


Ask the community...
Don't forget to factor in the quality of the plans too! I almost went with my employer plan for tax reasons until I realized it had a $4000 higher deductible and smaller network than my private plan. Sometimes the better coverage outweighs the tax benefits. Also, check if you qualify for ACA subsidies with your private plan. Depending on your income, those could be substantial and might not be reflected in the premium you're comparing.
Thanks for bringing up the non-tax factors! You're right that I should be looking at the whole picture. The deductible on my private plan is actually $3,500 lower than my employer's plan, and my regular specialists are all in-network with my current coverage. I don't qualify for ACA subsidies unfortunately - my income is too high. But the network difference is definitely significant. I guess I need to assign some dollar value to having better coverage and a lower deductible to make a fair comparison.
Absolutely! A $3,500 deductible difference is significant. One approach is to consider your typical annual healthcare usage. If you regularly meet your deductible, that $3,500 is a real savings that offsets some of the tax benefits. Also consider coverage for specific services you use regularly. For example, I discovered my employer plan had much worse mental health coverage than my private plan - fewer visits covered and higher copays. For someone who uses therapy regularly, that difference alone could be worth thousands.
Has anyone considered the impact of self-employment taxes in this calculation? If you're a true 1099 contractor (not W-2), you can deduct health insurance premiums as a business expense which reduces your self-employment tax base. That's an additional 15.3% savings on top of income tax savings!
This is an important distinction! The OP mentioned they're employed "by contract" but that could mean either W-2 through a contracting agency or true 1099 self-employment. If you're W-2, you can't deduct private health insurance premiums against self-employment taxes since you don't pay those - your employer pays half of FICA and you pay half through withholding. But if you're 1099, the self-employed health insurance deduction is super valuable. It reduces your income for income tax purposes AND self-employment tax purposes, which is huge.
If you're using H&R Block, try clicking "I'll enter my information without the form" instead of saying yes/no to whether you received it. I had the same problem last year and that option worked for me. Then you can just enter the small fees you paid in 2024 manually. Remember that your main tuition expenses were properly claimed on your 2023 return if box 7 was checked on that form.
Thank you! I just checked and I do see that option now. I think part of my confusion was that I started by saying "No" to receiving the form, which took me down a different path. When I went back and looked for the option you mentioned, I found it. I'll try entering just the graduation fees I paid in 2024. Does anyone know if graduation fees qualify as education expenses for tax purposes?
Graduation fees sometimes qualify and sometimes don't - it depends on whether they were required for your enrollment or attendance. Generally, optional fees like ceremony costs, cap and gown, etc., don't qualify. But required graduation fees that you had to pay to receive your degree would typically count as qualified education expenses. If you're unsure, check your student account statement to see how the fees are categorized. Required fees will usually qualify, while optional services typically don't.
Just to add another perspective - I'm a grad student too and had something similar happen. My university's financial aid office explained that schools aren't required to provide a 1098-T if you didn't have any qualified expenses in that tax year that weren't covered by scholarships/grants.
That's exactly right. According to IRS guidelines, educational institutions don't need to issue a 1098-T if there were no qualified tuition and related expenses paid that year, or if all expenses were covered by scholarships/grants. The November 2023 payment would've been on the 2023 form (with box 7 checked since the classes were in 2024).
Just wanted to add that if the gymnastics academy is a 501(c)(3) specifically (not all nonprofits are - there are different types of 501c organizations), they could potentially set up a scholarship or general travel fund that people could donate to directly. This would make the donations tax-deductible while still supporting the team's travel. The important distinction is that donors cannot earmark their contributions for specific students. The nonprofit must maintain control over how the funds are used, even if they end up using them for your team's trip.
That's a great idea! Do you know if there's a way to check what specific type of nonprofit they are? Their website just says "nonprofit organization" but doesn't specify the 501c classification.
You can look up their tax-exempt status using the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search tool at https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/. Just enter the organization's name or EIN number. You could also just ask the organization directly - they should know their tax status. If they're a 501(c)(3), they're eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. If they're another type of 501(c) organization (like a 501(c)(7) social club), then donations wouldn't be deductible even if made directly to them.
One option nobody has mentioned - could the instructor invoice the academy directly for the international competition, and then you make donations directly to the academy's general fund (not earmarked)? Then the academy could choose to allocate those funds to pay the instructor for the competition. The key difference is the money flow and who has control. If donors give to the academy's general operating fund with no strings attached, those could be deductible. Then it's the academy's decision how to use those funds.
This is actually a gray area that could get the nonprofit in trouble. If there's an understanding that donations to the "general fund" are actually intended to pay for specific students' expenses, the IRS could consider it a disguised payment for services rather than a donation. The nonprofit could risk their tax-exempt status if they're facilitating this type of arrangement.
Don't overlook the relationship aspect of this. Even with family and close friends, money can create tension. I'd suggest writing up a simple agreement regardless of tax implications - just to keep everyone on the same page about expectations. My cousin and I had a similar arrangement that went sideways because we had different memories of the repayment timeline.
Do you have any suggestions for a template or example of a simple agreement that worked? I'm not sure what should be included besides the basics.
A basic promissory note doesn't need to be complicated. Include the names of both parties, the loan amount, when and how payments will be made, and any consequences for late payments. Even if you don't plan to enforce it strictly, having it written down prevents misunderstandings. You should also consider including what happens if you lose your job or have an emergency - would they allow you to pause payments? Will the term be extended? Better to discuss these scenarios upfront when everyone's happy. I found some free templates online that worked great - just search for "family loan agreement template" and customize one to your situation.
I received a $12,000 loan from my brother last year to pay off credit card debt. The way we handled it was creating a simple one-page loan document that specified no interest, monthly payments of $400, and what would happen if I missed payments. We both signed it and kept copies.
Ahooker-Equator
My mortgage company does this too! The 1099-INT on the mortgage statement is typically interest they paid you for having excess funds in your escrow account. If you overpaid into escrow during the year, that money earned a tiny bit of interest, which they're required to report. The other 1099-INT is probably for your checking/savings accounts. Two completely different interest payments, but both taxable and need to be reported separately.
0 coins
Anderson Prospero
ā¢Is the bank required by law to pay interest on escrow accounts? My escrow account has thousands in it and I've never seen a 1099-INT attached to my mortgage statement.
0 coins
Ahooker-Equator
ā¢It varies by state. Some states have laws requiring mortgage servicers to pay interest on escrow accounts (California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, and Wisconsin). In other states, it's up to the terms of your mortgage agreement. If you live in one of those states and have a significant escrow balance but never received interest, you might want to check with your mortgage servicer. It's possible the interest was so minimal they didn't need to report it (usually under $10), or there could be specific exemptions in your state's laws.
0 coins
Tyrone Hill
Something nobody mentioned yet - double-check if the 1099-INT on your mortgage statement has a different account number in Box 3 compared to your regular 1099-INT. This would confirm they're for different accounts (likely your escrow account vs checking account). Also, you should verify the bank's tax ID number (EIN) on both forms - it should be the same since it's the same bank. If they're different, that could indicate the forms are from different entities within the bank's corporate structure.
0 coins
Toot-n-Mighty
ā¢This is good advice. I had a similar situation with Chase last year and the account numbers in Box 3 were different. One was for my savings account and the other was for escrow interest.
0 coins