
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
So I just got this job offer that has me a bit confused. It's basically an outdoor daycare/nature school for kids with some specific educational approach - which sounds awesome! I was pretty excited about the opportunity since I love working with kids in outdoor settings. But then things got weird. The director told me it's organized as a "PMA" and said that I wouldn't have to file income taxes on the money I make there. They also mentioned that the parents pay through "donations" rather than tuition fees. I've never heard of anything like this and it immediately raised some red flags for me. I'm pretty sure you have to pay taxes on any income you earn, regardless of what type of organization you work for. I started researching PMAs online and I'm getting conflicting information. Has anyone had experience with this type of setup? Is this some kind of tax scam I should avoid, or is there actually some legitimate arrangement where this could be true? I really like the job opportunity but don't want to get caught up in something illegal with the IRS.
I received some income from a discrimination settlement for a case I was involved in at work. My former company agreed to settle with me rather than going to court over the whole thing. I'm trying to figure out if I need to pay taxes on this amount and if so, how exactly I should report it on my taxes. The total settlement was around $42,500 and I got the money in December. My lawyer took about 30% as their fee. I'm worried about getting hit with a huge tax bill if I don't handle this correctly. Does anyone know if discrimination settlements are considered taxable income? And do I report the full amount or just what I received after the lawyer took their cut? This is the first time I've dealt with something like this and I really don't want to mess up my taxes. Thanks for any help!
Just a heads up - I'm not a tax pro but I went thru something similar. If ur settlement included any interest (like if the discrimination happened years ago and they added interest to the settlement), that part is DEFINITELY taxable and should be reported as interest income. My settlement had like $5k in interest and I missed it initially. Had to amend my return.
One thing to keep in mind with discrimination settlements is that the IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing these cases, especially larger amounts like yours. They're looking for proper documentation that supports the tax treatment you claim. Make sure you keep detailed records of everything - your settlement agreement, any correspondence with your attorney about the tax implications, and documentation of what portions relate to different types of damages. If the IRS ever questions your filing, you'll want to be able to show exactly how you determined what was taxable vs. non-taxable. Also, since you mentioned this was age discrimination, be aware that the EEOC has specific reporting requirements for employers on discrimination settlements. This means the IRS likely already knows about your settlement, so make sure you report it correctly rather than trying to minimize it inappropriately. Given the complexity and the amount involved, it might be worth investing in a consultation with a tax professional who specializes in settlement income. The cost of getting it right up front is usually much less than dealing with IRS problems later.
I've got kind of a weird tax situation and I'm not sure what to do. I have dual citizenship (Saudi and American) and just landed a job in Saudi Arabia. The thing is, I live here as a Saudi citizen, not as an American expat. Do I still have to pay US taxes just because I also happen to be a US citizen? Even though I'm living and working completely in Saudi Arabia under my Saudi citizenship? I'm really confused about how this works for dual citizens... Do I need to file a US tax return even if I'm not living there at all? Any advice would be super helpful!
Quick question - does Saudi Arabia have an income tax? I thought they didn't tax income which would make this easier since you wouldn't be double taxed, right?
As someone who went through a similar dual citizenship tax situation, I'd strongly recommend getting professional help sooner rather than later. The complexity of US tax law for expats is no joke, especially when you factor in FBAR requirements, potential FATCA reporting, and making sure you're properly claiming exclusions. One thing that wasn't mentioned yet - make sure you understand the "bona fide residence test" vs the "physical presence test" for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. Since you're living in Saudi Arabia as a Saudi citizen (not just working there temporarily), you'll likely qualify under the bona fide residence test, which can be more flexible than the physical presence test that requires you to be outside the US for 330 days out of 365. Also, even though Saudi Arabia doesn't have personal income tax, you still need to be careful about other types of income (investments, rental properties, etc.) that might not qualify for the FEIE. The US tax code doesn't care which passport you used to open accounts or earn income - your US citizenship creates the obligation regardless. Don't panic about past years - the Streamlined Procedures really are designed for situations like yours where people genuinely didn't know about their filing requirements. But definitely get started on this soon!
I got a car accident settlement last month and I'm trying to figure out if I need to report it on my taxes. Google is giving me mixed answers and I'm confused why this isn't just a simple yes or no. Some sources say it's not taxable, others say parts of it might be? I got around $32,000 total from the insurance company after my accident last year. The settlement covered medical expenses, car repairs, lost wages, and some additional money for pain and suffering. My tax guy is on vacation and I need to understand this before I file. Anyone deal with this before and know the real answer?
One more important thing: if you deducted any medical expenses in previous years that were later reimbursed by this settlement, you may need to report that reimbursement as income in the year you receive the settlement (called the "tax benefit rule").
Based on your breakdown, you're on the right track! The $6,500 for lost wages is definitely taxable income that you'll need to report. The medical expenses ($14,500) and pain/suffering ($8,000) portions are not taxable since they're compensating for physical injuries. For the $3,000 car repair portion, as long as it doesn't exceed what you originally paid for the car (minus any depreciation), it's typically not taxable income either - it's just making you whole for your property loss. One thing to watch out for: if you itemized deductions in previous years and deducted any of those medical expenses that are now being reimbursed by the settlement, you might need to include that reimbursed amount as income under the tax benefit rule. Also don't forget to check your state tax requirements - while federal rules are fairly clear on settlements, some states have different approaches to taxing settlement proceeds. Keep all your settlement documentation organized. The IRS likes to see clear records showing how the settlement amount was allocated between the different categories when there are questions.
I'm trying to figure out the tax implications of an international situation and could use some expert advice. My cousin runs a successful shipping and logistics business here in the US. He's currently structured with an operating corporation, plus he has some warehouses in an LLC partnership that leases back to the main business. He has a chance to grow by buying out a competitor, and his uncle (who lives in France) wants to invest in the business. The uncle is pretty wealthy and plans to cover most of the acquisition costs through an equity investment. Our family accountant is knowledgeable but admits he's never handled international tax matters like this. His current suggestion is to set up a US LLC as a holding company where the French uncle would own a percentage of the operating company. The uncle also wants to use this same LLC to make some investments in US stocks that have nothing to do with my cousin's business. The uncle won't have any ownership in the real estate/warehouse partnership. Since this would be a single-member LLC (disregarded entity), would the dividends from the operating corporation to the LLC be considered as paid directly to the uncle? And if so, would the US-France tax treaty mean he pays 15% tax on those dividends? Any advice on this international tax situation would be greatly appreciated!
Quick question related to this - my dad (Canadian) is thinking of investing in my small manufacturing business. I was planning to use an S-Corp but now I'm confused if that's even allowed with a foreign investor? Do I need to switch to C-Corp?
You can't have a non-US citizen/resident as an S-Corp shareholder - it's one of the strict eligibility requirements. If your Canadian father wants to invest, you'd need to switch to a C-Corporation or find another structure. The tax implications are significant, though, as C-Corps face potential double taxation (corporate tax + dividend tax) while S-Corps have pass-through taxation. It's definitely worth consulting with a tax professional to find the optimal structure.
This is a complex international tax situation that definitely requires careful planning! A few additional considerations that might be helpful: The French uncle should also be aware of French tax obligations on his US investments. France taxes worldwide income, so he'll likely need to report the US dividends and investment gains in France as well, though he may be able to claim foreign tax credits for US taxes paid. For the mixed-use LLC (business investment + personal stock investments), consider the administrative burden this creates. Having separate entities might actually save costs long-term since it simplifies record-keeping, especially if the uncle ever wants to bring in additional investors or exit one investment but not the other. Also worth exploring: if the acquisition is substantial enough, there might be advantages to structuring this as a partnership rather than having the LLC own corporate stock directly. This could provide more flexibility for profit distributions and potentially better tax treatment for both parties. Given the complexity with treaty benefits, withholding requirements, and the various reporting forms mentioned by others, I'd strongly recommend getting a consultation with someone who specializes in US-France tax matters before finalizing the structure. The upfront cost will likely save significant headaches and potential penalties down the road.
ShadowHunter
I work as a CPA and have seen several clients get burned by these PMA arrangements over the years. What makes this particularly concerning is that the IRS has been cracking down hard on these schemes recently. They've issued specific guidance (Notice 2004-30) warning about abusive trust arrangements that claim to eliminate tax obligations. The reality is that if you're providing services in exchange for compensation - whether they call it wages, donations, or gifts - that's taxable income. Period. The organizational structure doesn't change your personal tax obligations as an employee. My advice would be to run from this opportunity, no matter how appealing the job itself sounds. I've helped clients who got involved in similar schemes, and the back taxes, penalties, and interest can be financially devastating. The IRS doesn't care that someone told you it was legal - you're still responsible for properly reporting your income. Look for similar outdoor education positions with organizations that operate transparently and provide proper tax documentation. There are plenty of legitimate nature-based programs that would love to have someone with your enthusiasm without the legal risks.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
Thank you all for the incredibly helpful responses! This has been exactly what I needed to hear. I was already suspicious when the director made those claims about not paying taxes, but seeing all the detailed explanations about why this is problematic really confirms my instincts. I'm definitely going to decline this position. As much as I love the idea of outdoor education, it's not worth risking my financial future over what sounds like a clear tax evasion scheme. The fact that the IRS has specific notices warning about these arrangements really seals the deal for me. I think I'll also look into using some of the resources mentioned here like taxr.ai to analyze any future job offers that seem questionable. And if I do decide to report this organization, I'll check out that Form 211 process. Thanks again everyone - you probably saved me from a very expensive mistake! I'll stick to looking for legitimate outdoor education programs that handle their taxes properly.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
Smart decision to trust your instincts and decline the position! I'm glad this thread could help validate your concerns. It's frustrating when you find what seems like a perfect job opportunity only to discover it comes with major legal risks. For future reference, some red flags to watch for in job offers include: employers claiming you don't need to pay taxes, payment structures described as "donations" rather than wages, and organizations that can't clearly explain their tax status with proper documentation. Legitimate employers should be able to provide clear information about how they handle payroll taxes and employee reporting. Good luck with your search for legitimate outdoor education opportunities - there are definitely reputable programs out there that share your passion for nature-based learning without the tax complications!
0 coins