IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Zainab Yusuf

•

its def a browser issue. Firefox worked for me after chrome kept failing

0 coins

Layla Sanders

•

Had the exact same problem last week! Turns out my issue was with the ID.me verification - even though I thought I was fully verified, there was an additional step I missed. Try going to ID.me directly and making sure your identity verification is 100% complete. Also, disable any ad blockers or browser extensions that might interfere with the IRS site. The transcript system is super finicky about that stuff.

0 coins

I'm confused about one thing... when calculating the employer portion for a sole proprietor (Schedule C), is it actually 20% of net profit or is it 25% of (net profit - half SE tax)? I've seen both formulas used in different places and now I don't know which is correct.

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

It's 20% of net profit after deducting half of your self-employment tax. The confusion often comes from the different rates used for corporations vs. sole proprietors. For corporations, the limit is 25% of compensation. But for sole proprietors, it's effectively 20% of your net self-employment income (after the SE tax deduction). The difference is because when you're a sole proprietor, you calculate contributions based on your net earnings, whereas corporations calculate based on W-2 wages.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation as a freelance writer making around $55k. One thing I learned the hard way is to also consider the timing of your contributions throughout the year. Since we don't have regular paychecks like W-2 employees, it's easy to wait until the end of the year to make a big lump sum contribution. But I found it's actually better to make quarterly estimated contributions to my solo 401(k) to smooth out cash flow and take advantage of dollar-cost averaging. Also, don't forget that you can make contributions up until the tax filing deadline (plus extensions) for the previous year. So you have until April 15th, 2025 to make 2024 contributions, which gives you some flexibility if you're still figuring out your exact numbers. One more tip - keep detailed records of all your contributions and the calculations you used. The IRS can ask for documentation years later, and having everything organized from the start will save you major headaches down the road.

0 coins

This is why our tax code is so messed up. An EV battery providing power to a house is functionally identical to a Powerwall doing the same thing. But one gets a tax credit and one doesn't because of some arbitrary distinction about "primary purpose." Meanwhile the electrical grid gets the same benefit either way! Politicians talk about wanting to encourage clean energy adoption but then create these convoluted rules that just confuse everyone. Ugh.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

I get your frustration, but there's actually some logic to the distinction. A permanently installed home battery system is a dedicated investment in energy infrastructure. An EV that can occasionally power your home is primarily a transportation purchase that happens to have a secondary benefit. The tax code is trying to incentivize specific investments in home energy systems, not subsidize vehicle purchases that already have their own separate tax credits.

0 coins

Based on what I've seen from following similar cases, the IRS has been pretty consistent about denying these claims for EVs, even ones with impressive bi-directional capabilities. The "primary purpose" test isn't really about how you use it day-to-day, but about what the manufacturer designed and marketed it for. That said, I'd suggest documenting everything about your home integration setup - the equipment you purchased specifically for home connection, any monitoring systems showing energy flow patterns, utility company agreements if you're selling power back to the grid. Even if you can't claim the residential energy credit, this documentation might be useful for other incentives or if the rules change in the future. Also worth checking if your utility company offers any rebates or time-of-use rate programs for customers with bi-directional EV charging. Sometimes the utility incentives can be more valuable than the federal tax credits anyway, and they don't have the same "primary purpose" restrictions.

0 coins

James Maki

•

Has anyone noticed that sometimes the same deduction appears under different acronyms depending on the payroll system? At my old job SIT meant State Income Tax but at my new company they use STW (State Tax Withholding) for the exact same thing. Super confusing when trying to compare paychecks!

0 coins

Yes! My company switched payroll providers mid-year and suddenly all the codes changed even though the actual deductions stayed the same. What was MED became HLTH and 401K became RETIR. No explanation provided - it's like they want us to be confused about our own money.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

This is so relatable! I just went through this exact same thing when I started a new job. For $95 in deductions on a $1350 biweekly paycheck, that's actually around 7% which seems reasonable, but definitely verify what each one is. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track each deduction code with its meaning and amount. That way when the next paycheck came, I could quickly spot any changes. Also, don't feel embarrassed about asking HR - it's literally their job to explain this stuff to you, and most people don't understand payroll acronyms without help. If your company has a benefits portal or employee self-service website, sometimes there's a payroll glossary buried in there somewhere. Worth checking before having that potentially awkward conversation with HR!

0 coins

Is IRS refund adjustment ignoring Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) from Form 8960?

I've been dealing with a weird situation with my 2022 tax return that I'm hoping someone can shed light on. Earlier this year, I had trouble getting my federal return accepted because of what seemed to be an IRS error related to Form 8960 (Net Investment Income Tax). The IRS apparently changed the 2022 instructions but didn't update their validation logic. After several attempts, my return was finally accepted on February 19th. Things seemed normal at first, but then about a week later, my refund amount disappeared completely from the "Where's My Refund" tool. This morning I checked my IRS online account and noticed something strange. For 2022, my AGI looks correct, but under "Refund Amount as Shown on Return when Filed" it shows my expected refund PLUS the amount of NIIT I had calculated on Form 8960. My transcript also shows code 570: "Additional account action pending" for March 27. I'm confident my return is accurate - I definitely owe NIIT based on my investment income and have paid it in previous years without issue. Looking at my transcript more carefully, I see that while I reported positive "TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME," the IRS shows a negative "TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME PER COMPUTER." My "NET INVESTMENT INCOME TAX FOR INDIVIDUALS" is a positive number, but their "NET INVESTMENT INCOME TAX FOR INDIVIDUALS VERIFIED" and "NET INVESTMENT INCOME TAX FOR INDIVIDUALS PER COMPUTER" are both zero. Could the IRS still have issues processing Form 8960 correctly? Anyone experienced something similar?

Has anyone had the IRS actually correctly process Form 8960 for 2022 yet? I'm still waiting on my refund and have the same issue - filed with investment income tax but my transcript is showing they're not calculating it correctly.

0 coins

Chris King

•

My 2022 return with Form 8960 was finally processed correctly last week after being in review for almost 6 weeks. They initially showed the same error (negative investment income on their end) but eventually fixed it. The refund I received matched what I originally calculated.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience! That gives me hope mine will be fixed eventually too. Did your "Where's My Refund" status change during the review period or did it just suddenly update when it was approved?

0 coins

I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation! Filed my 2022 return in February with Form 8960, and my transcript is showing the same weird discrepancies - negative investment income on their end while I reported positive amounts, and their system calculating zero NIIT when I clearly owe it. What's frustrating is that I've filed Form 8960 successfully for the past three years without any issues. This definitely seems to be a systematic problem with how the IRS updated their 2022 processing rules. I also have the code 570 on my transcript dated March 15th. Based on what others are saying here, it sounds like we just need to wait for manual review to fix their computer errors. I'm keeping detailed screenshots of everything in case they send the wrong refund amount and try to collect it back later. Has anyone gotten any timeline estimates from IRS representatives about when these Form 8960 reviews might be completed?

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same boat! Filed in February with Form 8960 and seeing the same issues on my transcript - their system is showing negative investment income when I clearly reported positive amounts. My code 570 is dated March 20th. From what I've gathered reading through this thread, it sounds like this is a widespread issue with how the IRS updated their 2022 processing for Form 8960. The good news is that several people here have had their returns eventually processed correctly after manual review, though it's taking 4-6 weeks. I called using that Claimyr service someone mentioned above and the IRS agent confirmed they're aware of the Form 8960 processing issues and are working through them chronologically. She said returns flagged in mid-March should be resolved by early April, but couldn't give me a more specific date. Definitely keep taking screenshots of everything! The agent also recommended downloading a complete transcript copy now as documentation in case there are any issues later with incorrect refunds.

0 coins

Prev1...33663367336833693370...5645Next