on their transcript, they've completed their part. A few quick questions that might help narrow down the solution: β€’ What type of account is showing the deposit? (traditional bank, online bank, Cash App, etc.) β€’ Have you completed all identity verification requirements with that financial institution? β€’ When you say transfers are "declined," are you getting any specific error codes or messages? The $500 ATM limit suggests this might be a newer fintech platform that has stricter transfer limits until you complete additional verification steps. Many of these platforms automatically restrict large government deposits as a fraud prevention measure. I'd recommend calling their customer service and specifically asking about "large deposit holds" or "government refund verification requirements" - that usually gets you to the right department faster than general support. Keep documentation of everything in case you need to escalate this further. Hope you get access to your money soon!

0 coins

How ACA/Obamacare affects client finances - PTC impact when income increases

I've been noticing a pattern with my clients regarding ACA healthcare coverage that's really frustrating. The monthly premiums and Premium Tax Credit (PTC) are calculated based on your previous year's Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) and how your household income compares to the federal poverty level. These factors determine whether you qualify for tax credits or if you'll have to repay advanced PTCs you received when enrolling in ACA insurance. Every tax season, I see clients who had lower incomes when they initially signed up for ACA coverage, but then experienced significant income increases. Some examples from this year: - Client who landed a much higher-paying job - Client who sold investment property with substantial capital gains - Client with unexpected gambling winnings (without offsetting losses) I had five clients this year who, because their AGI jumped significantly, were no longer eligible for the PTC they'd been receiving. They had to REPAY the advanced PTC they'd received throughout the year. Each time I explain this, they're shocked and confused about why this is happening. What people need to understand is that when your AGI jumps from $40k to $110k+, you can't expect to continue paying $110/month for comprehensive health coverage for two people. Those low rates were based on your previous, much lower income. The most frustrating case was a client whose spouse went from self-employment with modest profits (Schedule C) to a full-time position making quadruple their previous income. They declined employer-sponsored health insurance because "We only paid $110 monthly through ACA before, why would we start paying $500 monthly through the employer plan?" I had to explain that with their new income, they no longer qualified for subsidized ACA premiums - and they might end up paying back thousands in advanced PTCs at tax time.

Connor Byrne

β€’

Something the original post didn't mention is that there are repayment caps for the PTC if your income is under 400% of FPL. So if your income increases but you're still under that threshold, you might not have to repay the full amount of excess advance PTC. For tax year 2025, the caps are: - Under 200% FPL: $650 (single) or $1,300 (all other filing statuses) - 200-300% FPL: $1,700 (single) or $3,400 (all other filing statuses) - 300-400% FPL: $2,800 (single) or $5,600 (all other filing statuses) It's only when you go over 400% FPL that you potentially have to repay the entire thing.

0 coins

Yara Elias

β€’

Does the same apply if you estimated your income way too low at the beginning of the year? Like if I put $30k as my estimate but ended up making $60k?

0 coins

Connor Byrne

β€’

Yes, the repayment caps still apply in that situation. If your actual income is $60k but that still puts you within one of those FPL percentage ranges I mentioned, your repayment would be capped at the corresponding amount. What the IRS looks at is your final income for the year compared to the FPL, not how accurate your initial estimate was. The caps are designed to provide some protection for people whose income increases moderately but stays under 400% FPL.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

β€’

The thing that gets most of my clients is they dont realize that the "affordable" employer coverage rule only applies to the EMPLOYEE coverage cost, not family coverage! So if employee-only coverage costs less than 9.12% of household income (for 2025), the whole family is ineligible for PTC - even if family coverage would cost way more! Its called the "family glitch" and it really hurts families! Some states have workarounds but most dont.

0 coins

Keisha Jackson

β€’

Wow, I had no idea about this! So if my employer offers me insurance at $150/month but covering my spouse and kids would cost $900/month, we still wouldn't qualify for ACA subsidies? That's completely messed up.

0 coins

@aec17087db47 Unfortunately yes, that's exactly how it works under current rules! The "family glitch" has been a major issue for years. The IRS only looks at whether the employee-only coverage is affordable (under 9.12% of household income for 2025), completely ignoring what it costs to add family members. So in your example, if that $150/month employee coverage is considered affordable based on your income, your entire family loses ACA subsidy eligibility - even though the $900/month family coverage might be completely unaffordable. Some families end up in situations where the employee goes on the employer plan and the spouse/kids go uninsured or pay full price for marketplace coverage. It's one of the most unfair aspects of the ACA that really needs legislative fixes.

0 coins

Prev1...35453546354735483549...5643Next