IRS

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One situation where filing separately saved us TONS of money: when my spouse was on an income-based repayment plan for federal student loans working toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness. We did the math and even though we lost several tax credits by filing separately, her monthly loan payments decreased so much (because they were based only on her income rather than our combined income) that we saved about $4,300 per year. If either of you has federal student loans on an income-driven plan, definitely run the numbers both ways! This can be one of the few cases where MFS is actually better.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

β€’

This is such a helpful discussion! As someone who's been filing jointly for years without really understanding the alternatives, I'm realizing there are way more nuances to this decision than I thought. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like for couples with similar incomes like yours (and mine), filing jointly is usually better because of all the credits and deductions you lose when filing separately. But the student loan situation really caught my attention - I had no idea that filing separately could impact income-based repayment plans so dramatically. The medical expense threshold is another angle I never considered. If one spouse has significant medical bills, filing separately could help them clear that 7.5% AGI hurdle more easily. It seems like the key takeaway is that while MFJ is better in most "standard" situations, there are specific circumstances where MFS can actually save money - mainly around student loans, medical expenses, or when one spouse has tax liability issues. Thanks for all the tools and resources mentioned here too. It's clear that running actual numbers is way more valuable than general rules of thumb!

0 coins

Chloe Martin

β€’

Does anyone know if I can still contribute to an IRA for 2024 at this point to reduce my tax bill? Or is that deadline passed too?

0 coins

The deadline for IRA contributions for a tax year is always the original tax filing deadline (usually April 15 of the following year), regardless of whether you file for an extension or file late. So unfortunately for 2024 taxes, that deadline passed in April 2025. You can still make IRA contributions now, but they'll count toward the 2025 tax year.

0 coins

Don't panic! You're actually in a pretty good position since you mentioned you'll likely get a refund. Here's what you need to do: 1. **File ASAP using regular 2024 tax forms** - no special "late" forms needed 2. **No penalties if you're getting a refund** - the IRS only penalizes when you owe them money 3. **You have until April 2027** to claim your 2024 refund, so while late, you're not in danger of losing it For your situation with all the life changes (divorce, moves, job change), make sure you have: - All W-2s from your various employers in 2024 - Any 1099s if you had contract work - Documentation of moving expenses if they're deductible - Divorce-related tax document changes The IRS is surprisingly understanding about life circumstances causing late filing when refunds are involved. Just file normally and you'll get your refund, though it will take longer to process than if you'd filed on time. The most important thing is to not put it off any longer!

0 coins

A little off topic but this might save your dad some headache - if he does end up as an independent contractor, make sure he sets aside 25-30% of EVERY check for taxes. I got destroyed my first year as an "independent contractor" because nobody told me about quarterly estimated tax payments and self-employment tax. Ended up owing over $18,000 at tax time with penalties.

0 coins

That's great advice. Also track EVERYTHING. Every receipt, every mile, every expense. I use an app called Stride that tracks mileage automatically and categorizes business expenses. Saved me about $4,700 in deductions last year.

0 coins

Thanks for the app recommendation! I've been using a paper logbook like a caveman. And you're absolutely right about tracking everything - I even deduct a percentage of my phone bill since I use it for work calls and routing. The key is being able to prove business purpose if audited.

0 coins

JaylinCharles

β€’

Former tax preparer here who specialized in transportation industry. Your father is absolutely being pushed into misclassification, and this is incredibly common right now. A few critical points to add to the excellent advice already given: 1. The LLC formation requirement is a HUGE red flag. Legitimate independent contractors typically already have their own business entity - they're not told to form one by the "client." This suggests the company knows they're converting employees. 2. Nevada LLC formation is correct, but he should also check if he needs to register as a foreign LLC in Colorado since that's where the company operates. Some states require this. 3. The insurance question is absolutely crucial. If they're providing the truck and insurance but calling him a contractor, that's textbook misclassification. True independent contractors own their equipment and carry their own commercial insurance (which runs $8,000-15,000+ annually). 4. He should document EVERYTHING about his current working relationship before they make the switch - schedules, routes assigned, equipment provided, training received, etc. This evidence will be critical if he needs to challenge the classification later. 5. Consider filing Form SS-8 with the IRS BEFORE agreeing to anything. This requests an official determination of worker status and can protect him from penalties if the IRS later determines he was misclassified. The company is trying to save money at his expense. Don't let them.

0 coins

Something no one has mentioned - check if your state accepts e-filing even if federal doesn't. In my case (Missouri), I was able to e-file the state return even though I had to paper file the federal return due to the Farm Optional Method/EITC issue. Saved my client from having to wait on both refunds.

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

β€’

Does that create any problems with the state return processing correctly if the federal was paper filed? I'm in Iowa and worried about creating a mismatch that might trigger unnecessary notices.

0 coins

No problems in my experience. The state systems don't actually cross-check the filing method with the federal return, just the data itself. Many states have completely separate e-file acceptance systems anyway. In my case, the state return processed normally and the refund was issued within 2 weeks, while the federal paper return took about 7 weeks. Just make sure the numbers match between what you e-file for state and what you paper file for federal. The only potential issue would be if the state requires attaching federal schedules that might not be processed yet, but that's rarely a problem.

0 coins

Carter Holmes

β€’

I just called my ProSeries rep about this exact issue. They said it's a known limitation in their software validation rules and they're working on fixing it for next year. The workaround they suggested was to paper file this year, but they gave me a specific diagnostic code to note in my files so I can follow up with them once they have the fix. Might be worth calling your software support to see if they have any solutions brewing.

0 coins

Sophia Long

β€’

Did they give any indication if this is something that affects all tax software or just ProSeries specifically? I've been using Drake and wondering if I should switch for my farm clients.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

β€’

From what I've experienced, this seems to be a widespread issue across multiple software platforms, not just ProSeries. I use TaxSlayer Pro for most of my farm clients and ran into the same Farm Optional Method/EITC e-filing rejection this year. A colleague who uses UltraTax CS mentioned having similar problems too. The issue appears to be in how the software validates the relationship between negative farm income on Schedule F and the positive earned income created by the Farm Optional Method for EITC purposes. Most tax software programs have validation rules that flag this as inconsistent, even though it's perfectly legitimate according to IRS guidelines. Drake might handle it differently since they tend to have more flexible validation rules, but I'd recommend testing it with a dummy return first if you're considering switching. You could also try reaching out to Drake support to ask specifically about their Farm Optional Method validation before making any software changes.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

β€’

This is actually more common than people think. Make sure your parents get a corrected 1098-T from your school showing the ACTUAL amounts paid for qualified expenses. The form should show no scholarships in Box 5. This will support their tax credit claims if they're audited.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

β€’

Do schools issue corrected 1098-Ts in cases like this? I thought they only report what they have on record, and if no scholarship was ever officially recorded, wouldn't the original 1098-T already show zero in Box 5?

0 coins

Andre Dubois

β€’

You're right - if no scholarship was ever officially recorded by the school, the 1098-T would already show zero in Box 5. What I meant was that OP should verify what's actually on the 1098-T that was issued. Sometimes students misunderstand their financial aid packages, and what they think is a "scholarship" might be recorded differently by the school (like a tuition waiver or discount). The key is making sure the parents have the official 1098-T from the school that accurately reflects what was paid, regardless of what OP told them.

0 coins

Ava Rodriguez

β€’

From a practical standpoint, you need to gather all documentation first before having any conversations. Get copies of your actual 1098-T forms from the school, bank records showing the transfers from your parents, and any tuition payment receipts. This will help you understand exactly what's been reported to the IRS versus what your parents believe. The good news is that this situation, while stressful, is fixable without major penalties if handled correctly. Since your parents are actually paying more in qualified education expenses than they're currently claiming credits for, they're not in an overclaim situation that would trigger penalties. They may actually be entitled to larger education credits than they've been taking. The key is transparency and proper documentation going forward. When you do come clean (which you absolutely should), have all the paperwork ready to show exactly what was paid and when. This will make it much easier for them to file any necessary amended returns and claim the correct credits they're entitled to. The IRS generally views honest corrections favorably, especially when they result in proper reporting rather than tax avoidance.

0 coins

Prev1...32063207320832093210...5645Next