IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I made this exact same mistake last year and it was such a stressful experience! What really helped me was calling the IRS right at 7 AM when they open - I got through in about 20 minutes instead of waiting hours. The agent was actually really understanding and explained that this happens more often than you'd think. They were able to transfer my payment from 2025 to 2024 over the phone, and it showed up correctly in their system within about 2-3 weeks. Just make sure you have your payment confirmation number ready when you call, and ask them to put a note on your account so you don't get any penalty notices while they're processing the transfer. Don't panic - it's totally fixable and they won't penalize you for an honest mistake like this!

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

This is exactly the kind of reassurance I needed to hear! It's so helpful to know that calling right at 7 AM actually works - 20 minutes is totally manageable compared to the horror stories about waiting hours. I love that the agent explained this happens frequently, which makes me feel so much less embarrassed about the whole thing. Having them put a note on the account to prevent penalty notices is such a smart move too. Thanks for sharing your timeline - knowing it took 2-3 weeks to show up correctly helps me set realistic expectations. I'm definitely going to try the early morning call with my confirmation number ready!

0 coins

This thread is incredibly helpful! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now where I made a payment for 2025 instead of 2024. Reading everyone's experiences has given me so much hope and practical advice. I'm definitely going to try the 7 AM call strategy that several people mentioned - it sounds like that timing really makes a difference in getting through quickly. I have my confirmation number saved and I'll make sure to ask them to put a note on my account about the situation. It's such a relief to know this is a common mistake and that the IRS is generally understanding about it. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories - this community support means everything when you're stressed about tax issues! šŸ™

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

I'm so glad you found this thread helpful! I'm actually new to dealing with tax issues like this, but reading everyone's experiences has been incredibly reassuring. The 7 AM calling strategy seems to be the golden tip that keeps coming up - I never would have thought that timing could make such a huge difference! It's amazing how supportive this community is when it comes to helping each other through stressful IRS situations. I'm bookmarking this thread in case I ever run into tax payment issues in the future. Wishing you the best of luck with your call - hopefully you'll get through quickly and get it sorted out just like the others! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

941 Schedule B - Need clarification on liability dates for tax deposits

I've been searching everywhere and can't find a clear answer to my question about Form 941 Schedule B. I've probably read Publication 15 Section 11 about fifteen times and I'm still confused. Here's my situation: I process payroll every Monday, and the employees' direct deposits hit their accounts on Wednesday. I submit my federal tax deposit through EFTPS on the same day I run payroll (Monday), and the government receives the funds on Tuesday - which is actually before my employees get paid. According to the table at the bottom of page 26 in Pub. 15, the taxes would be due the following Wednesday, meaning I'm paying taxes about 8 days early. What I really need to know is: For Schedule B purposes, is the "payday" considered the day employees actually receive their money (Wednesday)? The more complicated question is whether I should be using the date the taxes are DUE on my Schedule B instead of the actual pay date. What's making this confusing is an example on page 27 of Pub. 15. It shows a company with paydays on different days, saying that for a September 30 payday, deposits would need to be separate from an October 1 payday, even though both deposits are due on October 4th. If the tax liability for Q3 is due in the 4th quarter, how do you show that on Schedule B when there's no room for entries with liability in the following month? That example seems to indicate you should record the actual payday date on Schedule B. But in the past when we've been charged late fees, they're calculated based on the number of days past the date listed on Schedule B - which suggests we should be putting the deposit due dates instead. The Schedule B form itself doesn't clear anything up with its vague wording. Can someone please explain what dates I should actually be using?

The 941 Schedule B has caused me so many headaches! One thing I learned the hard way is that if you're a semi-weekly depositor and file Schedule B incorrectly, the IRS doesn't just send a nice reminder - they hit you with failure-to-deposit penalties. For the original question - the date that matters for Schedule B is 100% when employees have access to their funds (payday). I use ADP for payroll and they helped explain that I should list the payday date on Schedule B, not when I process payroll or when I make the deposit. Another tip - if you use the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS), it shows your tax payment history with "settlement dates." Don't use those dates on Schedule B either. Those are when the money moved, not when the liability was incurred.

0 coins

Thank you all for the incredibly helpful responses! I finally understand how to properly complete Schedule B. I'll use the Wednesday dates (when employees get paid) rather than the Monday processing dates or the tax due dates. This makes the quarter-end situation clear too - I'll report the liability in the month/quarter when employees actually receive their pay, regardless of when I process payroll or make the deposit. I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain this. The IRS instructions really should be clearer about the difference between liability dates and deposit dates!

0 coins

I'm glad this thread cleared up the Schedule B confusion! As someone who handles payroll for multiple small businesses, I've seen this exact issue come up repeatedly. One additional point that might help others - make sure your payroll software is configured to report the correct payday dates, not processing dates, especially if you're generating any automated reports for tax purposes. I've found it helpful to create a simple spreadsheet tracking our actual paydays alongside deposit dates and due dates. This makes it much easier when completing Schedule B and helps avoid the confusion between these different dates. The key takeaway from everyone's responses is crystal clear: use the date employees actually receive their wages, period. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise, especially the former IRS agent - that perspective was invaluable!

0 coins

Sienna Gomez

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm new to handling payroll and was making the exact same mistake - I was putting the deposit dates on Schedule B instead of the actual paydays. Reading through everyone's explanations really cleared this up for me. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I'm definitely going to set that up to track our paydays separately from processing and deposit dates. It's amazing how something that seems so basic can be so confusing when you're trying to interpret the IRS forms and publications. One quick question for the group - if we switch from weekly to biweekly payroll mid-quarter, do I need to do anything special on Schedule B or just list each payday as it occurs?

0 coins

NeonNova

•

Something similar happened to me and I realized it was because my spouse and I both selected "Married" on our W-4 forms. This can cause underwithholding when both spouses work! You should both check the box that says "Married, but withhold at higher Single rate" or use the new W-4 form's two-earner worksheet.

0 coins

This is exactly what happened to us! We both checked "Married" thinking it was the right thing to do, but ended up owing $3,400 at tax time. After fixing our W-4s to account for two incomes, our withholding is now spot on.

0 coins

I completely understand your frustration - the estimated tax system is unnecessarily confusing, especially when you're just starting to navigate it as a young adult! Here's the bottom line: You likely don't need to make quarterly estimated payments at all. Since you both have W-2 jobs, the simplest solution is to adjust your withholding through new W-4 forms with your employers. The key insight is that the IRS doesn't care HOW you pay your taxes throughout the year - whether through paycheck withholding or quarterly estimated payments. They just want to receive enough money as the year progresses. Based on your situation (owing $2000 last year), I'd recommend: 1. Calculate how much extra you need withheld per paycheck ($2000 divided by remaining pay periods) 2. Submit new W-4 forms to both employers requesting this additional withholding 3. This eliminates the need for quarterly payments entirely The "safe harbor" rule mentioned by others is also crucial - if your total withholding this year equals at least what you owed last year ($2000), you won't face penalties even if you still owe at filing time. Don't let the IRS rep's technical jargon intimidate you. This is actually a pretty straightforward fix once you understand your options!

0 coins

can someone explain this LLC thing? i thought if you have an LLC you don't pay taxes? my cousin said he has an "s-corp" and doesn't pay self employment tax.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

There's a lot of confusion about this. An LLC is just a legal structure, not a tax classification. By default, a single-member LLC is treated as a "disregarded entity" for tax purposes, meaning you still report business income on your personal tax return and pay self-employment tax. Your cousin with an S-corp is doing something different. An S-corporation allows you to be both an owner AND an employee. You pay yourself a reasonable salary (which has payroll taxes) and can take additional money as distributions (which avoid self-employment tax). But S-corps require more formalities like payroll processing, separate tax returns, etc. Usually not worth it until you're making at least $40-50k in profit.

0 coins

ohh that makes sense. everyone acts like LLCs are some magic tax saving thing but sounds like they're really just for legal protection? thanks for explaining!

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

I run a small Etsy shop selling handmade jewelry and went through this exact confusion last year! The $400 net profit threshold is definitely correct - I learned this the hard way when I thought I was under the filing requirement but wasn't. One thing that really helped me was tracking all my expenses throughout the year, not just at tax time. Things like materials, packaging supplies, Etsy fees, even mileage to craft stores all count as business deductions. I use a simple spreadsheet to track everything monthly. Also, since you mentioned you're set up as a sole proprietor LLC - that's actually redundant. An LLC with one owner is automatically treated as a sole proprietorship for tax purposes unless you elect otherwise. You'll still file Schedule C with your personal return just like any other sole proprietor. Keep those receipts organized now rather than scrambling later! Even at $3,700 in revenue, you'll likely have enough deductible expenses to significantly reduce what you actually owe in taxes.

0 coins

Just adding more confirmation that losses in an IRA don't have the same wash sale concerns as taxable accounts. I did this exact move last tax season, selling tech in my IRA at a loss and buying similar (but not identical) ETFs in my brokerage account. My tax software didn't flag anything and my accountant confirmed it was fine. Just be careful if you're selling at a GAIN in your IRA and then repurchasing elsewhere. That's not a wash sale issue, but you'd be realizing gains inside the IRA that you don't get to offset with losses, which isn't optimal from a tax perspective.

0 coins

Logan Chiang

•

Not to be pedantic but there are no tax consequences for selling at a gain in a traditional IRA either. You pay income tax on all distributions regardless of what happens inside the account. The only time this matters is in a Roth where gains are tax free anyway.

0 coins

Great question! I went through something similar with my tech holdings a few years back. The key thing to remember is that wash sale rules only apply when you're trying to claim a tax loss, but since IRA losses aren't tax-deductible anyway, you're in the clear. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - when you do move those investments to your taxable account, consider whether you want to buy the exact same stocks or use this as an opportunity to diversify a bit. You could look into broader tech ETFs or even mix in some other sectors while still maintaining exposure to the companies you believe in long-term. Also, since you're 30-40 years from retirement, you might not need to swing all the way to "safe" investments in your IRA. Maybe consider a middle ground approach where you reduce risk but still maintain some growth potential. Time is still very much on your side! The silver lining with those ARKK losses is that they're giving you a valuable lesson in portfolio management relatively early in your investing journey. Better to learn these lessons now than closer to retirement.

0 coins

This is really solid advice, especially about not swinging all the way to "safe" investments. I've been so burned by my tech picks that I was ready to put everything in bonds, but you're absolutely right that I still have decades ahead of me. The diversification point is particularly helpful - instead of just buying back the same stocks that hurt me, maybe I should look at broader ETFs that give me tech exposure without being so concentrated in individual names. Do you have any specific suggestions for tech ETFs that might be less volatile than something like ARKK but still give decent growth exposure? And thanks for the perspective on learning these lessons early. It definitely stings right now, but I'd rather figure out proper risk management in my 30s than my 50s!

0 coins

Prev1...30453046304730483049...5645Next