IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

A little off topic but this might save your dad some headache - if he does end up as an independent contractor, make sure he sets aside 25-30% of EVERY check for taxes. I got destroyed my first year as an "independent contractor" because nobody told me about quarterly estimated tax payments and self-employment tax. Ended up owing over $18,000 at tax time with penalties.

0 coins

That's great advice. Also track EVERYTHING. Every receipt, every mile, every expense. I use an app called Stride that tracks mileage automatically and categorizes business expenses. Saved me about $4,700 in deductions last year.

0 coins

Thanks for the app recommendation! I've been using a paper logbook like a caveman. And you're absolutely right about tracking everything - I even deduct a percentage of my phone bill since I use it for work calls and routing. The key is being able to prove business purpose if audited.

0 coins

Former tax preparer here who specialized in transportation industry. Your father is absolutely being pushed into misclassification, and this is incredibly common right now. A few critical points to add to the excellent advice already given: 1. The LLC formation requirement is a HUGE red flag. Legitimate independent contractors typically already have their own business entity - they're not told to form one by the "client." This suggests the company knows they're converting employees. 2. Nevada LLC formation is correct, but he should also check if he needs to register as a foreign LLC in Colorado since that's where the company operates. Some states require this. 3. The insurance question is absolutely crucial. If they're providing the truck and insurance but calling him a contractor, that's textbook misclassification. True independent contractors own their equipment and carry their own commercial insurance (which runs $8,000-15,000+ annually). 4. He should document EVERYTHING about his current working relationship before they make the switch - schedules, routes assigned, equipment provided, training received, etc. This evidence will be critical if he needs to challenge the classification later. 5. Consider filing Form SS-8 with the IRS BEFORE agreeing to anything. This requests an official determination of worker status and can protect him from penalties if the IRS later determines he was misclassified. The company is trying to save money at his expense. Don't let them.

0 coins

I just called my ProSeries rep about this exact issue. They said it's a known limitation in their software validation rules and they're working on fixing it for next year. The workaround they suggested was to paper file this year, but they gave me a specific diagnostic code to note in my files so I can follow up with them once they have the fix. Might be worth calling your software support to see if they have any solutions brewing.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

Did they give any indication if this is something that affects all tax software or just ProSeries specifically? I've been using Drake and wondering if I should switch for my farm clients.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

From what I've experienced, this seems to be a widespread issue across multiple software platforms, not just ProSeries. I use TaxSlayer Pro for most of my farm clients and ran into the same Farm Optional Method/EITC e-filing rejection this year. A colleague who uses UltraTax CS mentioned having similar problems too. The issue appears to be in how the software validates the relationship between negative farm income on Schedule F and the positive earned income created by the Farm Optional Method for EITC purposes. Most tax software programs have validation rules that flag this as inconsistent, even though it's perfectly legitimate according to IRS guidelines. Drake might handle it differently since they tend to have more flexible validation rules, but I'd recommend testing it with a dummy return first if you're considering switching. You could also try reaching out to Drake support to ask specifically about their Farm Optional Method validation before making any software changes.

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact same issue across multiple client returns this year. What I've found helpful is creating a detailed client letter explaining the delay and the legitimacy of the Farm Optional Method for EITC purposes. I include references to the specific IRS publications mentioned earlier (225 and 596) and explain that this is a software limitation, not a tax law issue. For managing client expectations, I've started quoting 8-10 weeks for paper filing processing times instead of the usual 6-8 weeks, since the IRS seems to be running behind on manual processing. I also make sure to explain that their refund amount is correct and won't be reduced - it's just the delivery method causing the delay. One thing that's helped reduce my stress about these returns is keeping detailed documentation of the Farm Optional Method calculation and the EITC eligibility reasoning in the client file. If the IRS does question it later, having that paper trail makes any correspondence much easier to handle.

0 coins

That's a really smart approach with the client letter! I'm definitely going to steal that idea. I've been getting so many frustrated calls from clients asking why their returns are taking so long, and having a professional explanation document would help a lot. Do you happen to have a template you'd be willing to share? I'm particularly interested in how you word the technical explanation without making it sound scary or like there's actually a problem with their return. My farm clients tend to get nervous when they hear "paper filing" because they think it means the IRS is going to scrutinize everything more carefully. Also, the 8-10 week timeline sounds about right based on what I've been seeing. I had one Farm Optional Method return that I paper filed in early February and it just got processed last week. The client was patient thankfully, but it's definitely longer than the normal paper processing times.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Just wanted to chime in as someone who dealt with this exact scenario two years ago. The advice here is spot-on - you definitely need to report the full 1099-K amount and then deduct your losses separately if you itemize. One thing I'd add is to check if your gambling sites provide annual win/loss statements. Most legitimate online poker and sports betting sites will generate these for you if you request them, and they're incredibly helpful for documenting your actual losses. I had to contact customer service for a couple of sites, but they were able to provide detailed breakdowns that made filing much easier. Also, if you're thinking about using any of the services mentioned here, just make sure you understand the costs upfront. Sometimes the stress of dealing with tax issues makes spending money on help seem worth it, but you want to make sure it actually saves you money in the long run. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about requesting win/loss statements from the gambling sites! I didn't even think about that option. Quick question though - if some of my gambling was on sites that might not be fully legitimate or have shut down since then, what should I do for documentation? I have my Venmo records showing the deposits and withdrawals, but I'm worried that might not be enough if I get audited. Should I try to recreate a gambling log from memory for those transactions?

0 coins

For sites that have shut down or aren't legitimate, your Venmo records are actually pretty solid documentation since they show the money flow. I'd recommend creating a reconstructed gambling log based on your Venmo transactions - match up the dates, amounts, and any descriptions you have. Even if you can't remember every specific bet, having a timeline that corresponds to your payment records is better than nothing. The key is being able to demonstrate a pattern of gambling activity that matches your reported losses. Your Venmo statements showing deposits to these sites and any withdrawals back to your account help establish that timeline. If you have any screenshots, emails, or even browser history from those sites, gather that too. The IRS understands that some gambling sites operate in gray areas or shut down, so they're usually more focused on whether your reported losses are reasonable given the documented transactions rather than having perfect records from every site.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - I got a 1099-K from Venmo for what appears to be a mix of gambling winnings AND some legitimate freelance work I did. The gambling portion represents maybe 60% of the total amount on the form. Has anyone dealt with a mixed-use 1099-K like this? I'm wondering if I need to somehow split the reporting between Schedule C (for the freelance income) and Schedule 1 (for the gambling winnings), or if there's a different approach I should take. The Venmo transaction descriptions don't always make it super clear which payments were for what, so I'm trying to figure out the best way to document this split if the IRS ever asks. Also, for the gambling portion, I'm definitely net negative like the original poster, but the freelance work was legitimate income. This seems to complicate things even more in terms of how to handle the deductions and whether itemizing makes sense.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

You're absolutely right that this complicates things! For a mixed-use 1099-K, you'll need to split the reporting based on the nature of each income type. Report the freelance portion on Schedule C as business income (and you can deduct related business expenses there), and report the gambling winnings portion on Schedule 1 as "Other Income." The key is creating a clear breakdown of which transactions were for freelance work versus gambling. Go through your Venmo history and categorize each payment - even if the descriptions aren't perfect, use context clues like amounts, dates, and any messages or emails you might have. Document your methodology in case you need to explain it later. For the itemizing question - since you have legitimate business income from freelancing, you might have business deductions on Schedule C that could affect your overall tax picture. The gambling losses would still only be deductible if you itemize, but your total tax situation is more complex now. You might want to run the numbers both ways (itemizing vs standard deduction) to see which works better with your mixed income situation.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

This is actually more common than people think. Make sure your parents get a corrected 1098-T from your school showing the ACTUAL amounts paid for qualified expenses. The form should show no scholarships in Box 5. This will support their tax credit claims if they're audited.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

Do schools issue corrected 1098-Ts in cases like this? I thought they only report what they have on record, and if no scholarship was ever officially recorded, wouldn't the original 1098-T already show zero in Box 5?

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

You're right - if no scholarship was ever officially recorded by the school, the 1098-T would already show zero in Box 5. What I meant was that OP should verify what's actually on the 1098-T that was issued. Sometimes students misunderstand their financial aid packages, and what they think is a "scholarship" might be recorded differently by the school (like a tuition waiver or discount). The key is making sure the parents have the official 1098-T from the school that accurately reflects what was paid, regardless of what OP told them.

0 coins

From a practical standpoint, you need to gather all documentation first before having any conversations. Get copies of your actual 1098-T forms from the school, bank records showing the transfers from your parents, and any tuition payment receipts. This will help you understand exactly what's been reported to the IRS versus what your parents believe. The good news is that this situation, while stressful, is fixable without major penalties if handled correctly. Since your parents are actually paying more in qualified education expenses than they're currently claiming credits for, they're not in an overclaim situation that would trigger penalties. They may actually be entitled to larger education credits than they've been taking. The key is transparency and proper documentation going forward. When you do come clean (which you absolutely should), have all the paperwork ready to show exactly what was paid and when. This will make it much easier for them to file any necessary amended returns and claim the correct credits they're entitled to. The IRS generally views honest corrections favorably, especially when they result in proper reporting rather than tax avoidance.

0 coins

I have a client who owes tax debt for 2022-2024 for $13000, and I am trying to prepare an OIC for them as Doubt of Collectability, as well as a low-income certification. Tax liability is SE due to being a freelance writer on Schedule C who is unmarried, has no car or any assets, and only made $10875.00 this year. Her grandfather helps her pay her half of the utilities and helps with other things she needs since she isn't paid regularly. This is my first one, and after entering all the income for the RCP, it only shows 336 future income. I was wondering what a reasonable offer should be. Since it is a Schedule C, I would send 6 months of bank statements, correct?

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Based on your client's situation, an offer around $336-500 would be reasonable since your RCP calculation shows $336 in future income and minimal assets. For someone making $10,875 annually with no significant assets, this falls well within acceptable parameters for Doubt as to Collectibility. A few important points for your first OIC: 1. Yes, include 6 months of bank statements for Schedule C income - the IRS wants to see the irregular income pattern that's typical for freelancers. 2. Document the grandfather's assistance carefully. Since he's helping with utilities and necessities, make sure to show this isn't "income" to your client but genuine family support for basic living expenses. 3. The low-income certification is smart here - with income at $10,875, she likely qualifies and this waives the application fee and initial payment requirements. 4. Consider going slightly above your RCP calculation (maybe $400-450) to show good faith and account for any minor assets or income the IRS might value differently than you did. 5. Include a detailed hardship letter explaining how the irregular freelance income makes it impossible to maintain consistent payments, and how family assistance is necessary just for basic survival. The key is showing that even your minimal offer represents her true ability to pay given the circumstances. Good luck with your first OIC!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I needed! Thank you for breaking it down so clearly. I'm particularly grateful for the tip about documenting the grandfather's assistance - I hadn't thought about how to properly characterize family help versus income. One quick follow-up question: when you mention going slightly above the RCP calculation to show good faith, is there a risk of offering too much? I want to be fair to my client but also don't want to lowball the IRS and get an automatic rejection. Is there a general rule of thumb for that "good faith" buffer amount? Also, should I include documentation of her irregular freelance payments (like copies of 1099s or client payment records) to support the income volatility argument, or are the bank statements sufficient?

0 coins

Prev1...32063207320832093210...5644Next