Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I work as a CPA specializing in nonprofit compliance, and what you're describing raises serious red flags. The variable "management fees" that coincidentally equal year-end excess funds is a textbook example of what the IRS calls private inurement - using a tax-exempt organization's resources to benefit private parties. Legitimate management agreements have several key characteristics that seem missing from your situation: fixed fee structures based on actual services, detailed contracts outlining specific responsibilities, and payments that don't fluctuate based on the nonprofit's financial performance. When payments are structured to essentially distribute all excess funds to related for-profit entities, it suggests the nonprofit is being used as a pass-through to avoid taxes on what should be taxable income. The fact that the same people control both the nonprofit and the for-profit entities makes this even more problematic. The IRS has specific intermediate sanctions (excise taxes) for exactly these types of arrangements, and in severe cases, they can revoke the organization's tax-exempt status entirely. If you decide to document this situation, focus on: the management agreements (if they exist), board resolutions approving these payments, the organization's conflict of interest policies, and how these transactions are reported on Form 990. You may also want to review whether the nonprofit is actually fulfilling its stated charitable purpose or primarily serving as a tax shelter. Consider speaking with a nonprofit attorney before taking any action, as whistleblower protections and proper reporting procedures can be complex.
This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping for. As someone new to understanding nonprofit regulations, the distinction you made about legitimate management agreements having "fixed fee structures based on actual services" really clarifies what I'm observing. From what I can tell, there aren't detailed contracts outlining specific responsibilities - it seems more like the payments are determined after-the-fact based on available funds. Would the absence of proper documentation itself be a red flag to the IRS, or do they focus more on the economic substance of the transactions? Also, you mentioned intermediate sanctions - are those applied to the individuals involved or the organization itself? I'm trying to understand what the potential consequences might be for everyone involved, including employees like myself who aren't part of the decision-making.
The absence of proper documentation is absolutely a red flag to the IRS. They look at both the economic substance AND the documentation requirements. Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code requires that compensation arrangements be "reasonable" and properly approved through specific procedures - including advance approval by an independent board, use of comparable data, and adequate documentation of the decision-making process. Regarding intermediate sanctions under Section 4958: these excise taxes are imposed on the individuals who benefited improperly (called "disqualified persons") and potentially on organization managers who knowingly participated in the transactions. The taxes can be 25% of the excess benefit amount initially, and up to 200% if not corrected. The organization itself doesn't lose its exempt status for intermediate sanctions violations, but could still face revocation if the violations are severe or ongoing. As an employee who isn't involved in decision-making, you generally wouldn't face personal liability. However, you should be aware that if you have knowledge of potential violations and are in a position where you could be considered to have participated in covering them up, that could potentially create issues. The key is that you're not a "disqualified person" (typically board members, officers, or substantial contributors) and you're not an "organization manager" who participated in approving the transactions. If you're concerned about your position, document what you've observed objectively and consider consulting with an employment attorney about whistleblower protections before taking any action.
Having worked in nonprofit financial oversight for several years, I want to emphasize that what you're describing sounds like a serious compliance violation that needs immediate attention. The pattern of variable year-end transfers to related for-profit entities controlled by the same individuals is exactly what the IRS looks for when investigating private benefit schemes. Beyond the legal implications others have mentioned, there's also the reputational risk to consider. If this arrangement becomes public or triggers an IRS investigation, it could severely damage the organization's credibility and ability to fulfill its charitable mission. Donors, grantors, and the community generally have little tolerance for nonprofits that appear to be gaming the tax system. I'd strongly recommend that you start by reviewing the organization's most recent Form 990 (available on sites like GuideStar or the Foundation Directory). Look specifically at Part VII (compensation), Schedule L (transactions with interested persons), and Schedule R (related organizations). If these transfers aren't properly disclosed there, that's another major red flag. Given the complexity and potential consequences, this really warrants consultation with both a nonprofit attorney and a CPA who specializes in exempt organizations. Many state attorneys general also have nonprofit oversight divisions that investigate these types of issues. Document everything you can while being mindful of any confidentiality agreements you may have signed, and consider whether your state has whistleblower protections that might apply to your situation.
This is really helpful guidance about checking the Form 990 disclosures. I'm completely new to understanding nonprofit compliance, so having specific sections to look for makes this much more manageable. I'm particularly concerned about the reputational damage you mentioned - this organization provides medical products to underserved communities, so if there really is improper financial activity happening, it could hurt people who genuinely need these services. That makes me feel even more obligated to understand what's going on. Quick question about the state attorney general oversight - do they typically investigate based on employee reports, or do they mainly respond to formal complaints from the public? I want to make sure I understand the proper channels before taking any steps that might escalate the situation unnecessarily.
State attorneys general typically accept reports from various sources, including employees, board members, donors, and the general public. Most have online complaint forms or hotlines specifically for nonprofit issues. They generally investigate when there's credible evidence of potential violations, regardless of the source. Given that this organization serves underserved communities with medical products, the stakes are indeed higher. You might want to start by gathering the documentation I mentioned (Form 990s, board minutes if accessible, any contracts) and perhaps consulting with a nonprofit attorney first. Many offer initial consultations that could help you understand your options and the strength of your concerns before deciding whether to file a formal complaint. Some states also have whistleblower protection laws that specifically cover nonprofit employees reporting potential violations. You should research what protections might apply in your state before taking any formal action. The important thing is that you're approaching this thoughtfully and systematically rather than rushing into anything that could backfire.
Join the conversation
Has anyone tried the "Get Transcript" tool on the IRS website? I amended my return last year and needed my AGI from the original filing, but couldn't find my paperwork. The online transcript tool let me download my original return info which made filling out the 1040-X way easier. Just need to create an account on IRS.gov.
The transcript tool is super helpful, but I had trouble verifying my identity when creating an account. They kept rejecting my phone number for some reason. Did you have any issues with the verification process?
I completely understand your frustration with the amendment process - it really is unnecessarily complicated! Based on what you've described, here are a few additional options that might help: Since you mentioned transportation is an issue, many post offices offer pickup services for a small fee if you schedule it online. You could also ask a friend or family member to drop off your amendment at the post office. Another option is to check if your local library has tax preparation volunteers during certain times of the year. Many libraries host AARP Tax-Aide volunteers who can help with amendments for free, even outside of regular tax season. If you do end up going the paper route with Form 1040-X, make sure to send it certified mail so you have proof it was delivered. The IRS processing times for amendments are typically 16-20 weeks, so having that tracking gives you peace of mind. Also, just a heads up - when you do get your additional EITC refund, the IRS will send it as a separate check/deposit from your original refund. Don't worry if it doesn't show up in the same account or method as your original refund. The whole system definitely needs to be modernized, but unfortunately we have to work within what exists right now. Hang in there!
Join the conversation
Whatever u do dont ignore this tax bill! Made that mistake with a 401k withdrawal and ended up owing wayyyy more with penalties and interest. IRS payment plans are actually pretty reasonable. Just call them (or use that callback service someone mentioned) and explain ur situation.
100% agree. The IRS is actually pretty decent to work with if you're proactive. I set up a payment plan for a similar situation and it was surprisingly easy. The interest rate is way better than credit cards too.
Thank you - I definitely won't ignore it. I'm looking at either a payment plan or possibly taking a low-interest personal loan from my credit union to pay it off. I'm just so frustrated that what I thought was a responsible withholding amount wasn't even close to enough.
I'm really sorry you're going through this - it's such a stressful situation on top of already dealing with medical bills for your mom. One thing that might help is looking into whether you can amend your return if you find any missed deductions or credits. Since you mentioned the withdrawal was for medical expenses, definitely check if your mom qualifies as your dependent - that could potentially save you the $2,300 penalty. Also, for future reference (though I know this doesn't help now), when you have a high household income like yours, it's usually safer to withhold at the highest marginal rate (35-37%) plus the 10% penalty when doing early withdrawals. The tax calculators online can be misleading because they don't always account for how the withdrawal pushes you into higher brackets. Have you considered consulting with a CPA? They might be able to find some deductions or strategies to reduce the bill, and could help you figure out the best way to handle payment - whether that's a payment plan, loan, or other options.
This is really helpful advice, especially about withholding at the highest rate for future reference. I'm definitely going to look into whether my mom qualifies as a dependent - I do provide significant financial support for her, so there might be a chance. A CPA consultation sounds like a good idea too. I've been doing our taxes myself for years, but with this kind of complexity and the amount of money involved, it's probably worth getting professional help. Do you have any suggestions for finding a good CPA who specializes in retirement account issues? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything else that could help reduce this bill.
Join the conversation
Has anyone tried using a CPA who specializes in nonresident taxes? I'm considering it this year because my situation is complicated with income from teaching, a research grant, and some freelance consulting work from my home country that I'm not sure how to report.
I went with a specialized international tax CPA last year and it was expensive ($450) but worth it for my complicated situation. He found deductions I never would have known about and properly applied tax treaty benefits. If you have multiple income sources like you described, it might be worth the investment.
As someone who's been through this exact situation multiple times, I'd recommend checking with your university's international student services office first. Many schools have partnerships with tax software providers that specifically support 1040-NR e-filing, and students often get discounted rates. That said, if your university's software doesn't work out, FreeTaxUSA actually supports 1040-NR e-filing and is much more affordable than the big names. Their interface isn't the fanciest, but it handles nonresident forms properly and includes most of the common tax treaty benefits. One important tip: make sure whatever software you use can handle both your scholarship income (which may be partially taxable) and your W-2 income correctly. The interaction between these two income types on Form 1040-NR can be tricky, and general tax software often gets it wrong. Also, don't forget to check if you need to file Form 8843 (Statement for Exempt Individuals) - most F-1 students need this even if they don't owe any taxes. The good news is that once you figure out e-filing this year, next year will be much easier since you'll know exactly what works for your situation!
Carter Holmes
I completely understand the confusion - I went through the same thing last year when my company switched to the new W4 system! The key thing to remember is that the new system is actually more precise, even though it feels more complicated. For your sister's situation with 3 kids under 5 making $52k, here's what I'd recommend starting with: 1. Put $6,000 on Line 3 (Child Tax Credit for 3 kids) 2. Leave Line 4(b) empty initially to be safe 3. Monitor her next few paychecks to see the change This conservative approach will still increase her take-home pay significantly without risking owing taxes. The $6,000 on Line 3 alone should reduce her withholding by about $230 per month. Once she sees how that affects her paychecks, she can always submit a new W4 later with additional adjustments on Line 4(b) if she wants to capture more of that projected $13k refund in her regular pay. It's better to adjust gradually than to risk a surprise tax bill! The beauty of the new system is you can update your W4 anytime during the year as your situation becomes clearer.
0 coins
Lucy Lam
•This is really helpful advice! I like the gradual approach you're suggesting. One question though - when you say the $6,000 on Line 3 should reduce withholding by about $230 per month, how did you calculate that? I want to make sure I understand the math so I can explain it to my sister when we fill out her new W4. Also, is there a good rule of thumb for how much to put on Line 4(b) later if she wants to capture more of that EIC? I know someone mentioned multiplying by 4, but I want to make sure we don't go overboard.
0 coins
StarStrider
•@833b61bcc5df Great question about the math! The $230/month calculation comes from dividing the $6,000 Child Tax Credit by 26 pay periods (biweekly), which equals about $231 per paycheck. Since she gets paid twice a month, that's roughly $460 more per month in take-home pay. For Line 4(b) and the EIC, you're right to be cautious. The "multiply by 4" rule assumes she's in roughly a 25% tax bracket. For someone making $52k, she's likely in the 12% bracket, so multiplying expected EIC by about 8-9 would be more accurate (since $1 of deduction saves about $0.12 in taxes). But honestly, I'd recommend she start with just the Child Tax Credit adjustment first, see how that goes for 2-3 paychecks, then maybe add just $2,000-3,000 to Line 4(b) as a test. She can always increase it later if she's still getting too much withheld. Better to be conservative and get a small refund than owe unexpectedly! The IRS withholding calculator at irs.gov can also help estimate the right Line 4(b) amount once she has a few paychecks with the initial adjustment.
0 coins
A Man D Mortal
The new W4 system definitely takes some getting used to! I went through this same confusion when helping my daughter adjust hers last year. One thing that really helped us understand the system better was using the IRS's own withholding calculator at irs.gov/W4App. It's free and walks you through your specific situation step by step. For your sister's case, it will factor in her income, filing status, number of dependents, and estimated credits like EIC. The calculator will then tell you exactly what to put on each line of the W4 - no guesswork needed. It even shows you how your changes will affect each paycheck and your projected refund. Since your sister is getting such a large projected refund ($13k), the calculator might suggest putting amounts on both Line 3 (for child tax credits) AND Line 4(b) (for other adjustments). The key is that it does the math for you based on current tax law. I'd recommend running through the calculator together - it takes about 10-15 minutes and gives you confidence that you're making the right adjustments. You can always be conservative with the first adjustment and run the calculator again in a few months if needed.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
•This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was looking for! I had no idea the IRS had their own calculator that would give specific line-by-line instructions. That sounds much more reliable than trying to figure out the math ourselves. I'll definitely run through the calculator with my sister this weekend. It makes sense to use the official tool rather than guessing, especially since we're dealing with such a large projected refund. The 10-15 minute time investment seems worth it to get personalized guidance. One follow-up question - does the calculator account for things like daycare expenses or other potential deductions she might have? She pays about $800/month for childcare for her youngest, and I'm wondering if that affects the W4 calculations at all. Thanks for pointing out this resource - sometimes the simplest solutions are right in front of us!
0 coins