


Ask the community...
Offsets are the worst fr. Lost half my refund to old student loans this year ๐ญ
oof thats rough buddy
The timing really depends on which agency is doing the offset. Federal agencies like student loans or child support usually update faster (1-2 weeks) while state debts can take up to a month to show on your transcript. If you're expecting more offsets, you can also check with the specific agency that's collecting the debt - they often know before it hits your IRS transcript.
I'm actually an accountant (though not specialized in tax) and have a number of clients who do similar things with credit card rewards. The key issue here is the "primary purpose" test. If your main purpose is getting the cashback through a business activity, then yes, the rewards are taxable. In your case, since you're specifically buying and selling gold coins with the cash back as a KEY part of your profit strategy, you should be reporting the total economics. It's a bit like getting a manufacturer rebate when you're a retailer - those rebates reduce your cost of goods sold. One warning - the IRS has been looking more closely at "side hustles" and has specifically mentioned credit card rewards used in business contexts in some of their guidance. Better to report it properly than risk an audit.
Thanks for the clear explanation. That makes sense about the "primary purpose" being important. So just to make sure I understand - on my Schedule C, I would report my sales revenue of $7350 for those coins, but then list my cost of goods sold as $7200 (the $7500 purchase price minus the $300 cashback), giving me the $150 profit? And one more question - do I need to maintain any special documentation for the cash back portion? My credit card statement shows the rewards but doesn't specifically tie them to individual purchases.
Yes, that's exactly right. You'd report $7350 as revenue and $7200 as your COGS after subtracting the cash back from your purchase price. This properly reflects your economic reality - a $150 profit. For documentation, you should maintain a record that connects the cash back to the specific inventory purchases. Since credit card statements often show rewards as aggregate amounts, I recommend creating a simple spreadsheet that allocates the rewards to specific inventory items based on the purchase amount and reward percentage. Keep copies of all statements showing the rewards earned alongside your purchase receipts. In case of an audit, you want to clearly demonstrate the connection between specific inventory purchases and the related cash back.
Has anyone here actually been audited for this kind of thing? I've been doing something similar with electronics and credit card rewards for years and just reporting the sales as income and purchases as expenses without factoring in the cashback. Now I'm worried I've been doing it wrong...
That's really concerning. I wonder if it would trigger an audit if I suddenly start filing differently. The amounts weren't huge - maybe $5-6k in unreported profit over 3 years due to not accounting for the cashback properly. Do you think that's enough to worry about?
$5-6k in unreported profit over 3 years is definitely significant enough to worry about. The IRS uses automated systems to flag inconsistencies, and if they notice a sudden change in how you're reporting similar income, it could trigger questions. However, voluntarily correcting past mistakes through amended returns actually demonstrates good faith compliance and typically results in better treatment than if they discover the errors during an audit. You'd likely just owe the additional tax plus interest (and possibly small penalties), but it's much better than having them find it later. I'd suggest consulting with a tax professional who can help you file the amended returns properly. They can also advise whether the amounts and circumstances warrant the effort and cost of amending versus just doing it correctly going forward.
Almost identical situation here! I got a 12C in April with NOTHING checked off. After three calls to the IRS, each with at least 90 minute wait times, I finally found out they needed proof of my dependents even though they didn't tell me that. So annoying!
This is incredibly frustrating but unfortunately becoming more common. I went through the exact same thing earlier this year - got a 12C letter that was completely blank where it should have specified what they needed. After multiple calls and a visit to my local Taxpayer Assistance Center, I found out they were questioning my student loan interest deduction even though the letter gave zero indication of this. Here's what finally worked for me: I gathered EVERY single document related to my tax return (W-2s, 1099s, receipts for deductions, etc.) and sent copies via certified mail with a cover letter explaining I received a defective 12C letter. I also included a copy of the blank letter itself. Within 3 weeks my refund was processed. The IRS representative at the TAC told me this is a known issue with their letter generation system and they're working on it, but in the meantime we're stuck dealing with these useless letters. Definitely try to get to a TAC in person if possible - they can actually see your full file and tell you specifically what's being questioned, unlike the phone agents who seem to have limited access. Don't give up! Your refund is coming, it's just going to take some persistence to get through their broken system.
Did the preparer explain why they felt entitled to use previous documents without permission? I went through something similar back in 2021 when my divorce was finalized. My ex's preparer used copies of our kids' documents from when we were married, and it created a nightmare with duplicate dependent claims. Did you find out about this because of a rejection or audit notice?
This is absolutely a serious compliance violation that needs immediate attention. The tax preparer is violating multiple IRS regulations by using previous year documentation without current authorization. Under IRC ยง7216, preparers must obtain fresh consent before using any taxpayer information, and Circular 230 requires current verification procedures each tax year. The fact that this involves minor dependents and custody arrangements makes it even more problematic - the preparer could face penalties ranging from $1,000 to $50,000 per violation depending on intent. I'd recommend documenting everything, filing Form 14157 with the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility, and contacting your state's board of accountancy if the preparer is licensed. This isn't just about convenience - it's about protecting your family's tax identity and ensuring proper compliance with federal regulations.
Gianni Serpent
Quick tip that helped us: make sure you're calculating the affordability threshold correctly. It's 9.12% of your ENTIRE household income, not just your spouse's employment income. So take your total AGI (including your self-employment income) and multiply by 0.0912 - that's your annual affordability threshold. If the annual cost of adding you to your spouse's plan exceeds that number, you should be eligible for the deduction.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
โขthanks for this clarification! i was doing the math wrong and only using my wife's income, which made it seem like we didn't qualify. but when i included my business income in the calculation, we're definitely over the threshold. hopefully this will save us a bunch on our 2025 taxes!
0 coins
Malik Johnson
This is a great question that many self-employed individuals face! Based on my understanding of the tax code, your husband should indeed be eligible for the self-employed health insurance deduction. The key is that "affordability" test - if your employer's family plan costs more than 9.12% of your household income, then your husband is not considered to have access to "affordable" employer-sponsored coverage. A few important points to keep in mind: 1. The deduction is limited to your husband's net self-employment income - he can't deduct more than his business actually earned 2. Make sure to keep documentation of your employer's family plan costs in case of an audit 3. This deduction goes on Schedule 1 of Form 1040, not Form 8962 (which is for premium tax credits) The IRS recognizes that just because coverage is "available" doesn't mean it's actually accessible if the cost is prohibitive. Since your family was able to get marketplace coverage based on the unaffordability of your employer's family plan, that's a good indication that the IRS would view your situation the same way for the self-employed health insurance deduction.
0 coins